Ixia Hawkeye vs Zabbix comparison

Keysight Technologies and Zabbix are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #82, while Zabbix is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.8. Keysight Technologies holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to Zabbix’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Zabbix users who would recommend it.

Ixia Hawkeye

Read 4 Ixia Hawkeye reviews

2,359 Views
1,651 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Zabbix

Read 109 Zabbix reviews

33,481 Views
19,754 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Ixia Hawkeye

Zabbix

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Zabbix and Ixia Hawkeye compete in the network monitoring category. Zabbix seems to have the upper hand in pricing and community support, while Ixia Hawkeye stands out with its comprehensive feature set.

Features: Zabbix offers advanced alerting and reporting, flexible integration options, and advanced data visualization. Ixia Hawkeye provides proactive network service monitoring, end-to-end visibility, and synthetic testing capabilities, making it suitable for large-scale deployments.

Room for Improvement: Zabbix could improve in simplifying deployment and expanding professional support options. Enhancing documentation and user interface could also benefit users. Ixia Hawkeye may address its higher pricing by offering more flexible plans. Increasing community engagement and broadening integration options could also be advantageous.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ixia Hawkeye provides a streamlined deployment process with dedicated technical support, making it appealing for enterprises. Zabbix, due to its open-source nature, offers flexibility for customized deployments but may involve a more complex setup, supported by an active community.

Pricing and ROI: Zabbix is a low-cost solution providing high ROI, appealing to budget-conscious organizations. Ixia Hawkeye, while more costly, offers a significant return on investment through its advanced features and reliable performance, suitable for organizations prioritizing advanced capabilities over budget.

To learn more, read our detailed Ixia Hawkeye vs. Zabbix Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Ixia Hawkeye vs. Zabbix

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 906,960 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ixia Hawkeye

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

82nd

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

66th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (5th)

Zabbix

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

1st

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

109

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (12th), Server Monitoring (1st), Cloud Monitoring Software (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Ixia Hawkeye is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zabbix is 3.9%, down from 12.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Zabbix	3.9%
Ixia Hawkeye	0.5%
Other	95.6%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

José Enrique Cano Rodriguez

Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy

A valuable tool for optimizing network performance and security with comprehensive network monitoring capabilities, user-friendly interface, and flexibility for scripting

Distinguishing itself from network management systems like SolarWinds Orion and Dataminer, Hawkeye offers a distinctive feature. It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games. In contrast, SolarWinds and Dataminer typically offer a more general evaluation of network health. Hawkeye's unique capability enables a detailed analysis of network performance through specific tests, allowing administrators to identify areas in need of improvement and take precise actions to enhance network performance.

Read full review

KamranBhatti

Network Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Helps reduce response time but has room to improve customization complexity

We are not working on simple standalone solutions like Kaspersky DDoS Protection or Hybrid Cloud Security. Once you understand Zabbix, then it is easy to customize those web pages and graphs for our customer use. It is fully automated to your requirements. Zabbix is working fine with no issues, and I am satisfied with it. We have combined Zabbix and SolarWinds. The integration works fine, and it is easy to integrate Zabbix with the IT environment. We were trying to purchase MDR (Managed Detection and Response), but we are not working on that. I don't have real experience with MDR. We are using Falcon software for that. We are working with Falcon Complete, not with Sandbox. We are not using Kaspersky for business or cloud protection. For that, we are using Zabbix CrowdStrike Falcon Complete solution. I have given this review an overall rating of 8.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I would recommend Ixia Hawkeye because there are some KPIs that are very useful."

"It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games."

"So far, this product is doing exactly what it is promised to do."

"The ease of setup is the most valuable aspect of this solution. It's easy to set up and run tests."

"The most valuable feature is the deployment because it's very easy to deploy real flow through the network."

"Our customer was happiest with the price of this product."

"We are using this solution for monitoring our internal network and infrastructure in the company, and also for monitoring a couple of our customers' installations, not only their network but also their services, and to reduce consumption."

"Zabbix is scalable."

"The initial setup was pretty straightforward, we did not face any issues and it was up and running within a day."

"We are now more pro-active before an issue appears to our customer because all the layers are now converged by Zabbix monitoring."

"There is less computing power needed for scaling."

"The best feature is that Zabbix can report everything, and everything in Zabbix is free."

"Zabbix allows us to monitor a lot of hardware equipment without any additional cost."

"We value the auto-host discovery, template import, bulk import/export features. Newer versions also add nice features, such as multi-IP per host."

More Zabbix pros

Cons

"You can't delete more than one thing at a time. It would be great to be able to highlight three out of five things and delete them, whether it's a test or an actual report."

"Ixia has one flaw, which is that they do not print the license code on the paper licenses that are shipped to the customers."

"The customization of tests and even the results can be improved."

"Improvements in network performance are essential."

"There's a small module of APM, however, it is not an enhanced version. People usually ask for a full-fledged APM solution."

"The APM monitoring has room for improvement, although I hear that the new 5.2 version has some improvements in that area, and I'd like to give that a go. I would like to see a few more templates out there for different styles of monitoring. I use the Grafana interface for reporting. I would also like it to have an out-of-the-box ability to email reports. You can create reports, but to be able to email those reports would be really helpful. I've got users who are not interested in logging in and generating a report. They want it all pre-canned and sent to an email address. It would also be really handy if we could pin certain reports up onto platforms such as Teams or SharePoint. A GUI for the proxy server would be cool to have for debugging purposes and for the support teams to have a look at, but I don't know whether that's really feasible to do. I get enough from the log files themselves."

