As a network engineer, the feature that I value with Aruba is the management of the devices, like the one-touch provisioning of a wireless network.
Network Design and Delivery at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Its Access Points are like plug-and-play devices that you just turn on and leave there and will automatically speak with its controller.
What is most valuable?
How has it helped my organization?
Aruba Access Points are like plug-and-play devices that you just turn on and leave there and will automatically speak with its controller! It just makes the network administrator's work easier.
What needs improvement?
I worked on getting the root cause of multiple alarms of wireless access points in our management platform and found it to be caused by a software bug of the current version in the wireless controller. While doing this task, I found that the TAC support people I worked with have limited knowledge or comprehension of the what's going on as I was passed around to other engineers a few times.
For how long have I used the solution?
I used to troubleshoot these devices for six years.
Buyer's Guide
Aruba Wireless
December 2024
Learn what your peers think about Aruba Wireless. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Due to the software bug I encountered (forgot the version), it appeared like that multiple access points were unstable, software speaking, but were not down physically.
How are customer service and support?
Just slightly above the middle rating because not all technical support have the same caliber of troubleshooting an issue.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I also worked with the Cisco wireless solution as I manage several enterprise networks that use different solutions. I would say that managing Aruba products is easier than Cisco.
How was the initial setup?
For a person who has been brought up with Cisco devices, I could say it was complex when I started working in Aruba's CLI.
What about the implementation team?
We just used the cheat sheets we have in our SharePoint, following what the previous engineers did when setting up.
What other advice do I have?
From a person who tried managing multiple wireless device platforms, there were little to no incidents that we receive for Aruba devices for a specific period of time. Though the biggest contender of this product line has been setup to majority of our customers, it appeared that Aruba devices are more stable.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Network Administrator at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
For the most part, users haven't noticed hiccups because of the HA capability & the speed at which the controllers can authenticate. Unlike in the past, quarterly release dates have been delayed.
Valuable Features
It's very adaptable from the access point line. We've found that ClearPass products have met our performance marks to the letter. They sold us on foundations stats and provided us with everything we asked for. They didn't come up short and were dead on the money.
Improvements to My Organization
It's provided our students with such reliable service that they just expect it to be there and take it for granted. They come to school, blackboard their work, get on YouTube, chat with friends, etc., and then go home, not realizing that they used the college network. We've been able to give them the best experience possible, and their feedback has been amazing. If there are ever any hiccups, the complaints and tickets pile up very quickly.
Our users, for the most part, haven't noticed hiccups because of the HA capability and the speed at which the controllers can authenticate. In fact, the last couple updates have boosted the quality and redundancy. Students have been able to watch YouTube videos without any noticeable rendering issues during hiccups.
We have a few IAP's and that's sort of like the standalone home router stuff. They're lacking in functionality, and though they are designed for standalone small deployments, they don't give you the good standalone fun stuff that you expect on a smaller scale router, like good DLNA. I wish they were a little bit more progressive on their IAP line.
Room for Improvement
Before HP bought Aruba, the release dates for codes were very predictable and quick. Code release were always visibly available. But since HP's acquisition, normal and quarterly release dates have been delayed, probably because of continued integration between the two companies. One specific issues is that we want to deploy their latest and greatest AP, but they don't have a GA code version available yet. We're still waiting.
I know that's a very specific complaint, but it actually has impacted us because we keep a flush on the older access points on hand just in the event code gets delayed by a few weeks. It's now been delayed by a month to two and I have to buy older access points. I can't deploy the latest and greatest.
I'm hoping things get smoothed out when they start getting their product lines and their flow of products and code deployments get fixed. I've been a little disappointed in that.
Also, I've found some of their onboarding stuff to be overkill and not worth the price. Their base stuff that's included in ClearPass is absolutely amazing, but the fringe things are superfluous and overcharged. The core stuff, though, is exactly what you pay for.
