Atera vs Ivanti Neurons for ITSM comparison

Atera and Ivanti are both solutions in the IT Service Management (ITSM) category. Atera is ranked #13 with an average rating of 9.0, while Ivanti is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.3. Atera holds a 2.4% mindshare in ISM, compared to Ivanti’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Atera users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Ivanti users who would recommend it.

Atera

Read 15 Atera reviews

1,129 Views
727 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Ivanti Neurons for ITSM

Read 16 Ivanti Neurons for ITSM reviews

951 Views
524 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Atera

Ivanti Neurons for ITSM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Ivanti Neurons for ITSM and Atera compete in the IT service management space. Atera holds an advantage in versatility due to its integrated services.

Features: Ivanti Neurons for ITSM provides advanced automation, focused incident management, and excels in service desk functionalities, appealing to specific ITSM requirements. Atera seamlessly integrates ITSM with RMM and PSA tools, offering a unified IT management platform that covers remote monitoring, device management, and automated alerts.

Room for Improvement: Ivanti could improve by enhancing user-friendliness in its advanced features and streamlining deployment processes. It may also benefit from more flexibility in integrations with third-party tools. Atera might enhance its dedicated ITSM capabilities to match specialized tool standards and invest in scalability for larger environments. Some users might desire improved customization features for unique business workflows.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ivanti Neurons for ITSM offers comprehensive onboarding with robust customer support, though deployment can be lengthy due to its feature-rich platform. Atera provides a quick deployment experience through its cloud-based model, emphasizing straightforward setup and accessible support channels, which significantly enhances adoption speed.

Pricing and ROI: Ivanti Neurons for ITSM requires a higher initial investment, suited for larger enterprises seeking long-term ROI from its specialized features. Atera presents a cost-effective option with flexible pricing and quicker ROI, particularly favorable for SMBs needing integrated management solutions. Specific pricing details are not provided, though Atera is generally valued for affordability.

To learn more, read our detailed Atera vs. Ivanti Neurons for ITSM Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Atera vs. Ivanti Neurons for ITSM

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Atera

Ranking in IT Service Management (ITSM)

13th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (4th), Patch Management (11th)

Ivanti Neurons for ITSM

Ranking in IT Service Management (ITSM)

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Help Desk Software (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the IT Service Management (ITSM) category, the mindshare of Atera is 2.4%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ivanti Neurons for ITSM is 2.3%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Service Management (ITSM)

Featured Reviews

James Clowes

IT Manager at Dynamic Bradview Roofing

Having fewer hardware replacements saves us in annual costs

There is a new version of the interface coming out. I have been asking for a new version for a while. While the interface is nice, I guess the developer thinks one way and the user thinks another. So, I think the interface is getting a big overhaul. This is what they have mentioned in their webinars and stuff. It is in beta, but I'm not on the beta program, so I haven't seen it. I can't really complain about the old interface, but now that I have heard there is a new one coming, all I want is the new one. The one thing that could do with improvement is the reporting. This is from someone who worked in an MSP, where I would want to run a report and be able to just present that to a client. Reports are fine for internal use, where they never leave your company. However, if I was an MSP, I would probably want a little bit more information or the ability to customize some of it without having to edit PDFs.

Read full review

Sanjay Mukhopadhyay

Director - Sales & Operations - India at Intertec Systems

The solution comes with a host of features for hyper-automation

The initial setup is a mix of complex and straightforward because it depends on which modules you are implementing for ITSM. There are a lot of complex workflows and SLAs around the workflow. We have to configure much more complex things than just Patch Management and Endpoint. For example, it might not take even two weeks to roll out APM for 10,000 assets, but it will take three months to roll out ITSM for 10,000 assets and an equal number of users. That's because the modules you were implementing require much more knowledge, and there are a lot of complexities and nitty-gritties inside the tool which need to be understood. ITSM skill sets are in demand because reaching an L3 certification is not easy. We have those certified skill sets. That's why we're able to roll out at a fast pace. With standard documentation available, it's very clear for a certified resource to understand step-wise implementation. For every step, there is a "build and test" approach. It's a continuous integration. You follow this process, so you don't suddenly realize there are many issues at the end of setup. You have to keep testing each module and process as you roll out. It's not complex, but you need to know the product.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"All of the features of Atera are valuable because they allow the customers to achieve their goals. It is easy to use, has good collaboration, and has zero maintenance."

