Amazon S3 Glacier and Oracle Cloud Object Storage are both powerful solutions for long-term data storage. Amazon S3 Glacier is favored for its affordability and ease of use, while Oracle Cloud Object Storage is noted for its advanced feature set and scalability, which many users find justifies its cost.
Features: Amazon S3 Glacier is known for its cost-efficiency, reliable data retrieval options, and straightforward usability. Oracle Cloud Object Storage offers seamless integration with other Oracle services, robust APIs, and advanced features that cater to complex storage needs.
Room for Improvement: Amazon S3 Glacier needs faster data retrieval times, better documentation, and enhanced user interface. Oracle Cloud Object Storage requires improvements in user documentation, a less steep learning curve, and more intuitive usage options.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon S3 Glacier is noted for its easy deployment and responsive customer service. Oracle Cloud Object Storage can be complex to deploy but is supported by comprehensive customer service, focusing on long-term support.
Pricing and ROI: Amazon S3 Glacier is highly cost-effective for long-term data storage. Oracle Cloud Object Storage has a higher initial setup cost but offers better ROI due to its advanced features and scalability, with users generally finding the higher price justifiable by its capabilities.
If AWS improves support and cost management, there would be fewer reasons for users to consider other cloud platforms.
As it is Amazon S3 Glacier, it is used only for archival purposes, so it is comparatively okay to use it, and we can save money compared to the standard which is high.
There is room for improvement in providing more skilled and comprehensive solutions.
They provide documentation and resolve issues.
If it is a business plan, then the support we have is really good.
When issues arise, it takes them at least three to four hours to respond.
I have a premium subscription for Oracle Cloud, which ensures a high level of support.
Oracle is more cost-effective than competitors.
Amazon S3 Glacier auto-scales according to the data.
Amazon S3 Glacier is infinitely scalable, with no issues on our end.
Glacier has excellent scalability, with elasticity and security that meet industry standards.
The scalability of Oracle Cloud Object Storage deserves a perfect ten as it can be scaled easily.
We can adjust the number of CPUs as per our need and reduce the load.
It is specifically designed for cold storage.
I do not experience any stability issues.
Amazon S3 Glacier is quite stable, nine out of ten.
The system is stable, especially when set up in a single region.
I would like to see improvements in the transfer rate as it takes quite a long time to retrieve data from Glacier compared to standard S3 storage.
Support could be more robust, with a focus on providing comprehensive solutions even for novel issues.
Another improvement is making Glacier available in all regions.
The product can be difficult to use compared to how it is marketed.
I would like to know about integration with other Oracle Cloud services and whether it is easy to integrate Oracle Cloud Object Storage with other Oracle Cloud solutions.
The retrievability for Oracle Cloud Object Storage could be made simpler through the implementation of a GUI interface to retrieve data.
Compared to competitors like GCP, AWS can work on reducing hidden costs and overall pricing to retain startups and medium-sized businesses.
The storage cost is minimal, which is beneficial for archival purposes.
While it's generally cost-effective, the pricing model could be clearer.
The pricing for Oracle Cloud Object Storage deserves a perfect ten as it is very inexpensive.
It is an expensive product.
The pricing for Oracle Cloud is comparable to other cloud providers.
Glacier greatly helps in managing storage costs by moving historical data to a lower-cost storage option.
The security features include object lock encryption and immutability options, so we can use this for backups.
The most valuable features of Amazon S3 Glacier are its cost-effectiveness for data archiving and its durability.
High availability, a large dataset, and stability are our main criteria for using this solution.
I find manageability, scalability, and security of the product most valuable.
It also provides multi-region support, enhancing data accessibility and safety.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Amazon S3 Glacier | 14.5% |
| Oracle Cloud Object Storage | 3.7% |
| Other | 81.8% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 25 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 13 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
Amazon Glacier is a secure, durable, and extremely low-cost cloud storage service for data archiving and long-term backup. Customers can reliably store large or small amounts of data for as little as $0.007 per gigabyte per month, a significant savings compared to on-premises solutions. To keep costs low, Amazon Glacier is optimized for infrequently accessed data where a retrieval time of several hours is suitable.
Scale with no new hardware - eliminates new capital expenditures, opens up data center space and reduces power and cooling requirements.
Elastic storage - shared infrastructure allows for infinite scalability. Eliminates forecasting and long procurement cycles.
Pay as you go and subscription models - purchase capacity with no commitment or reduce costs with longer-term agreements
Simple to manage industry standard OpenStack and RESTful APIs streamline management integration, freeing resources to accelerate other cloud projects.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
