Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs Ixia Hawkeye comparison

Broadcom and Keysight Technologies are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #68 with an average rating of 7.0, while Keysight Technologies is ranked #35 with an average rating of 10.0. Broadcom holds a 0.4% mindshare in NMS, compared to Keysight Technologies’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Keysight Technologies users who would recommend it.
DX Unified Infrastructure M...
Read 121 DX Unified Infrastructure Management reviews
  • 763 Views
  • 464 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
Ixia Hawkeye
Read 4 Ixia Hawkeye reviews
  • 452 Views
  • 319 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

DX Unified Infrastructure Management and Ixia Hawkeye are solutions competing in network performance monitoring. Ixia Hawkeye holds an edge with its superior features, though DX Unified Infrastructure Management is preferred in pricing and support.

Features: DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers centralized monitoring, automated troubleshooting, and easy integration for streamlined operations. Ixia Hawkeye delivers extensive network visibility, proactive issue detection, and comprehensive insights into network behavior, providing in-depth performance optimization.

Room for Improvement: DX Unified Infrastructure Management could enhance scalability, improve advanced analytical tools, and expand its integration capabilities. Ixia Hawkeye may benefit from simplifying its deployment process, offering more competitive pricing, and enhancing user interface design for better accessibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: DX Unified Infrastructure Management is praised for straightforward integration and a robust support system. Ixia Hawkeye, while slightly more complex in deployment, compensates with strong technical support, ensuring that users have access to necessary resources and guidance.

Pricing and ROI: DX Unified Infrastructure Management is known for competitive pricing, making it accessible for budget-conscious businesses seeking good ROI for smaller investments. Ixia Hawkeye, though initially higher in cost, provides substantial ROI with its advanced analytics and performance enhancements in larger environments, appealing to enterprises requiring detailed analysis.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Ixia Hawkeye Report (Updated: February 2025).
Buyer's Guide
DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Ixia Hawkeye
February 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

DX Unified Infrastructure M...
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
68th
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
53rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
121
Ranking in other categories
Server Monitoring (23rd), Cloud Monitoring Software (38th), AIOps (19th)
Ixia Hawkeye
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
35th
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
35th
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Unified Communications Monitoring (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX Unified Infrastructure Management is 0.4%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ixia Hawkeye is 0.2%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

Arunpandiyan M - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to set up, simple to use, and offers great technical support
There are quite a few manual processes. We've had issues with pulling reports. Sometimes we have trouble or get errors. The reporting process should be easier. If you have a hub, you should be able to have an unlimited number of servers. For example, if you have 500 servers, and the limit is ten, you have to pull 50 reports. We'd like to just pull one report for all servers. This also increases the time to pull reports. If we have to pull more reports, it takes that much longer than just pulling one. The product can be expensive. Right now, they are updating and consolidating the dashboard. I'm expecting an update that will resolve a few glitches in the server.
Read full review
José Enrique Cano Rodriguez - PeerSpot reviewer
A valuable tool for optimizing network performance and security with comprehensive network monitoring capabilities, user-friendly interface, and flexibility for scripting
Distinguishing itself from network management systems like SolarWinds Orion and Dataminer, Hawkeye offers a distinctive feature. It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games. In contrast, SolarWinds and Dataminer typically offer a more general evaluation of network health. Hawkeye's unique capability enables a detailed analysis of network performance through specific tests, allowing administrators to identify areas in need of improvement and take precise actions to enhance network performance.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The number of probes available. Out of the box, I believe about 200 probes are available. And, if there's a probe that is not available, you can write one. You can also go to the communities and suggest, and based on demand, CA will write one for you."
"Easy admin functionality. You can quickly do all the admin functionality without reducing cycles."
"It reduced cycles for a lot of quick out-of-the-box functionality. It also allowed us to get away from being stuck in SNMP, VTP V2, based off of agent deployment."
"It is reliable when it comes to monitoring."
"Monitors the infrastructure asset and also monitors as an IT service."
"You can scale it pretty much however way you want to as long as you have the servers to throw at it."
"Great customized dashboards and drill down reports with auto serve analytics."
"One of the things that I like about DX Infrastructure is that the topology is good enough to see what is happening in the infrastructure. You also get alerts if something is happening in the network. There are many features and benefits. It is serving our customers in knowing exactly how their network is performing in terms of reliability. It also helps them in planning the capacity. They know how much bandwidth the branches are consuming."
More DX Unified Infrastructure Management pros
"Our customer was happiest with the price of this product."
"The ease of setup is the most valuable aspect of this solution. It's easy to set up and run tests."
"The most valuable feature is the deployment because it's very easy to deploy real flow through the network."
"It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games."
 

