Eggplant Test vs SmartBear TestComplete Mobile comparison

The compared Keysight Technologies and SmartBear solutions aren't in the same category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #12 in TAt , with an average rating of 7.3, and holds a 4.3% mindshare in the category. SmartBear is ranked #11 in MTT , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 2.7% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SmartBear users who would recommend it.

Eggplant Test

Read 19 Eggplant Test reviews

3,848 Views
2,617 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

SmartBear TestComplete Mobile

Read 3 SmartBear TestComplete Mobile reviews

336 Views
255 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Eggplant Test

SmartBear TestComplete Mobile

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Eggplant Test and SmartBear TestComplete Mobile based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Katalon Studio, Worksoft and others in Test Automation Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Test Automation Tools Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,122 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Eggplant Test

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (9th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (12th), Test Automation Tools (12th)

SmartBear TestComplete Mobile

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (11th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Quality Assurance solutions, they serve different purposes. Eggplant Test is designed for Test Automation Tools and holds a mindshare of 4.3%, up 3.7% compared to last year.
SmartBear TestComplete Mobile, on the other hand, focuses on Mobile App Testing Tools, holds 2.7% mindshare, up 0.4% since last year.

Test Automation Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Eggplant Test	4.3%
Tricentis Tosca	13.4%
OpenText Functional Testing	6.5%
Other	75.8%

Test Automation Tools

Mobile App Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SmartBear TestComplete Mobile	2.7%
Tricentis Tosca	25.5%
OpenText Functional Testing	16.6%
Other	55.2%

Mobile App Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Mirza Hussain

Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Has required frequent manual adjustments due to screen resolution but supports simple automation with minimal effort

I would prefer more UFT because it has VB scripting capabilities. While Eggplant Test also has this feature, it's not very user-friendly. I prefer the features of UFT compared to Eggplant Test. When needing to do quick automation, I would prefer Eggplant Test, but otherwise, I would always choose UFT. It depends on the complexity of the tasks. For big problems and complex automation tasks, I would prefer UFT because it has more flexibility and is more effective. With Eggplant Test, if you have very low complexity automation, such as simple click sequences and validation, then it would be preferable; with more complexity, I would not recommend Eggplant Test.

Read full review

AhmedAllalen

Development team leader / APPR at a government with 501-1,000 employees

Clicking playback and detecting application needs improves functionality

There are complaints about not detecting all objects in the browser. I have to check and verify, and sometimes I have to bypass certain steps, which is a problem. I need to check the solution to understand why it's too detailed to detect or think of the browser. I use Chrome. Sometimes in Chrome, it doesn't detect certain elements in the web application. That's the problem. Also, when I run tests, I cannot export different types of logs in the same document. When I run different tests, it provides different logs, and these logs cannot be put in the same document. I have to compile them manually. Additionally, the tool can manage WinRamp scripts. I would say SilkTest also allows me to run tests, and I can challenge the sequencing, but it doesn't always do this correctly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the ability to create code from a flow chart, and then run the code through it."

"Everything is happening on the layout or display that is used by the user. Eggplant prompts processes, like 'click here,' or 'look for this image.' Eggplant makes it possible for QA people and BAs, working in the actual display, to check if the software is providing the right images, the right text, and the right results. They don't have to go inside the code or to the TCP/IP layer. Everything is happening at the highest level."

"The solution is a stable one."

"The biggest advantage has been the ability to improve the quality significantly."

"Good text reading ability."

"We did see a massive return on investment from using Eggplant."

"GUI testing is the strength of the tool. The tool works as expected, and the support response from eggPlant, as a company, has been quick and substantial."

"Eggplant Test is valuable due to its OCR technology, which is independent of underlying technologies and can identify applications based on labels such as 'username' and 'password'."

More Eggplant Test pros

"The features I find most valuable is the automatic remapping of aliases, because it is really helpful."

"It is very effective for detecting breaks and also for verifying the needs of the application before deploying it or when introducing a new product."

"I like that it offers internal methods for supported controls. It is very easy to code the tests. Object Spy is also a good feature."

Cons

"In terms of additional features, it would be helpful to have one package for all testing. You have the manager, the AI, then you have functional, and about 10 different packages for installing."

"The execution times are a little slower, and the two-system architecture that we currently follow could be better replaced with a one-system architecture."

"Eggplant Test is not a stable solution at all in my experience."

