Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Warehouse solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
They help with billing, cost determination, IAM properties, security compliance, and deployment and migration activities.
Technical support is very costly for me, accounting for twenty-five to thirty percent of the product cost.
Scalability can be provisioned using the auto-scaling feature, EC2 instances, on-demand instances, and storage locations like block storage, S3, or file storage.
It is provided as a pre-configured box, and scaling is not an option.
Regular updates, patch installations, monitoring, logging, alerting, and disaster recovery activities are crucial for maintaining stability.
There is room for improvement with respect to retries, handling the volume of data on S3 buckets, cluster provisioning, scaling, termination, security, and integration between services like S3, Glue, Lake Formation, and DynamoDB.
The cloud version is only available in AWS, and in the Middle East, it is not well-developed in the Azure environment.
Cost optimization can be achieved through instance usage, cluster sharing, and auto-scaling.
Amazon EMR helps in scalability, real-time and batch processing of data, handling efficient data sources, and managing data lakes, data stores, and data marts on file systems and in S3 buckets.
It operates as a high-speed data warehouse, which is essential for handling big data.
We monitor all Cloud Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
