Qt Squish Reviews

Name: Qt Squish
Brand: Qt Group
Rating: 4.4 (20 reviews)

4.4 out of 5

20 reviews
95% willing to recommend

789 followers

What is Qt Squish?

Take the complexity out of testing graphical user interfaces (GUIs) and human-machine interfaces (HMIs) – even in the face of product evolution and safety-critical applications.

Get the Qt Squish Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Qt Squish, Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio and more!

Qt Squish is the #10 ranked solution in top Test Automation Tools. PeerSpot users give Qt Squish an average rating of 8.8 out of 10. Qt Squish is most commonly compared to Tricentis Tosca: Qt Squish vs Tricentis Tosca. Qt Squish is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 62% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a manufacturing company, accounting for 21% of all views.

Helped 832,138 peers since 2012

Featured reviews

Luc Vangrunderbeeck

Software Test Engineer at Infrabel

There is nothing you can do for almost every application. If you do it for a single version, it is rather easy. However, if you want to run it for different versions of the software, then you need the Qt version of Java. You need to set up some special environment variables to be able to do that.

Read full review

Luc Vangrunderbeeck

Software Test Engineer at Infrabel

We use Squish to test real time traffic control screens Automated testing has clearly some advantages I like the dashboard. It's virtual, and you can see the customer results. I can do it at night and in the morning. I think it also automatically emails results. The price could be better. I…

Read full review

AnirbanSarkar

Head - Solution Management Group at Meteonic Innovation Pvt. Ltd.

There had been a lot of improvements with froglogic Squish already. There were some scenarios in which this particular solution was available in different flavors. They have pulled everything together in one solution. There were some monitoring systems, which were missing out from the solution earlier. They have a centralized dashboard for monitoring the test cases and their execution. It's a full-blown solution, there are not many glitches in terms of something missing out of the package. The froglogic Squish solution is only handling GUI regression testing, this is its forte. However, a lot of clients are looking into performance testing associated with it. If a performance testing capability can be added as a part of it, this would bring great value. froglogic Squish has a code coverage solution and they have done a pretty good job on it. The penetration testing could be added as a separate module, this would be beneficial.

Read full review

Qt Squish mindshare

As of February 2025, the mindshare of Qt Squish in the Test Automation Tools category stands at 3.0%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

PeerAnalyst reports

Type	Title	Date
Category	Test Automation Tools	Feb 1, 2025	Download
Product	Reviews, tips, and advice from real users	Feb 1, 2025	Download
Comparison	Qt Squish vs Tricentis Tosca	Feb 1, 2025	Download
Comparison	Qt Squish vs OpenText UFT One	Feb 1, 2025	Download
Comparison	Qt Squish vs Katalon Studio	Feb 1, 2025	Download

Title	Rating	Mindshare	Recommending
Tricentis Tosca	4.1	22.8%	96%	109 interviews Add to research
Katalon Studio	3.9	10.8%	89%	45 interviews Add to research

Valuable Features

Qt Squish offers robust UI component identification, seamless integration with CI systems like TeamCity, and compatibility with multiple scripting languages such as Python and JavaScript. It excels in cross-platform support, handles complex UI automation, and provides powerful test script recording with reliable replay capabilities. The IDE is user-friendly with strong tech support and efficient object mapping. BDD and data-driven testing features enhance its flexibility, while excellent documentation supports a wide range of testing frameworks and environments.

"It is very stable."
"I can perform Java SWT."
"Squish is integrated with Qt, which enables us to test the user interface effectively."

Room for Improvement

Qt Squish users highlight several areas for enhancement. They note a need for improvements in the IDE's polish, test recording code quality, and object identification. Users mention that Git integration and simplified scripting for non-programmers would add value. There's feedback on slow IDE performance, difficulties with Jenkins integration, and issues with canvas object identification. Additionally, users express a desire for improved cross-version application support and comprehensive reporting capabilities. Improved pricing is also suggested by some.

"Support isn't always helpful. I sometimes need to find solutions myself."
"You need to set up some special environment variables."
"We encountered issues with the embedded environment and building for the Qt version."

ROI

ROI from Qt Squish is evident through time saved for QA teams, eliminating manual regression tests, and enabling continuous release cycles. Unlimited licensing maximizes usage across machines. Automated test coverage reached 50% within six months, reducing testing time. Transitioning tests to a CI farm minimized the need for extra staff and local machines. Charitable organizations report infinite ROI with perceptual licenses. While some issues arise, automation benefits are anticipated long-term.

Pricing

Qt Squish pricing is perceived as medium to expensive, with different licenses for multiple platforms or languages. There are two primary license types: fixed (named) and group licenses. Initial costs are around €2000 for one user, with an optional support fee of €800. Annually, developer licenses may cost approximately $5200. Users find the setup straightforward and Froglogic equitable to deal with, but some note the pricing lacks flexibility compared to other tools.

"The platform is highly-priced."
"It is expensive."
"The price could be better. I believe each developer license costs about 6000 or 7000 Euros per year."

Popular Use Cases

Users leverage Qt Squish for automated GUI testing and regression testing, primarily focusing on table-driven and behavior-driven development testing. Its compatibility with various scripting languages and seamless integration with CI/CD tools and multiple data sources like CSV and databases enhances its usability. Qt Squish supports hybrid applications and distributed batch testing, making it ideal for complex use cases. Its key features include Gherkin Syntax and OCR support, catering to diverse platform requirements across different operating systems.

Service and Support

Froglogic customer service is praised for being quick and effective, with most queries answered in about an hour. They provide timely engineering builds and are open to calls for feature explanations. Although some find support expensive, many highlight its competence and friendliness. Not all experiences are positive, as some find responses lacking, requiring self-reliance. Nonetheless, technical support is often rated highly for efficiency and quick resolution of issues.

Deployment

Initial setup of Qt Squish is generally straightforward, with users finding it easy to install and start using. Many highlight the simplicity of the setup via a self-extracting exe or unzipping a binary. However, some mention challenges when integrating with specific systems, needing technical support, or handling the documentation, which may not be clear for non-programmers. For complex solutions, a thorough review of the documentation is essential. Automated installations and floating licenses add flexibility.

Scalability

Qt Squish is scalable according to users. Many did not encounter issues related to scaling. Its network feature enhances scalability, though it remains untested by some. Users report satisfaction in medium-sized companies and appreciate the floating license that allows easy expansion. Although specific tests can face glitches, scalability is generally rated highly. Some find scalability dependent on the number of classes, allowing only one test with the base license.

Stability

Many users found Squish to be stable, reporting no significant issues. Occasional minor problems were resolved quickly by support. Some observed that stability depends on how tests are designed. Squish was praised for stable performance, with minimal crashes and consistent results. Users rated its stability highly, appreciating its long-standing market presence and infrequent updates, which did not pose issues. Despite some challenges, stability was generally well-regarded by groups using it.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our Qt Squish Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.