I think what I'm really looking for is being able to get a faster root cause analysis for events and incidents that happen, including correlation of events across networks, servers, and applications across our infrastructure. We have a real hybrid landscape where we are on premises, as well as in the public cloud, across AWS, and in the Azure cloud. We want to make sure that we have our operations running brilliantly with fantastic up-times. We think that getting our resiliency right is possible, because we get faster root causes and event correlations that can actually come from the solution itself.
General Manager Strategic Programs at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
It correlates events across networks, servers, and applications across our infrastructure.
What is most valuable?
How has it helped my organization?
When we first transformed from being on premises to going significantly into the cloud, we had to go ahead and change a lot of our enterprise architecture and landscape. We needed to be networking very differently and to be leveraging virtual machines on the cloud very differently and in a cost-optimal way. This clearly meant that our internal IT had to operate very differently from what they were used to in the past. We needed to get them to change themselves and work differently so they could provide these kinds of services. IT needed to be able to give me the kind of resiliency, simplification, standardization, agility and the promise of the cloud with optimal cost. This was something which was important, and that's what it did to transform our IT.
What needs improvement?
I would like to see a lot more ease-of-use, as well as easier deployment of the product itself. Considering that the people who end up using these tools are much more cloud native for everything else, they would want to see something which is cloud native and as brilliant as some of the other products which are out there. That's something that I believe can be much better. I think HPE has this on their roadmap to actually get there.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Our level of implementation is not so deep as yet to be able to go ahead and say whether it's stable or unstable, but whatever I have seen it has been fairly stable.
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Operations Bridge
March 2025

Learn what your peers think about OpenText Operations Bridge. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.
842,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We are a very large organization with 170,000 employees. This product completely scales to meet our needs. We have 4,000-plus network devices, about 2,000-plus on-premises servers and about 1,000 cloud-based virtual machines, all of which are managed through the HPE solution.
How are customer service and support?
I think we need to get a lot more depth to be able to see how much technical support we'd actually require. So far it's been okay, but I would think that when we get much deeper entrenched into HPE Operations Bridge and use it significantly, that's when we'll really need technical support and that's when we'll figure out how good or not so good it might actually be.
How was the initial setup?
Initial setup and deployment has been fairly complex. There are specialized skills and expertise required to run deployments. Once deployed, I think the solution is fairly robust for us to go ahead and use.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I was not involved in the actual buy decision when that was made some time ago, but I do know that there are competitors out there. But I think some of them would be more collaborators rather than competitors.
As an example, at a recent conference, Scott Guthrie from Microsoft talked about the OMS suite of products, and that’s amazing because we are on Azure. I know that OMS has a set of capabilities that the HPE suite doesn't. On the other hand, the HPE suite has some capabilities that are not there on OMS.
We really like the synergies between both of these products, HPE Operations Bridge and Microsoft OMS, going forward. That got me thinking that maybe I should get OMS as well so that we can do some of the things that I want to be able to go ahead and do on Azure. We're heavy on Azure anyway and we would then be able to get the best of both of product lines.
What other advice do I have?
Remember that Operations Bridge can do a lot, but it's fairly complex to get started with. It means getting people to adopt the product significantly for them to be able to maximize that kind of investment. Once it is in there, it's extremely robust. The kind of value it can provide to the business would be significant. It should be maximized by all businesses, so go ahead and invest in the suite itself for the enterprise.
I think HPE has a fairly good roadmap. They're taking advantage of the kind of movements that are happening in the cloud. Going hybrid IT means being able to bring the best of legacy services that you've always had, with the strength of the solution that you've always had, over to the newer technologies which are really disrupting.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:

IaaS Manager with 1,001-5,000 employees
You can correlate certain systems with each other along with applications. 3PAR monitoring requires a third-party solution.
What is most valuable?
It helps us to take into account all of our infrastructure. It's monitoring all our infrastructure and is one single point of truth. It's also quite flexible for configuration. You can correlate certain systems with each other along with applications. Thus, we like the HPE product very much as it keeps our systems under control and in-check. You can also filter out the different alarms from your systems.
