Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs Trend Vision One Endpoint Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

Trellix Endpoint Security (...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
22nd
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
17th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
53
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Trend Vision One Endpoint S...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
5th
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
7th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
129
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Compliance (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is 1.6%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is 2.1%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

Venugopal Potumudi - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 7, 2022
Reliable with good independent modules and a straightforward setup
I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. Having used Trend Micro as well, I would rate Trend Micro higher. However, I would still choose this product as a second option. When we recommend a product, we would recommend something based on the fit of the product and customer requirements. We worked with Defender, we worked with Trend Micro, and we worked with McAfee. All of them almost overlap in multiple use cases. That said, we do see the customer IT strategy and where they're going, and they are adopting Azure more. We know there are certain limitations in their landscape where there may be some old legacy systems, and in that case, then we would either switch back to McAfee or Trend Micro instead of Defender.
Infosc Ann - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 7, 2024
We can get consolidated logs of suspicious objects and malware attacks in a single console
I like Vision Central. We can manage all the Trend Micro products from one console. Vision One protects against zero-day attacks. It has a feature where it identifies suspicious objects and traffic. We believe it's easy to learn. We perform cross-layer detection, threat hunting, and investigation from a single console. This capability is essential. We have 15-point IPS, DDI, and all these different security products that we can manage from one console. One Endpoint Security gives us end-to-end visibility. We can forward all the logs to the same solution and interact with the SOC team immediately. We get an alert about any suspicious objects or abnormal behavior, enabling us to take immediate action.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its dashboard."
"The most valuable feature is the integration between environments."
"The tool has contributed to improving our security posture. While it's just one part of our overall solution, it plays a crucial role. As we continue to evolve, we anticipate it becoming even more important alongside other aspects like network behavior and additional metrics."
"It's very stable and reliable."
"The stability has been great."
"The most valuable network security feature is the network sandbox solution. This sandbox feature works on traffic flow."
"MVISION offers decent protection."
"If the network has seen something, we can use that to put a block to all the endpoints."
"Trend Micro Apex One is a seamless solution compared to others."
"Apex One is effective at catching malicious activity. It has multiple modules that improve threat prevention across hundreds of networks."
"Technical support is quite knowledgeable and helpful."
"Stable threat protection software that's quick to install. The security it provides is okay."
"Trend Micro has advanced protection capabilities that cover unknown and advanced novel threats. It's critical because restoration could be complicated if we lose machines or information on the machine. If we lose some business information, we might run afoul of the law. Apex One can prevent all these incidents. It's an excellent solution."
"The policies, protection, and ease of use are the most valuable features of Trend Micro Apex One."
"I like Apex One's DLP and EDR features. The DLP is a good solution because it allows you to push policies. Source detection is another one. It automatically detects malicious IPs, domains, and URLs. Most of the time, it works automatically, but sometimes it doesn't quarantine or block, so we have to perform remediation manually and delete the file or application through Power Shell."
"The solution is used for XDR (extended detection and response), threat hunting, endpoint protection, and device filtering."
 

Cons

"Sometimes, one might face issues with the scalability of the product. The aforementioned area can be considered for improvement."
"They have something called Managed Detection and Response. They get intel from their customers, and that intel is shared with the rest of FireEye's customers. I want to subscribe to their intel, but that is not available to us."
"The central monitoring dashboard needs improvement."
"MVISION Endpoint is only compatible with Windows 10 and Windows 2016 and above. If I were using a Linux operating system, I would not be able to use MVISION Endpoint."
"It has very good integrations. However, its integration with Palo Alto was not good, and they seem to be working on it at the backend. It is not very resource-hungry, but it can be even better in terms of resource utilization. It could be improved in terms of efficiency, memory sizing, and disk consumption by agents."
"The email protection isn't efficient enough, and I'd like to see DLP features in the next release."
"I would like to see more local integration for the applications that we use."
"It is a bit technical. The user interface has some significant limitations, mainly when using HIPS on the server side, to protect files from being changed or deleted by hackers, users, or administrators."
"It should have a single agent as competitors are offering."
"The solution could use extra dashboards and offer more analytics."
"I'd like to see the different interface components combined into one, or be allowed to get to the agent management portion without having to log into the main console."
"I would like to see a sandboxing feature in the next release - which is currently something being supported by a third party - in addition to EDR capability on the cloud applications."
"In the next release, I would like to see IBS included in OfficeScan."
"In the next release, I would like to see IBS included in OfficeScan."
"The solution could be more proactive by using AI to assess the production landscape and compete with other products."
"The solution could improve by making the interface less confusing, it needs to be simplified."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Microsoft Defender is not cheap and from a cost perspective, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a better option."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"There's a subscription on a yearly basis. It's not that expensive; it's quite affordable."
"Customers would need to purchase a license. If a customer purchases an MVISION Endpoint license, he may use that license to install ENS. It's a flexible license where you have the option to either use the McAfee security software or the Windows Defender managed by McAfee, which is MVISION Endpoint."
"The pricing is mid-ranged and quite reasonable compared to other similar products."
"The price of the product is similar to the ones in the market that offer the same features."
"The product pricing is high."
"It is not so cheap in comparison to Sophos and other solutions."
"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."
"When compared with other solutions, the price could be better."
"Apex One has a high cost."
"Its pricing should be improved."
"The license fee for 300 users is approximately $2,000 USD and $500 USD for the implementation cost."
"On a yearly basis, it's about $50,000. There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
"When compared to Symantec, Kaspersky, and others the price is higher, they are more expensive."
"The pricing of Trend Micro Apex One was reasonable. There is a license required to use the solution and we have upgraded the solution to include some additional features, such as XDR."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Government
13%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Educational Organization
49%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Government
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...
How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?
The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...
What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint?
The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.
What's the difference between Trend Micro Deep Security and Trend Micro Apex One?
Trend Micro Deep Security offers a lot of features. It guarantees security for your data center, cloud, and containers - all with a unified and comprehensive SaaS solution and without compromising ...
What do you like most about Trend Micro Apex One?
It is updated automatically without much intervention from our side. We can also get some reports easily.
 

Also Known As

McAfee MVISION Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (HX)
Trend Micro Apex One, OfficeScan, Trend Micro OfficeScan
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Tech Resources Limited, Globe Telecom, Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation
Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, A&W Food Services of Canada, Babou, Beth Israel Deaconess Care Organization (BO), DCI Donor Services, Evalueserve, Gulftainer, Hiroshima Prefectural Government, MEDHOST
Find out what your peers are saying about Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.