OpCon surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive automation capabilities, seamless integration with diverse systems, and exceptional reliability, ensuring efficient management of IT operations and business processes.
Control-M excels in ease of deployment and comprehensive job scheduling across multiple platforms, making it ideal for businesses seeking straightforward implementation. In comparison, OpCon offers robust feature richness and competitive pricing, appealing to those requiring flexibility and budget-friendly options.
AutoSys Workload Automation is used by organizations for executing thousands of automations, managing server workloads, scheduling CP jobs, file transfers, enterprise batch scheduling, and ETL processing.
IBM Workload Automation offers robust scheduling, auditing, and reporting, ideal for detailed task management. In comparison, OpCon provides strong integration capabilities and flexibility, with simplicity and user-friendly operations. IBM excels in features; OpCon is favorable for ease of deployment and cost-efficiency.
To my knowledge, IWA is the only WLA product that will provide "parallel tracking" capability to assist in upgrading from one platform to IWA.
It is about one-third of the cost of a controller.
To my knowledge, IWA is the only WLA product that will provide "parallel tracking" capability to assist in upgrading from one platform to IWA.
It is about one-third of the cost of a controller.
Tidal by Redwood excels in scheduling, automation, and analytics with quick deployment and cost-effective setup. In comparison, OpCon shines in detailed reporting and extensive workflow features, offering better customer service and long-term ROI despite higher initial costs and complex deployment.
When we reviewed this solution against other vendors, Stonebranch blew everybody out of the water in terms of cost.
Outside of licensing fees, there aren't any other costs.
When we reviewed this solution against other vendors, Stonebranch blew everybody out of the water in terms of cost.
Outside of licensing fees, there aren't any other costs.
ActiveBatch by Redwood is used for data processing, automation, job scheduling, file transfers, server monitoring, and platform integration. It supports calculations, reporting, updates, and IT operations. Users benefit from centralized management and real-time monitoring. Improvements needed include better documentation, cloud support, UI, triggers, dashboards, reporting, and machine learning features.
The price was fairly in line with other automation tools. I don't think it's exorbitantly expensive, relatively speaking.
It allows for lower operational overhead.
The price was fairly in line with other automation tools. I don't think it's exorbitantly expensive, relatively speaking.
It allows for lower operational overhead.
The pricing and the licensing are good. It is affordable and can be used to improve and optimize productivity.
The pricing and the licensing are good. It is affordable and can be used to improve and optimize productivity.
VisualCron automates tasks like syncs, file transfers, and email processing, enhancing IT operations. Users value it for its scheduling, task types, conditional logic, and SQL/cloud integration. However, documentation, user interface, error handling, and security need improvement, alongside adding CI/CD support, quicker support responses, and better audit logs.
ROI is 95 percent.
ROI is one month.
ROI is 95 percent.
ROI is one month.
AppWorx Workload Automation automates your Ellucian’s Banner or Fiserv DNA processing. This innovative, best-in-class task scheduling solution accelerates your processing, provides visibility and control over business processes, and mitigates risk in both environments.
Licensing options are fairly straightforward.
We are satisfied with the pricing.
Licensing options are fairly straightforward.
We are satisfied with the pricing.
