Arcserve UDP vs OpenText Data Protector comparison

Arcserve and OpenText are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Arcserve is ranked #23 with an average rating of 6.9, while OpenText is ranked #26 with an average rating of 9.0. Arcserve holds a 1.1% mindshare in BRS, compared to OpenText’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Arcserve users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Arcserve UDP

Read 44 Arcserve UDP reviews

2,739 Views
2,328 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

OpenText Data Protector

Read 102 OpenText Data Protector reviews

2,452 Views
2,207 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Arcserve UDP

OpenText Data Protector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Arcserve UDP and OpenText Data Protector are two robust solutions in the data protection market. OpenText Data Protector has the upper hand due to its extensive features that justify its higher cost.

Features: Arcserve UDP is praised for its comprehensive backup and recovery features, ease of use, and reliable performance. OpenText Data Protector stands out with its advanced data governance, scalability, and appeals to enterprises with complex needs. Users find OpenText more feature-rich despite the steeper learning curve.

Room for Improvement: Arcserve UDP users suggest enhancing its cloud integration and improving reporting capabilities. OpenText Data Protector users desire a more intuitive setup process and faster issue resolution from support. The scope for improvement in both products highlights distinct user priorities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Arcserve UDP is noted for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. OpenText Data Protector, although more intricate to deploy, benefits from detailed documentation and a supportive user community. Both products offer dependable customer service, but Arcserve's simplicity scores higher with users.

Pricing and ROI: Arcserve UDP is recognized for its cost-effectiveness and predictable licensing, offering substantial ROI for small to mid-sized businesses. OpenText Data Protector, though initially more expensive, delivers value through its advanced capabilities and is often seen as a worthwhile investment for large enterprises despite its higher cost.

To learn more, read our detailed Arcserve UDP vs. OpenText Data Protector Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Arcserve UDP vs. OpenText Data Protector

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,435 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Arcserve UDP

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

23rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (17th)

OpenText Data Protector

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

26th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Arcserve UDP is 1.1%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Data Protector is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Arcserve UDP	1.1%
OpenText Data Protector	0.9%
Other	98.0%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Sergio Itikawa

Software Solutions Architect at SPEData

Has supported hybrid IT environments effectively and offers strong data protection

With Arcserve UDP, the most valuable feature is to improve persistent data, which I consider important. I use other products too, not only Arcserve UDP, as we use TrueNAS as well. Arcserve UDP improves the precision of data. I have utilized Arcserve UDP's data deduplication feature, and the data deduplication feature helps my storage efficiency significantly. I have used Arcserve UDP's continuous data protection. It is beneficial for operational continuity because we use it constantly and have no objections to Arcserve UDP technology; I think it is very good. Arcserve UDP's integration with multiple operating systems is very good and very efficient. This brings value for me since many of my clients have different operating systems like Windows and Linux; there is no problem. Regarding the deduplication and compression with Arcserve UDP, I think Arcserve UDP is still a solid solution that we primarily use.

Read full review

reviewer1751496

Project Manager and Technical Consultant at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Provides effective backup for physical servers and needs improvements for cloud compatibility

We use OpenText Data Protector for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security OpenText Data Protector is good for physical backup, specifically for physical servers. It is effective for direct backups to EMC library or storage without using a repository. However,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Easy restoration and the solution works quickly."

"The recovery part of the product is very good."

"The most valuable feature of Arcserve UDP is its decompression capability."

"We are satisfied with Arcserve UDP. The most important feature that we use and why we choose this product is the RHA feature."

"It is very stable."

"Our customers are happy with the product’s functionality."

"The standard backup and restore feature is most used."

"This product is extremely user-friendly and it is capable of performing large-scale archive/backup (five+ years worth). It is easy to store, maintain, and check backups."

More Arcserve UDP pros

"The file system backup (by far, the most used) is the most valuable feature."

"The dashboards in Micro Focus Data Protector are very good. They are similar to the dashboards in Veeam Backup & Replication."

"What we find most valuable in Micro Focus Data Protector is that it provides Japanese data protection, for example, it protects information such as the full Japanese name, address, etc."

"It is a traditional backup model. If you talk about file server and the official Windows database, it's a stable product."

"Regarding scalability, it's unlimited with Data Protector. You can link multiple installations and let them work together. They can share backup devices. You have many possibilities with Data Protector. It's very proficient."

"In one of the projects involving a database and UCMDB integration, we needed to manage a large database. We used the scheduling feature in Data Protector to automate backups."

"Micro Focus Data Protector's most valuable feature is its interaction with the fiber share. It is easy to use, we use it to back up without any problem to VTLs, and can use the Fiber Channel that is still the TCP."

"It's supports Unix, Linux, all of the OS's. It's very stable software."

More OpenText Data Protector pros

Cons

"In the most recent version of premium plus the replication has been removed, and it should re-added to the solution."

"Arcserve UDP is in the middle range of complexity. The interface can be developed a little bit more to be user-friendly."

"It takes much time to verify and consolidate images for backups."

"One of the biggest drawbacks of Arcserve UDP is that it does not have a single console, making it an area that needs to be considered for improvement."

"The product is not user-friendly."

