Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection comparison

Cybereason and WithSecure are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Cybereason is ranked #45 with an average rating of 8.3, while WithSecure is ranked #38 with an average rating of 8.0. Cybereason holds a 1.0% mindshare in EPP, compared to WithSecure’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Cybereason users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WithSecure users who would recommend it.
Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...
Read 20 Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response reviews
  • 4,828 Views
  • 2,681 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
WithSecure Elements Endpoin...
Read 7 WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection reviews
  • 2,286 Views
  • 1,731 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response and WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection offer robust solutions for endpoint protection. Cybereason generally receives higher marks for its advanced threat detection capabilities, while WithSecure is praised for its ease of deployment and comprehensive protection features.

Features: Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is noted for its advanced threat hunting, real-time detection, and automated response. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection provides comprehensive protection, user-friendly management, and effective malware prevention.

Room for Improvement: Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response users suggest improvements in system performance, lowering false positive rates, and enhancing reporting tools. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection users seek more advanced reporting tools, flexibility in policy management, and better system performance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is described as straightforward to deploy but can require additional configuration for optimal performance. Customer service receives mixed reviews. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is praised for its quick and easy deployment and strong customer service support.

Pricing and ROI: Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is generally viewed as a higher-cost solution but justified by its advanced capabilities. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection offers competitive pricing and better ROI according to user feedback.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Report (Updated: October 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
October 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 815,854 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
45th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (34th)
WithSecure Elements Endpoin...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
38th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is 1.0%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

AtulChaurasia - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 28, 2023
Scalable platform with intuitive features for detecting malicious files
We use Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response to scan and detect unusual processes and malicious files on the endpoint The product's threat-hunting feature is very intuitive and easy to use as it is GUI-based. We need to know the specific fields we want to scan. It gives the entire report of…
Read full review
Muhammed Abdul Gafoor - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 12, 2024
The product has excellent patch management features, but it does not provide technical support in the Middle East
Our clients are happy with the product. The notifications and patch management features are valuable. The interface is fine The product does not have technical partners in the Middle East. It only has sales partners. I do not like the sales partners in UAE. They did not support me when I needed…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"For me, the technical support is good."
"I haven't had any issues with the solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"What I like most about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is the support because the support is good. The solution is also easy to use, and it has a dashboard. Everything is good, and there's no problem with it."
"The initial setup was straightforward."
"The most valuable feature is the capability of the command used by the machine so that we see the kind of performance that is running."
"We didn't have the visibility that we now have. It has increased our visibility by a lot. So, we put a lot more time into really looking at our environment and what is happening throughout our different networks. It has increased our visibility by around fivefold."
"Cybereason's threat hunting and investigation are the most valuable features. Threat hunting is a user-friendly feature that keeps you safe. Investigation offers an added value that I haven't seen with other EDR services. It allows you to find specific policy problems within your environment."
"The initial setup was easy and straightforward."
More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pros
"The notifications and patch management features are valuable."
"On the cloud management page, the solution scales up very highly."
"We use the product for detecting network vulnerabilities and for software update purposes."
"F-Secure is useful for keeping user machines up-to-date by pushing out security and critical updates."
"There is a layer of security to prevent a malicious agent (malware) from interrupting or stopping services, deleting or modifying registry entries or even stopping the antivirus from acting, ensuring that there will be no interruption of protection."
"Both incoming and outgoing traffic is protected."
"The most valuable features of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection are the clear useful portal and overall company protection."
 

