Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

LiveAction LiveNX vs ManageEngine OpManager comparison

LiveAction and ManageEngine are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. LiveAction is ranked #60 with an average rating of 6.5, while ManageEngine is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.1. LiveAction holds a 1.0% mindshare in NMS, compared to ManageEngine’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 77% of LiveAction users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.
LiveAction LiveNX
Read 8 LiveAction LiveNX reviews
  • 1,518 Views
  • 1,145 Comparison Views
77% willing to recommend
ManageEngine OpManager
Read 50 ManageEngine OpManager reviews
  • 3,828 Views
  • 2,264 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ManageEngine OpManager and LiveAction LiveNX compete in the network monitoring solutions category. Users prefer ManageEngine OpManager for pricing and support, while LiveAction LiveNX is favored for its network monitoring features, justifying its higher price.

Features: ManageEngine OpManager offers robust device and network monitoring, automation capabilities to restart services upon failure, and comprehensive reporting for executives. Its features include threshold definitions, monitoring alerts, and device backup management. LiveAction LiveNX provides real-time network visualization, analytics, and clear graphical interfaces for bandwidth management. It supports critical alert settings and integrates well with Cisco SD-WAN solutions.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine OpManager users report issues with change control during upgrades, such as database impacts and UI inconsistencies. Desired improvements include AI features, better documentation, and enhanced local support. LiveAction LiveNX could improve multi-tenancy capabilities and API integration with non-Cisco platforms, and its documentation and customer support need development.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products offer on-premise deployment solutions. ManageEngine OpManager faces deployment difficulties in areas with less experienced support. LiveAction LiveNX receives positive feedback on customer service and technical support, though it has limited 24/7 coverage.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine OpManager is noted for competitive pricing and quick ROI due to reduced administrative overheads, offering flexible licensing with optional discounts for existing users. LiveAction LiveNX is more expensive but is effective for extensive site monitoring, avoiding per-user charges. Both demonstrate rapid ROI through improved uptime and streamlined operations.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed LiveAction LiveNX vs. ManageEngine OpManager Report (Updated: December 2024).
Buyer's Guide
LiveAction LiveNX vs. ManageEngine OpManager
December 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 824,053 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

LiveAction LiveNX
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
60th
Average Rating
6.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
IT Infrastructure Monitoring (55th)
ManageEngine OpManager
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
10th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
50
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of LiveAction LiveNX is 1.0%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine OpManager is 2.0%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

Mahesh Doshi - PeerSpot reviewer
Very good reporting and alerting abilities but inadequate enhancement support
Before choosing the solution, it is important to rank your requirements from high to low priority. The solution has a lot of features but at a high price. If you will only use 30% of the solution to meet your requirements, then it would be better for you to explore other products. Find the solution that best fulfills your requirements. The solution itself is great. If I could use it properly, then I would rate it a seven out of ten. Unfortunately, support is a factor when determining usability or cost effectiveness. We did not receive the needed support so had to stop using the solution. For that reason, my overall rating for the solution is a five out of ten.
Read full review
ShaheenKapery - PeerSpot reviewer
Reporting is good, monitors well and stable product
The pricing could be cheaper. The initial integration does cost a bit. Jira seems to be making a comeback on the Service Desk side, as well as Zendesk and Freshservice. I know that ServiceNow integration is very easy, like a three- or four-step process. But with the others, you need developers to do API-based integration, which takes longer and requires a different skill set. Even a monkey can follow a four-step process, but API integration can be more complicated here.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"One of the valuable features is the ability to create CLI scripts on the fly to fix any issues. We were using it for QoS modeling to ensure that we were properly modeling QoS, and it basically said here is what you need to fix to get this QoS done, whether it is ACL or something else. It would either push or recommend. If you have the right credentials, you could also push. It is very good if you are a Cisco shop. It gives you reporting, latency, and bandwidth utilization for your applications, so you can do good capacity management planning. There are a lot of pieces that LiveNX can give you. It is a total NPM solution for SD-WAN."
"We provide a tool for our customers to manage their reports. It's an extremely highly featured platform capable of producing a lot of data. We spent quite a long time working with customers and LiveAction to create template reports, and they're very good and configurable. You get a lot of data if you don't configure them."
"All in all, LiveAction LiveNX has become an indispensable tool for maintaining and improving our network's reliability and performance, ultimately supporting our organization's goal of providing timely and dependable delivery services."
"The product has a very good graphical interface."
"The intention and the idea of the filter is great."
"We don't have any complaints about the software. According to my team, it's a very good tool that's very intuitive."
"The alerting feature is very good because it allows you to set MOS alerts at various network junctures or data points."
"Its analytical capability is really good."
"ManageEngine OpManager is user-friendly and easy to use. Additionally, useful for basic monitoring."
"Flexibility in the two view dashboard helps viewers and admins get the information they need about the fetwork in a flash."
"The most valuable feature of ManageEngine OpManager is the management of the virtual machine and the host machine."
"The traffic monitoring and the traffic analysis are great."
"We have found the solution to be stable."
"In my three years of experience with OpManager, we haven't encountered any issues. So, I'd rate it a nine out of ten. It's very stable."
"We don't have to keep an eye on it; it has a good automation option, which keeps us informed. It gives very less false positives. Overall, a really great product."
"Defining thresholds and other alerting criteria is fairly simple and would not require a lot of training. This is very useful if you are managing a large environment."
More ManageEngine OpManager pros
 

