Automox vs Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac comparison

Automox and Ivanti are both solutions in the Patch Management category. Automox is ranked #8 with an average rating of 9.0, while Ivanti is ranked #30. Automox holds a 2.2% mindshare in PM, compared to Ivanti’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Automox users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ivanti users who would recommend it.

Automox

Read 20 Automox reviews

2,567 Views
1,078 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNI...

Read 4 Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac reviews

576 Views
576 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Automox

Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNI...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac and Automox both provide robust patch management solutions. Ivanti Patch is favored for its broad compatibility, while Automox stands out for its ease of use and automation capabilities.

Features: Ivanti Patch supports multiple operating systems, offers thorough patching, and detailed reporting, enabling patch management across diverse environments. Automox provides an intuitive setup, automation features, and a cloud-native architecture that simplifies management.

Room for Improvement: Ivanti Patch needs improvements in performance speed, more intuitive navigation, and frequent updates for new software support. Automox could enhance its reporting capabilities, offer more granular control over patch deployments, and address occasional delays in customer service.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ivanti Patch has a straightforward deployment process but can be complex for large-scale setups. Its customer service is highly responsive and thorough. Automox offers deployment simplicity due to its cloud-based system, with generally satisfactory customer service experiences.

Pricing and ROI: Ivanti Patch users consider the pricing reasonable with a good return on investment due to its robust capabilities, despite a potentially high initial setup cost. Automox users find the pricing competitive and value the automation features, which lead to significant ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Automox vs. Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Automox vs. Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 886,349 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Automox

Ranking in Patch Management

8th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (15th), Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (14th), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (5th)

Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNI...

Ranking in Patch Management

30th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of Automox is 2.2%, down from 3.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac is 1.2%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Patch Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Automox	2.2%
Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac	1.2%
Other	96.6%

Patch Management

Featured Reviews

Raphael Tiji

Senior Software Engineer at AT&T

Unified patching and remote access have strengthened security and reduced support overhead

Automox has significant potential and we truly appreciate its features and capabilities. However, we have encountered several performance issues, particularly with the remote access tool. We believe that with some improvement, it could replace other tools that we currently use. Exclusion for updates should be improved in Automox. Integration with Tenable vulnerability management should be improved, as it should be included. I do not have any other improvements needed for Automox that I have not mentioned yet, perhaps only small or wish-list features.

Read full review

KarthikU

Linux admin at Ameex Technologies

With good website development capabilities, the solution also provides exceptional stability

The initial setup is straightforward. The time taken for deployment for the website depends on the website code files and database. It may take four hours to eight hours for a single site to migrate from another solution. We used to do the migration from the cloud only and not on-premises. For deployment, we used to compress the code files, and using SFTP, we used to transfer the files. We then configure the same with that, and after transferring the code files, we used to have the UAT, staging, and production URL. Once everything is fine, we will switch the DNS for the live website. For the deployment and maintenance, we need support from the client's side and from the management side to make the DNS switch. We also need help from third-party vendors to provide access.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a flexible solution that does a majority of the tasks."

"Since using Automox, it has impacted my organization positively because it is absolutely great, has a fantastic price, and I have a better handle on missing patches in the environment."

"Its flexibility is most valuable."

"Automox is the only one that we've found that we can just set and then forget; it simply works and is the best."

"Automox has positively impacted my organization with significant time-saving, improved our security posture by automatically patching vulnerabilities, and is easy to manage and deploy while offering Automox University as a great resource for learning the platform."

"Among the most valuable features are its ease of use and the Worklets. Both of them are time-savers. Worklets enable us to customize things for a given environment. It's something like when Apple lets other people create applications. Other peoples' Worklets can be used in our environment and in our customers' environments. That saves a lot of time, and it's really cool."

"Automox has positively impacted our organization since we started using this tool as it has been a game-changer for us."

"Automox is a great tool to use on a daily basis as we use it to remotely connect to end-user machines, it is very cost-effective and simple to use, set up, and deploy, and with remote patching, scanning, and monitoring all in one panel, it has saved us money quickly by eliminating tools we no longer need in our organization."

More Automox pros

"Compared to other software options, this is not exactly a cheap solution, however, the value you get is good, and therefore it's worth the cost."

"Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, and Mac helps to ensure that everything is up to date."

