Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

BigPanda vs Nagios Core comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.0
BigPanda improved efficiency, reduced response times, consolidated alerts, saved man-hours, and increased productivity with seamless integration and intuitive automation.
Sentiment score
8.8
Nagios Core reduces downtime and costs with quick alerts, providing full ROI and eliminating expensive monitoring tools.
BigPanda offers significant time-saving, cost-saving, and resource-saving benefits.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.7
BigPanda's support is responsive and helpful, but some users experience delays and difficulty with escalation and contact methods.
Sentiment score
5.1
Nagios Core relies on community support, praised for stability and resources, but lacks official help compared to Nagios XI.
For technical support, we have only had to address password resets and alert mismatching.
They are generally fast with their responses, although there might be some delays when escalating to the next level.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.0
BigPanda efficiently manages large alert volumes, supports integration, and is rated highly for scalability, aiding IT team collaboration.
Sentiment score
6.7
Nagios Core shows scalability for large networks but may need customizations and integrations for distributed environments.
It handles large volumes of alerts without limitations.
BigPanda facilitates better collaboration between IT teams by providing a shared view of incidents and requests.
I rate the scalability of BigPanda at eight.
The solution is scalable.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.4
BigPanda is stable with resolved initial issues, prompt notifications, high availability, but manual alert checks are still needed.
Sentiment score
8.2
Nagios Core is highly stable and reliable with minimal footprint, supporting extensive monitoring without network burden.
I would rate the availability of BigPanda at nine because it's almost 99.99% available.
BigPanda is now stable.
I tried many other solutions at work, however, in terms of Nagios, I haven't seen any disruption or downtime.
 

Room For Improvement

BigPanda needs better analytics, intuitive interface, improved integration, reduced costs, and enhanced dashboard, automation, and reporting features.
Nagios Core needs a more intuitive interface, better scalability, and features like enhanced reporting and integration with modern tools.
A 'deep dive' analysis feature would be appreciated to give detailed insights such as CPU usage and disk space analysis.
The planned maintenance feature in BigPanda needs enhancements due to its limited scheduling options.
I am not sure if we can pull reports of bulk incidents in different formats like PDF, Excel, or CSV.
 

Setup Cost

BigPanda offers flexible, mid-range pricing ideal for high-growth companies, with scenarios varying based on existing solutions and discounts.
Nagios Core is a free, cost-effective open-source tool, but requires Linux expertise and incurs hosting and maintenance costs.
 

Valuable Features

BigPanda enhances service reliability with AI/ML, streamlined integration, automation, real-time notifications, and a centralized alert dashboard.
Nagios Core provides flexible, low-resource monitoring with customization, automation, efficient alerts, and integration support for reliable IT performance visibility.
It can correlate multiple issues within a single device, create a single incident, and thus reduce noise and provide faster resolution.
Its automation has significantly improved incident response times, reducing the process to within one minute.
BigPanda improves service reliability with instant resolution, increased uptime, and reduced mean time to resolution, thus enhancing service quality.
It has a very handy dashboard, providing live alerts and visibility for everything.
 

Categories and Ranking

BigPanda
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
51st
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
IT Alerting and Incident Management (12th), AIOps (18th)
Nagios Core
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
11th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
51
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of BigPanda is 0.9%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nagios Core is 3.7%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

Ankit-Mathur - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers comprehensive alert monitoring and a user-friendly interface but requires manual validation to provide accurate alerts
For new users, I would advise using BigPanda for its comprehensive alert monitoring and integration with ServiceNow. Its mapping capabilities and user-friendly interface make it valuable for incident analysis and prioritization. As users become more familiar with the tool, its full potential will become apparent, enhancing efficiency and effectiveness over time. It is easy for someone to learn to use BigPanda for the first time. We start with basic examples that everyone can understand, then provide verbal introductions followed by hands-on training over two weeks. We encourage making mistakes and asking questions to ensure understanding. It depends on the trainer's approach, but with proper guidance, anyone can learn effectively. Overall, I would rate BigPanda as a five out of ten. For it to be a perfect ten, it would need to consistently provide accurate alerts without requiring manual validation. This means it should effectively suppress similar incidents, eliminating the need for constant monitoring. Once it reaches this level of reliability, BigPanda would be exceptional.
Nishith-Vyas - PeerSpot reviewer
Valuable reporting and alert system with room for PDF export improvements
The NetEase reporting structure needs improvement, especially the availability report, which is weak. It should be generated automatically with minimal human intervention and should be exportable as a PDF. Besides that, an integrated PDF export feature for reports is necessary. Also, the alert mechanism and graphing mechanism need to be integrated properly into Nagios Core. Currently, integrating these requires advanced Linux knowledge. Integration of more visualization tools like Grafana and Prometheus for better graphing and visualization is also recommended.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
847,959 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
23%
Computer Software Company
19%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Insurance Company
7%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Any advice about APM solutions?
There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...
What do you like most about BigPanda?
One of the most valuable features of BigPanda is its user-friendly interface.
What do you like most about Nagios Core?
What I like about Nagios Core is that it helps me ensure everything is running smoothly by checking the status of hosts and services.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nagios Core?
Nagios Core is a free and open-source product. We don't charge for the product itself, but we charge for the man-hour costs related to installation, configuration, ongoing operation, and maintenance.
What needs improvement with Nagios Core?
The dashboard should be improved. It's very simple. I don't have a very clear or specific suggestion. You can change the skin of the dashboard, however, it's good for me.
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Nagios, ServiceNow, ITSM, NOC, CMDB Evolved, RemedyIncident Management Process
Airbnb, Cisco, PayPal, FanDuel
Find out what your peers are saying about BigPanda vs. Nagios Core and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
847,959 professionals have used our research since 2012.