Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs Trend Vision One Endpoint Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

Trellix Endpoint Security (...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
24th
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
17th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
53
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Trend Vision One Endpoint S...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
5th
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
7th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
130
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Compliance (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is 1.6%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is 2.1%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

Venugopal Potumudi - PeerSpot reviewer
Reliable with good independent modules and a straightforward setup
I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. Having used Trend Micro as well, I would rate Trend Micro higher. However, I would still choose this product as a second option. When we recommend a product, we would recommend something based on the fit of the product and customer requirements. We worked with Defender, we worked with Trend Micro, and we worked with McAfee. All of them almost overlap in multiple use cases. That said, we do see the customer IT strategy and where they're going, and they are adopting Azure more. We know there are certain limitations in their landscape where there may be some old legacy systems, and in that case, then we would either switch back to McAfee or Trend Micro instead of Defender.
Infosc Ann - PeerSpot reviewer
We can get consolidated logs of suspicious objects and malware attacks in a single console
I like Vision Central. We can manage all the Trend Micro products from one console. Vision One protects against zero-day attacks. It has a feature where it identifies suspicious objects and traffic. We believe it's easy to learn. We perform cross-layer detection, threat hunting, and investigation from a single console. This capability is essential. We have 15-point IPS, DDI, and all these different security products that we can manage from one console. One Endpoint Security gives us end-to-end visibility. We can forward all the logs to the same solution and interact with the SOC team immediately. We get an alert about any suspicious objects or abnormal behavior, enabling us to take immediate action.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Trellix Endpoint Security has a full suite of DLP."
"If the network has seen something, we can use that to put a block to all the endpoints."
"A great console with a user-friendly GUI."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"It's very stable and reliable."
"The seamless deployment is very valuable."
"Provides protection against threats."
"The most valuable network security feature is the network sandbox solution. This sandbox feature works on traffic flow."
"Apex One offers a lot of bang for your buck. It includes an antivirus solution, DLP, app control, and all the other features found in endpoint protection solutions like Microsoft Defender. Many other solutions require additional licenses for different operating systems, but Trend Micro software bundles everything."
"The most valuable feature is Vulnerability Protection."
"The solution is very simple to use and easy to deploy."
"I can run a full scan and it won't cost too much in terms of resources, which is good."
"I like One Endpoint Security's playbooks because they make it easier to set rules and policies. You can customize the playbooks and use them in more than one company. If you manage multiple businesses, it's a great way to set separate policies for each group. You can check for vulnerabilities, attacks, bugs, or anything strange. It also allows you to conduct performance analysis."
"It's easier to integrate Apex One than Kaspersky. It also performs well, and the customer feedback has been positive."
"It provides comprehensive visibility into all client logs and seamlessly integrates with other products, such as CM."
"It is very precise and allows more permission for different use cases."
 

Cons

"It has very good integrations. However, its integration with Palo Alto was not good, and they seem to be working on it at the backend. It is not very resource-hungry, but it can be even better in terms of resource utilization. It could be improved in terms of efficiency, memory sizing, and disk consumption by agents."
"They could provide better integration capabilities for the product with other services."
"The complexity of advanced modules can be improved."
"I would like to see more local integration for the applications that we use."
"The customization capabilities of the solution are an area where it lacks, so it would be great if our company could customize the solution to meet the demands of our customers."
"The solution needs to work on memory consumption. It is too high."
"The central monitoring dashboard needs improvement."
"A policy-editing console should be added."
"The solution could improve the Linux XDR functionality. It is not mature. There could be some improvement in the area of the use cases. For example, improvement is needed in OTN."
"It is weak in terms of intelligence. By implementing Trend Micro Apex One, I wanted to see real-life scenarios. I deployed it on 50 clients to check if I could do lateral moments and zero-day exploits. I wanted to check how the zero-day protection works with Trend Micro. It fails with most of them because it is signature-based. They are not looking at the MITRE ATT&CK framework, so with zero-day attacks, it mostly fails."
"Its pricing should be improved. In some cases, the user interface was not ready for our proof of concept. It wasn't a beta phase service."
"While the single console offers partial end-to-end visibility into our IT security environment, we leverage additional solutions to achieve comprehensive coverage, so this area can be improved by Apex One."
"The security features need improvement."
"We had a few occasions where we had to turn off our clients' computers to upgrade the drivers."
"It should have a single agent as competitors are offering."
"The time required for Apex One to notify us of detection in the central console should be reduced."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is reasonable."
"It is based on an annual subscription."
"Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) has a reasonable price."
"We are on an annual subscription for McAfee MVISION Endpoint. The cost for the license could be less expensive."
"It is a yearly subscription-based product, which includes the license and hardware. There is also a subscription for technical support up to five years."
"It is not so cheap in comparison to Sophos and other solutions."
"There's a subscription on a yearly basis. It's not that expensive; it's quite affordable."
"They should reduce the cost or make it free, open-source software."
"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."
"Its price is competitive."
"From a commercial aspect, it is a bit higher compared to other market products."
"Its pricing was good. It is very competitive with all the other vendors."
"From what I understand the pricing is not expensive for Trend Micro Apex One."
"The pricing for Apex One is midrange, and worth the costs."
"Apex One has a high cost."
"The SaaS version is competitively priced and amazingly easy to set up."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Government
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Educational Organization
50%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Government
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...
How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?
The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...
What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint?
The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.
What's the difference between Trend Micro Deep Security and Trend Micro Apex One?
Trend Micro Deep Security offers a lot of features. It guarantees security for your data center, cloud, and containers - all with a unified and comprehensive SaaS solution and without compromising ...
What do you like most about Trend Micro Apex One?
It is updated automatically without much intervention from our side. We can also get some reports easily.
 

Also Known As

McAfee MVISION Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (HX)
Trend Micro Apex One, OfficeScan, Trend Micro OfficeScan
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Tech Resources Limited, Globe Telecom, Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation
Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, A&W Food Services of Canada, Babou, Beth Israel Deaconess Care Organization (BO), DCI Donor Services, Evalueserve, Gulftainer, Hiroshima Prefectural Government, MEDHOST
Find out what your peers are saying about Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.