Microsoft Exchange Reviews

It is a basic email solution. There are two email options, including Exchange, which can be built internally, and Office 365 for cloud-based Microsoft email. The choice depends on the organization. I've worked with both Exchange and Office 365. 

The internal email system allows setting up the servers and domain controllers are employed. It facilitates internal communication for the employees. For external email services, other services are needed to be implemented within the same solution. It involves sending external emails by activating another service.

There aren’t any unique features and it's a standard email setup. 

Our company uses the solution as our server. We have 20 to 30 users who collaborate across the solution. We prefer the solution on our web servers for committee users. 

The email management system is very easy to set up, configure, and use. 

The integration and features are very good. 

There can be occasional challenges during the product's implementation phase, making it an area where improvements are needed.

I have been using Microsoft Exchange for twenty years. I am an end user of the product.

I use it for email service and contact management.

All features  are useful; they meet the purpose of an email server. There's no specific or very appealing function. All are related to email services.

The function of this product is to send an email. It's easy to manage because we know how. If you don't know how to manage, then, of course, it will be complicated.

We wanted to centralize email to a specific server. We needed to manage the Exchange from one place and centralized everything. We chose Office 365 for all of our mailboxes, and the emails run through Exchange. With one click, we can access all of Microsoft's products.

Everything is good.

New features come in regularly.

It helps users communicate effectively with outside parties.

The whole Microsoft Team has created a great tool that has helped improve our capabilities and productivity. We use the solution daily.

Technical support is good.

We have witnessed an ROI.

The solution is stable.

It can scale well. 

The solution's most valuable feature is Outlook, as its users are comfortable using it.

There will be no next release of the tool because Microsoft already announced that Exchange will reach the end of the support phase after October 2025. The only option people will have is Microsoft Office 365 or Exchange Online. Microsoft Exchange will not be updated in the future. The last release of the tool was in 2019, and it had extended support. After October 2025, no matter what, Microsoft will not provide support or updates for the tool.

The tool is not easy to use. Every person has to have at least administration-level experience to use the tool. From an improvement perspective, the tool can be made easier to use.

We use the platform for scheduling and managing meetings. We regularly use the calendar function to select and integrate schedules with Microsoft Teams for seamless communication and collaboration.

One major area for improvement is the need for repeated authentication when running a meeting. This requirement for users to sign in and authenticate their mail each time they access the service is complicated, as employees need to be able to access their accounts anytime, anywhere. Additionally, the functionality for replying to conversations using a link has deteriorated in the newer version of Outlook, an issue that needed to be present in previous iterations.

My use case for the product varies depending on the industry. It involves email management, scheduling, and collaboration to support real estate and managed IT services operations.

The platform's most valuable feature is the mailbox roles. I am currently using the 2019 version and previously used the 2016 version. The mailbox role hosts all the mailboxes, which is essential for our email management needs.