Automox vs Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac comparison

Automox and Ivanti are both solutions in the Patch Management category. Automox is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.8, while Ivanti is ranked #29. Automox holds a 2.6% mindshare in PM, compared to Ivanti’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Automox users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ivanti users who would recommend it.

Automox

Read 14 Automox reviews

3,701 Views
1,517 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNI...

Read 4 Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac reviews

747 Views
747 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Automox

Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNI...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac and Automox both provide robust patch management solutions. Ivanti Patch is favored for its broad compatibility, while Automox stands out for its ease of use and automation capabilities.

Features: Ivanti Patch supports multiple operating systems, offers thorough patching, and detailed reporting, enabling patch management across diverse environments. Automox provides an intuitive setup, automation features, and a cloud-native architecture that simplifies management.

Room for Improvement: Ivanti Patch needs improvements in performance speed, more intuitive navigation, and frequent updates for new software support. Automox could enhance its reporting capabilities, offer more granular control over patch deployments, and address occasional delays in customer service.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ivanti Patch has a straightforward deployment process but can be complex for large-scale setups. Its customer service is highly responsive and thorough. Automox offers deployment simplicity due to its cloud-based system, with generally satisfactory customer service experiences.

Pricing and ROI: Ivanti Patch users consider the pricing reasonable with a good return on investment due to its robust capabilities, despite a potentially high initial setup cost. Automox users find the pricing competitive and value the automation features, which lead to significant ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Automox vs. Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Automox vs. Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,125 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Automox

Ranking in Patch Management

13th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (38th), Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (36th), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (15th)

Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNI...

Ranking in Patch Management

29th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of Automox is 2.6%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac is 1.3%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Patch Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Automox	2.6%
Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac	1.3%
Other	96.1%

Patch Management

Featured Reviews

Naqash Ahmed

Senior Data Reporting Analyst at University of Bradford

Automation has saved time and improves secure, centralized patching across all our devices

While Automox has very good features, I think there's still room for improvement. I want the custom reports to be even more detailed, specifically where I can add more details. It would be nice to have more filters in reports based on location and department more easily. Secondly, the notifications could be more customizable. Many times notifications come, but we don't have control over which notification is urgent and which is not. For example, if there's an alert of a critical update or pending approval, it can help me focus better. An alert of a security threat could be another type of notification that tells me something is important. Customized notifications would be much better. I would say the user interface could be improved as well. Some parts of the dashboard are a bit hard to understand. If they could be improved to be more intuitive, for example, if it could be easy to navigate between devices and reports, that would be great. I would say if Automox could also provide automation templates, that would help. I know there are templates, but I want more templates. Having ready-made worklets for common tasks can save a lot of time. Lastly, it should also support the interface for mobile screens.

Read full review

KarthikU

Linux admin at Ameex Technologies

With good website development capabilities, the solution also provides exceptional stability

The initial setup is straightforward. The time taken for deployment for the website depends on the website code files and database. It may take four hours to eight hours for a single site to migrate from another solution. We used to do the migration from the cloud only and not on-premises. For deployment, we used to compress the code files, and using SFTP, we used to transfer the files. We then configure the same with that, and after transferring the code files, we used to have the UAT, staging, and production URL. Once everything is fine, we will switch the DNS for the live website. For the deployment and maintenance, we need support from the client's side and from the management side to make the DNS switch. We also need help from third-party vendors to provide access.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Automox has saved us on multiple tasks at least 10 to 15 hours a week."

"Automox's real-time visibility and control through its intuitive dashboard is important for our response to emerging threats because it tells us which applications need to be updated on a real-time basis."

"Automox is the only one that we've found that we can just set and then forget; it simply works and is the best."

"Automox provides complete visibility for any laptop, desktop or server in our environment, regardless of whether the person is on the train, in the cloud or on the move."

"Coming from prior solutions that were a lot more effort, Automox's patch management abilities are transformational. When I took over patching at my company, they were using on-premise architecture to patch. As the workforce shifted from being in the office into their home offices, I was able to lift and shift with no effort other than deploying the new agent out into the environment."

"Automox has eased our operations; it is very simple to use and does not have heavy workflows."

"It's super easy to use and we haven't found anything easier."

"The flexibility in creating tools to make changes on remote machines is most valuable to me. The reporting feature is also fantastic because on any given day I can bring up a list of machines that don't have patches, for example. Or I can bring up a list of machines that are in my environment on a certain day. The solution helps me with not only my own role, and what I look for internally myself, but it also helps during audits. I can go in and look at the number of machines in there, and their owners and timelines. It certainly helps tell a story for anything that IT requires."

More Automox pros

"The solution is easy to implement."

"The tool is a stable product."

"Compared to other software options, this is not exactly a cheap solution, however, the value you get is good, and therefore it's worth the cost."

"Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, and Mac helps to ensure that everything is up to date."

"The website development section is the most valuable feature of the solution."

Cons

"It should have integrated workstation access. So, there should be a remote desktop feature."

"The only thing that we've ever truly wanted is an onsite repository. Currently, all updates are provided directly from the internet. So, if you have 1,000 devices, all 1,000 devices go directly out to the internet. We would love the option of being able to put the updates on local storage so that we're not consuming as much bandwidth. That is literally the only thing that we've ever wanted."

"The stability has come a long way from what it was like when it started and now it's really good."

"I would add that remote support for iOS could be better, and remote support of Linux is also lacking."

"While Automox has very good features, I think there's still room for improvement."

"The biggest area they need to fix, without a doubt, is the ability to copy and sync profiles and worklets between all of the organizations you manage, and the ability to have top-level user access control across all of the companies that you manage."

"When we bring on a new client, we need to go into that client and manually set up my account, my chief engineer's account, three technicians' accounts, and a billing person's account all over again, which is annoying."