"It is reliable, and when it is working, it works without issues."

"Measuring the integration is very helpful when using Atera Assist Test. It takes the solution to the next level by automating activities. It doesn't just provide the solution but also allows running scripts to fix issues before a technician has to work on them."

"I have better access when I go to look for something regarding either a specific user or software. It is easier to locate. When I am troubleshooting with my clients on the phone, I am not fiddling around looking through a bunch of ticket notes trying to locate something. It makes me a lot more efficient."

"It's very easy to use, not just for me, but even for people who have claimed, "I'm not very good at IT." Once you have it installed and you have it set up, it pretty much works by itself. It really helps you do what you need to do. It's easy to use for a beginner, compared to some of the other larger RMMs that are a little bit more complicated."

"Pricing is definitely my favorite part of it. It is also extremely easy to use."

"Atera has saved our organization money. We look at Atera as an extra employee that we only pay about $300 a month. This is incredible savings over having to hire somebody to do all the tasks that Atera performs for us."

"The most valuable features of this solution are automatic batch matching and unattended support access."

More Atera pros

"I like Cloud Neurons. Since it's a cloud version, it's much easier to enhance productivity because it collects all the information automatically."

"Ivanti Neurons allows me to adjust our workflow according to our needs."

"The main feature for us is incident management, as it assists me in knowing my assignments, because we have group assignments. When we go to the group assignment they can assign it to me there."

"The solution is easy to use and has a user-friendly interface"

"It is easy to set up."

"The solution's technical support is excellent. I rate the technical support a ten out of ten."

"Primarily, I believe the focus lies on discovery, workflow configuration, and automation."

"The solution's installation depends on its customization. It is easy."

More Ivanti Neurons for ITSM pros

Cons

"I also use Apple Zoho, which does not require you to download anything. You can get help from Zoho. Atera, on the other hand, requires you to download an applet."

"I would like to see more mobile device management. iPad is a big one. I know they've been working on some of that. For me, it would be amazing if I could do tablet devices and even expand it to POS systems or the like. I know that a lot goes into that but I've seen it is an area they're looking at."

"The chat solutions need improvement because we first need to connect to the customer. This needs to improve so that there is a particular feature that can provide support to customers even if they are not connected to a computer."

"The solution is scalable. However, in the past, we did have some issues."

"They are working on an update, and I would like to see more stuff outside of just computers and servers. Increasingly, we need to be able to monitor and manage network devices. Atera is improving on that already, which is one place that it is currently lacking."

"Customization could be improved."

"The one thing that could do with improvement is the reporting. This is from someone who worked in an MSP, where I would want to run a report and be able to just present that to a client."

"Atera could be improved by adding more granular control over technician roles. We need more specific controls on what technicians can access, like limiting their ability to view certain sections or access devices and share files. This feature request has already been made. The IP asset management capabilities need improvement to better manage assets beyond just devices."

More Atera cons

"Configuration requirements are extensive, even in basic Service Desk processes."

"They could provide product integration with popular platforms."

"Sometimes I can't get the reports that I want until I go to the manager. They need to put more into the new reports. The standard reports are great, but there do not communicate as much."

"We'd like more integration with solutions like SolarWinds."

"I have had to open a few support tickets with the HEAT Service Management. They are very good but there are some areas that they could improve on."

"Ivanti Neurons for ITSM is not a user-friendly tool when compared to ServiceNow."

"The user interface must be made simpler and more effective."

"There could be an improvement in the ability to easily integrate other systems without extensive development."

More Ivanti Neurons for ITSM cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is my favorite part of it. It was per user, not per client."

"The price is reasonable for what we require."

"As an internal IT, it's gold right there. It is money in the bank."

"The solution cost approximately $200 Canadian per month."

"The value of the product is perfect, neither cheap nor expensive. I think it is the right rate. It would be awesome if it continued to be the same price because it is a great solution that I like. I like it because I'm not paying per device. I have some customers on monthly contracts and some of them are on break'n fix. If I have a client who is on break'n fix, and they need to pay per agent, then I am losing money. If they were ever to change structures, going to pay-per-device model, then I would need to think about changing to something else."

"One of the biggest issues I face is the need to pay per technician. I've dealt with other platforms that you need to have 250-500 devices. Even though the cost declines as the number of devices a person has increases, they still require you to pay for 250 or 500, respectively. With Atera, the number doesn't matter as you always pay the same amount. I approximate that Atera saves me $100 per week."

