We primarily use this solution as cover for mobile devices. I'm the manager of pre-sales and we are resellers and users of this solution. We are low-level partners of McAfee.
Manager Pre-Sales (ICT) at CNS Engineering
Provides good mobile device protection and it works on all platforms
Pros and Cons
- "Provides good mobile device protection."
- "The solution lacks device control."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
The solution provides good mobile device protection and it's great that it's on the cloud. The product is compatible and works for all platforms.
What needs improvement?
I'd like McAfee to include device control on MVISION. The solution currently lacks mobile device management. The cost of the solution is comparatively high and I'd like to see that reduced.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using MVISION for one year and working with McAfee solutions for the past 10 years.
Buyer's Guide
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
October 2024
Learn what your peers think about Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is stable for threat protection.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is scalable.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support is very good. They are very knowledgeable and also happy to help out.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is easy and very straightforward.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
There's a USD$1,500 supported annual subscription fee that includes maintenance for anywhere between 51 and 100 users. It's USD$30 per users which I think is quite expensive.
What other advice do I have?
It's important to be clear about your use case and environment before purchasing this solution.
I rate this solution eight out of 10.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: reseller / Partner
Simple implementation, stable, but priced high
Pros and Cons
- "McAfee MVISION Endpoint is stable."
- "The price of McAfee MVISION Endpoint could improve."
What is our primary use case?
McAfee MVISION Endpoint is used for endpoint protection. Protects the files and network against viruses and malware.
What needs improvement?
The price of McAfee MVISION Endpoint could improve.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using McAfee MVISION Endpoint for approximately one year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
McAfee MVISION Endpoint is stable.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have previously used Check Point and Microsoft Defender. I would recommend Microsoft Defender over the other solutions I have used.
How was the initial setup?
The installation of the McAfee MVISION Endpoint was simple. We are able to do it remotely from a central location.
What was our ROI?
I have had a return on investment by using McAfee MVISION Endpoint.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We are on an annual subscription for McAfee MVISION Endpoint. The cost for the license could be less expensive.
What other advice do I have?
I rate McAfee MVISION Endpoint a six out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
October 2024
Learn what your peers think about Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Senior Technical Manager at Incedo Inc.
This recognized brand has been reliable in the past but seems to be losing ground to competition
Pros and Cons
- "It is scalable and stable and the initial setup is the easiest part of using the product."
- "Intrusion detection and intervention seem to be falling behind the competition."
What is our primary use case?
McAfee MVISION is security for integrated VMware and OpenSite cloud solutions.
What is most valuable?
McAfee is fine as an endpoint. We are offering the product to clients for data protection. It is not about this being a reactive solution like a firewall. There should be a shield of gateways, wherever possible, whenever this security solution can be implemented.
What needs improvement?
The biggest problem we had with this product was when the DDoS (Distributed Denial of Service) did not respond well to a threat. We experienced one virus attack that the product did not catch. I do not know the exact CDC (Communication Device Class) details. That time, we did an analysis, but the systems crashed. We could not even access the infected file servers.
Because we could not access the servers in that attack, we could not even remove all the threats. Eventually, what we had to do is find out which servers got infected and then we had to roll back those servers to a previous backup. It left us in a little bit of a vulnerable situation. It ended up not being what we hoped for in an endpoint solution.
Because McAfee was infected, other endpoint protections were also affected that made the situation more difficult to resolve.
Improvements that I would like to see in MVISION would be to provide some additional features for the cloud to make their product a one-stop solution. For example, every organization is going into hybrid-cloud. That may allow part of a solution on-site. That can be part of multi-tier platforms and would be more flexible.
What they can do is offer more in order to be a leader in innovation for different architectures rather than for enterprise only. For example, the endpoint security product uses every desktop like service. They have the features for the hardware detection and the platform access, then on the application layers. These three layers are a part of the firewall. So these are the firewall and then there are other things they could be offering as a single source to create a more secure environment as a proactive solution.
