Everest Blueriq vs OpenText AppWorks comparison

Everest and OpenText are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Everest is ranked #35 with an average rating of 8.0, while OpenText is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.7. Everest holds a 0.2% mindshare in BPM, compared to OpenText’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Everest users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Everest Blueriq

Read 2 Everest Blueriq reviews

205 Views
138 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText AppWorks

Read 10 OpenText AppWorks reviews

343 Views
217 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Everest Blueriq

OpenText AppWorks

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Everest Blueriq and OpenText AppWorks compete in the business process management space, with OpenText AppWorks holding the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set despite higher costs.

Features:Everest Blueriq provides dynamic modeling capabilities, flexible integration options, and an emphasis on ease of use. OpenText AppWorks offers a robust range of built-in processes, extensive customization potential, and complex workflow solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Deploying Everest Blueriq is straightforward with streamlined setup and responsive support with hands-on guidance. OpenText AppWorks requires more initial time investment due to its comprehensive setup, complemented by detailed documentation and extensive service offerings suitable for organizations seeking depth.

Pricing and ROI:Everest Blueriq has moderate setup costs, focusing on value for mid-sized projects with satisfactory ROI. OpenText AppWorks demands a higher initial investment, justified by its vast functionality offering high returns for complex, large-scale operational requirements.

To learn more, read our detailed Business Process Management (BPM) Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,253 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Everest Blueriq

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

35th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText AppWorks

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

20th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Everest Blueriq is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText AppWorks is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

ChrisBiemans

Business Consultant at Ziggo Services B.V.

Stable platform with valuable case management capabilities

We use Everest Blueriq for a food safety organization, that revolves around automating and managing complex processes critical to ensuring food safety and compliance. It involves monitoring containers for pests and diseases before allowing entry into the EU. The platform plays a vital role in…

Read full review

Senthil Natarajan

Chief Operating Officer at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

The solution enables automation of supply chain and invoice processing with comprehensive integration and workflow capabilities

The main valuable features of OpenText AppWorks ( /products/opentext-appworks-reviews ) are the BPM ( /products/informatica-intelligent-data-management-cloud-idmc-reviews ) modules. There is the standard BPM ( /products/informatica-intelligent-data-management-cloud-idmc-reviews ) modeler and a case modeler. These are two strong features from the workflow layer. Additionally, the integration capability of the solution is beneficial. With these features, we are able to use OpenText AppWorks for automating supply-chain-related problems, vendor process automations, and invoice automations. We have built almost twenty-plus types of solutions and implemented around three hundred fifty-plus implementations. The solution also allows us to integrate it with our ERP ( /categories/erp ) system.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The biggest benefit of using the product is identifying the issues, enabling a more flexible working method."

"We really appreciate the process automation and how can you create human tasks as one of your processes."

"In terms of the scalability and the handling of complexity, the customers are satisfied, and we also have confidence in the solution to achieve whatever implementations are required."

"The monitoring aspect is highly valuable, as it offers an exceptional capability to track every minute of action performed by a business user in the global context."

"AppWorks is a very quick development platform with low-coding capability and strong integration with third-party systems."

"One of the most useful features is the code is customizable, we can make it our own."

"The good part of OpenText AppWorks is that all of its components are together in one platform, including integration capability, UI capability, and workflow capability."

"We've automated several processes, including purchase requisition to purchase orders, RFQ processes, vendor onboarding, project budgeting, and business case creation. The recent versions of OpenText AppWorks, especially those incorporating low-code functionalities, have had a significant positive impact. In some cases, we've observed a remarkable reduction in development time, ranging from 50 to 75 percent. The MTP model and life cycle have facilitated rapid development cycles."

"From a business perspective, the most valuable aspect lies in the optimization of processes."

More OpenText AppWorks pros

Cons

"The platform's initial setup process could be better."

"There could be some improvements with the low code design part. It could be more customizable and more user friendly."

"From an enterprise point, their pricing is a little bit crazy because they don't have a SaaS model."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing structure."

"The integration could improve."

"The crucial missing element is the archival function."

"The solution needs to continue to enhance the low-coding feature within the product itself."

"OpenText AppWork's low-code capabilities can be enhanced by integrating them with AI offerings like Aviator."

"A room for improvement in OpenText AppWorks is its user interface. It should have mobile compatibility because right now, you still have to make two applications with a user interface for Android and a user interface for iOS, so if OpenText AppWorks can provide one UI that can be used across all devices, that would make the solution better. An additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of OpenText AppWorks is a better UI in terms of the look and feel. Another feature I'd like to see in the next version of the solution is mobile compatibility because, at the moment, you have to make your application mobile-ready or compatible with mobile devices because there's no provision for it in OpenText AppWorks."

More OpenText AppWorks cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"AppWorks is pretty expensive."

"The price is on the higher side."

"Pricing for OpenText AppWorks, specifically in the Indian market, is reasonable, but I'm not aware if it's still reasonable outside of India. The licensing cost is based on the number of licenses and the number of users. OpenText AppWorks has different licensing options."

"There is a user-based perpetual license."

"The licensing cost varies based on several factors, such as the size of the customer and the domain URL."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Insurance Company

10%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Everest Blueriq?

The biggest benefit of using the product is identifying the issues, enabling a more flexible working method.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Everest Blueriq?

The platform's initial setup process could be better.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Everest Blueriq?

See all answers

What do you like most about OpenText AppWorks?

We've automated several processes, including purchase requisition to purchase orders, RFQ processes, vendor onboarding, project budgeting, and business case creation. The recent versions of OpenTex...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText AppWorks?

From an enterprise point, their pricing is a little bit crazy because they don't have a SaaS model. They have to go with a perpetual model, which makes it look crazy initially. But over a period, i...

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenText AppWorks?

They can improve the UI capability. Recently, they launched a low-code platform, called entity modeling, which they can enhance further. It would be beneficial if OpenText ( /products/data-express-...

See all answers

Comparisons

Pega Platform vs Everest Blueriq

Compared 100% of the time

More Everest Blueriq Competitors

Camunda vs OpenText AppWorks

Compared 20% of the time

Appian vs OpenText AppWorks

Compared 20% of the time

ServiceNow Now Platform vs OpenText AppWorks

Compared 16% of the time

OutSystems vs OpenText AppWorks

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs OpenText AppWorks

Compared 12% of the time

More OpenText AppWorks Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

April 2025

Download Everest Blueriq product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText AppWorks

March 2025

Download OpenText AppWorks product report

Also Known As

Blueriq, Aquima

No data available

Overview

Blueriq is the software platform for organizations with knowledge-based, rule-driven business processes. By modeling these processes in one central area, automate and integrate, you can respond quickly to changes, creating the ultimate customer experience and streamline your services.

Everest

OpenText Appworks. AppWorks is OpenText's Enterprise Application Development and Management platform. It allows you to quickly and easily build purpose-specific apps for the enterprise using the web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3 and JavaScript. These apps can connect to the OpenText EIM Suite using RESTful API.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Abn Amro, Aegon, duo, City of Tilburg

Red Deer County, DHFL Pramerica Life Insurance, Bangkok Airways, PBS, CIZ (Netherlands Ministry of Health), The Dutch Ministry of Defence, Mercer

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

April 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Automation Anywhere and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.