Amazon S3 Glacier vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Oracle are both solutions in the Public Cloud Storage Services category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.7, while Oracle is ranked #12 with an average rating of 9.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 17.4% mindshare in PCSS, compared to Oracle’s 4.3% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Amazon S3 Glacier

Read 38 Amazon S3 Glacier reviews

4,756 Views
4,059 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Read 4 Oracle Cloud Object Storage reviews

1,126 Views
1,055 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon S3 Glacier

Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

Amazon S3 Glacier and Oracle Cloud Object Storage are both powerful solutions for long-term data storage. Amazon S3 Glacier is favored for its affordability and ease of use, while Oracle Cloud Object Storage is noted for its advanced feature set and scalability, which many users find justifies its cost.

Features: Amazon S3 Glacier is known for its cost-efficiency, reliable data retrieval options, and straightforward usability. Oracle Cloud Object Storage offers seamless integration with other Oracle services, robust APIs, and advanced features that cater to complex storage needs.

Room for Improvement: Amazon S3 Glacier needs faster data retrieval times, better documentation, and enhanced user interface. Oracle Cloud Object Storage requires improvements in user documentation, a less steep learning curve, and more intuitive usage options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon S3 Glacier is noted for its easy deployment and responsive customer service. Oracle Cloud Object Storage can be complex to deploy but is supported by comprehensive customer service, focusing on long-term support.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon S3 Glacier is highly cost-effective for long-term data storage. Oracle Cloud Object Storage has a higher initial setup cost but offers better ROI due to its advanced features and scalability, with users generally finding the higher price justifiable by its capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Amazon S3 Glacier

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

12th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Amazon S3 Glacier is 17.4%, up from 15.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Cloud Object Storage is 4.3%, up from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Public Cloud Storage Services

Featured Reviews

Alan Bloor

Geographic Information System Developer at Public Sector

A powerful hosting service with an extensive code interface

Their pricing structure is always a big topic. It's so difficult to understand. I had a personal account once, and I was so scared to type in my credit card because I wasn't sure how much I would be charged. At home, I might turn on the VM to test something, and I might be on there for three minutes wondering how much it could cost. The solution might tell you there are so many hours of free usage and a free VM, but it's still scary because you don't know how much it will cost, even if you go over one second. The price structure needs massive simplifying and made crystal clear so people know what they're paying.

Read full review

Jonatas Pereira

IT Infrastructure Manager at Lojas Renner SA

Useful for businesses to archive their information

I don't use the tool directly. Based on what my team says, from one to ten, if one is difficult and ten is easy, I rate the product's initial setup phase as a nine. A technical person took care of the product's installation phase. The solution is deployed on the private and public clouds. The tool is majorly deployed on a private cloud. I use the cloud services from Microsoft Azure. The solution can be deployed in a period of two years. For deployment in the infrastructure, we had five people who are infrastructure specialists. About twenty people needed development, and the team consisted of analysts and specialists. For infrastructure, there were five people as specialists for Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI). Though we use too much of Azure, OCI is the biggest product for our company. Azure is managed by a medium number of people. There are five people to take care of the clouds.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"We get free credits from Amazon, and we like the overall stability. We haven't had to rely heavily on their customer success teams, which is a good sign."

"The solution is stable."

"Its auto-scaling capabilities allow us to add data continuously without needing to pre-provision storage."

"I find Amazon S3 Glacier valuable for storing various documents like purchase orders, standard documents, and drawings."

"Amazon S3 Glacier is a very cheap storage, where we store infrequently used data."

"The solution’s storage management is good and dynamic. The product is highly stable. The solution is highly scalable. The customer service and support is good. The initial setup is straightforward. I recommend the solution."

"Amazon S3 Glacier is a highly stable solution."

More Amazon S3 Glacier pros

"The most valuable features of the tool are scalability and security."

"One key feature is that you can make buckets private, requiring pre-authentication and using a specific URL for access. Additionally, the buckets are encrypted by default. The flexibility of public or private buckets and how you grant access are vital security features."

"The solution's most valuable features are its speed, unlimited space, and simplicity of use."

"The technical support for the solution was very nice."

Cons

"The cost can be lower."

"The technical support has room for improvement."

"I would like to see improved storage capacity and enhanced security features for better protection."

"The stability must be improved."

"The solution's cost optimization could be improved."

"I am unsure if the product provides good integration capabilities. From an improvement perspective, I want the tool to provide easier integration features."