This is something that definitely could be improved, especially with intrusion detection and intervention. It is very important to do more to cover the security of these more invasive practices. So, they could improve things with a web application firewall, and improve intrusion detection and prevention. Those should be the key areas which they are focusing on right now to improve the utility of the product moving forward.
If you have a look into the Gartner report, there are many companies that are making advances in this category of product and it means competition for McAfee.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this type of product from McAfee since about six years ago off and on.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I think it is a stable product. It needs to be more robust in identifying threats.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is a scalable, of course, as it is designed for enterprise use. It is scalable unless you do not configure it correctly and try to work with it without knowing how to do it.
How are customer service and technical support?
We have been in touch with the McAfee technical support. They also struggled with a problem we had with an infected server. I was involved in the contact with McAfee at the time when trying to resolve the issue. Ultimately, they did not have any solution for the problem and we ended up rolling back the server. In all that is a bit of a problem with the product and the technical support. Neither were optimal.
How was the initial setup?
The installation and implementation are the easiest parts of using the product. The real difference comes in how you want to optimize the performance. That is the key. Otherwise, implementation is not challenging.
By optimizing the performance, I mean that you should not change the function of the basic purpose of a security product. If it is a firewall implemented on the network, that product should be providing the service without excessive expense or resources in performance. We are looking at the cloud solutions in the same sense. There can be performance concerns for products on the cloud. It is a known factor.
Then the second point is all about the features and configuration. The question is about configuration management using tools on the cloud platforms. You may be using multiple clouds. You have to be sure you can configure it so the product remains secure across platforms. Security solutions should also focus on providing that rather than forcing users on to different products and having to manage multiple solutions.
The deployment for McAfee MVISION Endpoint, after everything has been considered and all of the points have been taken into account, takes some time. Say we have got around 3,000 to 10,000 servers. The type of configurations can be critical. If the client provides a rule-based requirement, we have to go with their requirements. Depending on what needs to be configured, this can take more or less time. Each of the servers will take a certain amount of time to do the implementation. So the time estimate for the implementation has to include the customer requirements. Analysis has to be completed for each unique need.
The maintenance is looked after by the client. It should not take more than five to six team members, even if we have a client with 3,000 servers. That is the number of people that we would expect once the product is properly organized and implemented.
That should not be considered just an eight-hour per day effort. It needs to be serviced around the clock because the servers do not sleep. Deployment of people to maintenance teams is important.
With the installation complete, the configuration done, and the maintenance team in place, using the product is all about monitoring it. A lot of intrusion detection is getting automated now, but not everything will be. Someone has to take some time doing analytics with the logs.
We try to configure the solution to sort out many things. We have to work with what the client is expecting and configure for that level of load and to get proper alerts. The configuration will probably be ongoing as a part of maintenance and review.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
MVISION is intended as an enterprise product and it is priced like one. That is what I can say about the pricing. Enterprise organizations will be able to make the expenditure and it will not be practical for most smaller organizations. This solution is within the price range of competitors at the enterprise level.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We definitely evaluated other products and continue to. We have to put our case forward for justifying our products and solutions within our company and with our clients. It has been an experience with the POC. Whatever the product and features, the cost-benefit analysis has to be taken in terms of leaky security. That may not matter for certain situations and products, but from our testing and experience, it will definitely matter for this product right now.
Our company has to make a decision about whether they have to switch to a different product internally. If we try to become a partner with a certain company and begin to resell that to other clients, we can get a better price in a negotiation. This may affect the product we end up using.
We definitely need to explore a lot. In this case, it will take a lot of time to consider the benefits of various products and cost-benefits.
What other advice do I have?
My advice to people considering this solution is that they should take a look at it. As of now, that is all I can say. I was not focused on working with all of the products within this category and, after a long time, I am working with them again. Just these last three or four months, I am back into evaluating the security solution sets more rigorously.
I am not biased at this point and have to leave the possibilities wide open in order to make a good recommendation.
