ScienceLogic and OpenText AI Operations Management are top competitors in the IT operations management category. Based on feature flexibility and user acclaim, ScienceLogic seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive customization options and excellent customer service.
Features: ScienceLogic offers a highly customizable platform, superior permissions management, and extensive application monitoring, supporting diverse platforms like AWS. It enables dynamic dashboards and significant automation across infrastructure. OpenText stands out for its advanced application monitoring, server automation, and seamless integration with business intelligence tools. Its strong data privacy and event correlation features enhance its appeal.
Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic users desire enhanced reporting, better SNMP processing, and improved self-service capabilities. Simplifying interfaces and improving synthetic transaction monitoring are also priorities. OpenText users call for more intuitive interfaces and streamlined dashboards, highlighting challenges with licensing and initial setup. Both products could benefit from improved scalability and configuration simplicity.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both platforms support flexible deployment options, including on-premises and hybrid environments. ScienceLogic receives high praise for customer service, offering timely and personalized support that boosts user satisfaction. OpenText is also noted for good support, though complex licensing and occasional performance issues can hinder user experiences.
Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic offers flexible pricing but can become costly when scaling to more devices, reflecting its broad capabilities. It's generally considered a smart investment for enterprises. OpenText is often deemed expensive, especially for smaller clients, due to its complex licensing, but its automation features provide significant value by reducing manual tasks. Both solutions offer positive ROI, but ScienceLogic's flexibility often makes it the preferred choice for larger organizations.
The return on investment is fair but often challenged by medium-sized businesses who may question its adequacy.
OpenText goes out to bring the right people to answer any inquiries I have.
I received excellent support from ScienceLogic.
Problems with Skylar may require longer wait times due to limited resource expertise.
We have a lab environment to test solutions before offering them to customers, ensuring everything works correctly.
The stability rating is nine out of ten, acknowledging some bugs, but indicating these are minor issues.
Splunk is more business-friendly due to its prettier interface.
While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise.
If the knowledge for implementation could be spread through articles, it would reduce this dependency.
Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial.
From a cost perspective, OpenText Operations Bridge is cost-effective as it saves us man hours.
It could be cheaper.
ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.
This integration ensures that when monitoring systems alert and subsequently resolve, tickets are automatically created and closed.
Notably, its automation features, such as Runbook action, enable domain experts like me to execute one-click automation solutions, which contributes significantly to reducing MTTR.
It offers over 500 integrations with a wide range of device types, referred to as PowerPacks, which are prebuilt integrations for hundreds, if not thousands, of integration types.
The CMDB update and the automatic CMDB update are valuable.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| ScienceLogic | 7.1% |
| OpenText AI Operations Management | 6.6% |
| Other | 86.3% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 35 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 24 |
OpenText AI Operations Management centralizes event correlation and monitoring across infrastructures, prioritizing scalability and automation for efficient alert management. It empowers organizations with transparency and insights essential for effective IT resource management in hybrid cloud environments.
OpenText AI Operations Management offers comprehensive solutions for event correlation, integration, and centralized alert management. With capabilities that streamline operations, this tool supports efficient IT management across AWS, GCP, and on-premises environments. Despite requiring improvements in performance and usability, its robust reporting and seamless monitoring provide valuable insights for root cause analysis. Users leverage this platform to integrate event data, automate incidents, and manage hybrid infrastructures effectively, making it a key component in enhancing service perspectives globally. Its heavy architecture and reliance on Java and Flash, coupled with complex licensing and pricing, necessitate attention to functionality and support areas.
What are the key features of OpenText AI Operations Management?OpenText AI Operations Management is widely implemented in industries requiring comprehensive monitoring capabilities. Organizations benefit from its ability to consolidate tools and manage events effectively across hybrid environments. The integration of incident automation and performance evaluation tools is particularly beneficial for those looking to enhance compliance support and reduce response times. Despite some challenges, the platform remains a valuable asset in managing complex IT environments and improving operational effectiveness.
ScienceLogic excels in customizable dashboards, seamless integrations, and real-time data analysis, supporting diverse IT environments with multi-tenant capabilities.
ScienceLogic provides robust infrastructure and network monitoring, catering to cloud, applications, and server environments. It supports hybrid setups, integrating with CMDB and ticketing systems while automating incident management. ScienceLogic's PowerPacks eliminate visibility gaps and its adaptable nature supports modern and legacy systems. Offering agentless monitoring, it ensures efficient operations with scalable infrastructure support and detailed reporting. However, the interface complexity and need for professional support can present usability challenges. Enhancements in reporting, application coverage, API support, and customization are desirable for improved user experience.
What are ScienceLogic's most important features?ScienceLogic is often implemented across industries requiring detailed attention to infrastructure and network monitoring. It finds utility in managing hybrid environments, integrating seamlessly with essential systems like CMDB and ticketing platforms. Its scalability and adaptability are valued in unifying complex, diverse environments under one monitoring platform.
We monitor all Event Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
