Inflectra Rapise vs Pega Robotic Process Automation comparison

Inflectra and Pega are both solutions in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category. Inflectra is ranked #32 with an average rating of 4.0, while Pega is ranked #19 with an average rating of 6.7. Inflectra holds a 0.6% mindshare in RPA, compared to Pega’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Inflectra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Pega users who would recommend it.

Inflectra Rapise

Read 7 Inflectra Rapise reviews

864 Views
389 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Pega Robotic Process Automa...

Read 25 Pega Robotic Process Automation reviews

2,144 Views
1,951 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Inflectra Rapise

Pega Robotic Process Automa...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 11, 2025

Inflectra Rapise and Pega Robotic Process Automation are prominent in the business automation market. While Inflectra is favored for cost-effectiveness, Pega is often seen as superior due to its advanced features and scalability for enterprise needs.

Features: Inflectra Rapise is known for its flexibility, broad test automation capabilities, and strong cross-browser testing. It supports a variety of testing types and enables easy script sharing among team members. Pega Robotic Process Automation offers advanced AI-driven automation, a sophisticated workflow system, and powerful integration with CRM tools, making it ideal for complex business processes.

Room for Improvement: Inflectra Rapise could enhance support for more complex enterprise needs, improve scalability and expand on AI capabilities. Pega Robotic Process Automation may benefit from simplifying its learning curve for beginners, streamlining integration for non-Pega environments, and expanding cross-platform support, especially for web-based automation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Inflectra Rapise provides a straightforward cloud-based deployment and reliable customer support, ideal for quick implementations. Pega Robotic Process Automation, although complex, supports large-scale enterprises with a robust support system, aligning well with intricate enterprise requirements.

Pricing and ROI: Inflectra Rapise has a lower upfront cost, offering faster ROI for tight budgets and smaller projects. Pega Robotic Process Automation, while requiring a higher initial investment, provides significant ROI potential with its advanced automation features for larger and more complex operations, suited for long-term investment strategies.

To learn more, read our detailed Inflectra Rapise vs. Pega Robotic Process Automation Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise vs. Pega Robotic Process Automation

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,227 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Inflectra Rapise

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

32nd

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Automation Tools (20th), AI Quality Assurance (2nd)

Pega Robotic Process Automa...

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

19th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category, the mindshare of Inflectra Rapise is 0.6%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pega Robotic Process Automation is 3.0%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Pega Robotic Process Automation	3.0%
Inflectra Rapise	0.6%
Other	96.4%

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

Featured Reviews

WIllWorley

Software Consultant at The New Humanitarian

The tool needs to improve in the areas of security, though it is a versatile product

Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability. I spoke with Inflectra's executive account rep on the need to expand the tool's ability. The problem with Inflectra Rapise is that a lot of companies are still using SAP GUI. Inflectra has no intention of building Rapise in a way that allows it to interact with SAP GUI. Inflectra Rapise has very limited value for the companies I work with because they they still use SAP GUI since their top priority is SAP testing, and they want to get into automation, for which they need a tool that cannot only used to automate processes, but can also do end-to-end testing where you are not only using SAP GUI, but you are using the interface with old legacy systems that are still in use or with today's more modern technologies. In the future, the tool needs to increase its versatility. If I am at a company that uses 23 different technologies, like .NET Visual Basic, Oracle, SQL, or whatever, Inflectra Rapise needs to be made as a product that is an out-of-the-box usable tool for any technology.

Read full review

reviewer1458102

Regional Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Has raised concerns due to outdated framework and high ownership costs

Pega Robotic Process Automation is a temporary solution to a bigger issue, and the cost of implementation especially with Pega really stops customers from proceeding. The total cost of ownership could be improved. From a technical perspective, the product performs adequately. The installation can be quite complex as it's not standalone, and customers need to get the whole Pega platform up and running. The total cost of ownership is not very attractive. RPA as a concept is outdated now, with agentic AI becoming more prominent. We don't see much interest from customers in going down the RPA route; Pega Robotic Process Automation is losing its prominence in the market.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's pretty straightforward to set up."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility."

"We always use the product for end-to-end automation test cases."

"I am impressed with the tool's recording feature."

"Pega is very mature. It's very old. They have grown with time, and they have learned. Other robotic process automation solutions are basically focused on only doing the automation, whereas Pega also gives you a workflow system so that you can create a workflow."

"It is a good and matured solution."

"The number of human steps that have been eliminated is significant, and we try to maximize straight-through processing."

"The most valuable aspect for myself was access to the .net framework. If I couldn't figure something out using the objects that they had provided, I could bring in the .net objects and do so using similar logic that I would in a .net or C sharp coding language. Having that familiarity was helpful."

"The tech support is highly available and there is plenty of online training available."

"It helped cut short the release cycle by almost 40% compared to the previous solution."

"Pega Robotics offers all the required features to build end-to-end process automation like any other similar tools. It's unique development style using data line and control flow line makes it easy to debug through the flow."

More Pega Robotic Process Automation pros

Cons

"The maintenance is very difficult. We've only been using the platform for three months, so I'm not sure if that will continue, but right now it's an observation I've had."

"Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability."

"It would be good if there could be more integration of Inflectra Rapise, since not all customers use the same tool for test management and automation integration."