"Sometimes if you want something done you're at the mercy of people having their machines turned on."

More Automox cons

"The solution can be quite expensive, compared to other options on the market."

"The better way to improve the solution is by working on an area where it lacks, which includes the migration part."

"The tool needs to improve its visual system."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost is very reasonable compared to the competition."

"The pricing and licensing costs have been great for us... My advice to others who are evaluating or thinking of implementing Automox is to give it a shot. If a free trial is still available, definitely use it, because it makes life a lot easier."

"There are no additional costs in addition to the extended licensing fees with Automox. You get your support and your per endpoint license with what you purchased."

"The product is a great value."

"For all these software tools, it is usually a subscription model. There is a monthly charge that we need to pass along to our clients because we are doing all this for their benefit. It is only a couple of bucks a month per computer, and that is a low enough price point where our clients, without exception, have accepted it, and said, "This is great. We will pay that. It sounds like a worthwhile thing.""

"We are on the premium licensing, which is the one that has the API capability that we use."

"Its licensing for a year was nine grand. There was no additional fee."

"Automox just charges us a set amount per user, per month, for using the product. That is very important to us. Because it's a cloud-native solution, you're saving on the cost of hosting an on-premises solution on your servers."

More Automox pricing and cost advice

"The solution is open-source, so we do not need any licensing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,125 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	11

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Automox?

The cost is very affordable. We have been able to save a lot of time, approximately 30%. Cost reduction has been noticeable, ranging from 50% to 40%, especially because we do not have to travel fro...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Automox?

From an enterprise perspective, Automox could have better compliance reporting, which is needed for audit readiness, security reviews, and customer compliance evidence. It could also leverage AI, w...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Automox?

Automox is used in our system primarily to manage patch management. It helps in managing Windows updates, third-party application updates, browser patching, and security updates across employee lap...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

NinjaOne vs Automox

Compared 8% of the time

Rapid7 Metasploit vs Automox

Compared 7% of the time

Tanium vs Automox

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Automox

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Automox

Compared 6% of the time

More Automox Competitors

KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac

Compared 27% of the time

Kaseya VSA vs Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac

Compared 24% of the time

BigFix vs Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac

Compared 14% of the time

PDQ Deploy vs Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac

Compared 14% of the time

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager vs Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac

Compared 8% of the time

More Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Automox

June 2026

Download Automox product report

Buyer's Guide

Patch Management

June 2026

Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac report

Download Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac product report

Also Known As

No data available

HEAT Patch, PatchLink

Overview

Automox offers automated patch management with cloud-native architecture, cross-platform compatibility, and ease of use. It provides real-time visibility and streamlines operations across Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it ideal for complex IT environments.

Automox empowers organizations with features like Worklets and remote management, enhancing security and efficiency through customizable patching policies, PowerShell script execution, and detailed reporting. It's primarily used for automated patch management, patch remediation, and compliance maintenance across diverse systems, ensuring cybersecurity and reducing vulnerabilities. Enhancements are desired for user access control, policy synchronization, and integration with tools like Tenable. Support for offline patching, rollback features, enhanced reporting, and notification customization are in demand. Improvements in cost effectiveness and multi-group policy applications are also suggested.

What are the key features of Automox?

Automated Patching: Streamlines updates across operating systems.
Cloud-Native Architecture: Offers real-time visibility and ease of use.
Cross-Platform Compatibility: Supports Windows, macOS, and Linux.
Worklets: Custom scripts for automating tasks.
Remote Management: Manage devices from anywhere.
Custom Patching Policies: Tailor updates for specific needs.
Insights Reporting: Generate detailed reports to enhance efficiency.

What benefits and ROI can users expect when evaluating Automox?

Time Efficiency: Saves time by automating complex tasks.
Increased Security: Enhances security through effective patch management.
Compliance: Maintains cybersecurity compliance.
Network Visibility: Provides comprehensive device network oversight.
Scalable Management: Handles extensive network updates effectively.

In industry applications, Automox is widely used for managing and updating vast fleets of devices, particularly in sectors requiring stringent cybersecurity measures. It ensures seamless operations through its centralized automation and management capabilities, making it essential for organizations handling extensive IT networks.

Automox

Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac provides comprehensive patch management capabilities tailored for these operating systems, ensuring systems remain secure and compliant without disrupting business operations.

This tool automates the patching process across Linux, UNIX, and Mac environments, addressing security loopholes and compliance requirements efficiently. It significantly reduces manual efforts, lowering risk and enhancing productivity within IT infrastructures by deploying timely updates. Its robust system integration capabilities allow seamless operation within IT ecosystems, ensuring minimal downtime and operational continuity.

What are the key features of Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac?

Broad Platform Support: Ensures a wide range of coverage across multiple operating systems.
Centralized Management: Allows patch activities to be monitored and controlled from a single interface.
Custom Patch Deployment: Facilitates tailored patch deployment strategies.
Security Compliance: Meets strict compliance standards by automating patch processes.
Real-Time Reporting: Offers insights into patching statuses and outcomes instantly.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Increased Security Posture: Reduces vulnerabilities through consistent patching.
Reduced Operational Costs: Minimizes manual task burdens leading to cost savings.
Enhanced System Performance: Boosts performance with streamlined update application.
Improved Compliance: Helps maintain necessary compliance with industry standards.

Industries such as finance and healthcare implement Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac owing to its ability to handle sensitive data securely while ensuring that systems stay updated with the latest patches, meeting strict data protection regulations. This makes it a reliable choice for organizations with critical operational requirements.

Ivanti

Buyer's Guide

Automox vs. Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac

April 2026

Free Report: Automox vs. Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac

Find out what your peers are saying about Automox vs. Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,125 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Automox vs. Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac report.

See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.