AWS X-Ray vs Amazon OpenSearch Service comparison

Amazon OpenSearch Service and AWS X-Ray are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Amazon OpenSearch Service is ranked #35 with an average rating of 7.5, while AWS X-Ray is ranked #19 with an average rating of 7.3. Amazon OpenSearch Service holds a 1.5% mindshare in APM, compared to AWS X-Ray’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of Amazon OpenSearch Service users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of AWS X-Ray users who would recommend it.

Amazon OpenSearch Service

Read 4 Amazon OpenSearch Service reviews

1,120 Views
1,039 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

AWS X-Ray

Read 8 AWS X-Ray reviews

5,943 Views
5,381 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon OpenSearch Service

AWS X-Ray

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

AWS X-Ray and Amazon OpenSearch Service are competing products for monitoring and analyzing applications. AWS X-Ray generally receives positive feedback for its ease of setup and robust tracing features, while Amazon OpenSearch Service is praised for its powerful search and analysis capabilities.

Features: AWS X-Ray is valued for its ability to trace requests, providing comprehensive insights into application performance and pinpointing issues quickly. It offers straightforward implementation and user-friendly features. Amazon OpenSearch Service is appreciated for its scalability and powerful search and analysis features that enhance data discovery. OpenSearch offers extensive functionality and greater analytical depth.

Room for Improvement: AWS X-Ray users suggest enhancing integration options and improving visualizations. Broader integration capability is needed. Amazon OpenSearch Service users express the need for better documentation and streamlined configuration processes. OpenSearch could benefit from more intuitive setup processes and easier initial configuration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS X-Ray is commonly noted for its quick, straightforward deployment and strong customer support. It is ideal for users needing rapid setup with minimal complexity. Amazon OpenSearch Service, although more complex to deploy, receives praise for comprehensive support once configured.

Pricing and ROI: AWS X-Ray offers competitive pricing, often seen as cost-effective for its feature set. Its ROI is highlighted due to its efficiency in identifying performance issues. Amazon OpenSearch Service, while more expensive, delivers significant ROI through enhanced data analytics capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS X-Ray vs. Amazon OpenSearch Service Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS X-Ray vs. Amazon OpenSearch Service

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,466 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon OpenSearch Service

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

35th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (32nd)

AWS X-Ray

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

19th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Amazon OpenSearch Service is 1.5%. The mindshare of AWS X-Ray is 3.3%, down from 3.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

VijayKumar27

Software Engineer at The American College

Effective as a vector store, serverless architecture but there aren't enough security features

The pricing aspect is a concern. The service is way too costly. For the past month, I used only 30 to 40 MB of data, and the cost was $500. AWS could improve pricing. Even being serverless, it incurs charges during idle times. For just holding data, you need to create a list. AWS should add an option to make data idle, so it won't include computing charges. They charge for OCU units based on the time the serverless solution is up, not on indexing or retrieval speed. Once the service starts, it starts getting billed. It would help if there were an option to limit computing. When using it as a database, storing data without frequent fetching would save computing costs.

Read full review

Willy Moura

Solutions Architect/ Analyst at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Identifying and resolving deployment issues while configuring can be challenging

I have two use cases with my customers. One involves using AWS Fargate, and the other involves an application running on WordPress. The WordPress application was very slow, and we used AWS X-Ray to understand the main problem. X-Ray helped us identify issues with our EFS, allowing us to adjust…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This service already sorts data like vectors. They have classified the storage pre-defined."

"We retrieve historical data with just a click of a button to move it from cold to hot or warm because it's already stored in the backend storage"

"The business analytics capabilities are the most important feature it provides."

"Amazon OpenSearch Service provides a managed database solution, so we don't need to manage everything ourselves."

"The customer service is excellent, rated nine out of ten."

"Amazon OpenSearch Service has enhanced our organization's ability to store and search large amounts of data efficiently."

"The most promising feature of AWS X-Ray is that you can debug the issues through the proper logs. You can also get an analysis out of the logs for some use cases, though I have yet to try all the features of AWS X-Ray."

"AWS X-Ray shows us exactly when there are delays, helping us understand the depth of issues and what is happening point-to-point."

"The most beneficial feature is that it shows a dashboard for performance intervals, which reveals latencies."

"The solution has made it easier for us to trace the problems that we have with our requests and to monitor the timing of each step in each request we do in our endpoints."

"It is a very scalable solution."

"The error analysis capabilities of X-Ray are really good."

"AWS X-Ray shows us exactly when there are delays, helping us understand the depth of issues and what is happening point-to-point."

"AWS X-RAY identifies bottlenecks in terms of stability and performance and how long certain data lives in terms of response time and duration."

More AWS X-Ray pros

Cons

"One improvement I would like to see is support for auto-scaling."

"The price is fair yet leans towards the expensive side. I'd rate it five out of ten with respect to capabilities vs. cost."

"The pricing aspect is a concern. The service is way too costly. For the past month, I used only 30 to 40 MB of data, and the cost was $500. AWS could improve pricing."

"They can enhance data visualization."

"It would be beneficial to have some level of customization available in the managed service, tailored to the specific use cases of the end users."

"One improvement I would like to see is support for auto-scaling."

"Compared to other open-source tools, AWS X-Ray needs improvement in providing discounts."

"A significant downside is that it is very expensive."

"What needs to be better in AWS X-Ray is the log filtering. Predefined filters could be helpful because the power of analytics comes from how you can filter the data. I also want to see more KPIs from AWS X-Ray."

"I do not have any notes in terms of improvements."

