Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on May 30, 2023
 

Categories and Ranking

iboss
Sponsored
Ranking in Secure Access Service Edge (SASE)
15th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (23rd), Internet Security (8th), Web Content Filtering (5th), Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) (11th), ZTNA as a Service (15th)
Cato SASE Cloud Platform
Ranking in Secure Access Service Edge (SASE)
6th
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
WAN Optimization (1st), Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) (5th), Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions (6th), WAN Edge (6th), ZTNA as a Service (6th)
VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN
Ranking in Secure Access Service Edge (SASE)
9th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
52
Ranking in other categories
Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions (5th), WAN Edge (5th)
 

Featured Reviews

GZ
Sep 25, 2021
Stable and quick to set up but needs more clear status information for end users
The solution is a corporate proxy server, an intelligence proxy From a corporate perspective, I understand that it's important to keep the company data safe. From a corporate point of view, it's a good solution. The solution is stable. The solution can scale.  It was a very easy product to…
it_user1337607 - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 28, 2020
Also functions as a next-gen firewall because it has security features
Our primary use case was to switch from MPLS to SD-WAN to minimize the cost. Also to have a cloud platform to transport traffic to different solutions to be more effective.  The most valuable feature is that it also works as a next-gen firewall because it has security features.  Based on the…
Thomas Pane - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 19, 2024
Multi-cloud support capability allows us to get extra capacity quickly, but it's an expensive solution.
It has a lot of major restrictions and it's a little costly. For example, the requirement to have the separate nodes from VMware to monitor and control nodes is a big expense. We looked at it from a Dell perspective and the minimum they want just to monitor and have that capability is $10,000 a month. It's kind of expensive. There's always improvements to be had, but the problem is the price. That's always the driving decision point. We don't want to have a SD-WAN for our business users and then have to go to someone like Zscaler for our private VPN. We would like to see one product do it all, so we're only dealing with one source when we talk about remote access, whether it be large installations or remote users. Having multiple products is a drain.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Our primary use case for this product is DLP,"
"Content filtering is the most useful feature of iboss."
"Iboss is a solution that prevents advanced persistent threats, and has a zero tolerance for attacks."
"Because of iboss, I did not have to assign web filtering tasks to my techs on a daily basis."
"It was a very easy product to install. It can be deployed very fast."
"Technical support is pretty sharp and very responsive."
"The security aspect of the solution, particularly the malware behind it, is excellent. That's something that really helped us out. It's not just a simple proxy that just blocks the insights of potential threats that come on behind it. They do malware detection and that helps us a lot."
"Its initial setup was straightforward."
"It is quite simple and easy to use."
"It is a stable solution...it is a scalable solution."
"We appreciate the optimization and acceleration of the performance of SDP users."
"The most valuable feature is that it also works as a next-gen firewall because it has security features."
"It's a pretty straightforward solution."
"The solution is stable."
"The visibility control and security aspects are amazing."
"I haven't had any trouble, and practically forget that I'm using it."
"The initial configuration and deployment are quite easy."
"It's easy to deploy and manage. Even a small group of people can manage a large environment. It's stable, easy to deploy, easy to install—all the stuff."
"This solution is as stable as most firewalls. VMware is a reputable vendor."
"One of the standout features is its ability to dynamically manage enterprise networks based on applications."
"I would absolutely recommend VeloCloud because it's user-friendly and because the integration is easier than with other solutions."
"Has an optimization feature that acts to ensure the quality of the services running on the overlay to be most valuable."
"The setup is very straightforward."
"When we upgrade to one of the edges, it goes very smoothly."
 