Cons

"There is also room for improvement in the reporting. It is not really good enough, according to our customers. So what we now usually do is use Power BI to get them the kinds of reports they want."
"​We want to see more investment in the UI and the dashboard."
"How we can get more native information from CA's solutions."
"There should be wider coverage of storage infrastructure."
"We have experienced challenges with finding a mechanism to deploy the agents, but it's only on the first deployment so it's not a big issue."
"It is a little complex to use versus other softwares."
"The biggest feature that I've been hoping they would enhance on is inventory management: things like adding/removing nodes."
"Customers have expressed that support is not as flexible, and it is difficult to obtain necessary information quickly."
More DX Unified Infrastructure Management cons
"The customization of tests and even the results can be improved."
"Improvements in network performance are essential."
"You can't delete more than one thing at a time. It would be great to be able to highlight three out of five things and delete them, whether it's a test or an actual report."
"Ixia has one flaw, which is that they do not print the license code on the paper licenses that are shipped to the customers."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license cost depends on the number of probes and robots."
"Reasonable setup cost and licensing prices."
"This product is expensive compared to other vendors (SolarWinds, ManageEngine)."
"Customers pay for the license and the support."
"The product-price ratio is better than other brands such as Fortinet or SonicWall."
"CAD $400,000 annually."
"Pricing for DX Unified Infrastructure Management isn't cheap at all. It's a complex tool, so you have to pay more. No one is happy with a large bill to pay, but if it's a complex product and you designed a complex solution to be monitored, it'll be your fault that you need to buy an expensive product, and that would be implicit in the design of DX Unified Infrastructure Management. Monitoring is just a small part of it. Sometimes you have to pay a significant amount of money for a complex yet very good solution."
"It cost us approximately 25,000 for two years. This is cheaper than ThousandEyes."
"In larger networks, the costs for licenses tend to be more reasonable, but for smaller networks, it appears relatively costly."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
11%
Real Estate/Law Firm
6%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for DX Infrastructure Manager?
We are an integrating company that offers DX Unified Infrastructure Management to customers. We help them set it up, do the integration, and provide support. Our end customers include financial ins...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering DX Infrastructure Manager?
I would recommend DX Unified Infrastructure Management to others as it is a good and reliable solution. I would rate it nine out of ten due to its robust functionality and capability to support inf...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX Infrastructure Manager?
The pricing of DX Unified Infrastructure Management is high and often a concern for customers. The cost is higher compared to other Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), which is feedback we hav...
See all answers
What do you like most about Ixia Hawkeye?
It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Ixia Hawkeye?
Improvements in network performance are essential.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Ixia Hawkeye?
Our objective is to evaluate the performance of GPON and DOCSIS networks which involves considering factors such as pricing, sales, and the technical aspects of conducting tests. To achieve this, v...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Zabbix vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Zabbix vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Compared 25% of the time
Datadog vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Datadog vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Compared 25% of the time
SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Compared 17% of the time
DX SaaS vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
DX SaaS vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Compared 17% of the time
Nagios XI vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Nagios XI vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Compared 15% of the time
More DX Unified Infrastructure Management Competitors
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Ixia Hawkeye Logo
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Ixia Hawkeye
Compared 37% of the time
ThousandEyes vs Ixia Hawkeye Logo
ThousandEyes vs Ixia Hawkeye
Compared 34% of the time
Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs Ixia Hawkeye Logo
Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs Ixia Hawkeye
Compared 28% of the time
More Ixia Hawkeye Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
DX Unified Infrastructure Management
February 2025
DX Unified Infrastructure Management reportDownload DX Unified Infrastructure Management product report
Buyer's Guide
Network Monitoring Software
February 2025
Ixia Hawkeye reportDownload Ixia Hawkeye product report
 

Also Known As

DX Infrastructure Manager, DX Infrastructure Manager for Z Systems and CA UIM for zSystems, CA UIM (DX Infrastructure Manager), CA Nimsoft Monitor, CA UIM, DX Infrastructure Manager
No data available
 

Overview

DX Unified Infrastructure Management is the only solution that provides an open architecture, full-stack observability and zero-touch configuration for monitoring traditional data center, public cloud, and hybrid infrastructure environments.

Designed to ensure an optimal end-user experience, this solution provides a modern HTML5 operations console that makes it easy and fast for today’s IT teams to implement, use, and scale – leading to faster time to value.

Broadcom
Hawkeye quickly and effectively validates network performance, isolates problems, and proactively detects issues by running scheduled verification tests. Using a combination of hardware and software agents called Performance Endpoints, Hawkeye simulates application traffic and sends key performance metrics to a central console for fast action.
Keysight Technologies
 

Sample Customers

CBNCloud, IIJ Global Singapore, AT&S, AXSOS, Aozora Bank, HCL Technologies, IntelliNet, Securex
EMA
Buyer's Guide
DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Ixia Hawkeye
February 2025
Free Report: DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Ixia Hawkeye
Find out what your peers are saying about DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Ixia Hawkeye and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Ixia Hawkeye report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.