Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Azul Zing vs Zenoss Cloud comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Azul Zing
Ranking in Application Infrastructure
16th
Average Rating
9.6
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Zenoss Cloud
Ranking in Application Infrastructure
34th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Event Monitoring (15th), Network Monitoring Software (72nd), Server Monitoring (24th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (59th), Container Monitoring (11th), Cloud Monitoring Software (41st), AIOps (20th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Application Infrastructure category, the mindshare of Azul Zing is 4.9%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zenoss Cloud is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Infrastructure
 

Featured Reviews

it_user332814 - PeerSpot reviewer
We no longer need to concern ourselves with tuning the garbage collector or coding around it, but the profiling tools lag behind those available for Oracle's Java implementation.
The most important Zing feature for LMAX Exchange is the C4 garbage collector. C4 effectively does continuous garbage collection and for LMAXExchange that means less latency jitter. Latency is a big deal for us and while low latency is important, predictable latency is also a requirement for our customers. Zing doesn't need to force periodic safepoints during normal operation, so assuming that you don't have any other sources of jitter in your program, you'll get a flatter latency profile with out-of-the-box behaviour.
ClaudiaChen - PeerSpot reviewer
Generates close to real-time alerts so users can resolve issues, but needs more integration and public cloud monitoring features
As Zenoss Service Dynamics is more for network-centric devices and you want to monitor, for example, a server, its services, IP addresses, and interfaces, if it's a network and you're going to monitor multiple items, you'll be charged multiple times. This is what Zenoss Service Dynamics needs to improve to make sure that customers pay just one fee to monitor the entire server. What I'd like to see in Zenoss Service Dynamics in the future is a public cloud monitoring feature, particularly for the Azure public cloud. Another additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is integration with the Azure public cloud because I know that there are some services from Azure that Zenoss Service Dynamics is currently unable to monitor.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
816,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Retailer
34%
Financial Services Firm
24%
Computer Software Company
10%
Real Estate/Law Firm
5%
Computer Software Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?
In my experience, I worked with many monitoring software, but the one that gave me the most functionalities of a large-scale company is Zenoss, due to its ability to monitor completely hybrid and a...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Cloud Monitoring, Zenoss Service Dynamics
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Priceline, RBS, Credit Suisse, ING, Creditex, Nielsen, Workday, Saks Fifth Avenue, Entergy, Quotix, Puma and many more.  Visit azul.com for more.
2degrees, Rackspace, State of North Dakota, El Paso Independent School District, NWN Corporation
Find out what your peers are saying about Azul Zing vs. Zenoss Cloud and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.