Automox vs Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac comparison

Automox and Ivanti are both solutions in the Patch Management category. Automox is ranked #14 with an average rating of 9.0, while Ivanti is ranked #29. Automox holds a 2.2% mindshare in PM, compared to Ivanti’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Automox users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ivanti users who would recommend it.

Automox

Read 20 Automox reviews

2,112 Views
908 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNI...

Read 4 Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac reviews

454 Views
454 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Automox

Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNI...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac and Automox both provide robust patch management solutions. Ivanti Patch is favored for its broad compatibility, while Automox stands out for its ease of use and automation capabilities.

Features: Ivanti Patch supports multiple operating systems, offers thorough patching, and detailed reporting, enabling patch management across diverse environments. Automox provides an intuitive setup, automation features, and a cloud-native architecture that simplifies management.

Room for Improvement: Ivanti Patch needs improvements in performance speed, more intuitive navigation, and frequent updates for new software support. Automox could enhance its reporting capabilities, offer more granular control over patch deployments, and address occasional delays in customer service.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ivanti Patch has a straightforward deployment process but can be complex for large-scale setups. Its customer service is highly responsive and thorough. Automox offers deployment simplicity due to its cloud-based system, with generally satisfactory customer service experiences.

Pricing and ROI: Ivanti Patch users consider the pricing reasonable with a good return on investment due to its robust capabilities, despite a potentially high initial setup cost. Automox users find the pricing competitive and value the automation features, which lead to significant ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Automox vs. Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Automox vs. Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,728 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Automox

Ranking in Patch Management

14th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (37th), Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (36th), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (13th)

Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNI...

Ranking in Patch Management

29th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of Automox is 2.2%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac is 1.2%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Patch Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Automox	2.2%
Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac	1.2%
Other	96.6%

Patch Management

Featured Reviews

Raphael Tiji

Senior Software Engineer at AT&T

Unified patching and remote access have strengthened security and reduced support overhead

Automox has significant potential and we truly appreciate its features and capabilities. However, we have encountered several performance issues, particularly with the remote access tool. We believe that with some improvement, it could replace other tools that we currently use. Exclusion for updates should be improved in Automox. Integration with Tenable vulnerability management should be improved, as it should be included. I do not have any other improvements needed for Automox that I have not mentioned yet, perhaps only small or wish-list features.

Read full review

KarthikU

Linux admin at Ameex Technologies

With good website development capabilities, the solution also provides exceptional stability

The initial setup is straightforward. The time taken for deployment for the website depends on the website code files and database. It may take four hours to eight hours for a single site to migrate from another solution. We used to do the migration from the cloud only and not on-premises. For deployment, we used to compress the code files, and using SFTP, we used to transfer the files. We then configure the same with that, and after transferring the code files, we used to have the UAT, staging, and production URL. Once everything is fine, we will switch the DNS for the live website. For the deployment and maintenance, we need support from the client's side and from the management side to make the DNS switch. We also need help from third-party vendors to provide access.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Coming from prior solutions that were a lot more effort, Automox's patch management abilities are transformational."

"Coming from prior solutions that were a lot more effort, Automox's patch management abilities are transformational. When I took over patching at my company, they were using on-premise architecture to patch. As the workforce shifted from being in the office into their home offices, I was able to lift and shift with no effort other than deploying the new agent out into the environment."

"Since using Automox, it has impacted my organization positively because it is absolutely great, has a fantastic price, and I have a better handle on missing patches in the environment."

"Automox is the only one that we've found that we can just set and then forget; it simply works and is the best."

"Its flexibility is most valuable."

"The flexibility in creating tools to make changes on remote machines is most valuable to me. The reporting feature is also fantastic because on any given day I can bring up a list of machines that don't have patches, for example. Or I can bring up a list of machines that are in my environment on a certain day. The solution helps me with not only my own role, and what I look for internally myself, but it also helps during audits. I can go in and look at the number of machines in there, and their owners and timelines. It certainly helps tell a story for anything that IT requires."

"Automox has saved us on multiple tasks at least 10 to 15 hours a week."

"Automox has positively impacted my organization by allowing us to set up as many policies as needed, so the customization aspect is top-notch."

More Automox pros

"The website development section is the most valuable feature of the solution."

"Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, and Mac helps to ensure that everything is up to date."

"The solution is easy to implement."

"Compared to other software options, this is not exactly a cheap solution, however, the value you get is good, and therefore it's worth the cost."

"The tool is a stable product."

