It's important to us that Purview can connect to iOS, Mac, and Android devices, as well as data in other SaaS apps. We also have numerous organizations with corporate devices, all of which are connected by the MDM and MAM systems within Azure and our on-premises network. Therefore, it's essentially within our perimeter. It's crucial to control the overall flow of data and information on all endpoints, including mobile devices such as tablets and phones. Almost everything is on iOS because we are currently transitioning from older Android devices and corporate devices to Apple devices. Essentially, iOS provides better control. Purview's native integration for compliance across Azure Dynamics 365 and Office 365 is of utmost importance to us. We have high demands for compliance, and the current design of Purview greatly enhances the user experience for both administrators and regular users. The all-in-one user admin dashboard holds significant value, as it allows administrators to easily visualize connections between modules. Moreover, as administrators, we can effectively track the flow of data between these modules and understand the interconnections of the rules across different modules. This feature is truly impressive and well-implemented. In contrast, most specific cybersecurity programs tend to have more complicated dashboard interfaces, making it challenging to identify the next step in the data flow. It is important that Purview was built taking into account critical regulations from around the world. We are part of an international group, and we collaborate with other offices and colleagues from different countries. They are currently conducting their own research and starting to implement it. We understand that we can essentially use the same rules, making it clear to everyone how it works, how it is made, and how it is built. We have already modified some default rules and sensitive information types, making it unnecessary to create them from scratch and consider all the small details. Microsoft has provided this functionality for us, and it's incredibly useful, making the entire process much quicker. We have a plan to set up Purview for the DLP model and incorporate it as a part of our Global DLP system in the company. Currently, we are in the planning and researching phase, and there is a lot of interest in the tool. We anticipate huge potential in Microsoft tools and how they evolve, such as Azure and Entra. Having a wider range of tools gathered in one place is very convenient. We observe the clients' weaknesses because it essentially operates through pooled solutions within the organization. Whether we use it or not, the tenant's full settings are functional. As we work, and delve deeper into research, we notice some weaker spots. At present, we are in a phase similar to the planning step, but we already perceive the potential directions that Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention offers for us to work on. Consequently, we have discovered a few types of information that we had not taken into consideration before, and we see that our users encounter these information types in their everyday operational activities. Purview has the potential to reduce the number of solutions, and as a result, it has logically impacted the company's budget. On the other hand, Microsoft has been very active in updating systems over the past three years. This development potential stands out compared to other cybersecurity tools that remain relatively static. Consequently, we don't foresee much progress or development in the functional side of those tools in the near future. In contrast, Microsoft offers its customers a clear and open roadmap for the development of their tools. The AI algorithms could significantly assist cybersecurity specialists in mitigating risks, addressing potential threats, and preventing such threats from compromising the system.
