JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs Microsoft System Center comparison

"Stable and easy to handle in terms of hosting applications."

"It's convenient and barebone."

"Its technical support is excellent."

"The most valuable aspect of JBoss EAP is its support for clustering and load balancing, which is essential for our applications that serve multiple users simultaneously."

"The most valuable features of this solution are scalability and performance."

"The solution is quite stable."

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft System Center is its GUI (graphical user interface)."

"Many processes could be implemented out-of-the-box, and this helped to adopt processes in areas which we lacked."

"The availability performance matrix and the reporting capabilities are the solution's most valuable features."

"System Center helps to create the basis for ITIL alignment."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it helps us manage our company's application pool, license pool, application update pool, and OS updates."

"The deployment and asset management features are the most valuable. These are the product's main features."

"The tool has many valuable features, including license tracking, software deployment, and installation deployment. However, we primarily use it for Windows updates and deployment for Windows servers and desktops. It's a complex product but very well-managed. If you use all the features, they will be valuable to your organization. It allows you to deploy desktops, manage patches, and track various features."

"We like Microsoft System Center's Operations Manager. That is primarily why we use it."

"This solution needs better management UI."

"Lacks some functional requirements."

"It's hard to find out the root cause of errors."

"Improvement is needed in the synchronization between cluster nodes, especially under network strain."

"A graphic user interface can be added."

"Its architecture needs improvement."

"The platform's performance could be improved. Additionally, its UI needs to be well-upgraded and work faster."

"Less server consumption would help, as would better, more flexible reports."

"The multi-tenancy support needs to be improved. We need to have the ability to manage several different environments from one central point of administration."

"Could be more user friendly."

"For me, the tool's UI seems to be too old."

"We have some bugs but it's stable. It doesn't break every day. It works. Like other applications, it has a lot of bugs but they're manageable."

"They should have some customized solutions or internal development, then maybe it could be easier to use different solutions or some self-developed solution."

"Something super important that we need is this integration via Intune Configuration Manager."

"While I am not directly involved with the financial aspects, JBoss is known for its reasonable subscription pricing. Potential users should consider whether the cost aligns with their budget and requirements."

"It is an open-source solution."

"The solution is cost-effective."

"Microsoft System Center's licensing is costly."

"We maximized our license investment."

"I rate the product price as five to six on a scale of one to ten, where one means it is cheap and ten means it is expensive."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."

"Microsoft System Center is quite expensive."

"I know that sometimes there is some reduction in the prices of Microsoft System Center because of the costs of Microsoft SQL Server, which can be advantageous."

"It's rolled into our enterprise subscription. The entire subscription is around $25,000 a year, however, that covers all the products that we use."