Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs Trend Vision One comparison

Bitdefender and Trend Micro are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. Bitdefender is ranked #41 with an average rating of 9.0, while Trend Micro is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.8. Bitdefender holds a 0.3% mindshare in EDR, compared to Trend Micro’s 2.9% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Bitdefender users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Trend Micro users who would recommend it.
Trend Vision One
Read 69 Trend Vision One reviews
  • 10,794 Views
  • 4,419 Comparison Views
97% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

Trend Vision One and Bitdefender GravityZone XDR are both prominent players in the advanced cybersecurity solutions category. Trend Vision One seems to have the edge in pricing and support, while Bitdefender GravityZone XDR is notable for its comprehensive suite of features.

Features: Trend Vision One offers advanced threat intelligence, real-time monitoring, and exceptional threat visibility. Bitdefender GravityZone XDR provides multilayered protection, enhanced threat detection through machine learning, and strong endpoint defense.

Room for Improvement: Trend Vision One could benefit from more advanced reporting capabilities, integration with additional third-party tools, and reduced false positive rates. Bitdefender GravityZone XDR could improve its use interface intuitiveness, expand its integration options, and offer more competitive pricing for smaller businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trend Vision One is praised for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer support. Bitdefender GravityZone XDR also offers effective deployment strategies with strong customer service, focusing on a well-established support network.

Pricing and ROI: Trend Vision One provides an affordable pricing model, ensuring a visible ROI. Bitdefender GravityZone XDR may require a higher initial investment but promises a substantial ROI due to its extensive feature set, positioning it as a long-term investment choice.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. Trend Vision One Report (Updated: February 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. Trend Vision One
February 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 842,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Bitdefender GravityZone Ext...
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
41st
Ranking in Network Detection and Response (NDR)
17th
Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
27th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Trend Vision One
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
4th
Ranking in Network Detection and Response (NDR)
3rd
Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
5th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
69
Ranking in other categories
Attack Surface Management (ASM) (2nd), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trend Vision One is 2.9%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
 

Featured Reviews

Robin Cook - PeerSpot reviewer
Exceptional threat detection and effortless installation impress users
The solution has best-in-breed technology and scores very highly on efficacy rates. The threat detection rates are exceptionally good, better than most of the competition. The solution is highly respected in the industry. The product is very scalable, and the installation is reported to be extremely easy, even for those without great technical capabilities.
Read full review
DavidBowman - PeerSpot reviewer
It improves the detection speed, but it could be more customizable
They need to stop changing Vision One once a week. They're in a hurry to change things so badly and so fast that I can't find where stuff is half the time, which is a challenge sometimes. I've given one piece of feedback to their product guys. One thing that they're trying to make is a SIEM. It's a product where you input all the logs from your tools, and it creates additional insights into how things look. They've been kind of playing the "me too" game on that, even though that's not what I bought the product for. They have a new gateway where I can take my firewall of email logs and send it over there. In theory, it's supposed to do a more comprehensive evaluation of all my stuff to improve that risk index score. I'm not impressed with it, and I've told them as much. I feel if you're good at something, you should keep working on that and not try to be all the things to all the people. I bought a different email solution even though it would have been 10 times easier to just stay with their email solution because they aren't great at it. They are great at other things, but they're playing the "me too" game with some of their products. Their competitors do this, so they should be doing this, too. They need to pick a product and keep being good at that. If they're going to roll new things out, they should do it but do it right. They have a button to isolate an endpoint because it looks bad, but it doesn't usually work. I've had no chance to argue with the product guys to show them examples of how their button doesn't work. You think it does, but it doesn't work in a real environment. That can be a challenge sometimes. I can see in the data showing what is a false positive. But it doesn't save me time helping them figure out how to fix the problem in their engine. It can help me identify it as a false positive, but it doesn't apply that consistently. It will ignore the false positive for that device, but if they start detecting a false positive on Apple devices, I have eight thousand Apple devices and get 8,000 alerts. I can tell that specific false positive, but it doesn't learn from that particularly well. We use the executive dashboards, but I don't find them particularly useful. One is the ability to customize. That has gotten a little better, and it'll be better in the future. Most of what they have on there are data points that are generic and not particularly actionable. That's why it's called an executive dashboard. Executives want to see if we are secure, but it's hard for me to find out why our attack surface risk went down by x percentage. I don't know. It says that on the dashboard, but it doesn't give me specific details about why. I find it confuses my executives, and it's not useful for me because it doesn't give me things to work on. It will give me generic things on the executive dashboard like you have a thousand accounts with an old password. Those are big generic things, but I also can't tell it that our password policy is different from what your automatic detection model means, and I don't have a problem with that, so quit lowering my risk score. The risk score is useless. In theory, it's based on the random intelligence they're getting from their various customers. I'm in K-12 education, so they have a decent amount of K-12 customers, but it's a subset, and the baseline of what's common in K-12 education is not the same. There's not enough data to make that particularly clean or useful. Vision One is not custom, and that's part of my beef. That index score is based on whatever random report they're looking at from their data sources at any given moment in time. It's nice, but I'd rather have one that's based on your particular circumstances. Instead, it's saying that the number one attack threat surface for school districts is email phishing. It's too generic.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution has best-in-breed technology and scores very highly on efficacy rates."
"It never fails. Bitdefender always catches all of the viruses that have been detected on customer sites."
"The threat detection rates are exceptionally good, better than most of the competition."
"The product is easy to use."
"The best thing about Bitdefender is that it has got top-notch features and it is not tied to specific countries like some other antivirus tools."
"I find Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus to be a pretty good solution for the mid-level market, specifically for organizations with up to two hundred fifty users. I like that it is an averagely priced solution. It also has a straightforward installation that can be completed within three to five minutes. Its technical support is also good enough."
"Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus is highly stable."
"The quarantine computer functionality is very good for me."
"We can scale the product as needed."
"I like Vision One's observed attack techniques feature. It lets you see what an attacker is doing, how they have tried to exploit a machine, or how malicious code is operating. It helps us discover indicators of compromise so we can write better rules for detection."
"This full security posture positions us well for our future security roadmap."
"It helps a lot to understand where the threat is coming from, where is it going, how is it being dealt with, et cetera."
"The most valuable features of Trend Vision One are its capabilities for XDR, EDR, MDR, and NDR, allowing for network detection and response."
"I appreciate the value of real-time activity monitoring."
"The search features help us try to correlate information and identify any suspicious activity."
"Scaling is not a problem at all."
More Trend Vision One pros
 

