Checkmk vs OpenText Operations Bridge comparison

Checkmk and OpenText are both solutions in the Cloud Monitoring Software category. Checkmk is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.4, while OpenText is ranked #30 with an average rating of 8.3. Checkmk holds a 5.3% mindshare in CMS, compared to OpenText’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Checkmk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Checkmk

Read 9 Checkmk reviews

3,111 Views
2,760 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Operations Bridge

Read 48 OpenText Operations Bridge reviews

285 Views
139 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Checkmk

OpenText Operations Bridge

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText Operations Bridge and Checkmk compete in the IT monitoring solutions category. OpenText Operations Bridge appears to have the upper hand with its centralized monitoring and comprehensive integration abilities, although Checkmk offers affordability and ease of use for handling complex infrastructures.

Features: OpenText Operations Bridge is notable for its extensive event correlation, scalability, and unified view of operational data sources, which is ideal for enterprises needing centralized reporting. Checkmk provides seamless integration, resource monitoring, and user-friendly interfaces, making it effective for managing complex infrastructures and offering outage detection at an affordable rate.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Operations Bridge faces challenges with its complexity in setup, needing enhancements in scalability, performance during upgrades, and more straightforward licensing. Checkmk can improve in alert management, documentation, and expanding integration capabilities. Users value its ongoing enhancements but suggest better predictive monitoring and presentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Operations Bridge offers versatile deployment options like on-premises and hybrid cloud, though technical support quality varies by geographical region, leading to occasional delays. Checkmk focuses on on-premises and private cloud deployments, with customer service being highly rated despite some technical support issues related to off-shore handling affecting response times.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Operations Bridge is considered costly, especially for smaller firms, due to its complex licensing model, yet offers substantial ROI through its extensive features. Checkmk is priced competitively, offering significant value, particularly appealing to budget-conscious organizations like educational institutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmk vs. OpenText Operations Bridge Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk vs. OpenText Operations Bridge

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,646 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmk

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

12th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (11th), Server Monitoring (5th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (13th)

OpenText Operations Bridge

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

30th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (8th), IT Operations Analytics (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Checkmk is 5.3%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Operations Bridge is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Paolo Sala

Application performance and System monitoring at Agos

A reasonably priced tool for system and application monitoring

The main room for improvement is in the solution's presentation and the integration area. In our company, we use the integration capabilities from ServiceNow. We also have another big monitoring solution in place in our company, which is Dynatrace. At the moment, there doesn't exist an out-of-the-box integration for Dynatrace. I think that the integration and the exporting of the data collected are areas where Checkmk lacks but should try to improve the most. The only implementation of Checkmk that allows high availability is the virtual appliance that has the option for the availability of a different box. Otherwise, you have to find a way to implement it manually with some custom solution, which could be an improvement.

Read full review

Ahmed Salman

Performance & Monitoring Supervisor at Saudi Telecom Company

Powerful data integration, comprehensive automation, and hybrid compatibility

The data lake is a very powerful feature within OpenText Operations Bridge. It can integrate with any BI tool to collect AI data and perform a variety of functions. It offers hybrid compatibility and supports desktop application customization and cloud integration. Another essential capability is server automation, which became significantly easier with the software appliance for deployment. This solution also provides role-based access that enhances data privacy and security.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's versatile, scalable, and easier to use compared to other solutions like Nagios and OMD."

"The alerting system in Checkmk really works properly."

"The initial setup of Checkmk was easy...It is a very stable solution."

"I really like the auto-discovery feature."

"Checkmk helps me compare data and foresee issues."

"The most valuable features of Checkmk are its resource monitoring, infra monitoring, and log factor configuration."

"We can monitor multiple sites using the product."

"Checkmk was built on a platform that was user-friendly, and I could build my charts easily."

More Checkmk pros

"The initial setup is pretty straightforward. It's not complex at all."

"I rate OpenText Operations Bridge as a solid nine on a scale of one to ten."

"The most valuable aspect of Operations Bridge for us is its integration capabilities."

"Purely, its flexibility is the most valuable aspect. It is hugely configurable."

"It's a very good product overall."

"It has the capability to display overall health of the infrastructure and is very useful for executive reports on the health of the infrastructure."

"This solution worked as an umbrella for many different types of monitoring systems, offering various tools for not only application performance management models but also user experience models and monitoring business processes."

"The broad integration possibilities, I'd say, with any kind of product, are probably the most valuable feature."

More OpenText Operations Bridge pros

Cons

"Checkmk does not allow running scripts at varying intervals."

"In Checkmk, the documentation can probably be improved a bit more."

"It is easy for tech-savvy people, but newcomers might find it intimidating."

"The initial setup is a bit complex."

"The main challenge for us is that we're moving from Nagios to Checkmk, and we're still getting used to the new way of working."

"If an alert is generated for a specific pattern in the log, and if Checkmk catches that log, it will stay there even after the alert is resolved."

"I think that the integration and the exporting of the data collected are areas where Checkmk lacks but should try to improve the most."

"Checkmk does not work too easily with the PowerStore. I use a PowerShell script as Checkmk runs on Linux and a Windows system, connecting with the Checkmk agent."