How has it helped my organization?
It has improved the working of our company, especially the working of our operation team. They have much more view on the servers and what is happening with them. They know when to act and on what to act. The alarms are very clear. There is only one central database for all the alarms; before we had to look on different systems.
It has not only the servers but also our network is in there. It's an all-in-one dashboard for our operations team so that is very helpful.
What needs improvement?
There is need to have more out-of-the-box support for HPE products itself.
For monitoring of HPE 3PAR, it doesn't come out-of-the-box with OpsBridge; we still need to install third-party stuff to it. At a recent conference, HPE announced that they will have their own software material, so that's improving. But we would like to see much faster support on the HP products themselves (including this product).
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We've had some issues in the past with the previous version. Currently, we are using version 10 and with this version all the stability issues are all fixed. We still have some issues with certain connectors but they are also getting fixed by HPE as of now. The issues are within the third-party connectors for Nagios and NNMi. But that is now being handled by HPE; hence we are very happy with the product.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It's quite okay. You need a few backend servers to run it on but it scales very easily. If we run into performance issues, we just add some vCPUs because we can virtualize the installation. It scales very well with that.
How are customer service and technical support?
I'm not involved in the technical support that much.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We were previously using something else but it was not fulfilling our needs. I think they were using a BMC product before I joined the company.
How was the initial setup?
I took over once the product was already running. It's now handled by my team, but I have only recent joined the team.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We wanted the manager of managers so that we have one single point of truth for all our alarming activities, cross server applications and so on.
We also checked with BMC but decided to select HPE as it is the most flexible solution.
What other advice do I have?
I would advise them to check this product out and to have a good look at it because we think it is a valuable system.
It is important to keep in mind the amount of work involved in setting it up. It is a lot of work because you need to have your agents installed on your machines, so it takes some time before everything is running like you want it to. For example, we have a license for 4,000 agents now. We use about a 3/4th of that number at the moment. Hence, its installation is intensive but once it is installed, it's fine.
There is no out-of-the-box support for HPE products. We have the feeling that it's going a little bit too slow. If they launch a new product, it's always taking some time before we get the connectors for the OpsBridge.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Operations Bridge
March 2025

Learn what your peers think about OpenText Operations Bridge. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.
842,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Global Monitoring Systems Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Reliable, good monitoring, and useful integration capabilities
Pros and Cons
- "It is stable."
- "I'm not aware of areas that need improvement."
What is our primary use case?
We primarily use the solution for monitoring Linux and application workloads.
What is most valuable?
The integration capabilities are very helpful.
It is stable and reliable.
What needs improvement?
I'm not aware of areas that need improvement.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used the solution for quite a while. I've used it for ten years at least. It's been about a decade.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The product is stable and reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I'm not sure how many people are using the solution in our company at the moment.
How are customer service and support?
I've never used technical support. I've never needed any assistance.
How was the initial setup?
I was not part of the original installment.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I haven't validated all of the monitoring tools on the market.
What other advice do I have?
We're a customer and end-user.
I'm likely using the latest version of the solution.
The solution is a good monitoring tool. People should try it.
I'd rate the product eight out of ten overall.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Systems Management, Technical Specialist HP BSM/BAC at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
The ability to integrate directly with the RIPM on top of DSM is useful. The IIS configuration definitely needs to be improved.
What is most valuable?
The ability to integrate directly with the RIPM on top of DSM. We're looking to use the event feed into OMI, the metrics feed, and using things like SHA. There might be opportunities later to try for a faster root cause analysis.
How has it helped my organization?
At the moment, we're still building the system, so I can't say.
What needs improvement?
When installing against IIS, you need to expect a fully locked-down IIS, rather than expecting a fully out-of-the-box. It is sold to enterprise customers and I can't believe any enterprise customers would be happy to leave IIS out-of-the-box. I would think that everybody would have locked it down. You add what you want to include in a white list, rather than blacklist out what you want to exclude. So, the IIS configuration definitely needs to be improved.