Use of Solution
We're essentially an Aruba shop. We have uniform wireless AP's ranging from AP 125's, which are slowly going to be de-commissioned on our next product cycle, all the way up to AP 325's in our fleet. We have three 7240 controllers, and one 7210 controller as our test platform box that we use for benchmarking and a few other projects. They're basically fully-licensed and we are basically all-wireless. We do not have any HP switching gear in-house or Aruba switching gear. All of this is controllers and access points for the hardware side. For the software side, we have AirWave, which monitors our entire wireless fleet in controllers, and ClearPass. We have three ClearPass appliances -- one is a hardware box and another is a VM box. Both of them are 25K units and one 5K unit appliance, as well as hardware.
We've been using them for about 10 years I would say, maybe nine years.
Deployment Issues
It deploys extremely quickly.
Stability Issues
The controller is a rock solid 10 out of 10, the access points are 9.5 out of 10, ClearPass is 10 out of 10, and AirWave is 9 out of 10.
Scalability Issues
It scales incredibly well. We did have some scalability issues with the system a long time ago, but they fixed that rather quickly. We also changed product lines at around that time. We were outgrowing the product a little bit too quickly, but since we've moved to the new controllers, it's been rock solid.
Customer Service and Technical Support
Technical support is very good, but it's dependent on the engineer you get. Sometimes you'll get a fantastic engineer and your problem is solved right away. Sometimes you might have to jump through a few more hoops. Sometimes you get the Cisco experience where you must follow the bouncing ball and complete all the 10 questions. You know how your product works, you don't need to complete 10 questions. You have a problem and want an engineer who can solve this really quickly.
I've noticed that it's been getting better over time. It used to be bad about four years ago. Over the last two to three years, it's been getting a lot better. As long as you fill out the surveys, I tend to find that the service has been getting better and better and better. You get your resolution pretty quickly. So I'm generally quite happy with the tech calls.
I've noticed they've scaled back a little bit of their SE's. I guess that's because they're such a big company.
Initial Setup
The initial setup tends to be both straightforward and complex. Although I haven't done an initial setup in a while, everything just clicks together very well. When I did do an initial setup, the wireless controller was up and running within a few minutes. Deploying new controllers into the cluster takes seconds. There are a lot of wizards and guides built into the controllers for setup. So it's very easy.
ClearPass is a little harder, and AirWave is medium difficulty. ClearPass is the hardest part to get going without a good amount of training.
Pricing, Setup Cost and Licensing
Day-to-day costs are generally very low. We have very few problems with the system, so our maintenance costs and hours that we put into solving problems is generally very low, which makes my life really easy to work on other issues that come up. Our wireless system generally doesn't generate a lot of day-to-day issues.
Initial costs for purchasing the system? It's on par with other vendors, but is a little bit cheaper than the equivalent of what we were getting out there, so I feel that we got really good value.
Other Advice
Make sure you buy the system that suits your network. They have a very broad pallet, so you can buy one that's overkill and buy one that's underkill. Make sure you spec and follow the guides appropriately. Also, you have to have a very good concept of how fast you're going to grow and how much you're going to grow because if you don't have a really good idea of what your growth curve is going to look like, you can easily buy something that doesn't fit perfectly.
Proper planning for scaling, and knowing what your growth curve is going to be is key. Work with the SE's on figuring out the plan is very important. Aruba has a very broad product line on scalability, so that can hurt you and help you at the same time. It is very nice to have.
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Buyer's Guide
Aruba Wireless
December 2024
Learn what your peers think about Aruba Wireless. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Network Engineer with 1,001-5,000 employees
We needed a real stack environment, a high density switch & dual power supply.
Managing our data centre network was a challenge. It was designed 15 years ago, before the internet, and not very flexible. If the users had asked us to create a new system we might have had to say no because we didn’t have the space and the bandwidth.
With two networks – one for administration and one for students – to manage, we were certain the old data centre would not serve users’ needs into the future: it had no room for expansion. It was difficult to install new equipment because of the huge amount of cable. We needed a data centre to give us space and where it would be easy to add and remove equipment. The administration had become increasingly dependent on IT services for carrying out its duties. As e-administration capabilities expanded, ensuring delivery of the systems demanded by its seven independent departments was becoming even more crucial. Everything is done electronically today.
