Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cyberwatch Vulnerability Manager vs Tenable Nessus comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.6
Tenable Nessus is scalable for small to medium users, but large users may face challenges with data and bandwidth.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.0
Tenable Nessus is valued for its thorough vulnerability detection, user-friendly interface, fast scanning, and affordable, reliable security management.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
5.6
Tenable Nessus requires enhancements in reporting, cloud integration, device support, automation, and security features for enterprise optimization.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.5
Tenable Nessus is stable and reliable, with users appreciating its consistent performance despite minor configuration and update issues.
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.6
Tenable Nessus support is responsive and helpful, though users note response time variability and desire clearer API documentation.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.4
Tenable Nessus offers competitive pricing with flexible licensing and discounts, praised for its value despite occasional cost concerns.
 

Categories and Ranking

Cyberwatch Vulnerability Ma...
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
70th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Tenable Nessus
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
78
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Use Cyberwatch Vulnerability Manager?
Share your opinion
Matthew Weisler - PeerSpot reviewer
Unlimited assets for one price and quick, agentless results
The solution has a single price for unlimited assets. Value wise, the solution is also great for pen testers and consultants. The solution is useful for vulnerability and patch management from both the internal and public facing sides. Quick assessments, compliance scores, and results are provided without having to do agents.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
816,816 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Educational Organization
39%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
7%
Financial Services Firm
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How would you choose between Rapid7 InsightVM and Tenable Nessus?
You have full visibility across cloud, network, virtual, and containerized infrastructures with Rapid7 Insight VM. You can easily prioritize vulnerabilities using attacker analytics. Overall, Rapid...
What's the difference between Tenable Nessus and Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?
Tenable Nessus is a vulnerability assessment solution that is both easy to deploy and easy to manage. The design of the program is such that if a company should desire to handle the installation t...
What do you like most about Tenable Nessus?
We have around 500 virtual machines. Therefore, we conduct monthly scans and open tickets for our developers to address identified vulnerabilities. These scans cover the servers, other network equi...
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Bitbrains, Tesla, Just Eat, Crosskey Banking Solutions, Covenant Health, Youngstown State University
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Wiz and others in Vulnerability Management. Updated: November 2024.
816,816 professionals have used our research since 2012.