Cons

"It is not as robust as other NPM solutions. For instance, there is a problem while labeling specific applications. It works well with well-known applications, but when you have to put in new applications that are not very known and set them up with names, ports, URLs, or some protocols, it is not as intuitive."
"This is a horrible solution and I think everything needs to be improved."
"Improved documentation and more responsive customer support can help in addressing issues faster."
"The product is weak in multi-tenancy. We have to install multiple instances of LiveAction, whereas we would like to build it once for our customers."
"They need to create a more simplified UI."
"The only downside to this software is the price."
"Sometimes the solution does not register devices properly and that is a bug."
"The tool crashes sometimes when we try to pull reports simultaneously."
"They should add more features to URL monitoring."
"Some of our customers have been asking that OpManager have a feature to monitor the operating system, however, I tell them that Endpoint Central is doing that. You can buy endpoints and then OpManager, and they integrate between them, and everything is okay."
"ManageEngine OpManager could improve the default dashboards that are available. We are not able to customize them easily and they do not give us the information we need unless we customize them. You need to have the technical knowledge to be able to do it, the customization should be easier."
"The storage level monitoring needs improvement. It needs storage level monitoring on the server itself. That feature is lacking right now."
"There are certain things that are not possible to do with Op Manager. It's a solution that still needs time to develop."
"We get a lot of false alerts."
"The dashboard has some limitations and should be more user-friendly."
"Needs an OVA, or more support for virtual deployments. Building a virtual instance of OpManager and OpManager Probe was a bit difficult because there was no OVA available."
More ManageEngine OpManager cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We use the free version."
"The solution is fairly expensive compared to other products."
"It's very expensive."
"It is reasonably priced."
"ManageEngine OpManager is cheaper than SolarWinds."
"The product is not worth the money."
"The tool's licensing costs are yearly."
"Pricing for ManageEngine OpManager depends on the number of nodes you onboard and whatever pricing is reflected on the ManageEngine portal which offers discounts from ten percent to fifteen percent. It purely depends on the sales volume and the negotiation. In my organization, there are about one thousand two hundred nodes which cost around $29,000 per year. There's no additional support fee or maintenance fee from ManageEngine OpManager. Pricing for the solution is highly competitive and I would rate it five out of five. ManageEngine OpManager is one of the most competitive options out there."
"The solution's licensing costs are yearly and based on the number of applications."
"The price of ManageEngine OpManager is reasonable. We have an annual license and the cost comes from how many devices are being monitored. There is not anything extra cost for maintenance and support."
"It is not really expensive; it is nominal licensing."
More ManageEngine OpManager pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
8%
Educational Organization
54%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Financial Services Firm
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about LiveAction LiveNX?
The product has a very good graphical interface.
See all answers
What needs improvement with LiveAction LiveNX?
The product is weak in multi-tenancy. We have to install multiple instances of LiveAction, whereas we would like to build it once for our customers. Most of these analytical packages have the same ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for LiveAction LiveNX?
Primarily, we use the product for monitoring the standard utilization of circuits. The tool has the incredible ability to provide granular details about the traffic passing through an interface on ...
See all answers
What do you like most about ManageEngine OpManager?
The product provides intensive reports.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine OpManager?
The pricing was okay. However, it has been increasing a lot lately. The product is not worth the money.
See all answers
What needs improvement with ManageEngine OpManager?
The product has only basic functionalities. It is not like SolarWinds. The data provided by the tool is not accurate. SolarWinds is more accurate.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