Cons

"The mobile version needs improvement."
"I would like automatic issue fixing for users without needing to physically open the PC. I'd prefer updates and fixes from the cloud to avoid headaches and save time."
"Some customers would like additional features that aren't available through the current GravityZone platform. Some feedback has been about the deletion of other software not going smoothly during the installation of Bitdefender, particularly the removal of previous software like Sophos."
"The solution seems to be pretty amateur for an EDR solution, and it should be more in sync in terms of features, with solutions such as FireEye and SentinelOne."
"The solution must improve its management features."
"Adding a feature like Data Loss Prevention would be beneficial."
"Some customers would like additional features that aren't available through the current GravityZone platform."
"I would like to have the capability to export the information we receive from the XDR into Microsoft Excel."
"Trend Micro could improve its support for non-third-party products and product integrations."
"It would be better if it were more user-friendly. It would also be better if the implementation were more straightforward."
"I believe that the interface could be more user-friendly. At times, it is challenging to locate certain features, and they need to reorganize the user interfaces."
"Trend Micro doesn't have the next-generation firewall."
"We've received some mild complaints that the documentation is sometimes not up to date."
"The product needs to have a lot more maturity, and they need to improve the overall technical support framework for getting the value out of XDR."
"The information captured by Trend Vision One needs to be more detailed."
More Trend Vision One cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus is pretty average, meaning it's not cheaper, but it's pretty good. It has average pricing."
"We have purchased licenses for the use of Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus. The price of the solution is reasonable but could be better."
"It's a very good price for MSP. It's cheaper than Symantec."
"Trend Micro XDR is expensive."
"I feel that Vision One is a bit expensive. As for the pricing or licensing, I would rate it a seven out of ten."
"Trend Vision One offers a competitive price-to-value ratio."
"The pricing is competitive, and the cost aligns with the features we receive."
"We have an annual subscription and I believe there is no option for monthly billing at the moment."
"It is definitely not cheap. I do believe you get what you pay for to some degree. It is cost-effective."
"The price is reasonable. It's not exorbitant. CrowdStrike and other players are on the higher side."
"Trend Vision One is cost-effective because it offers detailed reporting and environment control features."
More Trend Vision One pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
842,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
27%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Retailer
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Educational Organization
24%
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
5%
Healthcare Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus?
The best thing about Bitdefender is that it has got top-notch features and it is not tied to specific countries like some other antivirus tools.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus?
I would rate the costliness of the solution as a four out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus?
Some customers would like additional features that aren't available through the current GravityZone platform. Some feedback has been about the deletion of other software not going smoothly during t...
See all answers
What do you like most about Trend Micro XDR?
I appreciate the value of real-time activity monitoring.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Trend Micro XDR?
It is very good. The flexibility to temporarily exceed license limits when setting up new devices is helpful, as it allows us to ensure security before purchasing additional licenses.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Trend Micro XDR?
Improving the user interface would be helpful—it can be confusing, especially if you do not use it daily. We do not see a need for additional features. The tool has so many capabilities that it can...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
Compared 71% of the time
Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
Compared 15% of the time
Microsoft Defender XDR vs Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Microsoft Defender XDR vs Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
Compared 14% of the time
More Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Competitors
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security vs Trend Vision One Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security vs Trend Vision One
Compared 21% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trend Vision One Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trend Vision One
Compared 15% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trend Vision One Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trend Vision One
Compared 10% of the time
Wazuh vs Trend Vision One Logo
Wazuh vs Trend Vision One
Compared 8% of the time
Microsoft Defender XDR vs Trend Vision One Logo
Microsoft Defender XDR vs Trend Vision One
Compared 8% of the time
More Trend Vision One Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
February 2025
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) reportDownload Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) product report
Buyer's Guide
Trend Vision One
March 2025
Trend Vision One reportDownload Trend Vision One product report
 

