We compared BMC Remedy and ServiceNow across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Comparison Results: BMC Remedy is commended for its user-friendly interface, valuable features, and impressive dashboards and reports. However, it could benefit from more intuitive dashboards and improved system stability. On the other hand, ServiceNow is highly efficient in workflow management, offers scalability, and provides customization options. Nevertheless, it could enhance the implementation of features and improve its user interface. Both products are considered expensive in terms of pricing and licensing, but ServiceNow is viewed as more reasonable for large organizations. Customer service and support for both products have received mixed feedback, with some finding it helpful and others suggesting room for improvement.
"The solution offers some very good features."
"BMC Remedy Asset Management is pretty easy for quite a lot of functions."
"The service management features are beneficial – very good."
"It has a good peer sharing module."
"The product has excellent support for remote and hybrid environments."
"It's a scalable product."
"The asset discovery feature in BMC is notably better compared to ServiceNow."
"It had automation, orchestration, service level management, and event management. You could also integrate it for auto-remediation."
"Simplicity of Change Manager."
"For change management, I find the CAB workbench very useful. I haven't seen any other solution that has a CAB workbench or advanced automated solutions for a change advisory board. ServiceNow also has the Workflow Engine which works very well and is very intuitive."
"Great that it's knowledge-based and you can use the flows in ServiceNow."
"ServiceNow is a cloud solution. That fact was very important for us, that it is not an on-prem solution, as it reduces our internal cost of support."
"If it is a high priority, they will respond very quickly. If it is a low priority issue, it might take some time, some three or four days. I would rate the technical support as a 10 out of 10."
"Operations and maintenance costs have been reduced using this solution. We have been able to deliver faster solutions to our customers and track progress using live data."
"It provides internal clients with greater transparency about their projects and deliverables."
"There are a lot of features within ServiceNow. There are plenty of add-ons that go beyond the typical core helpdesk operations, such as HR facilities, BRM functionality, and various compliance and governance capabilities."
"The upgrade process could be better. It would be a good improvement."
"The UI is quite outdated."
"BMC Remedy Asset Management could improve by adding intuitive dashboards."
"BMC works through intermediaries or vendors for support, so you don't always interact with BMC directly. The quality can vary depending on the specific vendor."
"There are issues from a product functionality perspective."
"Could be more user friendly for admins to manage."
"There is room for improvement regarding the customization as it tends to lag in terms of flexibility, particularly in comparison to competitors."
"One area that requires improvement is the prevention of duplicates or data inconsistencies in the system."
"The licensing needs to be divided into tiers in order to attract lower-level users."
"The challenge with ServiceNow lies in its expansive portfolio of services. It can be complex, and users may find it expensive and challenging to understand. There is a need for a configurator within ServiceNow that guides users on how to utilize the tool effectively. This configurator should provide insights into licensing, team requirements, and the best licensing model based on whether companies prefer ownership or consumption-based models."
"When it comes to reference fields, there are some limitations where you aren't able to use them, like in relationship queries. In Remedy, when you click a menu, you get options directly, whereas here, if you use a reference field, it points you to a different form. So the UI experience totally changes for the end user."
"It's moving at a very fast pace. It is difficult for developers or engineers to keep up with it. That's the only issue."
"Very expensive."
"It is annoying that ServiceNow keeps on changing back to Quebec every six months."
"The ability to embed help information onto the screens."
"When we are using the solution on mobile phones on their networks the performance is reduced with a delay of approximately 8 seconds. There is less delay using the desktop computers connected to the WiFi or to the network directly."
BMC Remedy is ranked 5th in IT Asset Management with 23 reviews while ServiceNow is ranked 1st in IT Asset Management with 212 reviews. BMC Remedy is rated 8.0, while ServiceNow is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of BMC Remedy writes "Offers automation, orchestration, service level management but lacks AI-based rules ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ServiceNow writes "A stable and scalable solution that has excellent features and is useful for collecting data and building KPIs". BMC Remedy is most compared with BMC Helix Discovery, Snow License Manager, Qualys VMDR, ManageEngine IT Asset Management and BMC Track-It!, whereas ServiceNow is most compared with BMC Helix ITSM, Microsoft Power Apps, Pega BPM, IBM Maximo and PagerDuty Operations Cloud. See our BMC Remedy vs. ServiceNow report.
See our list of best IT Asset Management vendors.
We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
www.quora.com
The article linked above helps people select a help desk software based on the parameters suggested.
You can also try Happyfox, an online centralized ticket management software hosted on the cloud. It has light and clear pricing and leanest learning curve. Please check the set-up steps here. www.happyfox.com
Hult Internation Business school is currently using our help desk software. www.happyfox.com
Happyfox does provide special discounts for education institutions and please contact me for more information.
Hi Lawrence, I think you are opensource guy, so you may check it out
OTRS is an Open source Ticket Request System with many features to manage customer telephone calls and e-mails. It is distributed under the GNU AFFERO General Public License (AGPL) and tested on Linux, Solaris, AIX, Windows, FreeBSD, OpenBSD and Mac OS 10.x. Do you receive many e-mails and want to answer them with a team of agents? You're going to love OTRS!
github.com and try below release
www.otrs.com
1. Which software are you using and how do you find the software? Service Now, very useful. Is it easy to use and customizable? Yes. If so, how can we customize it? Forms, fields are easy to setup; business rules – java scripts, api.
2. What software did you use before the one you are currently using and did it offer a way to import existing tickets from your old system to your current one? CA and BMC. We did not import old tickets into the current systems. We imported assets. Change, Incidents, Request start from fresh. Old data was exported and kept as retention.
3. What about/How does licensing costs/work? Only IT roles are payable. As educational institutions face financial pressures, what are the costs and flexible options for payment? Cloud based subscription – based on usage.
4. Is your software on-premise and cloud/hosted/SaAS models? SAAS
5. Are you using any other of their modules/product offerings? If so, which ones? Catalog, Service Desk – incidents, problem, request, Change, Asset, CMDB, Discovery, KB, SDLC
6. What is it about the software that you like? Easy to use What is it that you dislike? Ease of version upgrades are managed but require testing for many hotfixes, some issues are moved to enhancement request within the platform and needs to move to the next version for resolution. Reporting is not as good for trending etc. However, OOB reports can be easily created with existing views. More scripting solutions should be made available to provide greater functionality.
7. What is it that you like about their company and support? Have timezone support with ease of ticket creation. What is it that you dislike? Some problems moved as next release enhancements; manual creation of MIBS / updates for discovery creation of correct models. No able to detect stack switches out of the box
8. Does your software have asset management (desktop, mobile, app and network), a solutions wiki? a help/chat ticketing system? etc. ITAM yes but has not moved onto SAM. Mobile not captured; workstations, servers, applications, business services, network are captured. Service Now discovery is very good as it is agentless but still need to be tweak to ensure proper creation especially on newer equipment and stack switches.
9. Has anybody used Cherwell? ServiceNow? FrontRange? BMC Track-IT? Service Now
Hi Lawrence. I work at Agiloft, and we use our own Service Desk solution. We have several customers successfully using Agiloft for higher education IT service management, including Texas A&M and Cal Poly.
Agiloft is completely customizable with no coding required - all customization is done using an easy drag-and-drop GUI. It's available as both an on-premise solution and SaaS, and includes modules for Asset Management, Customer Support, Integrated Chat, and more, with no additional per-module cost.
You can learn more at www.agiloft.com, or google "Agiloft reviews" to find plenty of thorough, 5-star reviews of our product, including several from our higher education customers. Hope this helps! Good luck!