Arcserve UDP vs OpenText Data Protector comparison

Arcserve and OpenText are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Arcserve is ranked #23 with an average rating of 6.9, while OpenText is ranked #26 with an average rating of 9.0. Arcserve holds a 1.1% mindshare in BRS, compared to OpenText’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Arcserve users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Arcserve UDP

Read 44 Arcserve UDP reviews

2,739 Views
2,328 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

OpenText Data Protector

Read 102 OpenText Data Protector reviews

2,452 Views
2,207 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Arcserve UDP

OpenText Data Protector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Arcserve UDP and OpenText Data Protector are two robust solutions in the data protection market. OpenText Data Protector has the upper hand due to its extensive features that justify its higher cost.

Features: Arcserve UDP is praised for its comprehensive backup and recovery features, ease of use, and reliable performance. OpenText Data Protector stands out with its advanced data governance, scalability, and appeals to enterprises with complex needs. Users find OpenText more feature-rich despite the steeper learning curve.

Room for Improvement: Arcserve UDP users suggest enhancing its cloud integration and improving reporting capabilities. OpenText Data Protector users desire a more intuitive setup process and faster issue resolution from support. The scope for improvement in both products highlights distinct user priorities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Arcserve UDP is noted for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. OpenText Data Protector, although more intricate to deploy, benefits from detailed documentation and a supportive user community. Both products offer dependable customer service, but Arcserve's simplicity scores higher with users.

Pricing and ROI: Arcserve UDP is recognized for its cost-effectiveness and predictable licensing, offering substantial ROI for small to mid-sized businesses. OpenText Data Protector, though initially more expensive, delivers value through its advanced capabilities and is often seen as a worthwhile investment for large enterprises despite its higher cost.

To learn more, read our detailed Arcserve UDP vs. OpenText Data Protector Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Arcserve UDP vs. OpenText Data Protector

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,443 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Arcserve UDP

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

23rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (17th)

OpenText Data Protector

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

26th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Arcserve UDP is 1.1%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Data Protector is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Arcserve UDP	1.1%
OpenText Data Protector	0.9%
Other	98.0%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Sergio Itikawa

Software Solutions Architect at SPEData

Has supported hybrid IT environments effectively and offers strong data protection

With Arcserve UDP, the most valuable feature is to improve persistent data, which I consider important. I use other products too, not only Arcserve UDP, as we use TrueNAS as well. Arcserve UDP improves the precision of data. I have utilized Arcserve UDP's data deduplication feature, and the data deduplication feature helps my storage efficiency significantly. I have used Arcserve UDP's continuous data protection. It is beneficial for operational continuity because we use it constantly and have no objections to Arcserve UDP technology; I think it is very good. Arcserve UDP's integration with multiple operating systems is very good and very efficient. This brings value for me since many of my clients have different operating systems like Windows and Linux; there is no problem. Regarding the deduplication and compression with Arcserve UDP, I think Arcserve UDP is still a solid solution that we primarily use.

Read full review

reviewer1751496

Project Manager and Technical Consultant at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Provides effective backup for physical servers and needs improvements for cloud compatibility

We use OpenText Data Protector for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security OpenText Data Protector is good for physical backup, specifically for physical servers. It is effective for direct backups to EMC library or storage without using a repository. However,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The interface is very refined, works fine, and is very intuitive most of the time. Scalability is nice. The multi-tenancy feature is very welcome. The integration with Linux works fine too."

"Easy restoration and the solution works quickly."

"Global deduplication is the best feature of this solution."

"It allows us to back up all the servers and centrally manage them."

"The most valuable features of this solution are that I can by just one click, copy and paste anything that I would want. I do not have to restore the whole virtual machine."

"The most valuable features are that it is able to restore quickly and that it is able to virtually restore on Hyper-V."

"The recovery part of the product is very good."

"I like the tool's speed."

More Arcserve UDP pros

"I have used Micro Focus Data Protector for the file backup facilities. My primary use of the software is to backup file data."

"It's supports Unix, Linux, all of the OS's. It's very stable software."

"The dashboards in Micro Focus Data Protector are very good. They are similar to the dashboards in Veeam Backup & Replication."

"Performs the backup properly and protects our data."

"The solution allows us to be able to backup and exchange directly, to backup Microsoft exchange."

"The initial setup is straightforward if you understand Data Protector."

"Regarding scalability, it's unlimited with Data Protector. You can link multiple installations and let them work together. They can share backup devices. You have many possibilities with Data Protector. It's very proficient."

"It is very easy to use and the interaction with various systems is very handy."

More OpenText Data Protector pros

Cons

"We cannot restore each user's mailbox. Each user's mailbox should be independently restorable. Also, this solution is very slow. If you select all of the servers, it runs for a long time... It needs to be faster. Finally, If anything happens to one server we should be able to switch to another server."

"Arcserve UDP is in the middle range of complexity. The interface can be developed a little bit more to be user-friendly."

"We are looking at scaling up to the cloud and using immutable copies on the cloud. Arcserve UDP 8.0 does have the immutable feature supporting AWS, but I'm looking for multi-cloud support. So, I'm waiting for Arcserve to release that in the next release."

"The tool doesn't provide cloud integration in India."