Cons

"They need to improve their technical support services."
"Its Microsoft PowerShell protections still need some compatibility improvements. We have run across just a few. It is compatible with 90% of what we have in our network, but there is that 10% that we are still struggling with as far as compatibility with the type of PowerShell scripts needed to run our day-to-day business."
"It should be more stable, and the sensor needs improvement in terms of connectivity."
"I feel that the product lacks reporting features and needs improvement."
"While the product is very good, there are still some areas for improvement. The initial triage area could be a bit simpler. They get into the weeds real fast; it gets very detailed very fast. I am still looking for an easier triage layer on top with the ability to dig deeper."
"There is room for improvement in the product features related to device control, particularly USB management."
"The network coverage becomes an issue most of the time."
"Compared to our previous endpoint, we have a lot more false positives and a lot more duplication of alerts. So we're chasing more alerts."
More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response cons
"The program and cloud service management is in English. It's not a problem for me, however, it might be for users who don't speak English or use it regularly."
"I would like the part of Hash Analysis by external sources to be improved."
"The solution could improve by having more real-time responses. For example, when a license gets removed from a computer it does not update the records of the change. Additionally, when I installed Microsoft Windows Defender I was not able to send licenses through email to our tenants. The integration with other solutions could improve."
"There is no technical support available in the Middle East."
"There could be a dedicated security partner with essential knowledge."
"Resource consumption is suboptimal and could be improved."
"But the biggest one for us is patch management because this has been our top priority when looking at alternatives. Every solution needs to have patch management, if that's possible. It would cut costs on our side if that feature were included, so we don't need to pay for two separate pieces of software."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I had to go through a third-party to purchase it, which I wasn't really pleased about."
"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing an eight."
"I do not have experience with the licensing of the product."
"The pricing is manageable."
"Though it is not the cheapest solution but it fits our budget. We pay an annual licensing fee."
"In terms of cost, this is a good choice for our needs."
"This product is somewhat expensive and should be cheaper."
"We considered a few other solutions. Some were ridiculously overpriced, while others didn't have solutions for Mac endpoints. That was a deal-breaker because most of our organization is on Mac. It came down to two vendors: Cybereason and another. They had similar pitches and almost identical approaches, but in the end, Cybereason gave us the best value for our money."
More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pricing and cost advice
"The cost of the solution depends on the size of the company and where the licenses are being ordered from."
"The product has average pricing."
"We pay a yearly licensing fee of about €20 per computer."
"The price is comparable."
"If you purchase licenses in bulk the price of the licenses can decrease."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
21%
Government
16%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Manufacturing Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?
Comparison with other products showed it be cheaper than some larger competitors. Set up cost for us were cheaper as we already had users experienced with the product in other business units. Initi...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?
We use the product for enhancing security postures by leveraging behavioral analytics and security engines effectively minimizing false positives and detecting threats.
See all answers
What do you like most about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?
The interface is user-friendly.
See all answers
What do you like most about F-Secure Protection Service for Business?
The notifications and patch management features are valuable.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F-Secure Protection Service for Business?
The price is comparable. We do not have a problem with the pricing. I rate the pricing a five or six out of ten. There are no additional costs associated with the solution.
See all answers
What needs improvement with F-Secure Protection Service for Business?
The product does not have technical partners in the Middle East. It only has sales partners. I do not like the sales partners in UAE. They did not support me when I needed help with security. The v...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
Compared 25% of the time
Darktrace vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Logo
Darktrace vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
Compared 22% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
Compared 9% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
Compared 8% of the time
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
Compared 6% of the time
More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Competitors
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Compared 40% of the time
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Compared 11% of the time
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Compared 7% of the time
Symantec Endpoint Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Compared 6% of the time
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Compared 6% of the time
More WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
November 2024
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response reportDownload Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response product report
Buyer's Guide
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
October 2024
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection reportDownload WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection product report
 

Also Known As

Cybereason EDR, Cybereason Deep Detect & Respond
F-Secure Elements Endpoint Protection, F-Secure Protection Service for Business
 

Learn More

Video not available
Cybereason
Video not available
WithSecure
 

Overview

Cybereason's Endpoint Detection and Response platform detects in real-time both signature and non-signature-based attacks and accelerates incident investigation and response. Cybereason connects together individual pieces of evidence to form a complete picture of a malicious operation.

WithSecure (formerly F-Secure) Elements Endpoint Protection is cloud-native, AI-powered endpoint protection that you can deploy instantly from your browser and manage easily from a single console. It integrates across all your endpoints, keeping your organization fenced in from attacks. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is a module of the Elements cyber security platform. The cloud-based platform provides effective protection against ransomware and advanced attacks. Elements brings together vulnerability management, automated patch management, dynamic threat intelligence and continuous behavioral analytics. Use individual solutions for specific needs or combine them all seamlessly for maximum defense.
 

Sample Customers

Lockheed Martin, Spark Capital, DocuSign, Softbank Capital
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
October 2024
Free Report: Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Find out what your peers are saying about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.