Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Qt Squish vs Testim comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.8
Qt Squish users saved time by automating tests, supporting agile practices with 50% coverage, benefiting organizations including non-profits.
No sentiment score available
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.3
Qt Squish customer support is praised for quick, effective service, with users valuing responsive, competent assistance and engineering solutions.
Sentiment score
7.4
Testim's customer service is responsive and effective, providing quick assistance and high-quality support, especially for technical issues.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.9
Testim offers effective scalability for varying user needs, resolving initial cost challenges and supporting medium organizations and DevOps teams.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.4
Testim users report high stability and reliability, with minimal issues and unaffected outcomes from numerous code changes.
 

Room For Improvement

Testim requires improvements in UI efficiency, feature customization, comprehensive documentation, stability, and cost effectiveness for enhanced testing capabilities.
 

Setup Cost

Enterprise users find Qt Squish easy to set up but costly, with simple yet inflexible named and group licensing.
Enterprise users find Testim cost-effective, appreciating its fixed pricing model and value compared to competitors with minimal extra costs.
 

Valuable Features

Testim offers record/playback, algorithm support, REST API, CLI integration, and AI features for efficient testing with ease.
 

Categories and Ranking

Qt Squish
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
9th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Testim
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
7th
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (12th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Qt Squish is 3.1%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Testim is 4.5%, up from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Automation Tools
 

Featured Reviews

AnirbanSarkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Seamless functionality, plug-and-play installation, and highly reliable
There had been a lot of improvements with froglogic Squish already. There were some scenarios in which this particular solution was available in different flavors. They have pulled everything together in one solution. There were some monitoring systems, which were missing out from the solution earlier. They have a centralized dashboard for monitoring the test cases and their execution. It's a full-blown solution, there are not many glitches in terms of something missing out of the package. The froglogic Squish solution is only handling GUI regression testing, this is its forte. However, a lot of clients are looking into performance testing associated with it. If a performance testing capability can be added as a part of it, this would bring great value. froglogic Squish has a code coverage solution and they have done a pretty good job on it. The penetration testing could be added as a separate module, this would be beneficial.
Dheeraj Bavirisetty - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhancing automation skills, intuitive, and low-code
We use Testim to automate our testing scripts. I am part of the testing team for a corporate bank in the US, which is my client. We work on building their product, and Testim is used to automate the scripts since it is a low-code automation platform The feature I like most about Testim is the…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
20%
Computer Software Company
18%
Healthcare Company
7%
Transportation Company
7%
Computer Software Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Educational Organization
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for froglogic Squish?
Qt and Squish are considered to be on the expensive side compared to other software development tools. The pricing is not very flexible, which has been noted as a concern.
What needs improvement with froglogic Squish?
We encountered issues with the embedded environment and building for the Qt version. Upgrading Qt and Squish can be annoying and would be better if Squish were more integrated with Qt, to ease the ...
What is your primary use case for froglogic Squish?
We use Qt Squish primarily for test automation in our embedded systems. While I configure it and set it up, another person uses it for testing. We also use Squish integrated with Qt, a framework fo...
What do you like most about Testim?
The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Testim?
I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools.
What needs improvement with Testim?
There is currently no room for improvement that I can identify as of now.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

froglogic Squish
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson
Microsoft, salesforce, JFrog, USA Today, Globality
Find out what your peers are saying about Qt Squish vs. Testim and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.