Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Workspace ONE UEM comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Privileged Access ...
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
193
Ranking in other categories
User Activity Monitoring (1st), Enterprise Password Managers (2nd), Privileged Access Management (PAM) (1st), Mainframe Security (3rd), Operational Technology (OT) Security (3rd)
Workspace ONE UEM
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
100
Ranking in other categories
Remote Access (3rd), Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) (7th), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (3rd), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (7th), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is designed for Privileged Access Management (PAM) and holds a mindshare of 22.1%, down 24.2% compared to last year.
Workspace ONE UEM, on the other hand, focuses on Unified Endpoint Management (UEM), holds 21.9% mindshare, down 27.4% since last year.
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
Unified Endpoint Management (UEM)
 

Featured Reviews

Chris V - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 1, 2023
Great password management, API password retrieval functionality and Rest API retrieval
We primarily use the product as part of the growing security posture of the company The solution provided password management and API password retrieval functionality.  The most valuable aspects of the solution include password management and Rest API retrieval of vaulted credentials.  The…
Ricardo Franco Mahecha - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 8, 2023
Easy to install, offers good scalability and allows for the remote management of PCs, laptops, phones, and desktops
All the use cases are related to Salesforce and people who are working outside the office. Sometimes, they register their PCs inside the office in Workspace ONE to manage them and push some software or install it remotely and some kind of things It's easier to install new software remotely using…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"On the customer accounts side, our account managers are responsive. If you ask them, they will get you whomever you need."
"The accounts are maintained automatically. Hence, resource and administration costs are less."
"It is an extremely scalable solution."
"It's highly secure and very flexible. It gives us all types of storage options and it gives us a high level of security."
"Allows secure, logged access to highly sensitive servers and services."
"This is a complete solution that can detect cyber attacks well."
"We like it for the ability to automatically change passwords. At least for my group, that's the best thing."
"The most valuable aspects of the solution include password management and Rest API retrieval of vaulted credentials."
"It's all about securing data with the help of the email client called VMware Boxer. It enables the end-user to carry data in their mobile devices but there is containerization between the personal data and the organization's data. It helps enhance their security while still carrying their own BYOD."
"It is a stable solution. I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."
"The most valuable feature depends on the use case of the clients. However, one feature I like is the Kiosk Mode. In the Kiosk Mode in most cases, the clients only can make available one application developed by the solution and permit the employee or the final client to use only this one application for interaction. This provides a security control layer limiting only one application functionally."
"The product enables us to access our internal applications from anywhere in the world."
"When we publish the applications, getting the credentials to log in and keep the application up or running is easy."
"The platform provides a stable environment for operations and quickly creates new environments. Additionally, it offers efficient flexibility."
"The performance is good, and it is easy to configure."
"The initial setup is easy and the deployment doesn't take too long."
 

