

HCL AppScan and OpenText Core Application Security are competitors in the application security domain. While both have their strengths, AppScan is praised for cost efficiency, and OpenText Core is favored for its comprehensive feature set, albeit at a higher cost.
Features: HCL AppScan identifies vulnerabilities like XSS and SQL injections quickly, integrates easily into development processes, and supports a variety of testing types including static and dynamic application security testing. OpenText Core Application Security offers robust integration with DevOps pipelines, sophisticated testing capabilities, and manages vulnerabilities across open-source libraries effectively.
Room for Improvement: HCL AppScan could improve its DOM-based XSS detection, enhance integration with other tools, and provide more detailed reports. OpenText Core Application Security users seek improvements in pricing, user interface design, and false positives management.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HCL AppScan provides flexible deployment with options for on-premises and cloud environments. OpenText Core Application Security is predominantly on-premises with limited cloud options. Both offer responsive customer service, though HCL AppScan has varied feedback on technical support speed, while OpenText's support is generally considered effective.
Pricing and ROI: HCL AppScan is viewed as more cost-effective, offering significant ROI through vulnerability reduction, while its pricing is deemed high by some. OpenText Core Application Security, though more expensive, is suited for organizations prioritizing comprehensive security measures. Both solutions are reported to offer substantial returns on investment by enhancing security posture and reducing vulnerabilities.
There is definitive ROI if OpenText Core Application Security is deployed properly; it substantially reduces efforts in securing the solution while averting various application-related risks.
Veracode provides excellent assistance and regularly scheduled calls to address customer concerns and updates.
There is still room for improvement when it comes to the speed of response.
I had direct interaction with them, which facilitated how we onboarded Fortify.
Support tickets often stay open for one month to three months, which leads to customer frustration.
The technical support from OpenText is very good.
OpenText Core Application Security is highly scalable; it is running on the cloud, and elasticity is one of the best points of a cloud environment.
If a customer wants to know the tools and the technology used for their application to scan their application, they provide less information on that.
Fortify is superior to many solutions because of its scalability and that it does not require massive compute capabilities for its SAST and sandboxing features.
Since we've been using HCL AppScan for about three months, we really have not encountered a false positive.
OpenText Core Application Security is stable and has minimal downtime, benefitting from AWS cloud availability.
Currently, you can find out the components belonging to a specific software, but if detailed reporting became available, you would be in a better position to identify vulnerabilities.
I would say OpenText Core Application Security is not very user-friendly in terms of price; it is quite high.
It would be beneficial if Fortify could check for CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures) in third-party libraries, which I currently use a separate dependency checker tool for.
One thing I would highlight is if Fortify can focus more on the centralized dashboard of the tools because nowadays, tools such as SentinelOne also exist for identifying security issues, but they have a centralized dashboard that merges their cloud solution and application security side solution together.
Companies often choose based on budget constraints, with Veracode being on the higher end cost-wise.
We were able to identify security issues such as certificate-related issues, authentication-related issues, and weak encryption-related issues.
AppScan's most valuable features include its ability to identify vulnerabilities accurately, provide detailed remediation steps, and the newly introduced AI-powered features that enhance its functionality further.
Additionally, you can integrate Fortify in CICD pipeline, so you get real-time updates about the security issues in your pipeline.
On demand you have two levels of reports: the first from the tool, which is the same as we can get from Fortify on-premises, and a next level reporting made by experts from OpenText, leading to a more condensed and precise report as level three.
The integration of OpenText Core Application Security with existing systems for security operations benefits us by providing vulnerability management and quality gates; without both, we will always have vulnerable applications running for our customers.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Core Application Security | 3.2% |
| HCL AppScan | 2.1% |
| Other | 94.7% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 14 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 31 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 18 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 45 |
IBM Security AppScan enhances web application security and mobile application security, improves application security program management and strengthens regulatory compliance. By scanning your web and mobile applications prior to deployment, AppScan enables you to identify security vulnerabilities and generate reports and fix recommendations.
OpenText Core Application Security offers robust features like static and dynamic scanning, real-time vulnerability tracking, and seamless integration with development platforms, designed to enhance code security and reduce operational costs.
OpenText Core Application Security is a cloud-based, on-demand service providing accurate and deep scanning capabilities with detailed reporting. Its integrations with development platforms ensure an enhanced security layer in the development lifecycle, benefiting users by lowering operational costs and facilitating efficient remediation. The platform addresses needs for intuitive interfaces, API support, and comprehensive vulnerability assessments, helping improve code security and accelerate time-to-market. Despite its strengths, challenges exist around false positives, report clarity, and language support, alongside confusing pricing and package options. Enhancements are sought in areas like CI/CD pipeline configuration, report visualization, scan times, and integration with third-party tools such as GitLab, container scanning, and software composition analysis.
What features define OpenText Core Application Security?Industries like mobile applications, e-commerce, and banking leverage OpenText Core Application Security for its ability to identify vulnerabilities such as SQL injections. Integrating seamlessly with DevSecOps and security auditing processes, this tool supports developers in writing safer code, ensuring secure application deployment and enhancing software assurance.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.