"The solution's pricing is too expensive and could be improved."

"The response times could be faster. When you are with Amazon and use Glacier, you expect a response time between four to seven hours to retrieve the data."

More Amazon S3 Glacier cons

"Oracle Cloud Object Storage needs to have an additional bucket for security."

"Sometimes, there are glitches with applying policies. Even when the policy is correct, it might not work consistently. We need to troubleshoot to see if it's a user error or if the policy itself needs adjustment. It usually works after refreshing, but that inconsistency is a minor complexity."

"Cost-wise, it is not an affordable tool if you allocate space, and try to use it some other day."

"The solution should provide more customization and the possibility of doing more manual tasks."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Customers prefer Amazon S3 Glacier because it is a cheap and pay-as-you-go solution."

"Amazon S3 Glacier is a little expensive solution."

"The product is cheap."

"Amazon S3 Glacier is not an expensive solution, and it has a pay-as-you-go pricing model."

"Amazon S3 Glacier has a good pricing point, and you pay for what's being used."

"The price point at which the product is available is pretty good."

"Amazon S3 Glacier is very cheap, but the cost becomes a concern when you have a very large amount of data."

"The pricing is average and reasonable. It varies depending on the region."

More Amazon S3 Glacier pricing and cost advice

"During the billing cycle, if I use the tool only for a day, I still need to pay you for a month."

"Oracle Cloud Object Storage might not be that expensive compared to on-premises solutions."

"Disaster recovery (DR) can be expensive."

"We have a yearly subscription for the product."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

34%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

University

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Amazon's S3 Glacier or EBS (Elastic Block Store)?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon's S3 Glacier or Elastic Block Store data storage software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Amazon's S3 Glacier, whi...

See all answers

What do you like most about Amazon S3 Glacier?

I like creating buckets where data can be segregated at a high level and then routing the appropriate data to each designated bucket. In terms of value, I would say that the tool gets the job done ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon S3 Glacier?

I would like to see improvements in the transfer rate as it takes quite a long time to retrieve data from Glacier compared to standard S3 storage. Additionally, improvements in configuration manage...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Cloud Object Storage?

The solution's most valuable features are its speed, unlimited space, and simplicity of use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Cloud Object Storage?

Cost-wise, it is not an affordable tool if you allocate space, and try to use it some other day. During the billing cycle, if I use the tool only for a day, I still need to pay you for a month. The...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Cloud Object Storage?

In my opinion, the tool's performance is very good. If Oracle can improve the tool's performance and make it better, then it would be good. There should be some kind of integration with other platf...

See all answers

Comparisons

Google Cloud Storage Nearline vs Amazon S3 Glacier

Compared 49% of the time

Google Cloud Storage vs Amazon S3 Glacier

Compared 16% of the time

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Amazon S3 Glacier

Compared 9% of the time

Wasabi vs Amazon S3 Glacier

Compared 8% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Amazon S3 Glacier

Compared 8% of the time

More Amazon S3 Glacier Competitors

Amazon S3 vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Compared 54% of the time

Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Compared 17% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle Database Backup Service vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Compared 7% of the time

Google Cloud Storage vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Compared 7% of the time

More Oracle Cloud Object Storage Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon S3 Glacier

December 2024

Download Amazon S3 Glacier product report

Buyer's Guide

Public Cloud Storage Services

December 2024

Download Oracle Cloud Object Storage product report

Also Known As

Amazon Glacier

No data available

Learn More

Video not available

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Oracle

Overview

Amazon Glacier is a secure, durable, and extremely low-cost cloud storage service for data archiving and long-term backup. Customers can reliably store large or small amounts of data for as little as $0.007 per gigabyte per month, a significant savings compared to on-premises solutions. To keep costs low, Amazon Glacier is optimized for infrequently accessed data where a retrieval time of several hours is suitable.

Scale with no new hardware - eliminates new capital expenditures, opens up data center space and reduces power and cooling requirements.

Elastic storage - shared infrastructure allows for infinite scalability. Eliminates forecasting and long procurement cycles.

Pay as you go and subscription models - purchase capacity with no commitment or reduce costs with longer-term agreements

Simple to manage industry standard OpenStack and RESTful APIs streamline management integration, freeing resources to accelerate other cloud projects.

Sample Customers

King Cpunty, Illumina, Backupify, Nearmap.com, Scribd, Baylor College of Medicine, SoundCloud

Brinks

Buyer's Guide

Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage

December 2024

Free Report: Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage report.

See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.