"The solution is easy to implement."

"The website development section is the most valuable feature of the solution."

"The tool is a stable product."

Cons

"Automox needs some improvement, particularly in that remote support for Linux is lacking."

"However, we have encountered several performance issues, particularly with the remote access tool."

"There should be better inventory capabilities. Right now, they only allow you to have insight into software out-of-the-box. It would be nice to also extend that into custom inventory that can be modified and managed by the practitioner."

"However, we have encountered several performance issues, particularly with the remote access tool."

"Automox can be improved because the notification app sometimes gets stuck preparing to restart, which means users have to restart manually, and that is time-consuming."

"Automox can be improved by offering another form of two-factor authentication instead of just waiting for the email, which would be easier."

"The only thing that we've ever truly wanted is an onsite repository."

"Sometimes if you want something done you're at the mercy of people having their machines turned on."

More Automox cons

"The solution can be quite expensive, compared to other options on the market."

"The better way to improve the solution is by working on an area where it lacks, which includes the migration part."

"The tool needs to improve its visual system."

"The solution can be quite expensive, compared to other options on the market."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are on the premium licensing, which is the one that has the API capability that we use."

"The cost is very reasonable compared to the competition."

"Its licensing for a year was nine grand. There was no additional fee."

"There are no additional costs in addition to the extended licensing fees with Automox. You get your support and your per endpoint license with what you purchased."

"The pricing and licensing costs have been great for us... My advice to others who are evaluating or thinking of implementing Automox is to give it a shot. If a free trial is still available, definitely use it, because it makes life a lot easier."

"For all these software tools, it is usually a subscription model. There is a monthly charge that we need to pass along to our clients because we are doing all this for their benefit. It is only a couple of bucks a month per computer, and that is a low enough price point where our clients, without exception, have accepted it, and said, "This is great. We will pay that. It sounds like a worthwhile thing.""

"The product is a great value."

"We're doing it annually directly through Automox. It is per endpoint. It is $2 and some change per endpoint, but I believe the cost is right around $28,000. Everything is covered in this fee."

More Automox pricing and cost advice

"The solution is open-source, so we do not need any licensing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

886,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	10

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Automox?

The cost is very affordable. We have been able to save a lot of time, approximately 30%. Cost reduction has been noticeable, ranging from 50% to 40%, especially because we do not have to travel fro...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Automox?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Automox?

Automox serves as a backbone tool for my company. We rely on Automox for application and operating system patching, which ensures that our machines remain compliant and secure. We also take advanta...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

NinjaOne vs Automox

Compared 10% of the time

Rapid7 Metasploit vs Automox

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Automox

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Automox

Compared 7% of the time

Tanium vs Automox

Compared 7% of the time

More Automox Competitors

KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac

Compared 34% of the time

PDQ Deploy vs Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac

Compared 26% of the time

Kaseya VSA vs Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac

Compared 22% of the time

BigFix vs Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac

Compared 17% of the time

More Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Automox

April 2026

Download Automox product report

Buyer's Guide

Patch Management

March 2026

Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac report

Download Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac product report

Also Known As

No data available

HEAT Patch, PatchLink

Overview

Facing growing threats and a rapidly expanding attack surface, understaffed and alert-fatigued organizations need more efficient ways to eliminate their exposure to vulnerabilities. Automox is a modern cyber hygiene platform that closes the aperture of attack by more than 80% with just half the effort of traditional solutions.

Cloud-based and globally available, Automox enforces OS & third-party patch management, security configurations, and custom scripting across Windows, Mac, and Linux from a single intuitive console. IT and SecOps can quickly gain control and share visibility of on-prem, remote and virtual endpoints without the need to deploy costly infrastructure.

Automox dramatically reduces corporate risk while raising operational efficiency to deliver best-in-class security outcomes, faster and with fewer resources.

Automox

Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac, powered by Heat, swiftly detects vulnerabilities in today’s environment, from workstation to data center. And it deploys expertly pretested patches automatically, helping organizations to patch with more efficiency and efficacy.

Ivanti

Buyer's Guide

Automox vs. Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac

March 2026

Free Report: Automox vs. Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac

Find out what your peers are saying about Automox vs. Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

886,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Automox vs. Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac report.

See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.