More Checkmk cons

"We need improvements in delivering quality reports from OBM and in integrating Operations Bridge with other components like UCMDB for asset discovery."

"Remove the dependency of Java technology. This is a feature used for admin purposes to update the modeling."

"Installing and upgrading the HPOM and Operations Agent software is not always easy and the process can be quite fragile. Once it is running, it is very quick and stable, but an upgrade can quite easily break something or terminate unexpectedly."

"Reporting has to be tackled a bit more. Conceptually, it is there and conceptually it is amazing, but somehow the module itself is suffering."

"The latest versions of the service reporting dashboards need improvement, such as service modeling."

"Our issues are largely support related due to where we are and the knowledge base that we have here. This issue relates both HPE in general and to the technical products."

"The product might currently have a lot of new features, however, I don't have information about these new features, so it's possible it may require updates in that area."

"The pricing is a bit expensive for smaller companies."

More OpenText Operations Bridge cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Checkmk is cheaper compared to other enterprise products."

"The product is affordable."

"Checkmk is a fairly reasonably priced solution."

"It is competitive."

"Setup costs can be high depending on the partner, but it is worth it."

"As OpsBridge is a suite of products bundled together, you may find yourself paying for software functionality that you don't actually use, e.g. Real User Monitor (RUM)."

"The cost is very high."

"The licensing cost for this solution is approximately $1,000 USD."

"The licensing model for Micro Focus Operations Bridge is unit-based so it can be one device or ten devices depending on your situation or model. Cost-wise, it's much more if you have more devices and features such as infrastructure monitoring, analytic dashboard, and business dashboard in your model."

"Pricing is very flexible and depends on the modules selected as per the requirement."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,646 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Checkmk?

The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Checkmk?

I will get more information about Checkmk when the proof of concept is done. It's going to be before the summer. There will be a report about the tool and a recommendation to use it. So far, it loo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Checkmk?

Checkmk ( /products/checkmk-reviews ) is a monitoring tool, so that's what I will use it for. Right now, it's not in production, but it's in a proof of concept phase. It looks good, so probably, du...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus Operations Bridge?

It is stable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Operations Bridge?

From a cost perspective, OpenText Operations Bridge is cost-effective as it saves us man hours. What used to be done manually by a person is now done automatically. With its automation capabilities...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Operations Bridge?

The only aspect I find lacking in OpenText Operations Bridge is more aesthetic. The dashboards from OpenText Operations Bridge, when compared to those from Splunk, are less visually appealing. Splu...

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Checkmk

Compared 49% of the time

Icinga vs Checkmk

Compared 9% of the time

LibreNMS vs Checkmk

Compared 7% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Checkmk

Compared 4% of the time

Centreon vs Checkmk

Compared 4% of the time

More Checkmk Competitors

OpsRamp vs OpenText Operations Bridge

Compared 41% of the time

SCOM vs OpenText Operations Bridge

Compared 33% of the time

BMC Helix Monitor vs OpenText Operations Bridge

Compared 26% of the time

More OpenText Operations Bridge Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk

April 2025

Download Checkmk product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Operations Bridge

March 2025

Download OpenText Operations Bridge product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus Operations Bridge, Operations Bridge Manager, Micro Focus Operations Analytics

Overview

Checkmk is a powerful tool for monitoring IT infrastructure, providing vital insights on servers, databases, network devices, and custom applications.

Primarily used for supervising IT infrastructure, Checkmk helps organizations ensure service availability by monitoring hosts, processes, load, storage, and network appliances. With support for both Linux and Windows environments across multiple data centers, Checkmk performs compliance checks and preserves historical data for core network devices.

What are the key features of Checkmk?

Auto-discovery: Automatically identifies new hosts and applies monitoring rules.
Custom monitoring: Enhances MySQL performance tracking.
Slack integration: Provides immediate downtime alerts.
Graphical trend analysis: Offers 400 days of trend data.
Multiple site monitoring: Ensures seamless data synchronization through task automation.
Resource and infrastructure monitoring: Configures log factors to fit budget constraints.
System metric imports: Includes servers, SQL, file systems, and application monitoring.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Time-saving: Auto-discovery and task automation streamline processes.
Proactive alerts: Immediate downtime notifications optimize response times.
Historical insights: Long-term graphical trend analysis aids strategic planning.
Cost efficiency: Resource monitoring aligned with budget constraints.

Checkmk is deployed extensively in large enterprise environments for monitoring critical infrastructure. It proves particularly useful under conditions of frequent power outages or network issues, helping maintain smooth operations. While the alert acknowledgment process and interface require improvements, and the lack of an agent-less platform complicates server management, the strengths in auto-discovery, integration, and comprehensive monitoring make Checkmk a strong contender for IT infrastructure monitoring.

Checkmk

OpenText Operations Bridge – SaaS is enterprise event and performance management software. With automated discovery, monitoring, and remediation, it fast-tracks your move to full-stack AIOps across multicloud and on- premises environments.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

GE Money Bank, Bank AlJazira, Tech Mahindra

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk vs. OpenText Operations Bridge

March 2025

Free Report: Checkmk vs. OpenText Operations Bridge

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmk vs. OpenText Operations Bridge and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,646 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmk vs. OpenText Operations Bridge report.

See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.