Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

3CX Live Chat vs Webex comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

3CX Live Chat
Ranking in Virtual Meetings
15th
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
55
Ranking in other categories
IP PBX (1st), Unified Communications (2nd), Live Chat (3rd), Hosted and Cloud Based VoIP (5th)
Webex
Ranking in Virtual Meetings
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
123
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Virtual Meetings category, the mindshare of 3CX Live Chat is 2.5%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Webex is 16.7%, up from 14.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Virtual Meetings
 

Featured Reviews

Ahmed ACHOUR - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhanced service desk workflow which streamlines operations and offers strong integration capabilities
The customers use 3CX for IP telephony and call center activities. Additionally, they use 3CX for service desk activities, including integration with other ITSM products to collect data from customers who need technical support on their platforms 3CX has proven to be a good solution, particularly…
AlexandruCioruta - PeerSpot reviewer
Used to conduct online third-party client meetings or third-party vendor meetings
The solution's video conferencing quality is good, and I rate it a nine out of ten. The solution's security features are end-to-end encrypted, and I rate them ten out of ten. The version we're using requires no technical team for deployment and maintenance. The solution has an enterprise version, but we're not currently using it. I would recommend the solution to other users because it has good video conference quality. I mostly leverage the solution for third-party client meetings or third-party vendor meetings. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Easy management console access through web browsers with a good interface to Outlook and multiple CRM systems."
"The integration with SMS has been helpful. That's how a lot of customers prefer to communicate nowadays. It makes it convenient for the customer to reach us."
"It’s straightforward to set up."
"The most valuable features of 3CX include meetings, IVR, and the workflow personalization of the service desk activity."
"We have not had any bugs or glitches, the solution is stable."
"The integration between the video and voice is the most valuable solution."
"With the reporting feature you can get all the incoming and outgoing call details."
"3CX is useful and easy to use. I can talk to my colleagues from anywhere."
"What we like about Webex is that it is a hosted solution, so there is no demand for us to invest in hardware, skill, or manpower to maintain our cloud meeting capability."
"Integrates well with other Cisco solutions."
"WebEx provides the option to record the chat or delete it. You can also dial into the video on your mobile to communicate with the engineer or whoever. One aspect we like most is that the audio is clear. That is one of the most valuable features of WebEx."
"Webex helps us collaborate better. We can work with customers and our team in real-time, share screens, and use a whiteboard. It's been really helpful."
"The most valuable feature of Webex is ease to use."
"You can configure whatever you want in great detail."
"The product improves team collaboration in our company since it integrates with Microsoft Teams or other vendors."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of use."
 

Cons

"Once we establish the system and do the initial configuration, some configurations will be fixed. However, if we need to change those configurations, the option is to do a reinstallation. Otherwise, we cannot do anything."
"Reporting and integration are the main challenges, which are at the mid-level or in the enterprise depending on the system that we choose."
"I need a robust provider who can help me use Live Chat. Unfortunately, I have to move from one provider to another because they don't have enough capabilities to maintain good service."
"There are a lot of quality of life things that could be improved. When adding extensions, you need to use the extension import setting, you can't just use an import function to update extensions. You have to delete and recreate the extension, which can have all kinds of unintended consequences."
"The solution could improve the web meeting feature. There is a lot of competition from all the other applications that are out there, such as Microsoft Teams and Zoom. I find I do not use it that much. I do not know how much effort they are putting into the web meeting part of the program but it could improve."
"The solution was simple to install, but the configuration was not as simple. The full installation process took a few days."
"It needs the option for the CS rep to stop recording when a credit card number is recited by the customer."
"The reporting and dashboards of 3CX could be improved."
"The performance is not always good and could be improved."
"Webex's translation feature could work more accurately."
"Webex support is not good. When we try to open a ticket, it takes approximately 24 hours. With Microsoft, we get support within two or three hours."
"Although we utilize it for team collaboration, it's not very efficient. Most people don't bother turning on their video during meetings. We feel stuck in the past, relying on outdated technology."
"The solution could improve by adding a survey or form feature to show for the users to be able to vote or answer any questions."
"When it was just two people trying to conference, it was easier. But now I see there are times when many people have to be on the call at the same time. That's definitely something that Webex can help with."
"There were some latency issues that could have been addressed if they had a data center in our location, e.g. the African region."
"The collaborative features could improve in Webex. There should not be the typical one on one connection that we have had in the past."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We used a yearly license depending on the customer's requirements, and the customers did not complain about the pricing."
"The price of the solution is reasonable. There are a few license options and we are using an enterprise license."
"The price of the solution is in the middle range compared to other solutions. There are different license options available. For example, there is a professional version and an enterprise version, and with the enterprise version, you have the ability to modify the dashboards. You can purchase a license at many different time frame increments, such as monthly, yearly, or two years."
"There aren't any additional costs. With the license I purchased, I have all features that I need. I don't have to buy an add-on or another license."
"Switching from POTS or PRI to SIP Trunk save the customer real costs. ROI is seen in less than a year."
"There is no add-on costing on the standard fees."
"The price of the solution has been reasonable. We have not had any problems or complaints with the licensing model. We have not reached a point where we need to upgrade. We have all the correct channels."
"We have purchased an annual license to use 3CX Live Chat. There are different options available, you can pay monthly or yearly. I am completely satisfied with the pricing of 3CX Live Chat, it is cheaper than competitors and it is a better solution."
"The tool's licensing is expensive, but it should be cheaper."
"My organization took care of the licensing. I'm guessing they did some subscription cycle, but I used the free version."
"The price of the license for the solution could be less expensive."
"For me, there is no licensing fee."
"The pricing of this solution is fine and I am satisfied with it."
"I am not aware of the pricing details."
"There is a need to pay the licensing charges to use Webex Enterprise Edition."
"I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is high price, and ten is low price."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.
816,192 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
10%
Educational Organization
6%
Educational Organization
84%
Computer Software Company
4%
Government
3%
Financial Services Firm
2%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for 3CX Live Chat?
The pricing of 3CX is around six out of ten. For some customers, the first year may be free of charge, allowing them to try the solution before deciding to implement it.
What needs improvement with 3CX Live Chat?
The reporting and dashboards of 3CX could be improved.
What do you like most about Webex?
Webex improved our overall team collaboration.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webex?
The tool is expensive. It costs approximately $6000 per year. The vendor must work on the pricing. $3500 to $4500 would be more reasonable. Webex is much more expensive than the other brands.
What needs improvement with Webex?
The solution's initial setup process is lengthy. The tool takes a bit of time to download. When you are at the tail end of starting up a meeting, installing Webex will delay you.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

3CX PBX
Cisco Spark
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Seagate Technology, Kohn Pedersen Fox, World Vision International, Glen Raven, University of Notre Dame, CEV Multimedia, The Food Group, LUMEDX, California Baptist University, and Georgetown University Law Center.
Find out what your peers are saying about 3CX Live Chat vs. Webex and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,192 professionals have used our research since 2012.