"I would like to see standardized actions already built into Eggplant. For example, "wait eight seconds". That way, I wouldn't need to create it as an action. Right now, I have to program that wait and describe it as an action so that everybody knows it is an action that waits eight seconds... That way, somebody who is not familiar with programming processes like "if-else", or "for", or "while", would be able, from the first moment, and without programming, to put some easy-to-use, standardized, actions in place."

"Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence could improve by lowering the price."

"The language is too specific; it is just for Eggplant."

"There was no free trial in it."

"The IDE could be even more full-featured. Because I was a developer, I was very spoiled by either Visual Studio Code or Visual Studio for shortcuts. For example, I was able to say "ctor" and hit Tab and it would create a template of a constructor for me... It would be great, when I want to create a new function, if there were shortcut commands like those that helped create all of the functions, or if there were shortcut features to do any of the complex plans."

More Eggplant Test cons

"The mapping is pretty complicated because there are a lot of controls that are the same and if you have a long name with the object mapping it is easy to get confused."

"It is very difficult to use the aliases on old software."

"There are complaints about not detecting all objects in the browser."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Make a smart decision about the number of developer- and execution-only licenses you purchase to maximize your budget. We found that going heavier on execution-only licenses has been a way to reduce our costs and maximize our ability to benefit from the software."

"End-to-end testing isn't possible for us because of the licensing problems. It's very expensive, so we only have two development/execution licenses."

"This solution is expensive when compared to the market. However, the reason it is more expensive is because of its stability, high performance, and for its support of any technology."

"It is scalable, but it is a matter of money in the pocket. You can scale it, but then you have to have additional licenses. The licensing approach of eggPlant is not the best."

"Eggplant Test is a very expensive solution."

"It probably has a yearly license."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,122 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Healthcare Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	14

No data available

Questions from the Community

How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?

Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Eggplant Manager?

The price of Eggplant Test is on the higher side, but the benefits it provides make it worth using.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Eggplant Manager?

See all answers

What needs improvement with SmartBear TestComplete Mobile?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SmartBear TestComplete Mobile?

The application is smaller than the transaction applications. It's a very delicate, complex application. Now I use it, however, it's just a test function for functional testing. I use TestComplete ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering SmartBear TestComplete Mobile?

It's straightforward to use. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

SmartBear TestComplete vs Eggplant Test

Compared 19% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Test

Compared 18% of the time

Qt Squish vs Eggplant Test

Compared 7% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Eggplant Test

Compared 5% of the time

Sauce Labs vs Eggplant Test

Compared 2% of the time

More Eggplant Test Competitors

Ranorex Studio vs SmartBear TestComplete Mobile

Compared 38% of the time

Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs SmartBear TestComplete Mobile

Compared 15% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs SmartBear TestComplete Mobile

Compared 14% of the time

More SmartBear TestComplete Mobile Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test

March 2026

Download Eggplant Test product report

Buyer's Guide

Mobile App Testing Tools

March 2026

Download SmartBear TestComplete Mobile product report

Also Known As

Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Eggplant DAI, Eggplant Automation Cloud, Eggplant Manager, Eggplant Mobile, Eggplant Customer Experience Insights

No data available

Overview

Across every industry, digital transformation is top of mind. New methods of developing software are driving fast change, and test teams are feeling the pressure. Increasing demand to release faster while maintaining the highest levels of quality is making the testing process more complex and harder to scale.

With AI-powered testing, Eggplant’s test and automation intelligence delivers the coverage you need to optimize the user experience, speed up release cycles, and improve your quality assurance process. Discover a fast, secure, and easy-to-use solution that tests any kind of software on any platform or device.

Keysight Technologies

AUTOMATE UI TESTING FOR ANY IOS OR ANDROID APP

Use script-free record and replay or choose from six languages, including Python and JavaScript, to create test automation scripts. Record repeatable and consistent gestures across any mobile device. Get full device control when creating automated UI tests. There is no modify or jail-break the app.

Separate the UI object identification from the test logic to build stable, easy-to-maintain automated tests. Seamless integration available with build server, source control systems, and defect management tools allows you to run automated mobile UI tests around the clock.

SmartBear

Sample Customers

FUJIFILM Group, NEC Personal Computers

Cisco, J.P. Morgan, Boeing, McAfee, EMC, Intuit

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

March 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Katalon Studio, Worksoft and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,122 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.