We performed a comparison between IBM FileNet and Mobius Content Services Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Content Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It has given us a whole new environment to do document management and document storage."
"Centralized our business documents."
"[The most valuable features are] scalability and ease of use. These features are important because the customer where we have deployed it has millions of documents... And over the last five years, the volume of the documents has been increasing. It's handling all of them and without any errors."
"Users are able to create their own content, and they can manage their own sets of tasks, to work at their own pace and get their jobs done."
"The key way that this product has improved the way that that our business functions is by its stability. Its ability to remain up despite other pressures, its consistency, and lack of downtime are really the greatest things that it brings."
"The most useful feature is its persistent storage. Also, the full-text search and attribute searching are valuable."
"The most critical benefit has been ease of use. It speeds along our development helping us go to market a lot sooner."
"We have probably cut out at least 40 percent of what the work process was by easing out that whole distribution of paper."
"It provides a single pane of glass for delivering content from multiple repositories. It is also highly recommended because of the ease of use when it comes to searching and retrieving from multiple repositories simultaneously."
"This solution has improved our organization by providing a central repository for business data with control over sensitive data."
"We would like to see, in FileNet, the ability to manage video and audio."
"To start with there are too many add-ons, which makes it hard for us. If they simplified the add-ons and plugins to be added to our existing systems, it would definitely help us in the future."
"I would say the installation process can be very complicated, and you need to to have an experience resource."
"If there was more AI capability, into Watson, that would be a benefit."
"It may be a little complex to implement and take some effort."
"It could be simpler to use, considering multiple use cases."
"I would like to see in FileNet integrated with Watson, which can read something and send it without any human contact or interaction."
"The area of migrations to new versions must be made easier. It's quite good that they have now begun to improve the API area, to modernize the interfaces, but there's always a very big investment involved in migrating from one version to another. That prohibits rolling out new functionalities to customers. It's not so easy.... In that area, they really must improve."
"Sales and service need to be more consistent."
"The setup and the support could be improved when it comes to populating the reports from a mainframe environment."
More Mobius Content Services Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM FileNet is ranked 6th in Enterprise Content Management with 94 reviews while Mobius Content Services Platform is ranked 12th in Enterprise Content Management with 3 reviews. IBM FileNet is rated 8.2, while Mobius Content Services Platform is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of IBM FileNet writes "A document management system that helps in document digitalization and workflow management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mobius Content Services Platform writes "Time from creation to access is much better, as reports are immediately available upon generation". IBM FileNet is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Documentum, OpenText Extended ECM, IBM ECM and Oracle WebCenter, whereas Mobius Content Services Platform is most compared with IBM ECM, SharePoint and Alfresco. See our IBM FileNet vs. Mobius Content Services Platform report.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.