Veeam Data Platform Reviews

I use it for our VMware environment and physical servers. It is a good product, in regards to performance, as well as data protection. 

After we bought this product, we backed up all the servers of Azure, as well as our physical servers. 

The product is user-friendly. 

• Restore "File" and "Folder" from VM Backup in Windows, as well as Linux.
• AD Restore 
• Exchange Database
• SQL Database
• Veeam dedup and compression 

In Linux, I suggest you backup for a PostgreSQL database.

Veeam's virtual lab is very useful for making use of existing backups for other purposes.

We use Veeam to protect our production environment without the need to install clients on every VM for every different MSFT applications that we have in production.

Veeam's been doing a good job in terms of delivering new features.

We have used this solution for more than 5 years.

The deployment was easy as pie.

There were no stability issues.

Our production environment is small but growing. So far, there have been no issues in terms of scalability for our use.

Customer service is pretty good. I would give them a rating of 7/10.

I never had to use technical support. The tool is pretty intuitive and we can solve most of the issues on our own.

It all comes down to cost.

The initial setup it was straightforward.

We did an in-house implementation.

Talk to your Veeam rep.

The solution scales in an easy and intuitive way.

Backup.

Improved backup and recovery speeds, ease of use.

Problems occur using VMware based snapshots.

4 years.

No.

Nothing serious, fixed quickly via patch.

No.

Was excellent now very good.

Good+.

BackupExec, not good enough support for VM backup.

Straightforward.

I am a certified integrator, so in-house.

Integrator.

Backing up VMs and it has been successful so far.

It has mainly been in dev testing, so I would say it's helped us to protect our IP address and critical information.

The most valuable feature is its consistency.

The only issue on which we would like to see for improvement would be, potentially, the ability to do some different things with recovery, like faster recovery onsite.

It seems pretty stable.

I can't say that I have tested scalability.

We didn't have a previous solution. We just realized that protecting some of the important data was something that was needed at a certain point, that we needed to do.

Most important criterion when selecting a vendor would be: Does the solution it fit our needs, what we are trying to do?

My understanding is that the initial setup was pretty simple and straightforward.

Right now we haven't fully exercised the solution but what I'm seeing on the backup side is pretty good. On the recovery/restore side maybe not so much. We're still validating that. So I would give it seven out of 10 overall.

My advice would be, test it out and make sure it does what you want it to do. And make sure you can do what you need to get your data secure.

Replicate several sites using VMware, centralise backup, and 10 agencies with Hyper-V and SQL databases.

Get only one interface to manage all backup sites, secure them with replication, and manage outside LTO media.

Replication and restore object in Exchange boxes with possibility to select part of Microsoft directory.

Support others operation systems, e.g., AIX. 

Add an archive option to support legal obligations.

My primary use case is as a physical environment for cloud protection in different public clouds.

The most valuable feature is the internal recovery.

In the next release, I would like replication directly to the cloud to be included.

I have been using this solution for about four years.

This product is very, very stable.

This product is pretty scalable and flexible.

The technical support is pretty good and is available in English and Spanish in Latin America.

The initial setup was very simple and took about an hour.

Licensing is available both annually and monthly, with no additional fees.

I would rate this solution as ten out of ten.

We have found instant recovery to be a valuable feature. 

There should be better use of the external hard drives. 

We have been using Veeam Backup and Replication for the past year. 

The solution is stable.

The solution is scalable. 

I consider the solution's technical support to be excellent, perfect.

While I used to work with other products whose names I cannot recall, I prefer to work with those of Veeam.

The initial setup was easy.

The price of the solution could be lower.

We pay for the solution annually, particularly as relates to the cloud version.

The solution is deployed both on-premises and to the cloud.

There are 1,500 people making use of it.

We require one person for its maintenance.

While the documentation is good enough, it should be properly read. A person should read the manual and be experienced with the infrastructure of his computers and company servers.

I rate Veeam Backup and Replication as an eight out of ten.

We use this product for backing up on-premises virtual servers. We have virtual servers at our two sites that we back up, and we also replicate them between each other.

Compared to other products, Veeam has a lot of features for the price.

I would like to see better features for exporting to cloud-based repositories.

Having reduced pricing for smaller businesses would be helpful.

We have been using Veeam Backup & Replication for approximately 10 years.

This product is very stable.

There are two of us, myself and my colleague, who use this solution in our company.

I have been in contact with technical support and they are very good.

I find the installation fairly easy, although I've been working with it for quite a while.

This product is not cheap, but it's well worth the cost.

I am looking forward to a new feature that is coming out in version 11 that allows you to lock your backups in a Linux backup repository. This will stop ransomware from destroying your backups.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.