Also Known As

GravityZone Ultra Plus
Trend Micro XDR, Trend Micro XDR for Users, Trend Vision One - XDR for Networks
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
Bitdefender
Trend Micro
 

Overview

Bitdefender GravityZone XDR enhances network security via advanced threat detection, offers centralized incident response, and comprehensive endpoint protection. Users value the user-friendly interface, robust analytics, and streamlined management, significantly boosting organizational efficiency and productivity.
Bitdefender

Trend Vision One offers comprehensive protection for endpoints, networks, and email with centralized visibility. It is valued for its attack surface management, real-time threat detection, integrated management, ease of deployment, and user-friendly interface.

Trend Vision One provides a sophisticated security platform combining endpoint, network, and email protection with features like virtual patching and advanced AI capabilities. Its centralized management and integration with platforms like Office 365 and Azure make it an attractive option for organizations needing streamlined workflows and efficient risk management. While it boasts robust integrations and ease of use, enhancements are needed in reporting, tool integration, and reducing false positives. Users call for better support infrastructure, faster response times, and improved threat intelligence capabilities. Despite some complexity, its AI and ML features significantly enhance threat detection and response.

What Features Define Trend Vision One?
  • Comprehensive Protection: Guard endpoints, networks, and emails against threats.
  • Centralized Visibility: Monitor systems with a unified view.
  • Advanced AI and ML: Improve threat detection and response capabilities.
  • Virtual Patching: Address vulnerabilities without immediate updates.
  • Integrated Management: Seamlessly manage across platforms.
What Benefits Should Users Look For?
  • Streamlined Workflows: Enhance operational efficiency.
  • Improved Threat Detection: Leverage AI for better response.
  • Ease of Deployment: Simplified initial setup and configuration.
  • Effective Risk Management: Benefit from centralized and integrated security tools.
  • Integration Capabilities: Flexibility to connect with different tools and platforms.

Trend Vision One is implemented in industries that require endpoint protection, ransomware defense, and incident response, being flexible for both on-premises and cloud environments. It is used to monitor servers, networks, and endpoints, providing features like email protection, behavioral detection, and threat visibility. Organizations benefit from AI and ML, improving their security posture and response capabilities.

Trend Micro
 

Sample Customers

Archdiocese, Northstar, SeSa, W&W Informatik, Yamaha Motor Europe
Panasonic North America, Decathlon, Fischer Homes, Banijay Benelux, Unigel, DHR Health,
Buyer's Guide
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. Trend Vision One
February 2025
Free Report: Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. Trend Vision One
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. Trend Vision One and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
842,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. Trend Vision One report.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.