Cons

"The dashboards for local use could be better."
"Iboss is growing so fast that it is often hard for them to keep up with the challenges."
"The solution could be stronger on the integration side and offer more cloud applications like G Suite or Oracle."
"Sometimes the agent stops working in iboss, and we have to reinstall the agent."
"Its pricing could be better."
"File integrity monitoring would be very advantageous as an additional feature."
"SSL decryption: We had issues with learners using apps instead of using web browsers. This type of encryption is tough for any appliance in a BYOD environment."
"To scale up, a new iboss Node Blade Chassis must be purchased."
"The price could be better."
"There's no principal in Malaysia, only a distributor."
"They can't do one-to-one NAT (Network Address Translation) in AP (their access point), and that is something that Palo Alto can do."
"The tool needs to be more granular. Its reports are not very in-depth."
"The product may be complex for users with few years of experience."
"The different languages in the user interface should be enhanced."
"Cato Networks security could be better."
"They should add more sophisticated security features. It should also be integrated into the cloud."
"The prep time and understanding what you want to do and how much bandwidth you'll need and how you're going to configure it on the network, that's more of an issue than anything else."
"The dashboards could be improved."
"The initial setup could be simplified for beginners."
"This solution can be improved by integrating other security solutions."
"Some of the service providers that use VeloCloud as their SD-WAN should be enabled to have better global visibility."
"It needs better security."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing."
"Can't execute commands quickly when troubleshooting. The graphic user interface is slow."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is expensive compared to one of its competitors."
"The price of Cato Networks is in the middle range compared to other solutions. NetFoundry is a less expensive solution than Cato Networks."
"The solution has reasonable pricing. It has a yearly subscription. The pricing depends on the permit to code. Sometimes, we need to increase the permit, and the cost will automatically change. There's no fixed cost. Unless we request additional modules such as DNS security, ELP, and decent features, there will be no additional cost."
"The pricing of this solution depends on what you need. It is based on bandwidth."
"I rate the price of Cato Networks a four out of five."
"The product is very competitively priced, and that's compelling. They don't charge the customer based on the operational cost like other brands such as Palo Alto. Cato has its own fully-fledged cloud, with their own data centers, equipment, and so on, which is an advantage. I rate the solution five out of five for affordability."
"The solution is reasonably priced since Cato Networks provides features like SASE and monitoring, which I am very happy with currently."
"The price is not an issue for us, as it is priced more competitively than some other vendors."
"Cato Networks seems more expensive than Cisco Meraki."
"The price of VMware SD-WAN is less expensive than some solutions, such as Cisco."
"The price of this solution is higher than that of other SD-WAN vendors."
"The solution's price combines the license and the bandwidth you used."
"You need to pay for a license to use this product."
"We make monthly payments toward the licensing costs of the solution."
"The minimum cost is $10,000 a month to have a monitoring station set up."
"Overall pricing could be lower. It is much more expensive than traditional hardware vendor pricing."
"The licensing model of VMware SD-WAN could be improved, it is not always that competitive. The biggest concern is to be competitive against other solutions. However, the way that the licensing model is designed is not corresponding to the real use cases of my customers."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions solutions are best for your needs.
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Educational Organization
8%
Computer Software Company
29%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Retailer
6%
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about iboss?
Content filtering is the most useful feature of iboss.
What needs improvement with iboss?
Sometimes the agent stops working in iboss, and we have to reinstall the agent. This is a hiccup that iboss should im...
What is your primary use case for iboss?
We use iboss for the proxy solution. I used iboss in my organization to block a few sites for a few of my employees.
What do you like most about Cato Networks?
The solution is a simple WAN solution. We've onboarded the socket on the Cato platform, and it provides connectivity....
What is your primary use case for Cato Networks?
For the past three years, our company has operated as a managed service provider across various continents. We assist...
What advice do you have for others considering Cato Networks?
AI is integrated into the Cato SASE Cloud Platform through various security tools like CASB, Kaspersky solution, DLP,...
What are the biggest differences between Fortinet Fortigate and VMware SD-WAN?
One of our favorite things about Fortinet Fortigate is that you can deploy on the cloud or on premises. It is a very ...
What do you like most about VMware SD-WAN?
One of the key use cases for VMware SD-WAN was assisting a customer in the industrial zone. They required virtualized...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware SD-WAN?
VMware SD-WAN provides competitive pricing. I rate the pricing a seven out of ten.
 

Also Known As

iBoss Cloud Platform
Cato Networks
VMware SD-WAN, VeloCloud
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

More than 4,000 global enterprises trust the iboss Cloud Platform to support their modern workforces, including a large number of Fortune 50 companies.
Paysafe, AdRoll, Pet Lovers Centre, Arlington Orthopedics, Humphreys & Partners Architects
Redmond, Coca Cola, Roka Bioscience, MetTel, Deutsche Telekom, Rockford Construction,  The Bay Club, tru Independence, Triton Management Services, DevCon, AXPM
Find out what your peers are saying about Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs. VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN and other solutions. Updated: July 2024.
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.