Parasoft SOAtest and Eggplant Test are both key players in the test automation category, each offering distinct capabilities. While Parasoft SOAtest is leading in comprehensive API testing, Eggplant Test holds an advantage with its UI and image recognition features, supported by AI-driven functionalities.
Features: Parasoft SOAtest offers comprehensive tools for API testing, supporting numerous protocols like JSON and REST. It features data-driven testing, ensuring flexibility in various testing scenarios. Integration capabilities, event monitoring, and a strong scripting environment enhance its appeal further. Eggplant Test stands out with its robust UI automation introduced through advanced image recognition and OCR for various platforms. It also enables cross-platform script creation, fully supported by its system-independent approach and AI-driven features.
Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest could improve its report intuitiveness, interface user-friendliness, and integration with other testing tools. Enhancements in workspace stability and Web UI testing are also desired. Eggplant Test needs better integration capabilities and wider support for non-Windows environments. Improved event handling and an easier setup process are areas that could enhance its attractiveness. Interface and performance efficiency are potential improvement areas for both products.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Parasoft SOAtest and Eggplant Test primarily offer on-premises solutions, with Parasoft also having a hybrid cloud option. Parasoft is known for prompt customer service and reliable technical support, though there can be delays occasionally. Users of Eggplant Test consistently report a high level of satisfaction with its customer service and technical support, noting its consistency in customer experiences.
Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest is regarded as more expensive but offers considerable features that can justify the cost if properly implemented. Complex licensing structures require careful planning. Eggplant Test is also perceived as costly and more suitable for large enterprises, with licensing costs often discouraging smaller companies. Despite pricing concerns, both products offer significant reductions in manual testing efforts and strong returns on investment when effectively utilized.
We found Parasoft SOAtest to be quick in building up test patterns, allowing us to create complex tests efficiently.
Eggplant Test offers 24x7 support.
The two-system architecture that we currently follow could be better replaced with a one-system architecture.
It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our own solutions.
Parasoft SOAtest is expensive, but it was acquired because the company was dissatisfied with Quick Test Pro.
It can auto-heal the test cases and suggest new paths for testing, enhancing our ability to automate end-to-end journeys across various applications.
Parasoft SOAtest is very good at ensuring tests don't pass or fail until they genuinely pass or fail.
Across every industry, digital transformation is top of mind. New methods of developing software are driving fast change, and test teams are feeling the pressure. Increasing demand to release faster while maintaining the highest levels of quality is making the testing process more complex and harder to scale.
With AI-powered testing, Eggplant’s test and automation intelligence delivers the coverage you need to optimize the user experience, speed up release cycles, and improve your quality assurance process. Discover a fast, secure, and easy-to-use solution that tests any kind of software on any platform or device.
Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).
SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