"I'm using the free version of Zabbix, and I'd like to see more customization options, especially for setting trigger thresholds."

"For our company, it is not scalable."

"It becomes complex when we are growing and need to add proxies. We need more scalability features and documentation for different use cases."

"The low discovery functionality is still very young so this feature has a lot of room for improvement."

"Zabbix is powerful, but it is difficult to understand initially. There are many things that can be improved, but we might not be using Zabbix to its fullest extent. The software has more features than we need."

"My advice for anybody who is implementing Zabbix is to seek the help of somebody who has actually done it before; otherwise, it's not worth their time."

More Zabbix cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In larger networks, the costs for licenses tend to be more reasonable, but for smaller networks, it appears relatively costly."

"It cost us approximately 25,000 for two years. This is cheaper than ThousandEyes."

"Zabbix is free but if you use it in production then you have to pay for it."

"This solution is completely open-source, so it is quite affordable."

"This is an open-source solution that can be used free of charge."

"We’re using the free version, which covers all our current needs."

"The solution is free to use but they offer support as a paid service. If you can go read the manuals and do the fine-tuning based on your needs, you do not need to pay anything and you will have a full solution."

"We use the open-source version of Zabbix."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly."

"It is reasonable."

More Zabbix pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

906,960 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user174738

IT Developer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

May 31, 2015

Nagios vs. Zabbix vs. PRTG vs. Spiceworks vs. Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor

I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

14%

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

University

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	56
Midsize Enterprise	23
Large Enterprise	35

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zabbix?

I think Zabbix is economical, whereas SolarWinds is expensive. SolarWinds has a lot of secure features, but Zabbix is providing everything free of cost. Zabbix is economical, and you can install it...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zabbix?

I am using only Area Operations, but I don't prefer it. I installed Zabbix for the 3000 devices. Area Operations is not good.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zabbix?

I am still working with VMware and Area Operations, but I installed Zabbix now. I think Zabbix is better than VMware Area Operations. It's really good. I'm working with both Zabbix and VMware now.

See all answers

Comparisons

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 8% of the time

Aurea CX Monitor vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 8% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 7% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 5% of the time

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 5% of the time

More Ixia Hawkeye Competitors

Checkmk vs Zabbix

Compared 3% of the time

Nagios XI vs Zabbix

Compared 2% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Zabbix

Compared 2% of the time

Icinga vs Zabbix

Compared 2% of the time

Centreon vs Zabbix

Compared 2% of the time

More Zabbix Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

June 2026

Download Ixia Hawkeye product report

Buyer's Guide

Zabbix

July 2026

Download Zabbix product report

Overview

Ixia Hawkeye provides network administrators with specialized tools for video streaming and application performance analysis, offering a straightforward deployment with efficient test scheduling and performance insights.

Ixia Hawkeye is a powerful tool for detailed network performance analysis, focusing on GPON and DOCSIS networks. It facilitates tests like traceroute, STP, and video streaming assessments crucial for proof of concept and service validation in industries such as telecom. Though cost-effective, there is potential for improving test customization, graph features, and making license codes more accessible. Users leverage its throughput test to gain insights into bandwidth, latency, and packet loss while also identifying areas needing improvements such as customizable outputs and enhanced comparison tools.

What are the most important features?

Specialized Views: Offers insights into video streaming and applications.
Performance Analysis: Provides detailed results on bandwidth, latency, and packet loss.
Graph Clarity: Easy-to-read visual data representations.
Cost-Effectiveness: Competitive pricing.

What benefits or ROI should be considered?

Efficiency: Simplifies test scheduling and execution.
Visibility: Enhances network and application performance insights.
Accessibility: Streamlined network performance assessments.
Verification: Validates internet services with real-world applications.

In the telecom industry, solution providers employ Ixia Hawkeye for enhanced network visibility and proof of concept. Network engineers and IT specialists utilize it for conducting performance tests and generating traffic, aiding clients in sectors like telecom with comprehensive performance assessments.

Keysight Technologies

Zabbix is an open-source monitoring software that provides real-time monitoring and alerting for servers, networks, applications, and services.

It offers a wide range of features including data collection, visualization, and reporting.

With its user-friendly interface and customizable dashboards, Zabbix helps organizations ensure the availability and performance of their IT infrastructure.

Zabbix

Sample Customers

EMA

1. IBM 2. Dell 3. Cisco 4. HP 5. Oracle 6. Microsoft 7. Amazon 8. Google 9. Facebook 10. Twitter 11. LinkedIn 12. Netflix 13. Adobe 14. VMware 15. Salesforce 16. SAP 17. Intel 18. AT&T 19. Verizon 20. T-Mobile 21. Vodafone 22. Ericsson 23. Nokia 24. Siemens 25. General Electric 26. Honeywell 27. Philips 28. Sony 29. Samsung 30. LG 31. Panasonic 32. Toshiba

Buyer's Guide

Ixia Hawkeye vs. Zabbix

June 2026

Free Report: Ixia Hawkeye vs. Zabbix

Find out what your peers are saying about Ixia Hawkeye vs. Zabbix and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

906,960 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ixia Hawkeye vs. Zabbix report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.