IBM Watson Studio vs RapidMiner comparison

Read 22 RapidMiner reviews

5,158 Views
4,232 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

IBM Watson Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

RapidMiner and IBM Watson Studio are products in the data analytics and machine learning space, each with its own strengths. IBM Watson Studio appears to have an upper hand given its advanced capabilities and integration options despite a higher cost.

Features: RapidMiner is notable for its data preparation and visualization capabilities, intuitive interface, and ease of use for non-technical users. IBM Watson Studio offers superior scalability, comprehensive integration capabilities, and a broad array of advanced analytics features suited for complex enterprise environments.

Room for Improvement: RapidMiner could benefit from enhancements in scalability, deeper integration options, and advanced analytics capabilities. IBM Watson Studio might improve its user interface for simplicity, lower the cost barrier for small enterprises, and streamline quicker deployment options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: RapidMiner is easily deployed and features responsive customer support targeted for quick resolutions. IBM Watson Studio offers a robust deployment model ideal for large-scale implementations, with extensive documentation and support services providing adaptability for complex scenarios.

Pricing and ROI: RapidMiner has a lower initial setup cost that appeals to smaller budgets while delivering respectable ROI. IBM Watson Studio is more expensive but justifies the cost with long-term gains from its superior features and comprehensive capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Watson Studio vs. RapidMiner Report (Updated: January 2025).

IBM Watson Studio vs. RapidMiner

Download the complete report

Helped 831,997 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Watson Studio

Ranking in Data Science Platforms

11th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Development Platforms (9th)

RapidMiner

Ranking in Data Science Platforms

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Predictive Analytics (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Data Science Platforms category, the mindshare of IBM Watson Studio is 2.1%, down from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of RapidMiner is 7.7%, up from 5.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Science Platforms

Featured Reviews

Abilio Duarte

Senior Solutions Architect at Self-employed

A highly robust and well-documented platform that simplifies the complex world of AI

The main challenge lies in visibility and ease of use. Providing training sessions can be immensely helpful in helping users navigate and understand the tool's potential. This approach would empower users to explore and make the most of the tools and technologies at their disposal. Another area where IBM could enhance its offering is by providing more visibility to end users regarding the vast potential that Watson offers.

Read full review

Rathnam Makam

Senior Technical Manager at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

A no-code tool that helps to build machine learning models

One challenge I encountered while implementing RapidMiner was the lack of documentation. Since there aren't as many users, finding resources to learn the tool was initially difficult. To overcome this hurdle, I believe RapidMiner could improve by providing more tutorials tailored for new users. I haven't explored the tool's latest version, so I'm unaware of the current features. However, I think it would be beneficial if they could enhance capabilities related to deep neural networks, provide better support for generating UI, and allow for importing and utilizing large language models.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most important thing is that it's a multi-faceted solution. It's a kind of specialist, not a generalist. It can produce very specific information for the customer. It's totally different from Google or any search engine that produces generic information. It's specialty is that it's all on video."

"Watson Studio is very stable."

"The main benefit is the ease of use. We see a lot of engineers in our site and customers that really like the way the tools are able to work with the people."

"The scalability of IBM Watson Studio is great."

"The system's ability to take a look at data, segment it and then use that data very differently."

"The solution is very easy to use."

"Watson Studio is the most complete tool for AI projects."

"For me, the valuable feature of the solution is the one that I used, which was Jupyter notebooks."

More IBM Watson Studio pros

"It is easy to use and has a huge community that I can rely on for help. Moreover, it is interactive."

"We value the collaboration and governance features because it's a comprehensive platform that covers everything from data extraction to modeling operations in the ML language. RapidMiner is competitive in the ML space."

"The most valuable feature of RapidMiner is that it is code free. It is similar to playing with Lego pieces and executing after you are finished to see the results. Additionally, it is easy to use and has interesting utilities when preparing the data. It has a utility to automatically launch a series of models and show the comparisons. When finished with the comparisons you can select the best one, and deploy it automatically."

"RapidMiner is very easy to use."

"I've been using a lot of components from the Strategic Extension and Python Extension."

"The solution is very intuitive and powerful."

"The GUI capabilities of the solution are excellent. Their Auto ML model provides for even non-coder data scientists to deploy a model."

"The most valuable feature is what the product sets out to do, which is extracting information and data."

