Qt Squish vs Testim comparison

"This product can work with QT applications and cross-cut from them on Windows or Mac."

"I like the dashboard. It's virtual, and you can see the customer results. I can do it at night and in the morning. I think it also automatically emails results."

"The initial setup process is straightforward."

"Squish is integrated with Qt, which enables us to test the user interface effectively."

"I find it very user-friendly and easy to start working with. The main benefit for me is that it allows testing applications developed in the Qt language. This capability makes Squish a game-changer, as it's the only tool I've found that enables automation for applications written in Qt. I appreciate three main aspects. Firstly, the documentation is excellent. Secondly, I value the way the tool efficiently locates elements during testing. These are the two aspects I particularly like."

"froglogic Squish is one of the most desired solutions if you are having a Qt as a framework and if you are looking at GUI regression testing. froglogic is a part of Qt as a company."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature."

"We added Testim to our CI flow. It allows us to test only tasks that already passed sanity tests."

"The automating smoke and regression tests have become easier and handier and manual efforts are saved."

"The pre-defined tests are a great help, specifically the custom JS test that allows us to be able to use custom code to test complicated elements or scenarios."

"Testim introduces three services covering validation steps, eliminating the necessity to write complex code."

"The REST API features allowed integrated testing for select products to quickly make calls and test the UIs with API calls while the CLI allows us to matrix the grid function across browsers."

"It is a highly stable solution."

"The feature I like most about Testim is the record and playback capability, which does not require writing a lot of code."

"I'm relatively new to Squish, so I'm not familiar with all its pros and cons. Currently, I haven't identified any specific improvements. However, one feature I miss is Git integration within the tool. In my previous experience with Selenium and Python in PyCharm, it was straightforward to create and review changes before pushing them. I haven't found a similar option in Squish, and having an integrated tool for managing conflicts would be beneficial in certain scenarios where collaboration is involved."

"The platform could be improved by implementing some basic functionalities that are frequently used, such as login procedures and screen handling when multiple screens are used at the workplace."

"The price could be better."

"We encountered issues with the embedded environment and building for the Qt version."

"There had been a lot of improvements with froglogic Squish already. There were some scenarios in which this particular solution was available in different flavors. They have pulled everything together in one solution. There were some monitoring systems, which were missing out from the solution earlier. They have a centralized dashboard for monitoring the test cases and their execution. It's a full-blown solution, there are not many glitches in terms of something missing out of the package."

"ID could be improved with suggestions of names, variables or class."

"I get a little bit confused while creating new branches."

"Testim sometimes fails due to stability issues. It doesn't always work consistently, especially after running multiple tests."

"There is currently no room for improvement that I can identify as of now."

"There are common properties between multiple elements that we should be able to edit - such as 'when this step fails,' 'when to run this step,' and 'override timeout'. I should be able to update these properties if I select multiple elements."

"There were some issues in the product's initial setup phase in regard to the area of documentation since it wasn't very easy to understand everything mentioned in it."

"The UI could use a better design with a better user experience in mind."

"The product's areas of improvement include pricing considerations and additional features related to visual testing and PDF handling."

"The API testing integration is a bit lacking and can be improved."

"The platform is highly-priced."

"The price could be better. I believe each developer license costs about 6000 or 7000 Euros per year."

"It is expensive."

"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools."

"The tool offers a fixed pricing model for our company."

"The solution is not expensive."