"Like most Amazon products, the user interface, configuration, and tuning aren't the easiest. That's the biggest reason why people tend to go to products like TerraForm and Terragrunt. We use TerraForm and Terragrunt. So, for setting things up and interacting with X-Ray, it's definitely the user interface that can be better."

"If you have a small team, it's probably overkill."

"It should have X-Ray SDKs for different languages like Node.js, Python, or Java."

"They can improve how traces are sent to other providers."

More AWS X-Ray cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"As you develop a relationship with Amazon, your pricing gets lower. You get credits for the amount of the system you use, and then if you're the government, you can get government pricing. For commercial users, there's a hump when you go from small to medium to big enterprise. Small businesses can live pretty easily off the free tier in a lot of cases, but when you go from a medium to a big enterprise, it becomes more expensive on a per-user basis. I'd like to see that curve going in a different way where pricing can be driven down while people are trying to adopt the technology."

"The solution is a bit expensive."

"The pricing for AWS X-Ray is a six out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,466 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon OpenSearch Service?

We retrieve historical data with just a click of a button to move it from cold to hot or warm because it's already stored in the backend storage

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon OpenSearch Service?

Amazon OpenSearch Service is a bit costly compared to self-hosted Elasticsearch due to the managed service pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon OpenSearch Service?

One improvement I would like to see is support for auto-scaling. The current configuration does not support automatic scaling based on server load, requiring us to manage the scaling manually. Addi...

See all answers

What do you like most about AWS X-Ray?

AWS X-Ray is a strong solution and has a smooth integration process.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS X-Ray?

Compared to other open-source tools, AWS X-Ray needs improvement in providing discounts. Customers often seek cheaper solutions. When using many AWS resources, pricing can be a mid-range cost, give...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS X-Ray?

Sometimes, the collector agents are confusing to configure initially. It requires research to understand the correct configurations, especially when deploying on-premises or on an EC2 instance. Usi...

See all answers

Comparisons

Grafana Loki vs Amazon OpenSearch Service

Compared 30% of the time

Datadog vs Amazon OpenSearch Service

Compared 18% of the time

Amazon CloudWatch vs Amazon OpenSearch Service

Compared 15% of the time

Dynatrace vs Amazon OpenSearch Service

Compared 5% of the time

New Relic vs Amazon OpenSearch Service

Compared 5% of the time

More Amazon OpenSearch Service Competitors

Datadog vs AWS X-Ray

Compared 20% of the time

Sentry vs AWS X-Ray

Compared 15% of the time

Azure Monitor vs AWS X-Ray

Compared 12% of the time

Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs AWS X-Ray

Compared 11% of the time

New Relic vs AWS X-Ray

Compared 10% of the time

More AWS X-Ray Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

March 2025

Download Amazon OpenSearch Service product report

Buyer's Guide

AWS X-Ray

March 2025

Download AWS X-Ray product report

Overview

Amazon OpenSearch Service is often used for log analysis, real-time application monitoring, and searching large datasets. Users benefit from its scalability, ease of use, and AWS integration, appreciating its capability to handle high data volumes while providing efficient search functionalities.

Many users choose Amazon OpenSearch Service for its powerful search and indexing capabilities, real-time analytics, and strong integration with AWS services. Key highlights include minimal downtime, detailed documentation, and efficient data processing. Scalability and automatic scaling are standout features, enabling users to manage high data volumes seamlessly. However, there is a call for improved integration, enhanced stability, and better support. Some users find the setup and configuration process challenging and desire more customization options for security features.

What are the key features of Amazon OpenSearch Service?

Scalability: Automatically scales to accommodate data growth and workload fluctuations.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides up-to-date insights and monitoring for applications.
Integration with AWS: Easily integrates with other AWS services, enhancing workflows.
Powerful Search Capabilities: Fast and efficient search and indexing functionalities.
Detailed Documentation: Comprehensive guides and resources to assist users.
Security Features: Flexible security options to protect data and manage access.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Efficiency: Quick data processing and minimal downtime.
Scalability: Ability to handle increasing data volumes without manual intervention.
Ease of Use: User-friendly interface and management tools.
Reliability: Consistent performance with robust support for data management workflows.
Integration: Seamless integration with existing AWS services and infrastructure.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and e-commerce, Amazon OpenSearch Service is implemented to manage and analyze large datasets in real time. Companies benefit from its ability to monitor application performance, analyze log data, and enhance search functionalities, leading to improved operational efficiency and decision-making processes.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

AWS X-Ray is a powerful debugging and performance analysis tool offered by Amazon Web Services. It allows developers to trace requests made to their applications and identify bottlenecks and issues.

With X-Ray, developers can visualize the entire request flow and pinpoint the exact location where errors occur. It provides detailed insights into the performance of individual components and helps optimize the overall application performance.

X-Ray integrates seamlessly with other AWS services, making it easy to trace requests across different services and identify dependencies. It also offers a comprehensive set of APIs and SDKs, enabling developers to instrument their applications and capture valuable data for analysis. With its user-friendly interface and powerful features, AWS X-Ray is a valuable tool for developers looking to improve the performance and reliability of their applications.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

COMCAST, ConnectWise, skyscanner, AirAsia, cookpad, cimpress, VTEX, zowdow

Buyer's Guide

AWS X-Ray vs. Amazon OpenSearch Service

March 2025

Free Report: AWS X-Ray vs. Amazon OpenSearch Service

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS X-Ray vs. Amazon OpenSearch Service and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,466 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS X-Ray vs. Amazon OpenSearch Service report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.