Cons

"The one place where we found that this product really needs to improve is the cloud. Simple integrations don't exist, even today. We don't have anything specific on CyberArk for managing, SaaS products, SaaS vendors, SaaS credentials. I understand it's a vendor-based thing and that they have to coordinate with the other vendors to be able to do that, and there are integrations coming. But these are the major places where CyberArk definitely needs to invest some more time."
"This product needs professional consulting services to onboard accounts effectively based user profiles."
"They can do a better job in the PSM space."
"CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault can improve the distributive vault feature. Distributing the vault in multiple areas and multiple data centers should improve."
"The continuous scanning of the assets is limited to Windows and Unix. We like to have the solution scan any databases, network devices, and security devices for privileged accounts. That would be very helpful."
"The interface could be improved it is not user-friendly, but they have improved but it could still improve. In the policies configuration, it would be a benefit to have more details."
"The stability depends on the infrastructure it is installed on, which is important because CyberArk does not have the hardware appliance."
"The PTA could be improved. Currently, companies often have multiple domains and sometimes it's difficult to implement CyberArk in this kind of infrastructure. For example, you can add CPM (Central Policy Manager) and PSM (Privileged Session Manager and PVWA (Password Vault Web Access) for access, but if you want to add PTA (Privileged Threat Analysis) to scan Vault logs, it is difficult because this component may be adding multiple domain environments."
"Setup is not too complex."
"When we had some issues, the support did not respond quickly, and they did not provide a solution."
"I tried to use the tool on an encrypted disk, but it was inconvenient."
"In terms of the inventory management side, as in the invoice management, the stock management and the entire inventory of an organization is lagging a bit in comparison to Blackberry or other EMM solutions."
"We'd like the customization to be better."
"There should be better compatibility with Linux devices."
"There is a need for better user lifecycle management within VMware Identity Manager, along with better user governance...The scalability of the product needs to improve."
"The only downside to the solution is that the dashboard is very confusing."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I'm aware that the organization had purchased licensing for almost all of CyberArk's solutions including licensing for PTA, EPM, and the Application Identity Manager. But when it comes to PSM, this is one of the components where there's an additional charge for any extra PSMs that you want to deploy. I believe that there's some rider where the vendor has a bit of leeway to, at times, charge a premium on whatever additional services you may require above the board."
"It can be an expensive product."
"The main problem for the tool is its licensing. I work for a really big company. When you try to develop this as a service, usually you work with leverage teams who are formed with dozens of members. You might dedicate one FTE, or less, for something, e.g., an antivirus administrator. You might have half an FTE's effort dedicated to administering the antivirus, but then you have a team of about 30 users who might access that ticket. The problem is that CyberArk eliminated the possibility of concurrent users years ago. This is a big problem for companies who work with leverage teams. You need to pay for everyone. 40 licenses are used by 20 or 30 people. This is a big problem because licenses are not precisely cheap."
"CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault's pricing is reasonable."
"It is in line with its competitors, but all such solutions cost too much money."
"CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is a very expensive product."
"The price of this solution is quite reasonable."
"The price of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager could be less expensive."
"While it is not inexpensive in terms of price, it is definitely worth it."
"Licensing fees are paid on a monthly basis."
"VMware Workspace ONE can fit any organization because if you need more devices there are only additional fees."
"The pricing currently is higher than the competition."
"It's a highly affordable solution"
"You should take out a dedicated license agreement of your MDM fleet and invest heavily in innovating in this space."
"The solution runs at roughly around $36/user for a year."
"The license is paid annually."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
28%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Sailpoint IdentityIQ compare with CyberArk PAM?
We evaluated Sailpoint IdentityIQ before ultimately choosing CyberArk. Sailpoint Identity Platform is a solution to manage risks in cloud enterprise environments. It automates and streamlines the m...
What do you like most about CyberArk Privileged Access Manager?
The most valuable features of the solution are control and analytics.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Privileged Access Manager?
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager comes at a high cost. But the solution is worth its price.
How does Microsoft Intune compare with VMware Workspace One?
Microsoft Intune is a great tool for managing a mobile device fleet while keeping access control. The solution makes it easy to control security and manage the usage of mobile apps when you have a ...
How does VMware Workspace One compare with VMware Horizon 7?
VMware Workspace One has a powerful set of helpful features. The solution offers very good documentation, the initial setup is easy, and the product is very stable and reliable. I think the fact th...
What do you like most about VMware Workspace ONE?
The platform provides a stable environment for operations and quickly creates new environments. Additionally, it offers efficient flexibility.
 

Also Known As

CyberArk Privileged Access Security, CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault
VMware Workspace ONE, VMware AirWatch, Workspace ONE Assist, VMware Identity Manager, Workspace ONE Access, VMware Horizon Air
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Rockwell Automation
Australian Sports Commission, Stockport NHS Foundation Trust, Lomond School, Merck, United Bank, Medical College of Wisconsin, Latymer Upper School, 2gether NHS Foundation Trust, Dowling Aaron Inc., Trillium Lakelands District School Board, Harrogate Grammar School, Duke University Football, Delta Air Lines, Adventist Health System, Giochi Preziosi, Cramlington Learning Village, Intermountain Healthcare, Safexpress, TAG Aviation
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, One Identity and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: September 2024.
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.