On a scale from one to ten where one is the worst and ten is the best, I would rate McAfee MVISION Endpoint as a five to six in a range of ten. The rating is not about the product being perfect, I am not rating it too high because the things that are missing are things that really should be a part of a superior endpoint solution already. They have so much to work on as of now with this product that it seems to be lagging behind. With their experience in the business, they should know these things are important. If you look into the other competing products of whatever brand, the competition has already released identity and access management. The new organizations in the category are coming into this field with all the latest innovations. As more of them do, they will create a challenge in the marketplace. McAfee is lagging a little behind and not moving quickly to keep up.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
National Technical Support Manager at BancoSol S.A.
It's a good solution , not the best. Email protection could be better.
Pros and Cons
- "MVISION offers decent protection."
- "The email protection isn't efficient enough, and I'd like to see DLP features in the next release."
What is most valuable?
MVISION offers decent protection.
What needs improvement?
The email protection isn't efficient enough, and I'd like to see DLP features in the next release.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using MVISION for three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
MVISION is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
MVISION is scalable.
How was the initial setup?
Setting up MVISION is easy.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We have an annual license and pay extra for support.
What other advice do I have?
I rate McAfee MVISION Endpoint six out of 10. It's a good product, but not the best. I wouldn't recommend it to others because it's not secure enough.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Private Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Cyber Security Consultant at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
Good solution offering containment and the ability to triage agent activities
Pros and Cons
- "The features we have found most valuable have been containment as well as the ability to triage agent activities."
- "The way that signatures work when using this solution could be improved. They could be more user friendly. We would like the ability to select a client's signature from a menu or file share to save time."
What is most valuable?
The features we have found most valuable have been containment as well as the ability to triage agent activities.
What needs improvement?
The way that signatures work when using this solution could be improved. They could be more user friendly. We would like the ability to select a client's signature from a menu or file share to save time.
FireEye allows three releases per day which are automated. If the automation fails for some reason, the release fails. FireEye does not allow manual releases. This is why we are moving away from using this solution.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
This is a stable solution.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
This is a scalable solution.
How are customer service and support?
The customer service is good.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have previously used Symantec at a different company. I think Symantec is the best solution overall.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was quite complex. It took three months for us to roll out the solution.
What other advice do I have?
The suitability of FireEye for a business depends on the business itself.
I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Technical Presales Consultant - Solutions Architect at Nexus Technologies,Inc.
Centralized management, integrates well, and the technical support is good
Pros and Cons
- "The agents are easy to deploy."
- "Endpoint resource utilization causes high levels of instability and that is something that needs improvement."
What is our primary use case?
We are a reseller and McAfee is one of the security solutions that we implement for our customers.
How has it helped my organization?
The cloud-based security and data protection features are essential for the work from home set up, because of the pandemic.
What is most valuable?
Some of the most valuable features of this solution are the ePO, centralized management, single control, and ease of management.
The agents are easy to deploy.
For McAfee, as long as you have ePO it is easy to manage.
It integrates well with other solutions and I like their CASB and the Web Gateway, their cloud security. Most of our clients are migrating to the cloud and they are evaluating cloud security solutions and data protection.
What needs improvement?
Endpoint resource utilization causes high levels of instability and that is something that needs improvement. Our clients are concerned about how it can affect their endpoints and do not want the CPU overburdened.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with this solution for four years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability is good.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
This is a scalable solution. Most of our clients are enterprise-level companies with 10,000 users.
How are customer service and technical support?
My personal experience with technical support is limited, but we have a good working relationship with them. In the four years that we have worked with McAfee, we have found that the people behind this product are easy to talk to. No matter how complex the problem is, they will help you to better understand it.
Overall, I feel that their support is good.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is straightforward and it is easy to configure.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing is mid-ranged and quite reasonable compared to other similar products.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Being a reseller, we handle many different endpoint products and have evaluated several of them. When comparing to Symantec, for example, McAfee is better in that they have multiple agents and multiple consoles. We also work with CrowdStrike and Cylance.