"Atera happened to have the best pricing model."

"With Atera, the more you add, the cheaper the cost of the additional endpoints will be."

More Atera pricing and cost advice

"I came to know from my team members that my company used to operate ServiceNow but shifted to Ivanti Neurons for ITSM due to its low licensing prices."

"The price is on the higher side. The support is included in the standard licensing fees."

"The product is affordable for small businesses."

"If you want to add more users who can handle support there will be additional fees. What we call our extensions, we need to pay more for. They tell us that we need to acquire more licenses or something like that. I think it's very expensive, because in terms the pula, our local currency, it's about 20,000 per license for each user. It is an annual fee."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Service Management (ITSM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Retailer

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Atera?

Pricing is low. It costs around 149 bucks per month.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Atera?

It should improve its processes.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Atera?

Atera is integral to our daily operations. We use it for RMM, PSA, our ticket system, and contact with people. We also integrate it with different products.

See all answers

What do you like most about Ivanti Neurons for ITSM?

I like Cloud Neurons. Since it's a cloud version, it's much easier to enhance productivity because it collects all the information automatically.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ivanti Neurons for ITSM?

The price is on the higher side. The support is included in the standard licensing fees.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ivanti Neurons for ITSM?

There could be an improvement in the ability to easily integrate other systems without extensive development. iPaaS has been introduced to help with this, however, I have not fully explored it yet.

See all answers

Comparisons

NinjaOne vs Atera

Compared 42% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Atera

Compared 13% of the time

N-able N-central vs Atera

Compared 10% of the time

Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs Atera

Compared 7% of the time

LogMeIn Central vs Atera

Compared 5% of the time

More Atera Competitors

ServiceNow vs Ivanti Neurons for ITSM

Compared 38% of the time

BMC Helix ITSM vs Ivanti Neurons for ITSM

Compared 11% of the time

ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus vs Ivanti Neurons for ITSM

Compared 11% of the time

JIRA Service Management vs Ivanti Neurons for ITSM

Compared 10% of the time

Freshservice vs Ivanti Neurons for ITSM

Compared 8% of the time

More Ivanti Neurons for ITSM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Atera

April 2025

Download Atera product report

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Neurons for ITSM

April 2025

Download Ivanti Neurons for ITSM product report

Also Known As

No data available

HEAT Service Management

Overview

Atera offers a comprehensive solution for MSPs and IT Professionals. The platform provides in one integrated solution: full remote monitoring and management (RMM), PSA, remote access, patch management, billing, reports, and so much more! Atera’s disruptive pricing model also helps managed IT service providers scale their business while providing continued best-in-class service. All plans include unlimited devices, meaning you only pay per technician.Everything you need, in one easy-to-use platform

Thousands of paying users in over 75 countries
Free 30-day trial, no credit card or commitment required
No hidden fees or restrictions, all plans include unlimited devices
Seamless integration with your favorite IT tools including: Splashtop, AnyDesk, TeamViewer, and ScreenConnect

What can Atera do for you?

Improve Efficiency. Atera delivers customers the tool suite for IT management. Everything you need in an all-in-one, easy-to-use platform.
Automation. Set alerts and proactively prevent issues for your clients. Minimize time spent on manual tasks and spend more time on what matters most, serving your customers.
Disruptive Pricing, Unlimited Devices. Per technician-based pricing with unlimited servers and workstations means you can cover it all, at one fixed price.

Atera

Automate workflows, eliminating costly manual processes, while making your business more efficient, compliant and secure. Whether you’re looking for an IT helpdesk/support ticket solution or need to perform more advanced ITIL service management processes, Ivanti Neurons for ITSM can easily scale and adapt to meet your specific business needs.

Ivanti

Sample Customers

MSPs, IT consultants, and IT departments worldwide trust and use Atera.

AFS Group, Auckland Airport, Baylor University, County of Maui, Dis-Chem Pharmacies, Elia, Essentia Health, Government Research Laboratory, Groupe Webhelp, HSBC Africa, Midwestern University

Buyer's Guide

Atera vs. Ivanti Neurons for ITSM

March 2025

Free Report: Atera vs. Ivanti Neurons for ITSM

Find out what your peers are saying about Atera vs. Ivanti Neurons for ITSM and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Atera vs. Ivanti Neurons for ITSM report.

See our list of best IT Service Management (ITSM) vendors.

We monitor all IT Service Management (ITSM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.