More RapidMiner pros

Cons

"We would like to see it more web-based with more functionality."

"I think maybe the support is an area where it lacks."

"Some of the solutions are really good solutions but they can be a little too costly for many."

"More features in data virtualization would be helpful. The solution could use an interactive dashboard that could make exploration easier."

"We would like to see it less as one big, massive product, but more based on smaller services that we can then roll out to consumers."

"I want IBM's technical support team to provide more specific answers to queries."

"Initially, it was quite complex. For us, it was not only a matter of getting it installed, that was just a start. It was also trying to come up with a standard way of implementing it across the entire organization, which had been a challenge."

"The initial setup was complex."

More IBM Watson Studio cons

"RapidMiner isn't cheap. It's a complete solution, but it's costly."

"The product must provide data-cleaning features."

"I would appreciate improvements in automation and customization options to further streamline processes."

"RapidMiner can improve deep learning by enhancing the features."

"I think that they should make deep learning models easier."

"It would be helpful to have some tutorials on communicating with Python."

"In terms of the UI and SaaS, the user interface with KNIME is more appealing than RapidMiner."

"Many things in the interface look nice, but they aren't of much use to the operator. It already has lots of variables in there."

More RapidMiner cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is generally reasonable and straightforward but can vary significantly depending on the specific workloads in use."

"Watson Studio's pricing is reasonable for what you get."

"IBM Watson Studio is a reasonably priced product"

"IBM Watson Studio is an expensive solution."

"The client only has to pay the licensing costs. There are not any maintenance or hidden costs in addition to the license."

"I used an educational license for this solution, which is available free of charge."

"Although we don't pay licensing fees because it is being used within the university, my understanding is that the cost is between $5,000 and $10,000 USD per year."

"I'm not fully aware of RapidMiner's price because we had licenses provided, but from my analysis, it's moderately priced, not too high or too low. It's worth the investment."

"For the university, the cost of the solution is free for the students and teachers."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Science Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,997 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

University

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Educational Organization

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Watson Studio?

Stability-wise, it is a great tool.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Watson Studio?

The pricing of Watson Studio is justified by the benefits and power it offers.

What needs improvement with IBM Watson Studio?

One area that could be improved is the backup and restoration of the database and the overall database configuration. There were also challenges with programming the network extension in the last p...

What do you like most about RapidMiner?

RapidMiner is a no-code machine learning tool. I can install it on my local machine and work with smaller datasets. It can also connect to databases, allowing me to build models directly on the dat...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for RapidMiner?

I'm not fully aware of RapidMiner's price because we had licenses provided, but from my analysis, it's moderately priced, not too high or too low. It's worth the investment.

What needs improvement with RapidMiner?

The product must provide data-cleaning features. I could not use RapidMiner for data cleaning in one of my projects and had to use Python instead.

Databricks vs IBM Watson Studio

Comparisons

Compared 27% of the time

Google Vertex AI vs IBM Watson Studio

Compared 17% of the time

Azure OpenAI vs IBM Watson Studio

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio vs IBM Watson Studio

Compared 14% of the time

Amazon Comprehend vs IBM Watson Studio

Compared 4% of the time

More IBM Watson Studio Competitors

KNIME vs RapidMiner

Compared 51% of the time

Dataiku vs RapidMiner

Compared 16% of the time

Alteryx vs RapidMiner

Compared 9% of the time

Tableau vs RapidMiner

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio vs RapidMiner

Compared 4% of the time

More RapidMiner Competitors

Product Reports

IBM Watson Studio

Download IBM Watson Studio product report

Download RapidMiner product report

Also Known As

Watson Studio, IBM Data Science Experience, Data Science Experience, DSx

No data available

Overview

IBM Watson Studio provides tools for data scientists, application developers and subject matter experts to collaboratively and easily work with data to build and train models at scale. It gives you the flexibility to build models where your data resides and deploy anywhere in a hybrid environment so you can operationalize data science faster.

IBM

RapidMiner's unified data science platform accelerates the building of complete analytical workflows - from data prep to machine learning to model validation to deployment - in a single environment, improving efficiency and shortening the time to value for data science projects.

Sample Customers

GroupM, Accenture, Fifth Third Bank

PayPal, Deloitte, eBay, Cisco, Miele, Volkswagen

IBM Watson Studio vs. RapidMiner