The installation instructions need to be improved, as well.
How are customer service and technical support?
We had a designated person with FlexCare. He was fair enough with the installation in general. I think we worked out what the problems were with the filters ourselves, because we've seen that on other HPE products. We were kind of expecting it.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We are combining it with other monitoring tools. They did a huge proof of concept to determine what the right fit was. I wasn’t involved in that. It was all vendor engagement, and so on. It wasn't just HPE, we had other vendors as well, such as IBM and Compuware.
How was the initial setup?
The installation instructions are a mess to the point where the advice given to us by other HPE people has been to not follow the instructions, but to follow the VMEs instead.
The installation for an enterprise IIS solution, rather than just an out-of-the-box one, doesn't work very well. We ended up needing to troubleshoot the installation to get it to work. Installing the IIS filters was a big headache. We installed them, but we couldn’t do anything until we went in and adjusted them. When I left, there was still a problem creating users. We couldn't do any of that, so I don't know if they fixed that yet.
What other advice do I have?
For people doing this for the first time, if you have support from HPE, use it. Milk it. Use your FlexCare points and grab somebody. You might sail straight through. If it works, and you do not have any problems with that, then maybe you're fine.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Senior Information Technology Security Officer at alpha
Reliable with good consolidation capabilities and excellent correlation features
Pros and Cons
- "I've found the solution to be very scalable."
- "The setup process can get a little bit complex."
What is our primary use case?
The solution is mainly used for server monitoring as well as consolidation integration with the various data sources. We use this for where we want to consolidate event performance rates and capture all those tools that were a single unit.
What is most valuable?
The even consolidation is great and the extract mechanisms give you very good correlation features.
The stability is good.
I've found the solution to be very scalable.
What needs improvement?
The setup process can get a little bit complex.
There is new development happening, however, it's important that certain legacy applications should be supported in the future.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used the solution for eight to ten years at this point.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It's highly stable. It's worked well for me for eight to ten years and I haven't had any issues with bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's very reliable and the performance is good.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution scales quite well. It's not a problem at all. If a company needs to expand it out, it can do so.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is not exactly straightforward. It's complex as it's not just one product. It has to integrate with many other products. A standalone product can be simple, however, when you have an integrated environment, definitely the complexity is increased. How you design it and whether it is standalone dictates the process. Every setup is unique and different according to each individual company.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The cloud version does have a subscription cost.
What other advice do I have?
While the solution is on-premises, we also have a cloud deployment that has just started. It's available via subscription and companies can use both models.
I would rate the solution at a nine out of ten. We've been quite happy with its capabilities and have been quite pleased with that solution overall.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Senior Technology Specialist at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Stable, good support and community, and very good for event management and agent-based monitoring
Pros and Cons
- "The correlation feature is the most used feature. It allows you to correlate events from different sources and have more meaningful events."
- "The deployment of agents on new CI should be improved. There should be some kind of automation to directly deploy them from the console. It can maybe have some more AI functions because most of the other tools are going in that direction."
What is our primary use case?
It is mostly used for event management. We use it to consolidate events from different data collectors.
What is most valuable?
The correlation feature is the most used feature. It allows you to correlate events from different sources and have more meaningful events.
What needs improvement?
The deployment of agents on new CI should be improved. There should be some kind of automation to directly deploy them from the console.
It can maybe have some more AI functions because most of the other tools are going in that direction.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for around two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is stable. It has got high availability.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I haven't done that yet, but its scalability must be good. It must be easy to add new servers.
In terms of usage, mostly the operations teams work on these events. We have a team of around ten members.
How are customer service and technical support?
Their support is good. The community is also helpful.
How was the initial setup?
It was pretty straightforward.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
It was actually management's call, so I didn't get a chance to look at other tools.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate Operations Bridge an eight out of ten. It is a very good solution for event management and agent-based monitoring.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
IT Performance Architect and Head of DB2 at Swiss Mobiliar
Helped us to increase transparency and visibility of the IT department. We would like to see more sensors in the dashboard.
