IBM Resilient vs Swimlane comparison

IBM and Swimlane are both solutions in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category. IBM is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.5, while Swimlane is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.5. IBM holds a 2.7% mindshare in SOAR, compared to Swimlane’s 3.7% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Swimlane users who would recommend it.

IBM Resilient

Read 18 IBM Resilient reviews

1,517 Views
937 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Swimlane

Read 3 Swimlane reviews

1,577 Views
1,125 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Resilient

Swimlane

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

IBM Resilient and Swimlane are competing in the cybersecurity automation domain. IBM Resilient seems to have the upper hand in support and integration, while Swimlane is favored for its robust features, offering a competitive advantage in functionality.

Features: IBM Resilient provides comprehensive threat intelligence integration, automated response capabilities, and strong support for security operations. Swimlane offers flexible automation workflows, highly customizable dashboards, and advanced analytics, giving it an edge for those seeking tailored solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Resilient is notable for seamless deployment and responsive customer service. Swimlane provides straightforward deployment with extensive customization and proactive support, benefiting complex environments.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Resilient involves a higher setup cost but substantial ROI through efficient threat management and integration. Swimlane offers competitive pricing for faster ROI with customizable tools and efficient automation, appealing to budget-conscious organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Resilient vs. Swimlane Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Resilient vs. Swimlane

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,265 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Resilient

Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

8th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Incident Response (3rd)

Swimlane

Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

15th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category, the mindshare of IBM Resilient is 2.7%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Swimlane is 3.7%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

Featured Reviews

Usman Bhatti

Senior Officer Security Operations Center at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Simple deployment, scalable, but lacking third-party solution compatibility

Integrating IBM Resilient with other applications can be very difficult and technically challenging. Often, they use the excuse that you are using the latest version of an application, such as an endpoint security system, and they don't have an API or support for it at the moment. There is no automation in the SOAR solution. It's worth noting that many third-party add-on applications needed to be purchased separately to integrate with IBM Resilient. While there were built-in applications available for incident remediation, the selection was limited. Additionally, integrating third-party applications was often a difficult and time-consuming process due to the technical complexity involved.

Read full review

Srikanth Nuthalapati

Software Engineering Manager at Deloitte

Great support, scalable, and easier to code

The stability of the solution has room for improvement. I would like Swimlane to provide a single space where we can go to code, build, and automate. Where we have a provision to create tables, playbooks, and tables to produce results, connect all the dots, and make the flow automated. This would make it much easier to navigate than having to jump to different places. I would like to have a single button to click that would start me on the journey of creating my own code from the ground up, from the workflow algorithm to the automation process. This would be simpler than what I had with Splunk Phantom, where I had to piece things together and connect the dots to get the full picture. With this new feature, I could create the full picture with just one button click.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is very good at incident response."

"What I like most about IBM Resilient is that it has a complete stack, which means you don't need to use different OEM products because you have all you need under the IBM Resilient umbrella. You don't need to worry much about integrations and components because you're working with tested and proven architecture."

"The solution is simple to use and to integrate with IBM QRadar."

"The most valuable features of IBM Resilient are its flexibility and customization options for incident response."

"The most valuable thing about it is how easy it is to navigate the user interface."

"This is a good solution that we recommend for customers."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"As a whole, the product is stable...Technical support is very good."

More IBM Resilient pros

"The technical support from Swimlane is very good."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the support."

"It provides us with a single portal for our logs from different solutions."

Cons

"One thing to improve is how it handles data formats, which currently might require scripting for conversion to CSV before uploading."

"It is not very straightforward to set up custom integrations, especially with services like Azure. You need an additional server for integration."

"The product must provide more integration with other tools."

"The ability to analyze incidents needs to be improved in the solution."

"Its price needs improvement."

"The integration could be improved so that it is easy to integrate with other solutions."

"The product needs a bit more development."

"Integration with some devices, including Cisco PowerPower and certain antivirus products, has limitations."

More IBM Resilient cons

"The initial setup and deployment are complex."

"The stability of the solution has room for improvement."

"We faced a lot of issues with the product’s stability."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing cost for IBM Resilient is not too expensive, but it's not affordable, so it's moderately expensive. Regarding price, I'm rating the solution seven out of ten. The company pays for the license yearly, based on the number of users. Apart from the cost of the license you need to pay for each user, you also need to spend an initial investment for the base platform. You also have to pay for IBM Resilient support."

"I feel it is an expensive product when my company pays annually for renewal, support, and follow-up."

"We could create unlimited users using the license we had purchased."

"The cost of the product is quite high."

"Pricing for the solution is good, in my opinion."

"It is very expensive."

"I would rate the tool’s pricing a three out of ten. The tool’s pricing is on a yearly basis."

"There is a license you need to pay for in order to use this product."

More IBM Resilient pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Resilient?

It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Resilient?

I am not the one in charge of pricing, so I am not sure about the costs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Resilient?

Integration with some devices, including Cisco PowerPower and certain antivirus products, has limitations.

See all answers

What do you like most about Swimlane?

It provides us with a single portal for our logs from different solutions.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Swimlane?

We faced a lot of issues with the product’s stability. Sometimes we find bugs in the plug-ins. We experience some latency when we have a huge amount of data.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Swimlane?

I use the solution for receiving alerts and case creation. It is used as a ticketing system.

See all answers

Comparisons

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs IBM Resilient

Compared 38% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs IBM Resilient

Compared 17% of the time

ServiceNow Security Operations vs IBM Resilient

Compared 17% of the time

Splunk SOAR vs IBM Resilient

Compared 17% of the time

Fortinet FortiSOAR vs IBM Resilient

Compared 8% of the time

More IBM Resilient Competitors

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Swimlane

Compared 26% of the time

Splunk SOAR vs Swimlane

Compared 22% of the time

Fortinet FortiSOAR vs Swimlane

Compared 15% of the time

Tines vs Swimlane

Compared 10% of the time

Torq vs Swimlane

Compared 9% of the time

More Swimlane Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Resilient

January 2025

Download IBM Resilient product report

Buyer's Guide

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

December 2024

Download Swimlane product report

Learn More

Video not available

IBM

Swimlane

Overview

The Resilient Incident Response Platform (IRP) is the leading platform for orchestrating and automating incident response processes.

The Resilient IRP quickly and easily integrates with your organization’s existing security and IT investments. It makes security alerts instantly actionable, provides valuable intelligence and incident context, and enables adaptive response to complex cyber threats.

Swimlane is a leader in security orchestration, automation and response (SOAR). By automating time-intensive, manual processes and operational workflows and delivering powerful, consolidated analytics, real time dashboards and reporting from across your security infrastructure, Swimlane maximizes the incident response capabilities of over-burdened and understaffed security operations.

Swimlane was founded to deliver scalable innovative and flexible security solutions to organizations struggling with alert fatigue, vendor proliferation and chronic staffing shortages. Swimlane is at the forefront of the growing market for security automation and orchestration solutions that automate and organize security processes in repeatable ways to get the most out of available resources and accelerate incident response.

Sample Customers

Golden Living, Health Equity, USA Funds

LinkedIn, TransUnion, Citrix, Aetna, Perspecta

Buyer's Guide

IBM Resilient vs. Swimlane

January 2025

Free Report: IBM Resilient vs. Swimlane

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Resilient vs. Swimlane and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Resilient vs. Swimlane report.

See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.