IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus vs ScienceLogic comparison

IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Read 42 ScienceLogic reviews

657 Views
470 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus and ScienceLogic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Event Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus vs. ScienceLogic Report (Updated: December 2024).

IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus vs. ScienceLogic

Download the complete report

Helped 825,566 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Ranking in Event Monitoring

4th

Average Rating

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ScienceLogic

Ranking in Event Monitoring

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Network Monitoring Software (30th), Server Monitoring (12th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (27th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), Cloud Monitoring Software (21st), AIOps (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Event Monitoring category, the mindshare of IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus is 8.2%, down from 9.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScienceLogic is 7.6%, up from 7.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Event Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Ahmed Salman

Performance & Monitoring Supervisor at Saudi Telecom Company

Aids in network performance monitoring and management

I am working as a customer, mainly using IntelliQ and another product, IBM NetCool, Watson AI. These products are used for monitoring network performance and management. The primary use case involves network performance monitoring, and it is compatible only with IBM DB2 IBM Tivoli NetCool…

Read full review

GauravSingh4

CEO at Parker Digital

Great integrations, power flow, and good support

They need a little more self-service. Some of the places where there's still a dependency on defense logic. If those could be eliminated, that would be ideal. They've done a fantastic job eliminating a lot of those dependencies and there's a lot of self-service. However, some of the areas where we could have it connect to, for example, Splunk or ServiceNow, in a self-care version versus having to go back to their engineers, that's an area where they could do a little more. There are still a lot of engineers who get involved versus if it's a little more API-driven and self-served dashboard connections. Doing it the other way would just make life easier for users.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"OMNIbus is valuable for its compatibility and performance, as I haven't encountered any performance issues."

"The biggest plus points for me are the configurability and scalability of the solution, as well as the multi-tenancy of the platform."

"It is an easy-to-use solution."

"The monitoring is the solution's most valuable feature."

"IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus supports legacy protocols like CORBA, Huawei, and other telecom protocols, which I find beneficial."

"Offers very good event/alert drill-down and statistical reporting capabilities."

"It is customer-centric. Customers can access the event list from their location or desktop and view the event. There is no need to go and connect to any other server and run events to have a view of all the events happening in the environment. We get a good response from customers about this feature and the main architecture of NetCool. Its processing is very good. Deduplication and correlation functionalities are good in this solution as compared to other solutions. A big advantage of NetCool is that it also supports multi-layered protocols. We can receive multiple events from different protocols like UDP, HTTP, and those events can be captured in NetCool."

"The most valuable feature is the event management capability."

More IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus pros

"When it comes to features, the power pack is the most valuable."

"Its ITSM and EMS combination is really amazing. There is no need to purchase two products, one for ITSM and a second for EMS/NMS."

"Provides agentless monitoring so there's no need to install the agent on each server."

"The most valuable features of ScienceLogic are AI and machine learning."

"Power packs."

"It has good monitoring capabilities across cloud environments, data centers, and hybrid environments."

"One of the valuable features is rapid dashboards."

"The best feature is the highly flexible graphs."

More ScienceLogic pros

Cons

"Its integration could be better. They should provide an easier integration for all the monitoring stuff, and it will make things easier for us. Currently, there is a complexity in integrating it with a vendor application, and we have to use another tool to integrate it with a vendor application. To integrate some applications with NetCool, I need to install an IBM tool on top of it. It would be good if they can provide an API or any kind of interface that we can leverage while developing a new protocol interface or application. We should be able to use an API or interface with NetCool. Its GUI can also be better. As compared to other tools, it is not user friendly, and it is not easy to do stuff through GUI. Whenever we do anything on the GUI, it takes time. They need to focus on the GUI part, especially the dashboard. They should focus on how users can effectively drill down from one box to another. The visual appeal of the dashboard is as important as the data and functionality."

"The solution needs to invest in the development of a knowledge base and use of AI services for providing event resolution and intervention directions."

"There should be an easier-to-understand model, more of a flat-structured model rather than different tiers of licenses which complicates licensing."

"The web portal and typical event controls are a little outdated."

"The cost of the product is quite high. They should work to adjust their pricing models."

"I would like for the next release to be more user-friendly and out of date. The next release should focus on the cloud, AI, and ML technologies."

"The solution has limitations in database integration as it cannot integrate with databases other than IBM DB2."

"Areas that could be better include the fact that the solution is only on-premises, lacks AI capabilities, and support response times could be quicker."

More IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus cons

"Admins do not have direct access to the reporting."

"The product must educate its strategic partners for deployment."

"We want to understand: how does the back end work? What if some problem occurs? What we can do? They need to provide more information."

"There are often bugs in new releases."

"ScienceLogic does not have application monitoring. We definitely need something integrated within ScienceLogic to monitor applications so that we don't have to rely on monitoring tools to monitor other applications. At least the ones that are market leaders, such as SAP, Oracle, and others."

"They need a little more self-service."

"It was challenging onboarding users."

"The product's reporting functionalities have certain shortcomings, making it an area where improvements are required."

More ScienceLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a costly solution."

"You have to have the right level of budget to afford this solution."

"Its license cost is a little bit more than other solutions. Our customers expect a standard market price that is comparative to other products. For each and every NetCool OMNIbus component, we have to purchase a separate license. These components are not free with the product."

"It comes with the OS built in, so no need to purchase an OS license or DB license."

"The solution is license-based. It's between $8 and $15, depending on what you need from the product."

"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."

"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."

"My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price."

"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."

"I'm not the best person to discuss pricing, but what I do know is that it's a use-and-go structure. You use this much storage and pay this much for it. That's how it is. Every time, we continue to add a large amount of data to the environment."

"The pricing model for ScienceLogic could improve."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Event Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

825,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

17%

Energy/Utilities Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus?

The biggest plus points for me are the configurability and scalability of the solution, as well as the multi-tenancy of the platform.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus?

If the various HW elements are from the same vendor, a monitoring solution provided by that vendor or its partners will potentially result in lower licensing and operational costs. Moreover, for ve...

What needs improvement with IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus?

IBM is working on converting NetCool to NetCool Operations Insight, which runs on Watson AI. There were areas needing improvement in terms of AI, however, they have migrated the entire NetCool suit...

What do you like most about ScienceLogic?

The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price.

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

The product's reporting functionalities have certain shortcomings, making it an area where improvements are required. The tool is more or less good. The tool needs to improve its APM capabilities.

ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Comparisons

Compared 30% of the time

PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Compared 16% of the time

IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact vs IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Compared 14% of the time

BigPanda vs IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Compared 13% of the time

SCOM vs IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Compared 8% of the time

More IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus Competitors

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 15% of the time

Zabbix vs ScienceLogic

Compared 11% of the time

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 10% of the time

LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 9% of the time

NetBrain vs ScienceLogic

Compared 2% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

Product Reports

IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Download IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus product report

Download ScienceLogic product report

Also Known As

Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

No data available

Learn More

IBM

Overview

Tivoli Netcool OMNIbus provides near real-time service assurance for business infrastructure, applications, servers, network devices and protocols, Internet protocols, storage and security devices.

ScienceLogic is a comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring solution that supports networks, servers, cloud environments, and applications, suitable for private cloud and on-premises deployments.

Organizations leverage ScienceLogic for its robust capabilities in monitoring IT infrastructures of all sizes. It offers granular discovery, integration with CMDB, and ticketing systems. Valued for its flexibility, incident automation, remediation, and real-time relationship mapping, it supports hybrid environments with scalable and efficient monitoring functionalities. AI and machine learning enhance its feature set, while ease of deployment and strong support are crucial benefits.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Agentless Configuration: Ensures easy deployment without the need for agents.
Third-Party Integration: Seamlessly integrates with various tools.
Dynamic Component Mapping: Offers real-time relationship and dependency mapping.
Flexible Graphs: Allows custom visual representation of data.
Role-Based Access: Provides tiered access for different user roles.
Infrastructure and Event Management: Efficiently monitors hybrid environments.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Scalability: Handles environments of all sizes efficiently.
AI and Machine Learning: Enhances automation and incident management.
Ease of Deployment: Streamlines initial setup and reduces time to value.
Customization: Custom dashboards and reports cater to specific needs.
Comprehensive Support: Access to excellent support services.

ScienceLogic is implemented across multiple industries, including large enterprises, for its capability to handle complex IT ecosystems. Its integration with CMDB and ticketing systems ensures it fits within existing workflows. Organizations use it to monitor diverse infrastructure landscapes, ensuring seamless performance and quick incident resolution.

Sample Customers

Consolidated Communications, €sterreichische Bundesbahnen (€BB), Capgemini

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell

IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus vs. ScienceLogic