Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS IAM Identity Center vs Ping Identity Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.3
AWS IAM Identity Center needs clearer UI, better group management, time-sensitive access control, and improved user management flexibility.
Sentiment score
5.3
Ping Identity Platform requires stronger functionalities, enhanced user experience, better security, and comprehensive support to compete effectively with Microsoft.
Having a lot of users on one instance is hard to configure, so I hope for more flexibility and ease in configuration.
This involves creating a user with necessary permissions valid for only a specific period and then automatically revoking access.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
AWS IAM Identity Center scales efficiently, supporting numerous users, groups, and roles without performance issues, despite permissions management complexity.
Sentiment score
7.6
Ping Identity Platform efficiently scales across servers and clusters, supports large environments, but performance varies based on configurations.
The scalability of AWS IAM Identity Center is excellent.
It can handle both a small number of users and a bigger number of users efficiently.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
8.8
AWS IAM Identity Center is praised for its affordable pricing, making it cost-effective for managing permissions and federations.
No sentiment score available
Ping Identity Platform is competitively priced, offering robust features and good ROI, but may be costly for small businesses.
Pricing for AWS IAM Identity Center is very affordable, rated at two out of ten with one being cheap.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
9.4
AWS IAM Identity Center is highly reliable, boasting 99.96% uptime and consistently rated ten out of ten for stability.
Sentiment score
7.9
Ping Identity Platform is highly reliable, with minimal bugs or crashes, though some infrastructure and server connection issues exist.
It offers 99.96% uptime.
Stability-wise, it is functioning well without any outages or crashes.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.2
AWS IAM Identity Center simplifies access management with centralized policies, templates, and role-based permissions for efficient multi-account security.
Sentiment score
8.0
Ping Identity Platform offers robust security with multi-factor authentication, seamless integration, user-friendly interface, and extensive customization options.
The most valuable features of AWS IAM Identity Center are role-based permissions and existing permissions templates.
The most valuable feature is the security configuration ease, which is great for me, especially as a beginner.
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Ping Identity Platform's support is prompt, knowledgeable, and proactive, though some users find the support portal confusing.
They are prompt, keep you updated, and provide excellent assistance.
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS IAM Identity Center
Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)
13th
Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)
18th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Ping Identity Platform
Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)
4th
Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
Authentication Systems (5th), Data Governance (6th), Access Management (3rd), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (2nd), Directory Servers (1st)
 

Featured Reviews

Nizamuddeen TZ - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps users provide or revoke accesses whenever needed
I don't think there is any need for improvement in the product since everything has been created architecturally by AWS. AWS has given all the features in the tool. In the product, two groups cannot have the same name. There will be a conflict if the same name is provided to two groups in the tool. If you want to say something to another user, the tool fails to identify which group out of the two having the same name is involved in the activity. In general, the tool does not allow for the duplication of names. The aforementioned area can be considered for improvement in the product.
Dilip Reddy - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to use but requires improvements in the area of stability
In my company, we have worked on authorization, and I know that there are different types of grants. We have worked on the authorization code, client credentials, and ROPC grant. There are two types of tokens, like the JWT token and internally managed reference tokens. JWT tokens are useful for finding information related to the claim requests. Internally managed reference tokens are useful for dealing with visual data and information. For the clients to fit the user information, they need to do additional work to fit all the user info into the site, which is to define and validate the token issue and provide the request for VPNs. I worked on the key differences between the authorization code and implicit grant. In the authorization code type, you will have the authorization code issued initially to the client, and the client has to exchange it with the authorization server, like using a DAC channel to get the access token. In implicit grants, tokens are issued right away if the application is a single-page application. We can either use the authorization code or an implicit grant.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
26%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
9%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Financial Services Firm
25%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Educational Organization
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS IAM Identity Center?
The product is easy for beginners to learn and use.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS IAM Identity Center?
AWS Identity Center is free, making it a cost-effective solution for managing IAM permissions and federations.
What needs improvement with AWS IAM Identity Center?
The AWS Identity Center's user interface could be improved to provide a clearer understanding of how the system operates. Although the API side is well-developed, the console can be misleading, and...
What do you like most about PingID?
The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logg...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingID?
The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap.
What needs improvement with PingID?
The management console needs to be improved. PingID should revise it.
 

Also Known As

AWS Single Sign On, AWS SSO
Ping Identity (ID), PingFederate, PingAccess, PingOne, PingDataGovernance, PingDirectory, OpenDJ
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS IAM Identity Center vs. Ping Identity Platform and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.