"StorageCraft ShadowProtect can improve by making one console that can control backups of all desktops and servers in one place. Additionally, the recovery process of the backups is very slow and could improve. It's very slow when we went to recover a complete disc but to recover one file is very fast."

"Based on my experience, whenever we need support, there are difficulties with communication when trying to resolve the issue."

"The initial setup was complex."

More Arcserve UDP cons

"The downside of the flexibility on offer is if you over-configure it, it may fail to function as some configurations may not match."

"OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup."

"Many of our users complain about the GUI. You still need to rely on the command line interface. Because it originated as a Unix system, Data Protector is still a command line-driven solution, which makes it seem rather dated compared to systems that are built around a GUI from day one. It doesn't affect the functionality, but some people don't find it user-friendly."

"The challenge is that we can't restore a single file from the VM in the data process when we do VM backups. But with Commvault, you can restore a single file even if you have a VM snapshot package. That's one drawback of this tool. When we do VM backups, it should help us browse the VMs to restore a single file instead of doing the complete VM restore."

"I'm uncertain if it supports virtual machine backup and restoration. If they could enhance this aspect, they could gain more support from end users."

"VMware backup integration and cloud recovery is lacking."

"It's very expensive compared to Veeam and other similar solutions."

"OpenText Data Protector is more difficult to use and configure than OpenText VIM. The user-friendliness of OpenText Data Protector has to be increased, and the complexity of the tool needs to be reduced."

More OpenText Data Protector cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of this product is high and it should be lower."

"The pricing of the product can be considered to be reasonable enough for the Asian region."

"The price is based on the number of sockets. We use a four-socket price that includes two servers and the cost is $4,375."

"I do not work with the pricing or licensing issues of the solution for our organization."

"In comparison to other vendors, it is a low-cost solution."

"The pricing is moderate."

"Its price seems reasonable. Its price is average as compared to the other products I've looked at. We have a three-year license right now. There are no other costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a four or five out of ten."

More Arcserve UDP pricing and cost advice

"The licensing cost was not annual. We didn't pay any license. We paid when we deployed and we didn't pay for anything after that. There were no additional fees after the initial payment."

"Our licensing is on a capacity basis."

"Data Protector's pricing is very competitive and we have no issues in this regard. I would give it an eight out of ten in terms of pricing."

"The license for the solution is very expensive compared to the other products in the market."

"They have two types of licensing, one is for storage capacity and the other is client licensing. The capacity licensing here is a bit expensive."

"The licensing cost is too high."

"The product is cheaper than Commvault."

"Pricing/licensing is Data Protector's single best offering. In its most basic environment, the only license required is for whatever target device is required."

More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,435 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Performing Arts

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	24
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	28
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	61

Questions from the Community

Major Differences Between These 4 Backup and Disaster Recovery Solutions?

Comparing the features of the four is not the right approach. You need to develop a list of requirements for backup and DR that are specific to your organization and then compare each of the four ...

See all answers

What do you like most about StorageCraft ShadowProtect?

The interface is very refined, works fine, and is very intuitive most of the time. Scalability is nice. The multi-tenancy feature is very welcome. The integration with Linux works fine too.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for StorageCraft ShadowProtect?

Regarding the setup cost for Arcserve UDP, it is significantly important, but the price is similar to all our options where clients need to have backup on-premises and replication in the cloud.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?

The solution is expensive as it requires purchasing all features without the option to negotiate based on client numbers, unlike Veeam which offers flexibility in pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?

OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup. It lacks functions and facilities compared to Veeam, which offers more user-friendliness for virtual machine backups. Ther...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Data Protector?

We use OpenText Data Protector ( /products/opentext-data-protector-reviews ) for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security.

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs Arcserve UDP

Compared 15% of the time

Rubrik vs Arcserve UDP

Compared 6% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs Arcserve UDP

Compared 6% of the time

Dell PowerProtect Data Domain vs Arcserve UDP

Compared 5% of the time

Veritas Backup Exec vs Arcserve UDP

Compared 4% of the time

More Arcserve UDP Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 23% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 9% of the time

Dell Avamar vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Data Protector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Arcserve UDP

January 2026

Download Arcserve UDP product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector

December 2025

Download OpenText Data Protector product report

Also Known As

StorageCraft ShadowProtect, StorageCraft Backup Analyzer

Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector

Overview

Arcserve UDP is a comprehensive solution that empowers even a one-person IT department to protect virtual and physical environments with a high degree of simplicity. It allows you to design and manage your entire data protection strategy with a unified management console, and enables you to scale your data backup coverage as your organization grows with the push of a button.

Arcserve

OpenText Data Protector standardizes and consolidates backups across multiple platforms. It provides secure, comprehensive backup protection for business-critical data and applications whether virtual, physical, or online in the cloud.

OpenText

Sample Customers

ITPS, North Hertfordshire Homes, SEMIKRON, Kajaani University of Applied Sciences, Test Valley Borough Council, EK Services

GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company

Buyer's Guide

Arcserve UDP vs. OpenText Data Protector

December 2025

Free Report: Arcserve UDP vs. OpenText Data Protector

Find out what your peers are saying about Arcserve UDP vs. OpenText Data Protector and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,435 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Arcserve UDP vs. OpenText Data Protector report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.