ScienceLogic and OpenText Operations Bridge are competitive products in the IT operations management category. Based on the comparison, ScienceLogic has the upper hand in terms of pricing and support, while OpenText Operations Bridge is more feature-rich, justifying its higher price.
Features: ScienceLogic is notable for its customizable and dynamic dashboards, granular permissions, and multi-tenant management. It offers strong predictive analytics and system integrations, beneficial for event management and automation. OpenText Operations Bridge excels in integration capabilities across various monitoring systems, providing application and infrastructure visibility. It offers centralized alerts, event correlation, and comprehensive dashboards for understanding business processes and service status.
Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic could enhance its knowledge base, simplify UI, and improve reporting. Users seek more straightforward API integration and notification features. OpenText Operations Bridge users highlight it is resource-heavy with a complex licensing model. They wish for better performance, scalability, and event correlation, along with simpler third-party product integration.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic supports seamless deployment across on-premises and cloud environments, earning a reputation for exceptional customer service with quick and effective responses. OpenText Operations Bridge is more limited to on-premises and hybrid environments with mixed reviews. Its support is effective but inconsistent, prompting users to demand improved customer service.
Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic offers flexible pricing options suitable for various organizational needs, yielding high ROI through effective monitoring. It is more expensive than open-source options but delivers through its features and support. OpenText Operations Bridge is considered expensive, especially for smaller organizations, due to its complex licensing. However, its comprehensive capabilities justify costs for larger enterprises by streamlining operations and enhancing resource management.
The return on investment is fair but often challenged by medium-sized businesses who may question its adequacy.
OpenText goes out to bring the right people to answer any inquiries I have.
Problems with Skylar may require longer wait times due to limited resource expertise.
Stability should relate to whether the platform fails, stops working, or breaks.
Splunk is more business-friendly due to its prettier interface.
While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise.
Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial.
From a cost perspective, OpenText Operations Bridge is cost-effective as it saves us man hours.
It could be cheaper.
This integration ensures that when monitoring systems alert and subsequently resolve, tickets are automatically created and closed.
It offers over 500 integrations with a wide range of device types, referred to as PowerPacks, which are prebuilt integrations for hundreds, if not thousands, of integration types.
The CMDB update and the automatic CMDB update are valuable.
ScienceLogic is a comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring solution that supports networks, servers, cloud environments, and applications, suitable for private cloud and on-premises deployments.
Organizations leverage ScienceLogic for its robust capabilities in monitoring IT infrastructures of all sizes. It offers granular discovery, integration with CMDB, and ticketing systems. Valued for its flexibility, incident automation, remediation, and real-time relationship mapping, it supports hybrid environments with scalable and efficient monitoring functionalities. AI and machine learning enhance its feature set, while ease of deployment and strong support are crucial benefits.
What are ScienceLogic's most important features?ScienceLogic is implemented across multiple industries, including large enterprises, for its capability to handle complex IT ecosystems. Its integration with CMDB and ticketing systems ensures it fits within existing workflows. Organizations use it to monitor diverse infrastructure landscapes, ensuring seamless performance and quick incident resolution.
We monitor all Event Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
