GitLab vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing comparison

GitLab and OpenText are both solutions in the DevSecOps category. GitLab is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2, while OpenText is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0. GitLab holds a 9.7% mindshare in DSO, compared to OpenText’s 6.3% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of GitLab users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

GitLab

Read 88 GitLab reviews

17,443 Views
698 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...

Read 22 OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing reviews

2,921 Views
555 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

GitLab

OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing and GitLab are solutions in the development security and CI/CD integration category. GitLab has the upper hand in features with strong CI/CD capabilities, while OpenText offers competitive pricing and reliable support.

Features: OpenText provides robust security scanning integrated into the development lifecycle, focusing on early vulnerability detection. GitLab offers a platform combining version control, continuous integration, and deployment alongside security features, with strong DevOps workflow integration and a dashboard that aids in branching and code review.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could improve in efficiency under resource constraints and cloud integration. It also requires enhancements in ease of use and interface performance. GitLab could expand its advanced feature set utilization, improve feature declination issues, and enhance the code review process for better smoothness and integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText provides straightforward deployment and dedicated customer service with prompt issue resolution. GitLab stands out with its cloud-native architecture, flexible deployments, continuous updates, and robust community-driven support that may require self-service.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText generally offers a lower setup cost, making it attractive for budget-conscious organizations and focuses on security testing for ROI. GitLab requires a higher initial investment but offers extensive features and integrations that lead to a strong long-term ROI with productivity gains and streamlined processes.

To learn more, read our detailed GitLab vs. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,422 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitLab

Ranking in DevSecOps

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (11th), Build Automation (1st), Release Automation (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (9th), Rapid Application Development Software (11th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (4th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (2nd)

OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...

Ranking in DevSecOps

8th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the DevSecOps category, the mindshare of GitLab is 9.7%, down from 10.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is 6.3%, down from 8.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

DevSecOps Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitLab	9.7%
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing	6.3%
Other	84.0%

DevSecOps

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven

Improved agility and time to market with CI/CD enhancements

The CI/CD pipelines in GitLab are highly valuable. Another important feature is the single source of repository, allowing efficient repository management and source code management. GitLab provides manageability by allowing us to manage source code effectively through separate repositories. Additionally, GitLab enables the creation of individual CI/CD pipelines for each repository, making software more agile. By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.

Read full review

ArnabPaul

Cyber Security Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Enhancements in manual testing align with reporting and integration features

WebInspect works efficiently with Java-based or .NET based applications. However, it struggles with Salesforce applications, where it requires approximately 20-24 hours to crawl and audit but produces minimal findings, necessitating manual verification. The solution offers customization features for crawling and vulnerability detection. It includes various security frameworks and allows selection of specific vulnerability types to audit, such as OWASP Top 10 or JavaScript-based vulnerabilities. When working with APIs, we can select OWASP API Top 10. The tool also supports custom audit features by combining different security frameworks. For on-premises deployment, the setup is complex, particularly regarding SQL server configuration. Unlike Burp Suite or OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing, which have simpler setup processes, WebInspect requires SQL server setup to function.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of GitLab is the automatic merging of code."

"The most valuable feature of GitLab is its convenience. I am able to trace back most of my changes up to a far distance in time and it helps me to analyze and see the older version of the code."

"The dashboard and interface make it easy to use."

"We use GitLab in the new project for CI/CD, integration, and deployment."

"The solution's most valuable features are pipelines."

"I have had no problem with the stability of the solution."

"The most important features of GitLab for us are issue management and all the CI/CD tools. Another aspect that I love about GitLab is the UI."

"GitLab's source control is excellent."

More GitLab pros

"The user interface is ok and it is very simple to use."

"When we are integrating it with SSC, we're able to scan and trace and see all of the vulnerabilities. Comparison is easy in SSC."

"The tool provides comprehensive vulnerability assessments which help ensure our deliverables are as free from vulnerabilities as possible. It has also streamlined our web application vulnerability assessments, assisting us in delivering secure applications to our clients."

"The solution's technical support was very helpful."

"The solution is able to detect a wide range of vulnerabilities. It's better at it than other products."

"Guided Scan option allows us to easily scan and share reports."

"I've found the centralized dashboard the most valuable. For the management, it helps a lot to have abilities at the central level."

"Reporting, centralized dashboard, and bird's eye view of all vulnerabilities are the most valuable features."

More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing pros

Cons

"GitLab should work on improving their user interface for GitOps as it is lagging behind."

"Some of the scripts that we encountered in GitLab were not fully functional and threw up errors."

"The licensing model could be improved to be more accommodating in terms of user numbers and costs."

"We have only seen a couple of issues on Gitlab, which we use for building some of the applications."

"I would like to see static analysis also embedded in GitLab. That would also help us. If there's something that it does internally by GitLab and then that is already tied up with your pipeline and then it can tell you that you're coding is good or your code is not great. Based on that, it would pass or fail. That should be streamlined. I would think that would help to a greater extent, in terms of having one solution rather than depending on multiple vendors."

"The user interface could be more user-friendly. We do most of our operations through the website interface but it could be better."

"In my experience, GitLab is stable; however, sometimes it takes much time to start the runner and gets stuck in a pending situation, possibly due to traffic issues."

"The pricing model of GitLab is an issue for me."

More GitLab cons

"Creating reports is very slow and it is something that should be improved."

"The initial setup was complex."

"We have often encountered scanning errors."

"The installation could be a bit easier. Usually it's simple to use, but the installation is painful and a bit laborious and complex."

"We have had a problem with authentification."

"I want to enhance automation. Currently, Fortify WebInspect can scan and find vulnerabilities, but users with specific skills need to interpret the results and understand how to address them."

