Acronis Cyber Protect vs Druva Phoenix comparison

Acronis and Druva are both solutions in the Cloud Backup category. Acronis is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.1, while Druva is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.6. Acronis holds a 7.3% mindshare in CB, compared to Druva’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Acronis users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Druva users who would recommend it.

Acronis Cyber Protect

Read 120 Acronis Cyber Protect reviews

8,399 Views
7,118 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Druva Phoenix

Read 7 Druva Phoenix reviews

705 Views
561 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Acronis Cyber Protect

Druva Phoenix

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

Acronis Cyber Protect and Druva Phoenix are leading products in data protection and management. While Acronis Cyber Protect offers a competitive edge with its comprehensive integration of backup and advanced cybersecurity features, Druva Phoenix's strength lies in its cloud-native capabilities and scalability, suggesting it may provide better value for some organizations.

Features: Acronis Cyber Protect integrates backup, cybersecurity, and data protection into one unified solution, providing features such as anti-malware protection, vulnerability assessments, and universal restore. Druva Phoenix stands out with cloud-native data backup and disaster recovery, focusing on scalability and ease of use, offering a conveniently managed platform for data across various endpoints.

Room for Improvement: Acronis Cyber Protect could enhance cloud integration, improve user interface intuitiveness, and expand scalability options. Druva Phoenix might benefit from broader support for non-cloud environments, enhanced cybersecurity features, and a more straightforward pricing model.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acronis Cyber Protect is known for straightforward deployment and strong support, aiding in quick implementation and resolution. Druva Phoenix's cloud-native architecture simplifies deployment, particularly for enterprises with distributed networks, providing flexibility that suits larger and geographically diverse organizations.

Pricing and ROI: Acronis Cyber Protect offers competitive pricing and solid ROI, appealing to cost-sensitive businesses seeking integrated solutions. While Druva Phoenix may have higher initial setup costs, its significant ROI is through scalability and reduced infrastructure overhead, making it an attractive option for organizations prioritizing cloud-native environments.

To learn more, read our detailed Acronis Cyber Protect vs. Druva Phoenix Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Acronis Cyber Protect vs. Druva Phoenix

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Acronis Cyber Protect

Ranking in Cloud Backup

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

120

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (10th)

Druva Phoenix

Ranking in Cloud Backup

15th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery as a Service (5th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (11th), SaaS Backup (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Cloud Backup category, the mindshare of Acronis Cyber Protect is 7.3%, down from 8.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Druva Phoenix is 0.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Backup

Featured Reviews

Stuart Grigor

Senior Manager Governance and Quality Assurance at Motus Car Rental

Good backup solution but challenges with the stability

It is recommended that people know what they are starting with. A part of our challenge was we bought and needed to implement it. So by the time we went to implement it, we were running into support issues. Also, make a market comparison to ensure that the product you choose is what you want to end up with. I would give it a six out of ten because restoring from a backup takes longer than usual. It should happen in a matter of hours, not a matter of days. We are yet to have an experience when trying to restore from Acronis that we haven't had to wait at least a couple of days for our server to be available for testing or working.

Read full review

Ratnodeep Roy

Lead Consultant at Stratogent

Patch-based system, offers network flexibility but Logs are not very informative for regular users

The ransomware features are limited in Druva. There's a lot of improvement needed. It should extend to Nutanix and Hyper-V. It should extend to Azure as well. A lot of people are looking for ransomware scans, but Druva doesn't support them. Veeam barely supports them over Azure Virtual Machines. It doesn't support Linux Virtual Machines. NetApp and Commvault don't have such features. Acronis is also limited. In Azure, you have Azure Defender, but that works extensively on cloud storage, not on the servers. So, backup companies like Druva need to work a lot on ransomware protection and detection. These companies need to work a lot on ransomware detection, protection and more. Ransomware protection doesn't work in this hash-based transfer mirroring. If I only have to find this hash and feed it to the Druva end. It's sometimes not possible. It will struggle when the workloads are more than a hundred machines. It's not possible to find the hash of each file and provide it to Druva. So, this needs to be fully automated. If I were scanning with some technology, maybe signature-based scanning, behavioral-based, or keyword-based scanning. I can put this FHA, maybe SIEMs as well. But Druva is very limited. It's already in an active stage. I don't like that they don't extend all the features to all the workloads. These features are minimal compared to those of its competitors. For instance, I have one customer who was looking for Druva, but since they have Azure machines, they couldn't find a way to restore a particular file. Druva doesn't provide Azure virtual machine single file restore. It doesn't make sense to build a product and then it doesn't support it. Customers really struggle. Some customers tried Druva so that they don't have to think about setting up a separate network, but Druva is making things critical by not providing all the things at once and gradually releasing them. It's been more than six months or one year since they started their virtual machines, but there is no single file restore. Every time you have to restore the VM, and then from there, you can get the file. Why would people go with Druva if they have to manage backup machines? Nowadays, backup product companies need to be aggressive and adopt themselves in this highly changing world of AI and ML.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For my first experience, it is the best software for backups, especially for a five-system backup."

