Discover the top alternatives and competitors to SAP Identity Management based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Entra ID, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, and Omada Identity.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
SAP Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with SAP, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
SAP Identity Management is suitable for organizations using SAP applications due to its integration capabilities and tailored data protection. In comparison, Microsoft Entra ID appeals to businesses in the Microsoft ecosystem with its cloud integration and user-friendly management, providing faster deployment and effective support.
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud offers an intuitive, scalable cloud-native solution ideal for quick deployment, aiding smaller organizations. In comparison, SAP Identity Management provides extensive customization and feature depth, making it suitable for complex enterprise environments with higher initial investment.
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud offers a straightforward setup process, while SAP Identity Management may involve more complex setup costs, highlighting a notable difference in initial investment requirements.
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud offers a straightforward setup process, while SAP Identity Management may involve more complex setup costs, highlighting a notable difference in initial investment requirements.
Omada Identity offers cost-effective centralized governance and seamless IT integration. In comparison, SAP Identity Management provides advanced automation and detailed reporting, justifying its higher cost. With Omada's user-friendly cloud deployment versus SAP's customizable on-premises setup, buyer decisions hinge on specific needs for flexibility or feature richness.
Omada Identity offers a straightforward setup cost, making it appealing for businesses with simpler needs, whereas SAP Identity Management incurs a more substantial setup expense, indicating a comprehensive feature set and integration capability.
Omada Identity offers a straightforward setup cost, making it appealing for businesses with simpler needs, whereas SAP Identity Management incurs a more substantial setup expense, indicating a comprehensive feature set and integration capability.
SAP Identity Management excels in role management and SAP integration, appealing to enterprises with extensive SAP use. In comparison, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator offers superior two-factor authentication and ease of deployment, benefiting organizations seeking streamlined security and fast implementation.
SAP Identity Management requires a higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, making it a potentially less economical choice for initial deployment.
SAP Identity Management requires a higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, making it a potentially less economical choice for initial deployment.
SAP Identity Management shines in pricing and support with centralized administration and role management. In comparison, Saviynt offers advanced analytics and flexibility, appealing to tech buyers seeking comprehensive features. SAP is ideal for cost-conscious users; Saviynt suits those prioritizing long-term returns.
SAP Identity Management is ideal for SAP-centric environments due to its seamless integration and effective cost management. In comparison, ForgeRock offers broader adaptability across platforms, making it suitable for organizations with diverse IT systems and prioritizing advanced integration capabilities over initial cost savings.
One Identity Manager is valued for its scalability, automation, and cost-effective setup, suitable for diverse IT ecosystems. In comparison, SAP Identity Management excels with robust SAP integration and advanced role-based controls, ideal for SAP-centric organizations, despite higher initial investment requirements.
SAP Identity Management provides intricate identity lifecycle management for complex enterprises. In comparison, Microsoft Entra ID Protection enhances security through advanced threat detection. Tech buyers may prefer SAP for detailed user workflows, whereas Microsoft offers seamless integration and cost-efficiency within its ecosystem.
SAP Identity Management typically has higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Entra ID Protection, which provides a more budget-friendly installation option.
SAP Identity Management typically has higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Entra ID Protection, which provides a more budget-friendly installation option.
SAP Identity Management stands out with seamless SAP integration, flexibility, and proactive support. In comparison, Microsoft Identity Manager requires a Windows-centric setup, excelling in comprehensive identity management with strong audit features. SAP attracts with lower costs, while Microsoft promises ROI in Windows-heavy infrastructures.
SAP Identity Management often incurs higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Identity Manager, whose setup is generally more budget-friendly. This difference in initial investment can be crucial for businesses evaluating cost-effectiveness between the two identity management solutions.
SAP Identity Management often incurs higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Identity Manager, whose setup is generally more budget-friendly. This difference in initial investment can be crucial for businesses evaluating cost-effectiveness between the two identity management solutions.
SAP Identity Management excels in role-based access and SAP integration. In comparison, Oracle Identity Governance offers advanced auditing and compliance. SAP's straightforward setup appeals to existing SAP users, whereas Oracle's extensive customization options suit complex, diverse IT environments better.
SAP Identity Management typically involves higher setup costs compared to Oracle Identity Governance, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
SAP Identity Management typically involves higher setup costs compared to Oracle Identity Governance, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
SAP Identity Management offers streamlined integration with SAP systems for businesses using SAP software. In comparison, NetIQ Identity Manager enables extensive customization and supports diverse IT infrastructures, offering flexible deployment and cost-effective solutions for varied organizational needs.
SAP Identity Management has a higher initial setup cost due to its extensive integration capabilities, while NetIQ Identity Manager requires a smaller investment for setup, reflecting its focus on scalability and customization.
SAP Identity Management has a higher initial setup cost due to its extensive integration capabilities, while NetIQ Identity Manager requires a smaller investment for setup, reflecting its focus on scalability and customization.
SAP Identity Management offers strong integration with SAP products, making it ideal for SAP-centric environments. In comparison, EVOLVEUM midPoint provides flexibility and customization, appealing to enterprises needing scalable solutions, with its open-source model facilitating community-driven support and updates.
Symantec Identity Governance and Administration provides cost-effective, automated compliance and simple deployment. In comparison, SAP Identity Management offers extensive integration capabilities and customization options, requiring a larger investment but ensuring long-term scalability, making it suitable for enterprises seeking comprehensive identity management solutions.
EmpowerID appeals to cost-conscious organizations with its pricing and support, offering workflow automation and cloud-native deployment. In comparison, SAP Identity Management suits complex environments with advanced integration, compliance tools, and comprehensive features, though typically involves higher initial costs and on-premises deployment.
EmpowerID incurs lower setup costs, offering a cost-effective starting point compared to SAP Identity Management, which might entail higher initial investment requirements. This distinction highlights a significant financial difference between the two identity management solutions.
EmpowerID incurs lower setup costs, offering a cost-effective starting point compared to SAP Identity Management, which might entail higher initial investment requirements. This distinction highlights a significant financial difference between the two identity management solutions.