"Fortify WebInspect's shortcoming stems from the fact that it is a very expensive product in Korea, which makes it difficult for its potential customers to introduce the product in their IT environment."

"The solution needs better integration with Microsoft's Azure Cloud or an extension of Azure DevOps. In fact, it should better integrate with any cloud provider. Right now, it's quite difficult to integrate with that solution, from the cloud perspective."

More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month."

"It seems reasonable. Our IT team manages the licenses."

"The price is okay."

"The solution is based on a subscription model and is reasonably priced."

"The solution's pricing is acceptable."

"The price of GitLab could be better, it is expensive."

"The solution is based on a licensing model that includes technical support and is paid annually."

"This product is not very expensive but the price can be better."

More GitLab pricing and cost advice

"Our licensing is such that you can only run one scan at a time, which is inconvenient."

"The pricing is not clear and while it is not high, it is difficult to understand."

"It’s a fair price for the solution."

"This solution is very expensive."

"The price is okay."

"Its price is almost similar to the price of AppScan. Both of them are very costly. Its price could be reduced because it can be very costly for unlimited IT scans, etc. I'm not sure, but it can go up to $40,000 to $50,000 or more than that."

"Fortify WebInspect is a very expensive product."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which DevSecOps solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

15%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	36
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	43

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	15

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitLab?

I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

We are currently using general GitLab, not GitLab Premium.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitLab?

GitLab can be improved by being more responsive in the UI and offering better pricing for premium features, which would be useful for small startups. While GitLab's CI/CD is powerful, it is somewha...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortify WebInspect?

While I am not directly involved with licensing, I can share that our project's license for 1-9 applications costs between $15,000 to $19,000. In comparison, Burp Suite costs approximately $500 to ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fortify WebInspect?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Fortify WebInspect?

I am currently working with several tools. For Fortify, I use SCA and WebInspect. Apart from that, I use Burp Suite from PortSwigger. For API testing, I use Postman with Burp Suite or WebInspect fo...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 48% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab

Compared 7% of the time

SonarQube vs GitLab

Compared 4% of the time

Tekton vs GitLab

Compared 3% of the time

TeamCity vs GitLab

Compared 3% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 16% of the time

Veracode vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 7% of the time

Acunetix vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 7% of the time

OWASP Zap vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 7% of the time

Rapid7 InsightAppSec vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitLab

December 2025

Download GitLab product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

December 2025

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing report

Download OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing product report

Also Known As

Fuzzit

Micro Focus WebInspect, WebInspect

Overview

GitLab offers a secure and user-friendly platform for CI/CD pipeline management, code repository control, and collaboration, enhancing development speed and efficiency. It facilitates automation with extensive customization and tool integration, ideal for DevOps processes.

GitLab supports source code management, version control, and collaborative development. It's frequently used in CI/CD processes to automate builds and deployments while integrating DevOps practices. GitLab allows companies to manage repositories, automate pipelines, conduct code reviews, and maintain development lifecycles. The platform supports infrastructure and configuration management, enabling efficient code collaboration, deployment automation, and comprehensive repository handling. Many organizations commit and deploy developed code using GitLab's capabilities.

What are GitLab's most valuable features?

CI/CD Pipeline Management: Streamlines development through automated testing and deployment.
User-Friendly Interface: Ensures ease of collaboration and task automation.
Code Merging and Branching: Facilitates smooth code integration and version control.
Security Platform: Provides strong security features for safe development.
Tool Integration: Enhances functionality with diverse tool integration.

What benefits should users evaluate?

Development Speed: Accelerates processes through automation.
Collaboration Ease: Simplifies team interactions and workflow.
Customization Options: Offers extensive personalization for specific needs.
Comprehensive Documentation: Provides detailed guidance for users.
Secure Platform: Maintains integrity with robust security features.

In specific industries, GitLab serves as a backbone for source code management and CI/CD implementation. Companies leverage its capabilities for infrastructure management and deployment automation, thus streamlining project delivery timelines. Its ability to handle configuration management and code repositories effectively aids in maintaining development lifecycles, making it a preferred choice for organizations committed to enhancing their DevOps practices.

GitLab

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing offers robust scalability, ease of use, and high accuracy in scanning, making it a valuable tool for enterprises.

This security testing platform is known for its centralized dashboard, guided scans, and comprehensive reporting. It integrates seamlessly with tools like Fortify code scanner and supports extensive vulnerability detection and analysis, enhancing efficiency in security management. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in cloud integration, cost-effectiveness, and installation processes. Faster scans, reduced false positives, and improved mobile testing features are also desired.

What are the key features of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing?

Scalability: Easily adapts to changing enterprise needs.
Ease of Use: User-friendly interface with guided scans.
Comprehensive Reporting: Detailed vulnerability analysis and reporting.
Integration Capabilities: Works with Fortify code scanner and user authentication scanning.
Wide Vulnerability Detection: Identifies extensive security vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users expect from reviews?

Efficient Vulnerability Management: Streamlines security management in development environments.
Detailed Analysis: Provides in-depth insights into security issues.
Quick Setup: Easy to deploy within existing systems.
Enterprise Preference: Supports enterprise environments efficiently.

In industries like BFSI, OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is employed for performance network application testing, dynamic and static application security testing, and code checks. Security and QA teams use it in development processes to ensure application security prior to release, proving integral in both enterprise and testing environments.

OpenText

Sample Customers

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG

Aaron's

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

December 2025

Free Report: GitLab vs. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitLab vs. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing report.

See our list of best DevSecOps vendors.

We monitor all DevSecOps reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.