AWS CodePipeline vs CloudBees comparison

Read 20 CloudBees reviews

770 Views
148 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS CodePipeline

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

AWS CodePipeline and CloudBees compete in the CI/CD tools category. AWS CodePipeline seems to have the upper hand with its seamless integration with AWS services, making it highly efficient for AWS environments.

Features: AWS CodePipeline offers excellent integration with AWS services, providing seamless transitions between environments. It has cost-effective pay-as-you-go pricing and includes integration with applications like Slack. CloudBees provides scalability for large teams, extensive tool integration, and advanced security features.

Room for Improvement: AWS CodePipeline could improve multi-cloud compatibility and documentation. Improvements in build time and customization would be beneficial. CloudBees faces challenges with slow performance when running multiple pipelines and requires enhanced integration with AI tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS CodePipeline is suited for public cloud environments with generally responsive customer service, though premium support costs extra. CloudBees supports on-premises and private cloud deployments, appealing to enterprises with hybrid needs, and is well-rated for customer service.

Pricing and ROI: AWS CodePipeline's pay-as-you-go model is affordable, especially for AWS users, with ROI seen in time savings. CloudBees is pricier, with ROI focusing on resource optimization and reduced development overhead.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodePipeline vs. CloudBees Report (Updated: April 2025).

AWS CodePipeline vs. CloudBees

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodePipeline

Ranking in Build Automation

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

CloudBees

Ranking in Build Automation

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Configuration Management (11th), Value Stream Management Software (3rd), DevSecOps (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of AWS CodePipeline is 5.7%, down from 8.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CloudBees is 1.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Udhay Prakash Pethakamsetty

Data Engineer Manager at Capgemini

A fully managed service with excellent integrations and a flexible architecture

Compared to any other tools, AWS products provide better integrations. We have tools for all our needs. The integrations are good. The product is a fully managed service. We specify the various stages in the CI/CD process. We can do it without any external tools. Going through everything is usually an overhead for developers. It is like a configuration. We need to configure it only once. The integration with other AWS services has helped us. Our life as a developer is easy. We need not focus on the integration manually. If we work with third-party tools, we must consider connectivity, role management, security, authentication, and authorization. In AWS CodePipeline, if we have IAM roles configured and KMS for the credentials, we need not worry about anything else. Everything can be done within the tool. The integrations are the best part. We can track everything. The connectivity and scalability are good. The architecture is also flexible enough. We can add multiple things.

Read full review

YashBrahmani

Senior Associate at BNP Paribas CIB

Offers a clear visualization and overview of workflows and helpful in managing CI/CD processes

Improvement in the sense that they can do better in terms of management of logs and stuff like that because the console logs are very extensive, and that causes a lot of storage issues. That is one of the things which is there. Also, with respect to the traditional platform and the modern platform, many things have upgraded, and it has quite improved. But when we talk about the performance of the agents, it’s still very crucial because it’s not up to par. It takes a lot of time to provision the agent and to finish the build because of the SSH connection and the JNLP connection. Due to that, sometimes the agent doesn’t get provisioned. Those are some of the blockers that meet up the time in terms of administering the instance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Different applications can be enhanced with AWS CodePipeline"

"The tool's recent version helps us to run pipelines in parallel. The integration with other AWS services has greatly impacted our use of AWS CodePipeline. It made tasks such as integrating with Jira and provisioning instances much easier."

"The management of CodeBuild and CodeDeploy on a three-point trigger basis is an important feature."

"The integrations are good."

"I find performance to be the most valuable CodePipeline feature. It works perfectly and smoothly."

"It's a perfect solution if you are just using AWS."

"I prefer using CodePipeline and CodeBuild in AWS due to their integration with AWS services, like directly deploying to ECS using Cloud Deploy."

"It helps develop CI/CD implementations with centralized management of code building, deployment, and version control."

More AWS CodePipeline pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that its GUI is quite simple."

"CloudBees's user interface is very simple and user-friendly."

"CloudBees assists by automating tasks, previously done manually, in the pipeline setup."

"The solution's most valuable feature is its flexibility."

"The initial setup is easy."

"I find the automation feature most valuable. CloudBees is highly scalable and supports both small and large teams. The deployment process is also faster when compared to on-premise."

"The most valuable features are Java features, microservice communication, payment validation, Jenkins Sonar, management master to CloudBees, Blue Ocean, JobConfig, and support."

"CloudBees is the Jenkins tool for building and deploying. There's open-source Jenkins, which is free and can be used by any organization, but it offers a different architecture for Jenkins. If your organization is larger, you might choose the architecture. This way, you can have different masters for different applications, and different teams can manage their masters separately. However, a single person can still control all the masters, whoever manages it for the organization."

More CloudBees pros

Cons

"AWS CodePipeline is quite a simple tool mostly for management and creating automation."

