Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs Trend Vision One Endpoint Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.5
Trellix Endpoint Security offers robust protection with reduced threat response time and ROI, despite high costs and occasional inaccuracies.
Sentiment score
6.5
Users of Trend Vision One Endpoint Security report varying ROI, with notable savings from reduced threats and costs.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.9
Trellix ENS support is praised for 24/7 access but criticized for delays, regional disparities, and module compatibility issues.
Sentiment score
7.1
Trend Vision One support is mixed; praised for local service but criticized for slow global response and language issues.
They were fairly responsive and able to resolve the issue.
I have not needed much technical support except during the uninstallation issues, which took some time to resolve.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
Trellix Endpoint Security is praised for its scalability and ease of deployment, though expertise is needed for optimal configuration.
Sentiment score
7.8
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is scalable, meeting diverse organizational needs and rated highly for supporting growth without infrastructure changes.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
Trellix Endpoint Security is generally stable and reliable, with deployment challenges but receiving regular updates and solid ratings.
Sentiment score
8.6
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is stable and reliable, with minor bugs but overall high user satisfaction.
 

Room For Improvement

Trellix ENS needs improved compatibility, UI, performance, customization, support, integration, pricing, and automation to meet user expectations.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security requires firewall upgrades, better Linux support, streamlined management, enhanced integration, and improved technical support.
20% to 30% of endpoints faced difficulty in cleaning or uninstalling the software.
 

Setup Cost

Trellix ENS offers competitive pricing and value, with scalable discounts and essential features, despite not being the cheapest.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers competitive annual pricing around $50,000, with straightforward setup and no hidden fees.
 

Valuable Features

Trellix Endpoint Security provides comprehensive threat protection, centralized management, and AI-driven capabilities for robust network security and usability.
Trend Vision One excels in endpoint security with user-friendly management, advanced threat detection, integration, and efficient multi-environment handling.
Trellix Endpoint Security seems to do a good job in terms of protecting my infrastructure from malware.
The integration of ML and AI provides complete visibility, suggests responses, detects threats, and includes integration into XDR, which covers email security, endpoint security, cloud security, among other aspects.
 

Categories and Ranking

Trellix Endpoint Security (...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
23rd
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
17th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
54
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Trend Vision One Endpoint S...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
5th
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
6th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
130
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Compliance (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is 1.6%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is 2.0%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

Shreyansh Sharma - PeerSpot reviewer
Our main antivirus tool and offers adaptive threat prevention tool
The technical support needs some improvement. When product distribution errors occur, we have to contact technical support, which is a very tedious and time consuming task. After raising the call onto the technical support portal, usually receive a notification after 24 hours. It usually takes 3 to 4 days to conclude and resolve the issue. If 24/7 online support or a phone line where we could speak directly with technical support for real-time troubleshooting, that would be very helpful. Licensing is another aspect where trellix should look into. Different purchases are grouped together in single user account get mixed up. Categorization of purchases and their grant numbers is not available to end user.
John Trembly - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides a single dashboard, integrates well, and has predictive machine learning
Microsoft's new Azure Code Signing is causing a lot of issues for us with One Endpoint Security. We currently have two systems in operation, on-prem and SaaS, and many of the agents won't upgrade beyond version B11564 because these newer versions require Azure Code Signing compliance on the endpoint. If we are not up to date with our Windows updates, we don't have this compliance. Irrespective of the Windows version we are running, we have to apply patches to the machines, if the OS is not damaged, to make them compliant. After that, we can upgrade to the latest version of the respective agent. This process also applies to both Deep Security and Workload Security. I have two production servers: one for Windows and another for Mac. These servers are available in both on-premise and SaaS versions. Additionally, I have a test server that is located on-premises. The significant distinction with the SaaS version is the absence of a test server where I can install a new version. This means I can't allow the agents on it to upgrade and then perform testing. In contrast, with the production SaaS version of One Endpoint Security, I have numerous agents transitioning and coming online. It's essential that these agents upgrade to a newer version. Among these agents, there are five or six different versions, not counting the really old ones that have yet to upgrade due to ACS non-compliance. I can't leave the testing phase for an extended period because I still have outdated agents that need to be updated. These agents can't be left hanging while I wait to test the newest version that has just been released. New versions seem to come out every couple of months in the SaaS environment. In the past, when I solely used the on-premises version, I would review security bulletins for the SaaS version to identify any issues. I'm apprehensive about potential future situations involving this, primarily because the majority of our agents now operate on the cloud version. If a problem is discovered, rolling back on those agents would be challenging. It would require careful operation to revert them to a different version. The on-premises version of One Endpoint Security has an update function that allows us to manually update a bunch of servers. For example, if I just turned on a policy, I can force the agents to quickly download the policy and start following the update procedure or update settings. However, this function is not available in the SaaS version. This is because the system cannot communicate with the agent through the firewall. The SaaS version has an automatic update function and an update source entry in the update agents sub-menu, but it does not have a way to force agents to update. This is a problem because we cannot automatically update the agents. We have to manually log in to the machines and give them an update command. Currently, we have no choice but to wait until the agents find the updates themselves.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Government
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Educational Organization
51%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Government
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...
How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?
The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...
What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint?
The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.
What's the difference between Trend Micro Deep Security and Trend Micro Apex One?
Trend Micro Deep Security offers a lot of features. It guarantees security for your data center, cloud, and containers - all with a unified and comprehensive SaaS solution and without compromising ...
What do you like most about Trend Micro Apex One?
It is updated automatically without much intervention from our side. We can also get some reports easily.
 

Also Known As

McAfee MVISION Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (HX)
Trend Micro Apex One, OfficeScan, Trend Micro OfficeScan
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Tech Resources Limited, Globe Telecom, Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation
Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, A&W Food Services of Canada, Babou, Beth Israel Deaconess Care Organization (BO), DCI Donor Services, Evalueserve, Gulftainer, Hiroshima Prefectural Government, MEDHOST
Find out what your peers are saying about Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.