ThousandEyes vs LiveAction LiveNX Logo
ThousandEyes vs LiveAction LiveNX
Compared 24% of the time
SolarWinds NPM vs LiveAction LiveNX Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs LiveAction LiveNX
Compared 14% of the time
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs LiveAction LiveNX Logo
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs LiveAction LiveNX
Compared 10% of the time
Meraki Dashboard vs LiveAction LiveNX Logo
Meraki Dashboard vs LiveAction LiveNX
Compared 7% of the time
LiveSP vs LiveAction LiveNX Logo
LiveSP vs LiveAction LiveNX
Compared 7% of the time
More LiveAction LiveNX Competitors
SolarWinds NPM vs ManageEngine OpManager Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs ManageEngine OpManager
Compared 27% of the time
Zabbix vs ManageEngine OpManager Logo
Zabbix vs ManageEngine OpManager
Compared 16% of the time
PRTG Network Monitor vs ManageEngine OpManager Logo
PRTG Network Monitor vs ManageEngine OpManager
Compared 10% of the time
SCOM vs ManageEngine OpManager Logo
SCOM vs ManageEngine OpManager
Compared 8% of the time
Nagios XI vs ManageEngine OpManager Logo
Nagios XI vs ManageEngine OpManager
Compared 7% of the time
More ManageEngine OpManager Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
LiveAction LiveNX
December 2024
LiveAction LiveNX reportDownload LiveAction LiveNX product report
Buyer's Guide
ManageEngine OpManager
December 2024
ManageEngine OpManager reportDownload ManageEngine OpManager product report
 

Also Known As

LiveNX
OpManager
 

Learn More

Video not available
LiveAction
ManageEngine
 

Overview

LiveAction develops IT visibility solutions designed to simplify network management. Initially developed to aid the US Department of Defense in the operation of its networks, LiveNX (Network Experience) features an innovative visual display, real-time big data analytics and deep control of routers and switches for unparalleled network administration. LiveNX accelerates troubleshooting with its QoS control, application-aware, and WAN functionality developed through engineering partnerships with Cisco Systems.

ManageEngine OpManager is a network, server, and virtualization monitoring software that helps SMEs, large enterprises and service providers manage their data centers and IT infrastructure efficiently and cost effectively. Automated workflows, intelligent alerting engines, configurable discovery rules, and extendable templates enable IT teams to setup a 24x7 monitoring system within hours of installation.

 

Sample Customers

Tampa Electric, Digital First Media, Allscripts, Boxwood Technology
Bonita, Thorp Reed & Armstrong, Galaxy, Fiserv Credit Union Division, Universitas 21 Global, ERP Suites LLC
Buyer's Guide
LiveAction LiveNX vs. ManageEngine OpManager
December 2024
Free Report: LiveAction LiveNX vs. ManageEngine OpManager
Find out what your peers are saying about LiveAction LiveNX vs. ManageEngine OpManager and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our LiveAction LiveNX vs. ManageEngine OpManager report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.