Amazon S3 Glacier vs IBM SoftLayer comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and IBM are both solutions in the Public Cloud Storage Services category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.7, while IBM is ranked #22. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 17.1% mindshare in PCSS, compared to IBM’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Amazon S3 Glacier

Read 38 Amazon S3 Glacier reviews

4,961 Views
4,255 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

IBM SoftLayer

Read 2 IBM SoftLayer reviews

109 Views
68 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon S3 Glacier

IBM SoftLayer

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

IBM SoftLayer and Amazon S3 Glacier are leading cloud solutions but target different needs. User feedback indicates IBM SoftLayer offers robust support and customizable features, whereas Amazon S3 Glacier excels in long-term data storage at competitive rates.

Features: IBM SoftLayer users highlight comprehensive network management, integration capabilities, and robust support as valuable features. Conversely, Amazon S3 Glacier users praise its low-cost data archiving, efficient retrieval options, and seamless storage management.

Room for Improvement: IBM SoftLayer reviews suggest enhancements in user-friendliness, interface design, and documentation quality. Amazon S3 Glacier users mention the need for faster data retrieval times, simpler management tools, and better API documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Users find IBM SoftLayer relatively straightforward to deploy, with reliable customer support. In contrast, Amazon S3 Glacier deployment involves a steeper learning curve, although its support team is responsive.

Pricing and ROI: IBM SoftLayer's setup costs are higher, but users find the ROI justified by its extensive features. Amazon S3 Glacier offers cost-effective storage solutions with good ROI, primarily for archival purposes.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon S3 Glacier vs. IBM SoftLayer Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon S3 Glacier vs. IBM SoftLayer

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 815,854 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Amazon S3 Glacier

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM SoftLayer

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

22nd

Average Rating

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Amazon S3 Glacier is 17.1%, up from 15.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM SoftLayer is 0.2%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Public Cloud Storage Services

Featured Reviews

Alan Bloor

Geographic Information System Developer at Public Sector

Nov 8, 2023

A powerful hosting service with an extensive code interface

Their pricing structure is always a big topic. It's so difficult to understand. I had a personal account once, and I was so scared to type in my credit card because I wasn't sure how much I would be charged. At home, I might turn on the VM to test something, and I might be on there for three minutes wondering how much it could cost. The solution might tell you there are so many hours of free usage and a free VM, but it's still scary because you don't know how much it will cost, even if you go over one second. The price structure needs massive simplifying and made crystal clear so people know what they're paying.

Read full review

reviewer1032702

Global Principal Cloud Architect at NTT DATA

Nov 19, 2021

Stable with excellent speed and agility

The most valuable aspect of the solution is simply to have the ability to host in a cloud form and out of the data center - the IBM big iron solution. It's the speed and the agility that really sell SoftLayer. The ELT versus ETL extract, transform and load versus extract, load, and then transform, the ELT method is what really sells SoftLayer. The ability to extract act from your current location, load into your future location, with limited change, and then be able to take the transfer actions slowly and methodically after you're in your new location is the part that really makes this awesome. The stability and scalability are quite good.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"AWS does support the ability for user controlled movement of data between regions for business continuance (BC), high availability (HA) and disaster recovery (DR)."

"The solution is great for storing data you don't usually need access to. It's also well-integrated with Amazon S3."

"The tool is simple to use and not very expensive."

"The solution is easy to use."

"I like the price. If you compare Glacier to others, the prices in terms of what you store beyond retention are much lower."

"Amazon S3 Glacier is a scalable and easy-to-manage solution with good read-write capability."

"AWS Lambda is the most valuable part of the solution because it gives you a code interface for everything."

"It is a very comprehensive tool."

More Amazon S3 Glacier pros

"The ELT versus ETL extract, transform and load versus extract, load, and then transform, the ELT method is what really sells SoftLayer."

"The stability is the solution's most valuable aspect for our organization."

Cons

"Amazon S3 Glacier is a cheaper tool if you're running it on-prem, but it is expensive if deployed on the cloud."

"The learning curve is very high."

"The product’s pricing must be improved."

"The solution’s deployment process is complex and could be improved."

"The stability must be improved."

"Although Amazon S3 Glacier is cheap, its data retrieval cost is very high compared to other solutions."

"The solution's cost optimization could be improved."

"I would like to see improvements in the transfer rate as it takes quite a long time to retrieve data from Glacier compared to standard S3 storage."

More Amazon S3 Glacier cons

"For us, the versioning was an issue."

"The interface is hard to use for us. It should be simplified."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Amazon S3 Glacier has a good pricing point, and you pay for what's being used."

"The price point at which the product is available is pretty good."

"The product is very cheap."

"Amazon S3 Glacier is a cost-effective solution for archiving."

"The pricing must be improved."

"Customers prefer Amazon S3 Glacier because it is a cheap and pay-as-you-go solution."

"The solution is cost-effective."

"We don't pay for licenses. We pay based on consumption data, considering how much data is stored."

More Amazon S3 Glacier pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

34%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

University

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Amazon's S3 Glacier or EBS (Elastic Block Store)?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon's S3 Glacier or Elastic Block Store data storage software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Amazon's S3 Glacier, whi...

See all answers

What do you like most about Amazon S3 Glacier?

I like creating buckets where data can be segregated at a high level and then routing the appropriate data to each designated bucket. In terms of value, I would say that the tool gets the job done ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon S3 Glacier?

The product could be improved in terms of the customer support team's response times.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Google Cloud Storage Nearline vs Amazon S3 Glacier

Compared 46% of the time

Google Cloud Storage vs Amazon S3 Glacier

Compared 17% of the time

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Amazon S3 Glacier

Compared 9% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Amazon S3 Glacier

Compared 9% of the time

Wasabi vs Amazon S3 Glacier

Compared 8% of the time

More Amazon S3 Glacier Competitors

Amazon AWS vs IBM SoftLayer

Compared 100% of the time

More IBM SoftLayer Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon S3 Glacier

November 2024

Download Amazon S3 Glacier product report

Buyer's Guide

Public Cloud Storage Services

November 2024

Download IBM SoftLayer product report

Also Known As

Amazon Glacier

CloudLayer

Learn More

Video not available

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

IBM

Overview

Amazon Glacier is a secure, durable, and extremely low-cost cloud storage service for data archiving and long-term backup. Customers can reliably store large or small amounts of data for as little as $0.007 per gigabyte per month, a significant savings compared to on-premises solutions. To keep costs low, Amazon Glacier is optimized for infrequently accessed data where a retrieval time of several hours is suitable.

SoftLayer provides cloud infrastructure as a service from a growing number of data centers and network points of presence around the world. Our customers range from Web startups to global enterprises.

Products and services include bare metal and virtual servers, networking, turnkey big data solutions, private cloud solutions, and more. Our unique advantages include the industry's first Network-Within-a-Network topology for true out-of-band access, and an easy-to-use customer portal and robust API for full remote-access of all product and service management options.

Sample Customers

King Cpunty, Illumina, Backupify, Nearmap.com, Scribd, Baylor College of Medicine, SoundCloud

Whogohost Ltd., Skypicker, Infinity Computers and Communications Company, Grace Co. Ltd., Keyword, Uvionics Tech, Tennis Australia, immixGroup, Salesbox, Cxense ASA, Avnet Inc., Komsomolskaya Pravda, Seekr

Buyer's Guide

Amazon S3 Glacier vs. IBM SoftLayer

October 2024

Free Report: Amazon S3 Glacier vs. IBM SoftLayer

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon S3 Glacier vs. IBM SoftLayer and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon S3 Glacier vs. IBM SoftLayer report.

See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.