DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs Ixia Hawkeye comparison

Broadcom and Keysight Technologies are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #75, while Keysight Technologies is ranked #32 with an average rating of 10.0. Broadcom holds a 0.4% mindshare in NMS, compared to Keysight Technologies’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Keysight Technologies users who would recommend it.

DX Unified Infrastructure M...

Read 120 DX Unified Infrastructure Management reviews

747 Views
446 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Ixia Hawkeye

Read 4 Ixia Hawkeye reviews

436 Views
299 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

DX Unified Infrastructure M...

Ixia Hawkeye

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

DX Unified Infrastructure Management and Ixia Hawkeye are solutions competing in network performance monitoring. Ixia Hawkeye holds an edge with its superior features, though DX Unified Infrastructure Management is preferred in pricing and support.

Features: DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers centralized monitoring, automated troubleshooting, and easy integration for streamlined operations. Ixia Hawkeye delivers extensive network visibility, proactive issue detection, and comprehensive insights into network behavior, providing in-depth performance optimization.

Room for Improvement: DX Unified Infrastructure Management could enhance scalability, improve advanced analytical tools, and expand its integration capabilities. Ixia Hawkeye may benefit from simplifying its deployment process, offering more competitive pricing, and enhancing user interface design for better accessibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: DX Unified Infrastructure Management is praised for straightforward integration and a robust support system. Ixia Hawkeye, while slightly more complex in deployment, compensates with strong technical support, ensuring that users have access to necessary resources and guidance.

Pricing and ROI: DX Unified Infrastructure Management is known for competitive pricing, making it accessible for budget-conscious businesses seeking good ROI for smaller investments. Ixia Hawkeye, though initially higher in cost, provides substantial ROI with its advanced analytics and performance enhancements in larger environments, appealing to enterprises requiring detailed analysis.

To learn more, read our detailed DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Ixia Hawkeye Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Ixia Hawkeye

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,862 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX Unified Infrastructure M...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

75th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

55th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

120

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (24th), Cloud Monitoring Software (41st), AIOps (21st)

Ixia Hawkeye

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

32nd

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

35th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX Unified Infrastructure Management is 0.4%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ixia Hawkeye is 0.2%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Arunpandiyan M

Senior Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Easy to set up, simple to use, and offers great technical support

There are quite a few manual processes. We've had issues with pulling reports. Sometimes we have trouble or get errors. The reporting process should be easier. If you have a hub, you should be able to have an unlimited number of servers. For example, if you have 500 servers, and the limit is ten, you have to pull 50 reports. We'd like to just pull one report for all servers. This also increases the time to pull reports. If we have to pull more reports, it takes that much longer than just pulling one. The product can be expensive. Right now, they are updating and consolidating the dashboard. I'm expecting an update that will resolve a few glitches in the server.

Read full review

José Enrique Cano Rodriguez

Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy

A valuable tool for optimizing network performance and security with comprehensive network monitoring capabilities, user-friendly interface, and flexibility for scripting

Distinguishing itself from network management systems like SolarWinds Orion and Dataminer, Hawkeye offers a distinctive feature. It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games. In contrast, SolarWinds and Dataminer typically offer a more general evaluation of network health. Hawkeye's unique capability enables a detailed analysis of network performance through specific tests, allowing administrators to identify areas in need of improvement and take precise actions to enhance network performance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It gives us visibility inside applications. It helps us to dig down and find the root cause of any issue within the network."

"The ability to monitor any platform. We have Windows, Linux, AIX, and mainframe all being monitored with the same UIM infrastructure."

"Having all of our information within one tool set; our alerts, our monitors, and the things that our operations team needs to function."

"We are able to go in and actually leverage the thick client for a nice easy drag and drop solution."

"I can use the Drag and Drop feature to build dashboards within minutes."

"It is reliable when it comes to monitoring."

"The benefit is easy installation. Thus, the model approach of the product and out-of-the-box probes, which deliver direct value."

"Monitoring infrastructure and business applications are the most valuable features."

More DX Unified Infrastructure Management pros

"The ease of setup is the most valuable aspect of this solution. It's easy to set up and run tests."

"The most valuable feature is the deployment because it's very easy to deploy real flow through the network."

"It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games."

"Our customer was happiest with the price of this product."