"AWS CodePipeline functions well, but there's room for improvement in providing technical support to regular customers who haven't purchased developer support. I mean, having it available for everyone, even if it's not a 24-hour service. It would be more useful if specific support hours were available for assistance."

"It would be a much better tool if it could be made compatible with other cloud services as well since this is an area the product currently lacks."

"One downside in AWS is that when you attempt to push a change in, it misses that part, or it could be because some variables are not set correctly."

"It would be best if AWS CodePipeline provided multiple integration options directly by providing some URLs."

"The solution could improve the documentation. Sometimes we have some issues with the documentation not updating after releasing .NET 6. We had some issues with building the code pipeline, and it was not updating the documentation. It's better to update the code documentation."

"AWS CodePipeline works effectively, and I haven't identified any specific areas needing improvement as it has been quite satisfying in terms of deployment needs."

"Improved enhancements and features could make it more intuitive."

More AWS CodePipeline cons

"I noticed that CloudBees runs too slowly because some applications run more than 50 pipelines."

"There are connection issues with CloudBees, specifically between Sybase and CloudBees. W"

"It could improve the document upload process."

"We've noticed occasional issues with folder permissions changing unexpectedly. Specifically, permissions sometimes shift from the CloudBees user to the root user. This can cause pipeline failures, as pipelines require the correct CloudBees user permissions to execute properly."

"I think a preview of the errors would be good just at the point where the error occurs."

"The problem with CloudBees is that when you merge it, the pipelines would randomly fail multiple times."

"The platform could integrate better with other tools and support external tools directly."

"The setup is somewhat complicated. You need a cloud architect and engineer to set it up properly. The initial setup will take time, so you need a good engineer and architect to handle it."

More CloudBees cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is quite expensive compared to other solutions."

"AWS CodePipeline is quite affordable. I've been running around four pipelines and the cost is around one dollar per month. It rarely exceeds two dollars."

"AWS offers free business or enterprise support services."

"AWS charges you based on the number of pipelines you have and how active they are, and I also think that the root account user knows about all the price-related metrics."

"The price of the product depends on how many times you run it. The tool offers a pay-as-you-go model."

"The pricing of this solution is dependent upon your needs including how many jobs you daily and how many times the developer will be changing codes and completing deployments."

"I would rate the product's pricing a five out of ten."

"The pricing is manageable."

More AWS CodePipeline pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

25%

Legal Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which AWS solution would you choose - CodeStar or CodePipeline?

Both AWS solutions deliver solid options, with uniquely different features. AWS CodeStar allows for quick development, building, and deployments of apps. It also provides web application and web se...

What do you like most about AWS CodePipeline?

Code deployment is the best feature.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodePipeline?

AWS CodePipeline and its associated services do not incur significant additional charges. The cost primarily comes from deploying other AWS resources like EC2 and S3 alongside the pipeline.

What needs improvement with CloudBees?

There are connection issues with CloudBees, specifically between Sybase and CloudBees. We often encounter connection problems, and there are issues with the pipelines.

What is your primary use case for CloudBees?

We use CloudBees for deploying the code in higher environments, such as QA, C2, staging, and production.

What advice do you have for others considering CloudBees?

I would recommend CloudBees to others because building jobs is much easier than with other solutions.

GitLab vs AWS CodePipeline

Comparisons

Compared 65% of the time

Jenkins vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 11% of the time

GitHub Actions vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 8% of the time

AWS CodeStar vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 7% of the time

Tekton vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 4% of the time

More AWS CodePipeline Competitors

GitLab vs CloudBees

Compared 55% of the time

Harness vs CloudBees

Compared 28% of the time

Tekton vs CloudBees

Compared 16% of the time

More CloudBees Competitors

Product Reports

AWS CodePipeline

Download AWS CodePipeline product report

Download CloudBees product report

Also Known As

CodePipeline

No data available

Overview

AWS CodePipeline is a fully managed continuous delivery service that helps you automate your release pipelines for fast and reliable application and infrastructure updates. CodePipeline automates the build, test, and deploy phases of your release process every time there is a code change, based on the release model you define. This enables you to rapidly and reliably deliver features and updates. You can easily integrate AWS CodePipeline with third-party services such as GitHub or with your own custom plugin. With AWS CodePipeline, you only pay for what you use. There are no upfront fees or long-term commitments.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

CloudBees DevOptics is a robust software utilized primarily to enhance CI/CD processes by offering real-time visibility into Jenkins pipelines. It facilitates effective monitoring, incident management, and decision-making through comprehensive data analysis. Users value its features like DevOps performance metrics and seamless tool integration, leading to improved operational efficiency and productivity in organizations.

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Capital One, PEGA, vistaprint, HSBC, BOSCH, Starbucks Coffee

AWS CodePipeline vs. CloudBees