We performed a comparison between Infor LN and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial setup is easy."
"I would say that it is typically used by large-scale manufacturing industries, especially in discrete manufacturing, and it has proven to work brilliantly."
"It's not too hard to handle the initial setup."
"It has strong sales, purchase, warehousing, and logistics order management."
"The most valuable features are manufacturing, and manufacturing costing modules. These are all powerful features of Infor LN."
"Material planning and predictive planning are both essential aspects."
"LN is definitely a stable product. It's number one on Gartner's four quadrants."
"The best feature of this solution is it comes as a complete bundle. The solution has effective project, document, and application management. Additionally, the collaboration is fantastic, it is well integrated, and can be customized."
"The solution’s Accounts Payable and Procurement modules are the most stable and quite useful compared to other finance modules."
"The financials are great."
"It is easy to inquire about any account in our company."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne's most valuable feature is its one consolidated platform that runs all the different aspects of companies."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne has improved within all the solutions and there have been a lot of investments by Oracle in these solutions. Most of the functionalities, and business requirements, are available for the system in the solution and there have been enhancements to the processes, UI, and tools, which have been done on a regular basis."
"The most valuable feature of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is the flashback it quickly takes you to the data browser. Additionally, one of the newer tools is the orchestrator which is very good."
"The most valuable features of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne are financial reporting, procurement, and project management."
"We do a straight forward, simple plug and play installation so there are no problems technically now."
"The user interface needs to be improved."
"Infor LN has customer support in India, but service could be improved. So, basically, they prioritize agreements, and the number of tickets closed within a certain timeframe, not necessarily the quality or resolution of the tickets themselves. They just open and close them, sometimes without even understanding the issue. That's the biggest problem."
"The tool is expensive. It needs to refine its planning details."
"One area that could be improved in Omada Access Points is team communication."
"In general, the HR-related part of Infor LN doesn't work properly in Germany, making it an area that requires improvement."
"The solution’s performance could be improved."
"From a customers' perspective, Infor LN covers most of the processes in the company, but sometimes, they have to choose other tools because of the functionality or the cost of the Infor solution. It covers the core functions of the company—such as financial, operations, logistics, and so on—very well, but it doesn't cover some parts such as invoices, digitization, etc."
"The interface can be difficult sometimes. I need to apply a bar code system, such as business intelligence and user interface tools. The user has to be a technician sometimes to use it."
"The way of creating daily reports could be made a little bit easier."
"The product’s pricing should be improved."
"We’d like to see technical support integrated within the application so that it is not required to raise additional incidents or do manual outreach to support."
"Lacking in certain areas of support."
"The Fixed Asset module is not desirable because it is complicated."
"They need to improve the logs and need to write some sort of script that clears logs after so many days."
"They have been improving it every day, but it could have more automation."
"We found that the system was unable to address many of our concerns, especially when it comes to project management."
Infor LN is ranked 8th in ERP with 25 reviews while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 7th in ERP with 55 reviews. Infor LN is rated 8.2, while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Infor LN writes "A flexible ERP with the best project module and excellent support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "Simplifies processes, is easy to set up, and offers good integrations". Infor LN is most compared with SAP ERP, Infor M3, Infor LX, Infor CloudSuite and Oracle E-Business Suite, whereas JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with JD Edwards World, SAP ERP, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, PeopleSoft and IFS Cloud Platform. See our Infor LN vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