Cons

"As concerns the patching concepts, there's a bit of a learning curve in terms of working out how Automox wants you to work within the console, not only splitting up everything into groups, but then having the various policies assigned."

"It should have integrated workstation access. So, there should be a remote desktop feature."

"Automox needs some improvement, particularly in that remote support for Linux is lacking."

"Asset management would be a great feature to add to Automox. We would run easier scripts or more out of the box scripts that would help us in audits. \"

"The biggest area they need to fix, without a doubt, is the ability to copy and sync profiles and worklets between all of the organizations you manage, and the ability to have top-level user access control across all of the companies that you manage."

"The only thing that we've ever truly wanted is an onsite repository. Currently, all updates are provided directly from the internet. So, if you have 1,000 devices, all 1,000 devices go directly out to the internet. We would love the option of being able to put the updates on local storage so that we're not consuming as much bandwidth. That is literally the only thing that we've ever wanted."

"One area where Automox can be improved is that it does not support offline patching, which could be a limitation for air-gapped or highly restricted environments."

More Automox cons

"The tool needs to improve its visual system."

"The solution can be quite expensive, compared to other options on the market."

"The better way to improve the solution is by working on an area where it lacks, which includes the migration part."

"The solution can be quite expensive, compared to other options on the market."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing and licensing costs have been great for us... My advice to others who are evaluating or thinking of implementing Automox is to give it a shot. If a free trial is still available, definitely use it, because it makes life a lot easier."

"Automox just charges us a set amount per user, per month, for using the product. That is very important to us. Because it's a cloud-native solution, you're saving on the cost of hosting an on-premises solution on your servers."

"The cost is very reasonable compared to the competition."

"The product is a great value."

"There are no additional costs in addition to the extended licensing fees with Automox. You get your support and your per endpoint license with what you purchased."

"For all these software tools, it is usually a subscription model. There is a monthly charge that we need to pass along to our clients because we are doing all this for their benefit. It is only a couple of bucks a month per computer, and that is a low enough price point where our clients, without exception, have accepted it, and said, "This is great. We will pay that. It sounds like a worthwhile thing.""

"Its licensing for a year was nine grand. There was no additional fee."

"We are on the premium licensing, which is the one that has the API capability that we use."

More Automox pricing and cost advice

"The solution is open-source, so we do not need any licensing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,728 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	10

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Automox?

Automox needs some improvement, particularly in that remote support for Linux is lacking. Additionally, remote support for iOS could be better. The integration is seamless.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Automox?

Our main use case for Automox is that we as a company need to be Cyber Security Plus compliant, and therefore we need to ensure that our devices are patched regularly. Having over 1,000 devices, ma...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Automox?

Automox is a modern, simple-to-use, and powerful tool that works well for all sizes of organizations that have a mix of remote, hybrid, and endpoints. Automated patching is a key strength of Automo...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

NinjaOne vs Automox

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Automox

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Automox

Compared 7% of the time

Tanium vs Automox

Compared 7% of the time

Rapid7 Metasploit vs Automox

Compared 6% of the time

More Automox Competitors

KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac

Compared 34% of the time

PDQ Deploy vs Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac

Compared 28% of the time

Kaseya VSA vs Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac

Compared 21% of the time

BigFix vs Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac

Compared 17% of the time

More Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Automox

March 2026

Download Automox product report

Buyer's Guide

Patch Management

March 2026

Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac report

Download Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac product report

Also Known As

No data available

HEAT Patch, PatchLink

Overview

Facing growing threats and a rapidly expanding attack surface, understaffed and alert-fatigued organizations need more efficient ways to eliminate their exposure to vulnerabilities. Automox is a modern cyber hygiene platform that closes the aperture of attack by more than 80% with just half the effort of traditional solutions.

Cloud-based and globally available, Automox enforces OS & third-party patch management, security configurations, and custom scripting across Windows, Mac, and Linux from a single intuitive console. IT and SecOps can quickly gain control and share visibility of on-prem, remote and virtual endpoints without the need to deploy costly infrastructure.

Automox dramatically reduces corporate risk while raising operational efficiency to deliver best-in-class security outcomes, faster and with fewer resources.

Automox

Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac, powered by Heat, swiftly detects vulnerabilities in today’s environment, from workstation to data center. And it deploys expertly pretested patches automatically, helping organizations to patch with more efficiency and efficacy.

Ivanti

Buyer's Guide

Automox vs. Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac

March 2026

Free Report: Automox vs. Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac

Find out what your peers are saying about Automox vs. Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,728 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Automox vs. Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac report.

See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.