JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs Microsoft System Center comparison

"The most valuable aspect of JBoss EAP is its support for clustering and load balancing, which is essential for our applications that serve multiple users simultaneously."

"It's convenient and barebone."

"The most valuable features of this solution are scalability and performance."

"Its technical support is excellent."

"Stable and easy to handle in terms of hosting applications."

"The solution is quite stable."

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft System Center is its GUI (graphical user interface)."

"The solution is easily available. That's its most valuable aspect."

"System Center helps to create the basis for ITIL alignment."

"The deployment and asset management features are the most valuable. These are the product's main features."

"I like the automated features of it that let you schedule those updates and the ability of the product to focus on the specific updates, specific platforms, and products that we're interested in keeping up to date."

"It can generate KPIs and management reports with monthly presentations on activities and updating the environment (success and failure)."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it helps us manage our company's application pool, license pool, application update pool, and OS updates."

"The product's initial setup phase was easy."

"Its architecture needs improvement."

"A graphic user interface can be added."

"It's hard to find out the root cause of errors."

"This solution needs better management UI."

"Lacks some functional requirements."

"Improvement is needed in the synchronization between cluster nodes, especially under network strain."

"The solution’s pricing could be improved."

"Something super important that we need is this integration via Intune Configuration Manager."

"Microsoft System Center should be easier to manage. However, it is complex to deploy, so people hesitate to use it. Though it has many features, such as licensing, asset tracking, and software deployment, we mainly use it for Windows updates. It protects many screens and integrates with databases, but it's complex compared to other solutions. Many now use cloud-based products or other tools like Automox to deploy updates and manage vulnerabilities."

"Implementation and integration in the case of multi-tenant environments needs improvement."

"The solution's dashboard needs improvement."

"Less server consumption would help, as would better, more flexible reports."

"They should have some customized solutions or internal development, then maybe it could be easier to use different solutions or some self-developed solution."

"Could be more user friendly."

"The solution is cost-effective."

"While I am not directly involved with the financial aspects, JBoss is known for its reasonable subscription pricing. Potential users should consider whether the cost aligns with their budget and requirements."

"It is an open-source solution."

"We maximized our license investment."

"Microsoft System Center's licensing is costly."

"I rate the product price as five to six on a scale of one to ten, where one means it is cheap and ten means it is expensive."

"I know that sometimes there is some reduction in the prices of Microsoft System Center because of the costs of Microsoft SQL Server, which can be advantageous."

"It's rolled into our enterprise subscription. The entire subscription is around $25,000 a year, however, that covers all the products that we use."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."

"Microsoft System Center is quite expensive."