What is most valuable?
It's helped us to increase transparency of our line of business, as well as both transparency and visibility of the IT department within the company.
What needs improvement?
Currently the BVD, it's not living. We would like to see more sensors in the dashboard. If you go over 60 miles on the screen, nothing happens. Part of our BVD is a map of Switzerland with some highlighted agencies where there is something specific happening. If it moves over 60 miles over this location, nothing happens. But there are 160 locations and it's not always very easy to find out if there is a yellow light there and which location it is exactly.
For how long have I used the solution?
The first implementation of the Business Value Dashboard went live early this year, so we have now 11 months of experience with it.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is very stable. We don't have any vulnerability or issues like that.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The BVD does not have a problem with scalability. You can add additional sources and increased uptake frequency. We don't see any problems going forward.
How is customer service and technical support?
It's a very new product so support is not very mature. You have to find the right people in HPE to support it correctly. Then it works great.
How was the initial setup?
Well, implementation is straightforward. It's a reason to implement the dashboard. The more complex things are the numbers that will be produced, but that's not a problem of the product. That's a problem of how to consolidate these numbers.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
The initial trigger was that we had a new head of communications and she has been working for a newspaper before where they had a very large newsroom. So we had to have a newsroom too and we had to fill it with content and the BVD was the best thing for it. At the time, we were approached by HPE to be the first user of this product and then we started the work with them. That was the way we went.
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Oss manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Runs and manages different kinds of technologies, operating systems, and management packs.
Pros and Cons
- "Purely, its flexibility is the most valuable aspect. It is hugely configurable."
- "The latest versions of the service reporting dashboards need improvement, such as service modeling."
What is most valuable?
Purely, its flexibility is the most valuable aspect. It is hugely configurable. We have a huge amount of different kinds of technologies, different kinds of operating systems and management packs that effectively are run and managed by Operations Bridge.
What needs improvement?
The latest versions of the service reporting dashboards need improvement, such as service modeling. A lot of our customers want to be able to understand and look at their solution end-to-end, including all the components, all the management elements of the operations, and the system's databases. I think that's the way the market is going anyway. People want to see an end-to-end service and they want to have that visualization of it as well.
For how long have I used the solution?
We first started to install the components that make up Operations Bridge in 2005.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is hugely stable. Actually, I would have to say that was one of the main reasons why we have kept it. We run it on what is probably an ancient platform now, but it is rock solid. Fingers crossed, it never fails.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We were an HPE Gold partner at the time of the initial setup. That's primarily why it was brought into the organization. It has shown itself to be worth its weight and not very much was paid for it. Our business has quadrupled in size since 2005 and we are a much larger organization than we once were. It has scaled and grown with the business.
How are customer service and technical support?
It's supported pretty well. We've got some really good in-house guys who know their stuff. We haven’t raised a call about Operations Bridge for a good few years now. This is primarily because we install our own installations. We manage them, we develop them, and we understand how they work.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
When choosing a vendor, I look at the solution. My directors look at cost.
How was the initial setup?
The setup takes a lot of planning and preparation, like any upgrade. You just have to make sure you have a basic plan. I think it goes like the old adage, “If you fail to plan, then plan to fail.”
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

Buyer's Guide
Download our free OpenText Operations Bridge Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: March 2025
Popular Comparisons
ScienceLogic
BMC TrueSight Operations Management
IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus
BMC Helix Monitor
IDERA SQL Diagnostic Manager for SQL Server
Buyer's Guide
Download our free OpenText Operations Bridge Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- What is the difference between IT event correlation and aggregation?
- When evaluating Event Monitoring, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- What questions should companies ask vendors when researching event monitoring solutions?
- What insider threat detection tool do you recommend to a company with a modest budget?
- Have you successfully migrated from a best-of-breed enterprise management/monitoring & automation/orchestration platform to the ServiceNow framework?
- Why is Event Monitoring important for companies?