Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Apache JMeter vs HCL AppScan comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Apache JMeter
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
92
Ranking in other categories
Performance Testing Tools (1st), Load Testing Tools (1st), API Testing Tools (3rd)
HCL AppScan
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
43
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (15th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (12th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Quality Assurance solutions, they serve different purposes. Apache JMeter is designed for Performance Testing Tools and holds a mindshare of 24.4%, up 22.6% compared to last year.
HCL AppScan, on the other hand, focuses on Application Security Tools, holds 2.7% mindshare, down 2.8% since last year.
Performance Testing Tools
Application Security Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Swetha Mahasivbhattu - PeerSpot reviewer
Cost-effective performance and useful insights with an easy setup
It is very user-friendly. We just upload the script, and the dashboards are very informative. It's useful for both the person conducting the test and the higher management, like project managers or senior executives, who may not know about the test. They can easily view the results and gain valuable insights. Additionally, monetary benefits with Apache JMeter are notable since it doesn’t require a licensed version.
Rishi Anupam - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable and scalable scanning solution with good reporting feature
The solution is used for the vulnerabilities scan on the network side The reporting part is the most valuable feature. The penetration testing feature should be included. I have been using the solution for four years. It is a stable solution. I rate it seven out of ten. It is a scalable…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"To me, what's most valuable in Apache JMeter is that it's a lightweight tool for application testing. It's the best load-testing tool for my company because Apache JMeter simulates your application during testing. Apache JMeter also creates threads with good server utilization. Apache JMeter allows you to focus on analyzing the situation, looking into measurements, response time, and client-server responses, which I find valuable."
"The most valuable feature in JMeter is the Thread Group, which helps us to see whether the performance is good."
"JMeter is basically the art of the entire performance testing process."
"Monetary benefits with Apache JMeter are notable since it doesn’t require a licensed version."
"It is scalable. It is cloud-based."
"User-friendly and open source."
"We find the load testing feature valuable."
"A lot of things are valuable. It is free. It has a lot of features, such as report generation and integration with CI/CD, which makes it very competitive with the other paid solutions available in the market. It is a good solution."
"AppScan's most valuable features include its ability to identify vulnerabilities accurately, provide detailed remediation steps, and the newly introduced AI-powered features that enhance its functionality further."
"It highlights, with several grades of severity, the types of vulnerabilities, so we can focus on the most severe security vulnerabilities in the code."
"The product is useful, particularly in its sensitivity and scanning capabilities."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution...The initial setup or installation of HCL AppScan is easy."
"It's generally a very user-friendly tool. Anyone can easily learn how to scan"
"There's extensive functionality with custom rules and a custom knowledge base."
"The UI was very intuitive."
"Technical support is helpful."
 

Cons

"The reports in Apache JMeter could improve."
"The tool needs to have a better Graphical User Interface. Many of the solution's features are difficult to understand due to the complex user interface and user experience. The product needs to add plugins. It should also work on the integration with external partners like IDE and API gateways."
"It should start supporting the presentation layer. It currently provides performance testing specifically at the application and API level. It can be extended to the presentation layer, which includes mainly Angular and React frameworks. It should also be easy to use and easy to train people."
"The solution is not user-friendly, there is no framework for autocorrelation or parameterization."
"It should be easier to combine multiple scripts. If you have multiple scripts, you need to write a new script to combine those scripts. The virtual user generator is slow."
"They should improve the solution on its UI front."
"JMeter's reporting is extremely rudimentary. The fundamental reporting mechanisms need to be drastically improved. It doesn't utilize an automatic session management mechanism or methods other tools use like parsing cookies and variables. Everything needs to be done manually. There's no automation."
"We would like more documentation to be provided for the advanced level features that are available in this solution, in order to improve development."
"AppScan needs to improve its handling of false positives."
"In future releases, I would like to see more aggressive reports. I would also like to see less false positives."
"We would like to see a check in the specific vulnerabilities in mobile applications or rooted devices, such as jailbreaking devices."
"The databases for HCL are small and have room for improvement."
"A desktop version should be added."
"IBM Security AppScan needs to add performance optimization for quickly scanning the target web applications."
"They should have a better UI for dashboards."
"They could incorporate AI to enhance vulnerability detection and improve the product's reporting capabilities."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Apache JMeter is a free, open-source solution."
"Since we are using an outsourced solution, it is not paid for by our company."
"No licensing is required as it is a free, open-source tool."
"We didn't pay licensing fees for Apache JMeter because it's an open-source tool. We only paid for the machines where we installed Apache JMeter modules."
"Apache JMeter is far less expensive than HP Performance Center."
"I was using the free version of the software."
"The solution is open source with no user fees or licenses."
"JMeter is open source, so there are no licensing costs associated with it."
"The price is very expensive."
"The solution is cheap."
"Pricing was the main reason that we went ahead with this solution as they were the lowest in the market."
"Our clients are willing to pay the extra money. It is expensive."
"The product is moderately priced, though it's an investment due to extensive code analysis needs."
"AppScan is a little bit expensive. IBM needs to work a little bit on the pricing model, decreasing the license cost."
"With the features, that they offer, and the support, they offer, AppScan pricing is on a higher level."
"The price of HCL AppScan is okay, in my opinion. You just buy HCL AppScan and don't pay anything anymore, meaning it is just a one-time purchase."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
830,726 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Postman compare with Apache JMeter?
Postman lets you easily define variables, which then get updated automatically. This is a huge time-saver and makes processes very efficient. We can also export the test cases we create and share t...
How does BlazeMeter compare with Apache JMeter?
Blazemeter is a continuous testing platform that provides scriptless test automation. It unifies functional and performance testing, enabling users to monitor and test public and private APIs. We ...
What do you like most about Apache JMeter?
I appreciate JMeter's simplicity and power for performance testing.
What do you like most about HCL AppScan?
The most valuable feature of HCL AppScan is its integration with the SDLC, particularly during the coding phase.
What needs improvement with HCL AppScan?
AppScan needs to improve its handling of false positives. It also requires enhancements in customer support, similar to what Veracode provides. Regularly scheduling calls with clients to discuss fe...
What is your primary use case for HCL AppScan?
The primary use case for AppScan is for security purposes. I compare AppScan with other tools such as Veracode. We use AppScan for vulnerability detection and auto-remediation of vulnerabilities wi...
 

Also Known As

JMeter
IBM Security AppScan, Rational AppScan, AppScan
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

AOL, Orbitz, Innopath Software, PrepMe, Sapient, Corporate Express Australia, CSIRO, Ephibian, Talis, DATACOM, ALALOOP, eFusion, Panter, Sourcepole, University of Western Cape
Essex Technology Group Inc., Cisco, West Virginia University, APIS IT
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Tricentis, OpenText and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: January 2025.
830,726 professionals have used our research since 2012.