Our network supports more than 400 applications, ranging from internal systems for supporting healthcare for the elderly and handicapped to public-facing, self-service applications for the municipality’s 203,000 citizens.
We chose the HP 3800 switches for a number of reasons: we needed a real stack environment, it is a high density switch with 48 1 Gb ports and four 10 Gb ports, it has dual power supply for redundancy, and it has a lifetime warranty. The lifetime warranty is important to us. If a device breaks and is no longer available, HP provides a similar device – a newer version.
At the network’s edge are more than 1,000 devices in 800 different buildings, connected using HP 2600 Series Switches and HP 3500 Series Switches. HP 5400 Series Switches connect 30 backbone devices. HP ProCurve MultiService Mobility Access Points are installed throughout the network to give easy network access to laptops, tablets and smartphones.
We have been working with HP products for the past 15 years. We needed to do this installation quickly and working with products we trusted and knew inside out really helped. There was just no reason to start again with a new vendor. Network deployment took just six weeks. We have helped beta-test HP ProCurve Manager Plus for the past 5 years.
The whole design creates redundancy, it is a showcase of the right way to do it. The HP 3800 switches not only have the flexibility of a stackable form factor, they have 10 Gb expandability to support bandwidth-intensive applications, providing investment protection for future needs. The flexibility we have is a huge benefit. We now have a system that can cope with future demands and can create new systems demanded by the users. It is much more flexible when you have to add more equipment: we no longer have to pull new cables because they are already installed in the racks. You just have to add the new equipment, put the network connections into the network switches and it just runs the way it should.
When you have 10 Gb links it is easier to add extra VLANs and now we have the option to use 10 Gb everywhere – a huge difference to the 1 Gb links we had previously. The 10 Gb fibre is key to making our network design work. Currently we have 450 km of fibre installed across our municipality. It is now easier to find your way around the network, improving network monitoring significantly. The way it is structured now, monitoring is easier. All the racks are designed the same so it’s much easier to find your way around. All the devices have a unique naming structure and unique address, and all the ports on the switches are designed for a specific purpose – so you know where things are.
Even when a stackable switch is operated with other units, there is only ever a single management interface for the network administrator to deal with. This simplifies the setup and operation of the network. You only have to manage 1 switch for each stack, meaning I only have to manage 5 switches instead of the 24 I would have had to manage previously.
The system is more responsive for the users and we now have a system that can cope with future demands: now that we have the space and the bandwidth we need, we have the ability to create the new systems that the users want.
Disclosure: PeerSpot has made contact with the reviewer to validate that the person is a real user. The information in the posting is based upon a vendor-supplied case study, but the reviewer has confirmed the content's accuracy.
Pre-Sales Manager at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
Has good stability, performance, and functionality; has a straightforward setup
Pros and Cons
- "What I like most about Aruba Wireless is its stability, functionality, and performance."
- "What needs improvement in Aruba Wireless is its access point, in particular, it should have more flexibility. Aruba Wireless has Campus AP, Instant AP, and Unified AP, but it would be better if the product has a generic access point that you can manage over the cloud, on-premise, etc. Another area for improvement in Aruba Wireless is scalability. In terms of what additional features I'd like to see in the product, I'm unsure if it's already on the roadmap, but if possible, it would be good to have an SD-WAN functionality on the AP in Aruba Wireless."
What is our primary use case?
I'm using Aruba Wireless for enterprise deployment that's more centralized.
What is most valuable?
What I like most about Aruba Wireless is its stability, functionality, and performance.
What needs improvement?
What needs improvement in Aruba Wireless is its access point, in particular, it should have more flexibility. Aruba Wireless has Campus AP, Instant AP, and Unified AP, but it would be better if the product has a generic access point that you can manage over the cloud, on-premise, etc.
Another area for improvement in Aruba Wireless is scalability.
In terms of what additional features I'd like to see in the product, I'm unsure if it's already on the roadmap, but if possible, it would be good to have an SD-WAN functionality on the AP in Aruba Wireless.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have years of experience with Aruba Wireless.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Aruba Wireless has great stability, especially because it's from Aruba, a brand known for its stability and performance.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
In general, the scalability of Aruba Wireless needs some improvement. The product needs to be more flexible in terms of scalability.