"It takes much time to verify and consolidate images for backups."

"Its interface can be improved. I find it unintuitive."

"In the most recent version of premium plus the replication has been removed, and it should re-added to the solution."

"The speed of restores should be improved. We have found the speed of large restores rather slow."

More Arcserve UDP cons

"They should design the solution so that it is much easier for deployment and make the UI easy to use."

"It can occasionally be inaccurate in its backup/recovery time estimates."

"We're not satisfied with the robustness and stability of the software since Micro Focus took it in-house. The GUI is one thing they could improve. It's still a bit archaic. Data Protector needs a more functional, user-friendly GUI."

"Many of our users complain about the GUI. You still need to rely on the command line interface. Because it originated as a Unix system, Data Protector is still a command line-driven solution, which makes it seem rather dated compared to systems that are built around a GUI from day one. It doesn't affect the functionality, but some people don't find it user-friendly."

"If you compare the solution with the same specific features and enhancements on another solution, Data Protector is expensive. This is especially true when compared to, for example, Veeam."

"Micro Focus Data Protector must improve its overall evolution record. They need to focus on hardware based instant recovery, client recovery, and cloud ability. Now there is no cloud ability."

"VMware backup integration and cloud recovery is lacking."

"We have a lot of requests for the Micro Focus team, particularly in terms of the Japanese data pattern, as it's not as good now. The Japanese data pattern accuracy of the Micro Focus Data Protector needs to be improved because there are a lot of false negatives and false positives. We are currently testing this and our product team has been communicating with the Micro Focus team."

More OpenText Data Protector cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of StorageCraft ShadowProtect is competitive in the market."

"The licensing cost is for one year. There are not any hidden costs involved in the pricing model of the solution."

"The solution is expensive."

"As an MSP partner, I believe that the prices are fair."

"I feel that the product is fairly priced."

"The solution is priced well compared to other solutions."

"I do not work with the pricing or licensing issues of the solution for our organization."

"It is a bit pricey, considering the reliability problems. If the tool worked flawlessly, the price would be fair, even cheap."

More Arcserve UDP pricing and cost advice

"Avoid using many LTO drives; when using fewer drives, the price will be extremely good."

"Data Protector's pricing is very competitive and we have no issues in this regard. I would give it an eight out of ten in terms of pricing."

"The solution requires paying for a license."

"The license for the solution is very expensive compared to the other products in the market."

"There is a perpetual license involved in addition to support which needs to be renewed annually."

"The product is cheaper than Commvault."

"They have two types of licensing, one is for storage capacity and the other is client licensing. The capacity licensing here is a bit expensive."

"It is fast, reliable, and its licensing policy is great."

More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,443 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Performing Arts

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	24
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	28
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	61

Questions from the Community

Major Differences Between These 4 Backup and Disaster Recovery Solutions?

Comparing the features of the four is not the right approach. You need to develop a list of requirements for backup and DR that are specific to your organization and then compare each of the four ...

See all answers

What do you like most about StorageCraft ShadowProtect?

The interface is very refined, works fine, and is very intuitive most of the time. Scalability is nice. The multi-tenancy feature is very welcome. The integration with Linux works fine too.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for StorageCraft ShadowProtect?

Regarding the setup cost for Arcserve UDP, it is significantly important, but the price is similar to all our options where clients need to have backup on-premises and replication in the cloud.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?

The solution is expensive as it requires purchasing all features without the option to negotiate based on client numbers, unlike Veeam which offers flexibility in pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?

OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup. It lacks functions and facilities compared to Veeam, which offers more user-friendliness for virtual machine backups. Ther...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Data Protector?

We use OpenText Data Protector ( /products/opentext-data-protector-reviews ) for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security.

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs Arcserve UDP

Compared 16% of the time

Rubrik vs Arcserve UDP

Compared 7% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs Arcserve UDP

Compared 6% of the time

Dell PowerProtect Data Domain vs Arcserve UDP

Compared 5% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs Arcserve UDP

Compared 4% of the time

More Arcserve UDP Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 26% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 11% of the time

Dell Avamar vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 7% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText Data Protector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Arcserve UDP

December 2025

Download Arcserve UDP product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector

December 2025

Download OpenText Data Protector product report

Also Known As

StorageCraft ShadowProtect, StorageCraft Backup Analyzer

Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector

Overview

Arcserve UDP is a comprehensive solution that empowers even a one-person IT department to protect virtual and physical environments with a high degree of simplicity. It allows you to design and manage your entire data protection strategy with a unified management console, and enables you to scale your data backup coverage as your organization grows with the push of a button.

Arcserve

OpenText Data Protector standardizes and consolidates backups across multiple platforms. It provides secure, comprehensive backup protection for business-critical data and applications whether virtual, physical, or online in the cloud.

OpenText

Sample Customers

ITPS, North Hertfordshire Homes, SEMIKRON, Kajaani University of Applied Sciences, Test Valley Borough Council, EK Services

GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company

Buyer's Guide

Arcserve UDP vs. OpenText Data Protector

December 2025

Free Report: Arcserve UDP vs. OpenText Data Protector

Find out what your peers are saying about Arcserve UDP vs. OpenText Data Protector and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,443 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Arcserve UDP vs. OpenText Data Protector report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.