"What I don't like that much in Pega Robotic Process Automation is its monitoring tool because that tool is tightly connected with the platform. If the Pega team can deploy the monitoring tool separately, so that it's a separate solution altogether, then that would be good because currently, if you have to use the monitoring tool, then that means you have to use the Pega Robotic Process Automation platform. The initial setup for Pega Robotic Process Automation also needs improvement because it is complex. The only additional feature I'd like to see in the solution is for the monitoring tool to be a stand-alone rather than being tightly coupled with the Pega platform. Looking at the current features of Pega Robotic Process Automation concerning application automation, it covers most of my needs currently."

"It's difficult not knowing when alerts will arrive."

"The orchestration needs to be better."

"I would like to improve the tool's integration features and stability."

"Pega has a no-code low-code environment. We do everything based on established rules. You kind-of have to learn how all their rules work and how it works for robotics before you can use the solution effectively."

"Pega Robotic Process Automation scalability is too low."

"In this modern world, in this automation space, if Pega could provide more options that are user-friendly and provide a way to quickly develop an automation solution that is drag-and-drop with a minimal coding approach, then it would be great for automation."

"The development experience needs to be improved."

More Pega Robotic Process Automation cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing."

"We pay no more than $50 annually for support of each one of the licenses."

"Pega Robotic Process Automation is an expensive solution."

"In terms of Pega Robotic Process Automation pricing, I would rate it a five out of five because the solution has a good price. Pricing is not very high, though I'm unsure of the exact cost, based on my experience, the price for Pega Robotic Process Automation is less than Blue Prism because I worked with a few clients that have both solutions and my clients prefer Pega Robotic Process Automation over Blue Prism particularly because of the licensing costs."

"Pega is as competitive as the basic players such as UiPath or Automation Anywhere. UiPath is the most expensive, but Pega is at par with Automation Anywhere."

"Pega is pretty costly."

"The licensing cost is too high."

"I was not involved in licensing and pricing, but it is worth the cost."

"I would rate the product's pricing a nine out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,227 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Government

16%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Performing Arts

Financial Services Firm

21%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	17

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Pega Robotic Process Automation?

The solution's automation handling capability has positively impacted the overall automation process in my experience.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pega Robotic Process Automation?

I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Pega Robotic Process Automation?

See all answers

Comparisons

Ranorex Studio vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 33% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 27% of the time

UiPath Platform vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 20% of the time

NICE Robotic Automation vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 20% of the time

More Inflectra Rapise Competitors

Microsoft Power Automate vs Pega Robotic Process Automation

Compared 38% of the time

UiPath Platform vs Pega Robotic Process Automation

Compared 29% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs Pega Robotic Process Automation

Compared 7% of the time

IPsoft 1RPA vs Pega Robotic Process Automation

Compared 6% of the time

Blue Prism vs Pega Robotic Process Automation

Compared 5% of the time

More Pega Robotic Process Automation Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise

January 2026

Download Inflectra Rapise product report

Buyer's Guide

Pega Robotic Process Automation

January 2026

Download Pega Robotic Process Automation product report

Also Known As

Rapise

Pega RPA, OpenSpan

Overview

Inflectra Rapise is a robust software testing tool designed to automate testing for desktop, mobile, and web applications. It offers flexibility for testing scenarios and supports both functional and regression testing, suited for end-to-end test management needs.

Inflectra Rapise integrates seamlessly with existing technologies, providing a comprehensive environment for test automation. With its scriptless test automation approach, users can rapidly create tests without needing deep programming skills. This empowers teams to improve productivity and efficiency. Rapise's user-friendly interface and its ability to handle complex testing scenarios make it a preferred choice among testing professionals.

What are the critical features of Inflectra Rapise?

Keyword-Driven Testing: Enables easy reuse of test scripts with minimal effort.
Web Services Testing: Supports verification of web API performance and reliability.
Cross-Browser Support: Allows testing across different web browsers to ensure compatibility.
Data-Driven Testing: Facilitates the execution of tests with multiple data sets for thorough coverage.
Mobile Testing Support: Provides testing capabilities for iOS and Android applications.

What benefits should users look for?

Reduced Testing Time: Increased automation reduces the need for manual testing, saving time and resources.
Improved Accuracy: Automation minimizes human error, leading to more reliable testing outcomes.
Enhanced Collaboration: Easy integration with team collaboration tools enhances communication.
Scalability: Adapts to different project sizes and complexities, ensuring versatile use.

Inflectra Rapise is implemented across numerous industries, including finance, healthcare, and retail, where precise and efficient software testing is crucial. Its adaptability means it can meet diverse testing requirements, making it indispensable for projects demanding rigorous QA processes.

Inflectra

With Pega Robotic Process Automation (RPA), organizations can automate the mundane, tedious, time-consuming, manual work that is hampering productivity and efficiency. Whether adjudicating claims, onboarding customers or employees, reconciling financials, updating customer information in systems record, Pega RPA can manage the work across your enterprise.

Pega

Sample Customers

- Soflab - RegEd - Intel - US Government

eBay Enterprise, M&I Bank

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise vs. Pega Robotic Process Automation

December 2025

Free Report: Inflectra Rapise vs. Pega Robotic Process Automation

Find out what your peers are saying about Inflectra Rapise vs. Pega Robotic Process Automation and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,227 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Inflectra Rapise vs. Pega Robotic Process Automation report.

See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.

We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.