How are customer service and support?
I would rate the technical support for Aruba Wireless as five out of five. It's quite impressive, though it's not perfect.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I compared Aruba Wireless with other solutions, and I found it to be a complete product. It's ahead of the competition, so I chose to work with it.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup for Aruba Wireless is straightforward. There's nothing complex about it.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The price of Aruba Wireless is higher than other products, but you'll get stability, performance, and functionality out of it.
On a scale of one to five, I'm rating the price of Aruba Wireless a three.
What other advice do I have?
I'm working with Aruba Wireless.
My company has a partnership with Aruba.
My company is a technology provider, so it's not an enterprise user of Aruba Wireless.
I have experience with both the on-premise and cloud versions of the product.
I would recommend Aruba Wireless for enterprise customers. The product applies to multiple verticals.
Overall, my rating for Aruba Wireless is eight out of ten, and it's a product that I would recommend to others.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Engineer at Eden
Reasonably priced with an easy implementation and helpful support
Pros and Cons
- "The user interface is great."
- "The certification for licensing could be better."
What is our primary use case?
We primarily use the solution due to the fact that the architecture is suitable for management and engineers.
What is most valuable?
The user interface is great.
We have found the pricing to be reasonable.
Technical support is pretty good.
It's very easy to set up the solution.
What needs improvement?
The certification for licensing could be better.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for seven years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is stable and reliable. While we have noticed many bugs in other offerings, Aruba has been issue-free. The performance is good.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution can scale if you need it to. It's not a problem.
We have 20,000 people, including network engineers, using the product in our organization. Right now, we do not have plans to increase usage.
How are customer service and support?
I've used technical support in the past and find them to be helpful and responsive. They are better than, for example, Cisco, when it comes to assisting us.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We also use Cisco. We find Aruba's technical support is better.
How was the initial setup?
I've been a part of the implementation process and found it to be quite straightforward and simple. It's not an overly complex or difficult process at all.
We can have it deployed in an hour. It's pretty quick to get everything up and running.
What about the implementation team?
We are able to handle the implementation process ourselves.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It's not an overly expensive solution. However, I cannot speak to the overall costs involved in buying or operating the product. I don't handle the licensing aspects.
What other advice do I have?
I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. We've been fairly happy with its capabilities.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
IT Supervisor at TPC VINA Plastic and Chemical Corp., Ltd.
Priced well, stable, and good support
Pros and Cons
- "Aruba Wireless has been straightforward to set up."
- "The user interface could be improved in Aruba Wireless. This would make the setup easier."
What is our primary use case?
We are using Aruba Wireless to connect our internal network.
What needs improvement?
The user interface could be improved in Aruba Wireless. This would make the setup easier.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Aruba Wireless for approximately three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Aruba Wireless is a stable solution.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We have approximately 200 people using this solution in my organization.
How are customer service and support?
I have used the support from Aruba Wireless.
I rate the support from Aruba Wireless a four out of five.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I was previously using Cisco small business. We switched to Aruba Wireless because the capacity was better and was more stable. I wanted to switch to SQL Enterprise but the price was very high compared to Aruba Wireless.
How was the initial setup?
Aruba Wireless has been straightforward to set up.
I rate the initial setup of Aruba Wireless a four out of five.
What was our ROI?
I have received a return on investment while using Aruba Wireless.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The price of Aruba Wireless has a more competitive price than other solutions.
I rate the price of Aruba Wireless a four of five.
What other advice do I have?
I rate Aruba Wireless an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Help Desk Coordinator & Media Analyst with 201-500 employees
We are able to broadcast different SSIDs with different protocol requirements
Pros and Cons
- "The feature that I love the most is being able to broadcast different SSIDs with different protocol requirements. "
- "Initial setup was very straightforward. We set up the switches and APs, then took it from there. "
What is our primary use case?
The primary use of this system was to provide the best possible WiFi experience for students, faculty, staff, and guests of our campus. We had 88 APs throughout 14 buildings on campus. During the academic year, we could have hundreds of users connected to the APs at any given time.
How has it helped my organization?
