Dell Avamar Reviews

Users experience significant cost savings with Dell Avamar, with data reduction, deduplication, and compression reducing costs by around $200,000. It ranks nine out of ten for ROI. Organizations value its ability to secure data against ransomware and recover information after server failures. It enhances IT operations by saving disk space and time. The cost-effectiveness varies with organizational needs.

Dell Avamar's pricing is often described as expensive, with customers experiencing varying costs depending on their usage, environment size, and discounts. Licensing models include CPU, capacity, or VM-based options, which can impact the overall price. Users find the initial setup straightforward, but note a lack of flexibility in licensing, especially with storage upgrades. Some find it cost-effective compared to competitors like Veeam, but others feel it is less competitive, particularly for smaller enterprises.

• "I rate the tool's price as a three out of ten if one means expensive and ten means it is a cheaply priced tool."
• "Regarding pricing, I would say Avamar is slightly expensive compared to its functionalities. It's not high-priced or low-priced but somewhere in between."
• "The solution is costly."

Dell Avamar is primarily used for data backup and recovery, with a focus on virtual machines, servers, desktops, and laptops. Users appreciate its effectiveness for on-premises and hybrid environments, particularly within VMware infrastructures. The platform supports compliance needs and optimizes backup processes with features like deduplication. It is utilized globally across diverse IT environments, addressing the backup requirements of extensive and varied data types, ensuring secure operations and reliable data protection.

Customers experience mixed results with Dell Avamar's support. Many appreciate the quick response and expertise, rating it highly. However, dealing with accents and offshore teams can be challenging. Some find the response time unsatisfactory, while others praise its responsiveness. Technical support is generally seen as helpful but varies in consistency and speed. Users are often satisfied with the knowledge and availability of support, yet they desire improvement in first-line responses and escalations.

Users have mixed feedback about Dell Avamar's initial setup. Some find it straightforward and quick, while others describe it as complex, requiring technical expertise or vendor support. Setup times vary, ranging from a few hours to a week, depending on factors like network configuration and deployment scale. Several users mention the importance of pre-deployment planning, network adjustments, and the potential need for training and assistance for smoother installation.

Many users find Dell Avamar scalable, yet complex when expanding with physical nodes. Some praise its adaptability with Data Domain integration, supporting both medium and large enterprises. Others face challenges with integration and high costs. While some appreciate its ease in managing sizable environments, others criticize the solution's traditional deployment limitations. Ratings on scalability vary, with some users highly rating it, while others find it adequate but costly.

Dell Avamar is praised for its stability, with many stating it as reliable and free from crashes. Some mention its sensitivity to incorrect operations but note it performs well when rules are followed. Users report it as efficient for daily operations, supporting various infrastructures, and providing reliable performance. A few express needs for improvement in newer versions, yet most reviews rate stability between seven and ten out of ten, describing Dell Avamar as highly resilient and dependable.