Some of our customers prefer McAfee because they started with an on-premises solution, which is a good thing. Not every company is cloud-ready, yet. Some of them have hybrid configurations, where they have on-premises protection as well as cloud-based protection.
Price-wise, McAfee is less expensive than CrowdStrike or Cylance, although not as cheap as Kaspersky or Sophos. I would say that it is reasonable, for the feature set.
What other advice do I have?
We have been working with McAfee for four years and the sales and support have always been good. It is not difficult for us to handle McAfee because they have always worked well with us.
I think that this is a good option for people working from home because it is easy to implement and deploy the agents.
My recommendation for anybody who is implementing this product is to have VPN access set up, adding to the security, especially when working from home.
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: reseller
Security Engineer at Mavisco Resources Sdn Bhd
An endpoint security solution that needs to reduce RAM and CPU usage
Pros and Cons
- "Trellix Endpoint Security has a full suite of DLP."
- "The product needs to reduce the usage of RAM and CPU."
What is our primary use case?
We use the tool for endpoint security.
What is most valuable?
Trellix Endpoint Security has a full suite of DLP.
What needs improvement?
The product needs to reduce the usage of RAM and CPU.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the solution for three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Trellix Endpoint Security is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is scalable and works on Windows, Mac, Linux, and mobiles.
How are customer service and support?
I am satisfied with the solution's support.
How was the initial setup?
Trellix Endpoint Security's installation was straightforward. It takes around one to two days to complete the installation.
What about the implementation team?
We did the tool's deployment in-house.
What other advice do I have?
I rate Trellix Endpoint Security a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Information Security Engineer at Nhq Distribution Ltd
A good endpoint security software in the market that needs to offer more customization capabilities
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature of the solution is its dashboard."
- "The customization capabilities of the solution are an area where it lacks, so it would be great if our company could customize the solution to meet the demands of our customers."
What is our primary use case?
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is useful as an endpoint security software.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature of the solution is its dashboard.
What needs improvement?
The dashboard provided by the solution needs to be improved. The customization capabilities of the solution are an area where it lacks, so it would be great if our company could customize the solution to meet the demands of our customers.
In the future, I would like technical support for the solution and its UI to be more efficient.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) for two years. I usually deal with a product's latest version. My company has a partnership with Trellix.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten. The solution is mostly stable, but sometimes, there is a need to do some troubleshooting.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.
How are customer service and support?
I rate the technical support an eight out of ten.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Currently, I work with CrowdStrike since my company has a partnership with it. CrowdStrike is better than Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS). CrowdStrike offers functionalities like machine learning and DLP.
How was the initial setup?
I have used the solution on the cloud and on-premises. Currently, the solution is deployed on the cloud services offered by Trellix, which I feel is a public cloud.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I don't think there are any extra expenses besides its licensing costs.
What other advice do I have?
Maintenance of the solution is required, including some troubleshooting parts managed by five to six engineers in our company.
I recommend the solution to those planning to use it.
Not all solutions in the market are good, though I found Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) to be a good product.
I rate the overall solution a seven out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Other
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: October 2024
Popular Comparisons
CrowdStrike Falcon
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Cisco Secure Endpoint
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
Fortinet FortiClient
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
Symantec Endpoint Security
Intercept X Endpoint
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
Trellix Endpoint Security
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
- How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?
- Where can I get a fully paid for training course for McAfee MVISION Endpoint?
- What is the biggest difference between EPP and EDR products?
- Can Cylance be used with Symantec or Kaspersky endpoint solutions without conflict?
- When evaluating Endpoint Security, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- What are the threats associated with using ‘bogus’ cybersecurity tools?
- Which Endpoint Protection Solution offers Zero Trust (ZTN) as a feature?
- What to choose: an endpoint antivirus, an EDR solution or both?
- Are you aware of SIEM platforms that integrate both Active Directory auditing and security monitoring tools?
The GUI of ePO must be upgraded.