Cons

"They need to continue to advance the filter capabilities, and provide more input fields."

"In the UMP, certain devices will show up multiple times and they don't correlate correctly. That's one of the issues."

"Stability."

"Making a GUI with criteria such as selection by robot/hub/probe etc."

"It would be good to implement views showing the aggregated status graphically."

"How we can get more native information from CA's solutions."

"DX UIM's reporting and customization need to be improved."

"It needs a little bit more functionality in the Admin Console."

More DX Unified Infrastructure Management cons

"The customization of tests and even the results can be improved."

"Ixia has one flaw, which is that they do not print the license code on the paper licenses that are shipped to the customers."

"Improvements in network performance are essential."

"You can't delete more than one thing at a time. It would be great to be able to highlight three out of five things and delete them, whether it's a test or an actual report."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"CAD $400,000 annually."

"This product is expensive compared to other vendors (SolarWinds, ManageEngine)."

"The license cost depends on the number of probes and robots."

"Pricing for DX Unified Infrastructure Management isn't cheap at all. It's a complex tool, so you have to pay more. No one is happy with a large bill to pay, but if it's a complex product and you designed a complex solution to be monitored, it'll be your fault that you need to buy an expensive product, and that would be implicit in the design of DX Unified Infrastructure Management. Monitoring is just a small part of it. Sometimes you have to pay a significant amount of money for a complex yet very good solution."

"Reasonable setup cost and licensing prices."

"The product-price ratio is better than other brands such as Fortinet or SonicWall."

"It cost us approximately 25,000 for two years. This is cheaper than ThousandEyes."

"In larger networks, the costs for licenses tend to be more reasonable, but for smaller networks, it appears relatively costly."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

12%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for DX Infrastructure Manager?

We are an integrating company that offers DX Unified Infrastructure Management to customers. We help them set it up, do the integration, and provide support. Our end customers include financial ins...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering DX Infrastructure Manager?

I would recommend DX Unified Infrastructure Management to others as it is a good and reliable solution. I would rate it nine out of ten due to its robust functionality and capability to support inf...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX Infrastructure Manager?

The pricing of DX Unified Infrastructure Management is high and often a concern for customers. The cost is higher compared to other Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), which is feedback we hav...

See all answers

What do you like most about Ixia Hawkeye?

It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ixia Hawkeye?

Improvements in network performance are essential.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ixia Hawkeye?

Our objective is to evaluate the performance of GPON and DOCSIS networks which involves considering factors such as pricing, sales, and the technical aspects of conducting tests. To achieve this, v...

See all answers

Comparisons

Datadog vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 24% of the time

Zabbix vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 23% of the time

Nagios XI vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 20% of the time

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 18% of the time

Dynatrace vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 15% of the time

More DX Unified Infrastructure Management Competitors

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 40% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 33% of the time

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 27% of the time

More Ixia Hawkeye Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX Unified Infrastructure Management

April 2025

DX Unified Infrastructure Management report

Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

March 2025

Download Ixia Hawkeye product report

Also Known As

DX Infrastructure Manager, DX Infrastructure Manager for Z Systems and CA UIM for zSystems, CA UIM (DX Infrastructure Manager), CA Nimsoft Monitor, CA UIM, DX Infrastructure Manager

No data available

Overview

DX Unified Infrastructure Management is the only solution that provides an open architecture, full-stack observability and zero-touch configuration for monitoring traditional data center, public cloud, and hybrid infrastructure environments.

Designed to ensure an optimal end-user experience, this solution provides a modern HTML5 operations console that makes it easy and fast for today’s IT teams to implement, use, and scale – leading to faster time to value.

Broadcom

Hawkeye quickly and effectively validates network performance, isolates problems, and proactively detects issues by running scheduled verification tests. Using a combination of hardware and software agents called Performance Endpoints, Hawkeye simulates application traffic and sends key performance metrics to a central console for fast action.

Keysight Technologies

Sample Customers

CBNCloud, IIJ Global Singapore, AT&S, AXSOS, Aozora Bank, HCL Technologies, IntelliNet, Securex

EMA

Buyer's Guide

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Ixia Hawkeye

April 2025

Free Report: DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Ixia Hawkeye

Find out what your peers are saying about DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Ixia Hawkeye and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Ixia Hawkeye report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.