Apiary vs webMethods.io comparison

Oracle and IBM are both solutions in the API Management category. Oracle is ranked #37, while IBM is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.7. Oracle holds a 0.7% mindshare in APIM, compared to IBM’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Apiary

Read 4 Apiary reviews

615 Views
615 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 94 webMethods.io reviews

9,029 Views
2,618 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Apiary

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Apiary and webMethods.io compete in the API management and integration platforms sector. webMethods.io is considered superior due to its advanced feature set and integration capabilities, despite Apiary offering favorable pricing and support ratings based on data comparisons.

Features: Apiary offers collaborative API design, testing capabilities, and supports both Swagger (OpenAPI Specification) and API Blueprint. It integrates with GitHub for version management. webMethods.io provides comprehensive integration features, advanced mapping, and orchestrating capabilities suitable for complex environments. It also offers robust connectors, API gateway functionality, and scalable integration solutions.

Room for Improvement: Apiary could improve by enhancing its integration features, providing more robust connectors, and expanding its enterprise capabilities. It would benefit from advanced orchestration features and better scalability for larger environments. webMethods.io might enhance its API governance features, improve user interface friendliness, and offer more competitive pricing options for smaller businesses or startups. It could focus on simplifying its setup process for non-enterprise users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: webMethods.io is known for streamlined deployment and robust support services catering to enterprise-scale implementations. It allows for scalability and quick integration. Apiary offers easy deployment with a focus on API design and prototyping, appealing to agile teams and startups looking for quick project setups.

Pricing and ROI: Apiary's pricing is competitive, making it appealing to startups and mid-sized businesses looking for cost-effective API management. The swift ROI is realized through reduced design and development time. webMethods.io, though having a higher setup cost, justifies its price with enhanced integration features that are beneficial for large enterprises managing extensive API ecosystems. Its ROI is seen in scalability and comprehensive integration capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Apiary vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Apiary vs. webMethods.io

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apiary

Ranking in API Management

37th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

webMethods.io

Ranking in API Management

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (5th), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (11th), Cloud Data Integration (10th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Apiary is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 2.4%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
webMethods.io	2.4%
Apiary	0.7%
Other	96.9%

API Management

Featured Reviews

Phil Wilkins

Enterprise Integration Architect at Capgemini

The ability to configure rules to check for consistency has helped

Apiary provides a free tier of the platform which allows a small group of developers to collaborate easily on the design of open source APIs. In addition to this, it provides mock endpoints allowing people to experiment with the API without depending or having to stand up a real backend. With our clients, using Apiary allows us to very quickly pull together an API definition (particularly when using API Blueprint). The whole API design process for the simpler use cases can be done in a relatively short workshop which makes it a lot easier to agree, publish, version-manage an API definition with suitable documentation. This can then be evolved and enhanced (particularly in the documentation aspects). With the ability to support Swagger (Open API v2 and introducing/ed support for v3) and API Blueprint makes it a very versatile tool.

Read full review

Yashraj Makwana

Developer at a hospitality company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Offers strong integration capabilities and reliable features but needs pricing and scaling improvements

Many things are evolving with the AI buzz in the market. What I would like to see improved or enhanced in webMethods.io in the future is that since webMethods.io is already under IBM, I think IBM will introduce and integrate AI into it. Additionally, regarding what webMethods.io can improve is the license cost. Other cloud players are also providing the same kind of functionality, such as AWS and Azure. webMethods.io is being installed on-premises, but AWS is providing it directly in the cloud. When comparing the license cost and request per minute cost, webMethods.io needs to address that. There are many competitors in the market for this.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I find the generation of mock services very useful, especially when demonstrating for new consumers."

"In two years, there was one time the service was down for an hour or so."

"I do like the overall performance of the solution."

"Git integration"

"Quick and easy way to share a new API design with teams."

"The tool supports gRPC."

"This solution has given us a competitive advantage because we have better automation and insight."

"webMethods API Portal is overall very valuable. It is now a comprehensive API catalogue that serves various purposes, including API assessment and evaluation."

"webMethods Trading Networks is a stable solution."

"The messaging part is the most valuable feature."

"Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature."

"It's a visual tool, so our transformations can be quickly implemented without a lot of fuss. The fact that we have an easy way to expose REST services is also very interesting. It offers the possibility to connect over GMS to synchronize message brokers."

"It integrates well with various servers."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"I would like an integrated option to download a Swagger version of the definition."

"The Oracle release cycle is very bad because the patches only update once a year."

"Swagger (OpenAPI Specification) and Blueprint Support"

"The price should be reduced to make it more affordable."

"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."

"The installation process should be simplified for first time users and be made more user-friendly."

"The patching of infrastructure is not very smooth and improved authentication should be added in the next feature."

"With performance, there is room for improvement in regards to if we would like to put another extra layer of security on it, such as SSL. This is affecting their performance quite significantly. They need to improve the process of managing the SSL and other things inside their solutions, so there will not be quite such a significant impact to the performance."

"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."

"We need more dashboards and reporting engines that can provide detailed information for management. In short, we need better analytics."

"A potential drawback of webMethods.io API is its adaptability to legacy systems, which can vary in compatibility."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a free subscription option to start and try the service."

"It is easy to get started with personal (free) accounts, but a subscription is required for additional features."

"The pricing is a yearly license."

"webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them."

"Always plan five years ahead and don’t jeopardize the quality of your project by dropping items from the bill of materials."

"It is an expensive tool. I rate the product price a nine out of ten, where ten means it is very expensive."

"There is a license needed to use the webMethods Integration Server."

"It's a good deal for the money that we pay."

"This is an expensive product and we may replace it with something more reasonably priced."

"Currently, the licensing solution for this product is pretty straightforward. The way that Software AG has moved in their licensing agreements is very understandable. It is very easy for you to see where things land. Like most vendors today, they are transaction based. Therefore, just having a good understanding of how many transactions that you are doing a year would be very wise. Luckily, there are opportunities to work with the vendor to get a good understanding of how many transactions you have and what is the right limit for you to fall under."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	64

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

Apigee vs Apiary

Compared 36% of the time

Postman Enterprise vs Apiary

Compared 34% of the time

SwaggerHub vs Apiary

Compared 30% of the time

More Apiary Competitors

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 5% of the time

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 5% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 3% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

API Management

January 2026

Download Apiary product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

January 2026

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

No data available

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

Apiary's pioneering APIFlow solution provides the framework and tools for developing application programming interfaces (APIs) that share enterprise services and data and help create modern, cloud-based applications and experiences. APIFlow spans the API creation lifecycle, including design, governance, testing, and documentation, while supporting API Blueprint and OpenAPI industry standardsץ

Oracle

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

Microsoft, salesforce.com, Bloomberg, GoodData, Viacom, Akamai Technologies, DigitalGlobe

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

Apiary vs. webMethods.io

February 2026

Free Report: Apiary vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about Apiary vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apiary vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best API Management vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.