Compared to what we previously used to have, this product has enabled us to have more devices connected to our WiFi network.
What is most valuable?
The feature that I love the most is being able to broadcast different SSIDs with different protocol requirements.
What needs improvement?
AP signal strength and price. I know this is a competitive market, but APs should not cost so much if they do not cover a large area.
For how long have I used the solution?
Three to five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The system was very good, but we needed to upgrade in order to adapt for our needs, and doing so with Aruba would have been more expensive.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
No issues.
How are customer service and technical support?
We used a network vendor to work with us whenever we had an issue, so they took care of everything for us.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
With our previous system, we had to delete users who had not connected to our WiFi for a period of time. With this system, we did not have to worry about that.
We used Cisco and switched because of the price. In order for us to get what we needed from them, it would have been too costly.
How was the initial setup?
Initial setup was very straightforward. We set up the switches and APs, then took it from there.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Besides paying for the APs, you need to pay a license each year for their use. Therefore, watch out for that and do the best you can to keep costs down.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I can't remember, but we probably did.
What other advice do I have?
It is a great product if it has what you are looking for.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Manager - Network Services at Seneca College of Applied Arts and Technology
AirWave allows us to do different reporting on WiFi utilization at our different campuses so I can break down different areas of the college and find out how many users there are at any given time.
What is most valuable?
There are a couple of valuable features of Aruba Wireless for us. First is ClearPass, which is an authentication product, and second is AirWave, which is a reporting function.
AirWave allows us to do different reporting on WiFi utilization at our different campuses so I can break down different areas of the college and find out how many users are using the network at any given time. I can find out the utilization of different access points, which allows me to do capacity management.
How has it helped my organization?
It needs the ability to perform mobility device management. They should have some kind of mobility device management built into the product.
What needs improvement?
You need to make sure that the controllers at the access points have the capacity to handle the additional licenses. Otherwise, buying additional licenses won't necessarily scale.
For how long have I used the solution?
We're very happy with the Aruba. We've been using them for about the past five years.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
We've had no issues with deployment.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
For the most part, stability is excellent.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
All you need to do is buy licenses for the access points that you have on those campuses.
How are customer service and technical support?
Customer Service:
9/10. The customer service we get from our sales rep is excellent.
Technical Support:Technical support is always going to take more time. If there's any kind of issue it needs to be replicated, it needs to be taken away and examined certainly more than customer service.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We were using another vendor to provide WiFi capabilities. Although it didn't have any limitations, Aruba integrated better with our existing equipment.
How was the initial setup?
It's very easily set up.
What was our ROI?
I don't know what the ROI is on this. It's difficult to value the experience that the students have and the staff have, so to put an actual number on that is going to be very difficult.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We looked at other vendors before deciding on Aruba.
What other advice do I have?
Make sure you're fully aware of all the products around WiFi and capitalize on any ones that are out there that would help your specific environment.
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Aruba Wireless Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: December 2024
Product Categories
Wireless LANPopular Comparisons
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Cisco Wireless
Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points
Ruckus Wireless
Ubiquiti WLAN
Huawei Wireless
Mist AI and Cloud
Omada Access Points
D-Link Wireless
Fortinet FortiWLM
Aruba Instant
ExtremeWireless
NETGEAR Insight Access Points
Fortinet FortiAP
Aruba Instant On Access Points
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Aruba Wireless Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- What is the best high-performance Wireless LAN device?
- What is the biggest difference between Aruba Wireless and Ruckus Wireless?
- What Is The Biggest Difference Between Aruba And Cisco Wireless?
- What are pros and cons of Aruba 515 Series AP vs. Cisco Meraki or Extreme Networks?
- What are the biggest differences between Ruckus Wireless, Aruba Wireless, and Cisco Wireless?
- How different are the pricing and costs of Aruba Wireless and Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?
- What are the biggest differences between Aruba Wireless and ExtremeWireless?
- How does Cisco Wireless compare with Aruba Wireless?
- Aruba Wireless or Ruckus Wireless?
- When evaluating Wireless LANs, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
Is the product Aruba or hat else? (He says Aruba would have been expensive)