Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

BigPanda vs Nagios Core comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
BigPanda's customer support varies, with some users praising promptness and effectiveness, while others face delays and poor availability.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
6.3
BigPanda requires better cost efficiency, integrations, observability, AI, visualization, UI, multi-cloud environment, event correlation, and automation improvements.
No sentiment score available
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
BigPanda is noted for managing large infrastructures, though some users express concerns about scalability and additional licensing needs.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
BigPanda costs $200,000 annually, with users finding it reasonably priced, flexible in setup, and sometimes cheaper than competitors.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
5.8
BigPanda is stable but users have reliability concerns about alerts and incidents, partly due to its newness and unfamiliarity.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
BigPanda excels with a user-friendly interface, seamless integrations, AI-driven event correlation, anomaly detection, and efficient notifications.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

BigPanda
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
54th
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
IT Alerting and Incident Management (12th), AIOps (18th)
Nagios Core
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
8th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
50
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of BigPanda is 1.1%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nagios Core is 3.9%, up from 3.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

Ankit-Mathur - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers comprehensive alert monitoring and a user-friendly interface but requires manual validation to provide accurate alerts
For new users, I would advise using BigPanda for its comprehensive alert monitoring and integration with ServiceNow. Its mapping capabilities and user-friendly interface make it valuable for incident analysis and prioritization. As users become more familiar with the tool, its full potential will become apparent, enhancing efficiency and effectiveness over time. It is easy for someone to learn to use BigPanda for the first time. We start with basic examples that everyone can understand, then provide verbal introductions followed by hands-on training over two weeks. We encourage making mistakes and asking questions to ensure understanding. It depends on the trainer's approach, but with proper guidance, anyone can learn effectively. Overall, I would rate BigPanda as a five out of ten. For it to be a perfect ten, it would need to consistently provide accurate alerts without requiring manual validation. This means it should effectively suppress similar incidents, eliminating the need for constant monitoring. Once it reaches this level of reliability, BigPanda would be exceptional.
Nishith-Vyas - PeerSpot reviewer
Valuable reporting and alert system with room for PDF export improvements
The NetEase reporting structure needs improvement, especially the availability report, which is weak. It should be generated automatically with minimal human intervention and should be exportable as a PDF. Besides that, an integrated PDF export feature for reports is necessary. Also, the alert mechanism and graphing mechanism need to be integrated properly into Nagios Core. Currently, integrating these requires advanced Linux knowledge. Integration of more visualization tools like Grafana and Prometheus for better graphing and visualization is also recommended.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
23%
Computer Software Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
6%
Computer Software Company
15%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Any advice about APM solutions?
There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...
What do you like most about BigPanda?
One of the most valuable features of BigPanda is its user-friendly interface.
What do you like most about Nagios Core?
What I like about Nagios Core is that it helps me ensure everything is running smoothly by checking the status of hosts and services.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nagios Core?
Nagios Core is a free and open-source product. We don't charge for the product itself, but we charge for the man-hour costs related to installation, configuration, ongoing operation, and maintenance.
What needs improvement with Nagios Core?
The NetEase reporting structure needs improvement, especially the availability report, which is weak. It should be generated automatically with minimal human intervention and should be exportable a...
 

Comparisons

 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Nagios, ServiceNow, ITSM, NOC, CMDB Evolved, RemedyIncident Management Process
Airbnb, Cisco, PayPal, FanDuel
Find out what your peers are saying about BigPanda vs. Nagios Core and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.