"Acronis has a very rich functionality."

"The most valuable feature of Acronis Backup is the data recovery and restoration details."

"Stability is always good. I have used Acronis for 10 years now, if not more. I have never had a problem with availability, etc."

"It actually does its job very well and has interesting capabilities, but it has the most awful interface."

"It is a very fast and reliable backup, which requires less management and restores quickly."

"The solution's most valuable features are its ease of use and its user-friendly interface compared to other tools."

"I can encrypt the data, I can make it send me an email if it fails. It lets me choose which files I want to ignore during backup."

More Acronis Cyber Protect pros

"I found the cost-effectiveness of Druva Phoenix to be its most valuable feature, especially when compared to on-premises backup solutions."

"The most valuable features of Druva Phoenix are the simple portal to log in and flexibility."

"I would definitively say that we have been able to make our people more productive by at least 30%."

"Once you set it up and you tell it exactly what needs to be backed up, you literally forget about it. It sends you emails and notifications of the current status of the jobs."

"It's patch-based, so you don't have to bother about the backup server or the repository."

"Druva Phoenix is easy to use and easy to start with."

"The initial setup was very straightforward."

Cons

"It supports Microsoft SQL and Microsoft Exchange, but it does not support Oracle databases or Postgres."

"The problems that we face are often related to the customer's network, although sometimes there are problems with the software, such as an error in the configuration."

"If there was a wizard that would lead you down a road, when creating a backup, that would probably be better than having to go online or call somebody to actually do a backup. It's not intuitive..."

"The pricing could be improved."

"No technical support and minimal documentation."

"The new version has anti-malware and software management features, but these features should be enhanced. It is working as an exclusive solution along with the backup and recovery."

"The biggest problem that we have is when the antivirus is installed, the whole machine runs very slowly and some of the machines hang."

"A little bit more integration would be good. It should support broader platforms."

More Acronis Cyber Protect cons

"The product's pricing needs to be improved."

"There is room for improvement in the reporting aspect of Druva Phoenix."

"Druva Phoenix is optimized to work with x86 platforms, making it unsuitable for backing up non-x86 architectures like AIX. The solution is primarily designed for physical Linux and Windows systems based on the x86 architecture, as well as virtualized Windows and Linux environments. However, if you have an AIX system, it cannot be deployed in the cloud, and therefore, backing it up in the cloud is not a concern."

"They were able to give us a very reasonable price considering we were non-for-profit organizations, however, there is always room for improvement on that cost."

"The ransomware features are limited in Druva. There's a lot of improvement needed. It should extend to Nutanix and Hyper-V. It should extend to Azure as well."

"Druva Phoenix should include a few reporting features that it doesn't provide currently."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's subscription costs are monthly. The product's pricing is fair."

"It is a low-cost solution."

"If the solution was less expensive it would be better."

"The license is a perpetual license. The cost is an area for improvement."

"I would say that at the pricepoint that it's at, it's definitely worth the money."

"There is a license required for this solution and it can be on a monthly basis."

"Licensing fees are billed annually and there are no extra charges."

"We use the free version that provides very basic functionalities."

More Acronis Cyber Protect pricing and cost advice

"We’ve had experience with the data center for a while and we have had solutions that were able to support older versions of the operating systems that we needed. I would like for Druva to support it as well."

"It's very costly. Normal people wouldn't understand how their credits are calculated. It's pretty complex."

"Druva Phoenix's pricing is based on the service provided, and it's reasonable. The cost of the service will depend on the size of your data and the number of virtual machines being backed up. However, the pricing structure is straightforward and easy to understand."

"I assume clients use Druva Phoenix because it is cheaper than other products."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Backup solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Major Differences Between These 4 Backup and Disaster Recovery Solutions?

Comparing the features of the four is not the right approach. You need to develop a list of requirements for backup and DR that are specific to your organization and then compare each of the four ...

See all answers

How does Acronis Backup compare with Veeam Backup & Replication?

Acronis Backup is a versatile backup-as-a-service solution for service providers. It allows you to protect workloads on-premises and in the cloud and provide backup to any storage. The deployment i...

See all answers

What do you like most about Acronis Backup?

One of its most valuable aspects is its user-friendly interface.

See all answers

What do you like most about Druva Phoenix?

Druva Phoenix is easy to use and easy to start with.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Druva Phoenix?

The product's pricing needs to be improved. Including more flexible feature sets such as options for sending secondary backups to different locations would be beneficial.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Druva Phoenix?

We utilized the product to modernize backup as a service, eliminating the need for extensive hardware and ensuring data is securely backed off-site.

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs Acronis Cyber Protect

Compared 21% of the time

R-Drive Image vs Acronis Cyber Protect

Compared 7% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Acronis Cyber Protect

Compared 7% of the time

Azure Backup vs Acronis Cyber Protect

Compared 5% of the time

N-able Cove Data Protection vs Acronis Cyber Protect

Compared 5% of the time

More Acronis Cyber Protect Competitors

Druva inSync vs Druva Phoenix

Compared 34% of the time

Rubrik vs Druva Phoenix

Compared 17% of the time

Azure Backup vs Druva Phoenix

Compared 14% of the time

N2WS Backup & Recovery vs Druva Phoenix

Compared 8% of the time

AWS Backup vs Druva Phoenix

Compared 8% of the time

More Druva Phoenix Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Acronis Cyber Protect

December 2024

Download Acronis Cyber Protect product report

Buyer's Guide

Druva Phoenix

December 2024

Download Druva Phoenix product report

Also Known As

Acronis Backup, Acronis Backup 12.5 Standard, Acronis Backup 12.5 Advanced

CloudRanger

Learn More

Acronis

Druva

Overview

Acronis Cyber Protect offers a revolutionary approach to cyber protection by integrating data protection with cybersecurity. This integrated method eliminates complexity challenges, delivers better protection against today’s threats, and maximizes efficiency by saving time and money. With its full-stack antimalware protection and comprehensive endpoint management, Acronis Cyber Protect combats advanced cyberattacks with a unique integration of protection technologies while simplifying daily IT operations, endpoint deployments and management, and reporting. Now you can manage all cyber protection aspects from a single pane of glass.

Druva Phoenix is a comprehensive cloud-based data protection and management solution that enables organizations to securely backup, recover, and manage their data across endpoints, physical servers, virtual machines, and cloud applications. With its scalable and flexible architecture, Druva Phoenix simplifies data protection and eliminates the need for traditional backup infrastructure.

By leveraging the power of the cloud, Druva Phoenix offers organizations a cost-effective and efficient way to protect their critical data. It provides automated backup and recovery capabilities, ensuring that data is always protected and easily recoverable in the event of a disaster or data loss. With its global deduplication and compression technology, Druva Phoenix minimizes storage requirements and reduces costs.

Druva Phoenix also offers advanced features such as point-in-time recovery, allowing organizations to restore data to a specific point in time, and granular file-level recovery, enabling users to recover individual files or folders. Its intuitive web-based console provides a centralized view of all protected data, making it easy to manage and monitor backups across the entire organization.

In addition to data protection, Druva Phoenix offers comprehensive data management capabilities. It enables organizations to gain insights into their data through advanced analytics and reporting, helping them make informed decisions and optimize their storage resources. Druva Phoenix also supports legal and compliance requirements by providing eDiscovery capabilities and ensuring data is retained and disposed of according to regulatory guidelines.

With its cloud-native architecture, Druva Phoenix offers organizations the flexibility to protect and manage their data across a wide range of environments, including on-premises, remote offices, and cloud applications such as Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace. It seamlessly integrates with popular cloud platforms like AWS and Azure, allowing organizations to leverage their existing cloud investments.

Sample Customers

Kings Academy, Rush Memorial, Pentagon Credit Union, Oxford School District, New York City Probation, Dolmen Insurance, New Bedford Community Health, Gerard Darel, Ready Honda

TRC Companies, Family Health Network, GulfMark Offshore, Pall Corporation

Buyer's Guide

Acronis Cyber Protect vs. Druva Phoenix

December 2024

Free Report: Acronis Cyber Protect vs. Druva Phoenix

Find out what your peers are saying about Acronis Cyber Protect vs. Druva Phoenix and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Acronis Cyber Protect vs. Druva Phoenix report.

See our list of best Cloud Backup vendors and best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.